Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Public Health ; 180: 29-37, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31838343

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of the latest smoke-free legislation on hospital admission rates due to smoking-related diseases in Spain. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate changes in hospital admission rates for cardiovascular, respiratory diseases, and smoking-related cancer in Valencia, Spain, during the period 1995-2013. Law 28/2005 and then law 42/2010 prohibited smoking in bars and restaurants as well as playgrounds and access points to schools and hospitals. METHODS: General population data by age and sex were obtained from the National Institute of Statistics census. Data on hospital admissions were obtained from the Minimum Basic Data Set. Diagnoses were codified according to the International Classification of Diseases-9th revision. Data from all hospitals of the Valencian Community from 1995 to 2013 were analysed. Trend analyses in the periods before and after the approval of the 2005 law were conducted using least-squares linear regression models. RESULTS: Adjusted hospital admission rates per 100,000 inhabitants for cardiovascular diseases significantly decreased after the 2005 Law (from 550.0/100,000 in 2005 to 500.5/100,000 in 2007), with a further decrease (to 434.6/100,000) in 2013, after the 2010 Law. Reductions in hospital admissions were seen in men and women, although declining trends were more marked in men. Hospital admission rates for respiratory diseases showed a reduction of a lower magnitude, whereas for smoking-related cancer admissions there was a slight decline only among men. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish comprehensive smoking ban resulted in a remarkable reduction of the adjusted rate of hospital admissions mainly associated to cardiovascular diseases. The decrease in the number of persons requiring in-patient care is relevant and may be viewed as an improvement of the public's health.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Política para Fumadores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tabaquismo/prevención & control , Tabaquismo/terapia , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar/efectos adversos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , España/epidemiología , Tabaquismo/epidemiología
2.
Public Health ; 168: 137-141, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30769245

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The enhanced safety surveillance for seasonal influenza vaccines established by the European Medicines Agency is required each season. Therefore, a registry capable of rapidly detecting and evaluating potential new safety concerns is needed. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of the vaccine information system of the Valencia region to make a rapid assessment of the influenza vaccine safety and describe the safety of the two vaccine types used in the 2017/2018 season. STUDY DESIGN: It is a population-based descriptive study. METHODS: Adverse events following immunization reports collected from 23rd October 2017 to 15th March 2018 were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 55 adverse events for influenza vaccine were reported in season 2017/2018 with a reporting rate (RR) of 0.77 per 10,000 administered doses. Injection site reactions had a RR of 0.30 and 0.47 per 10,000 for subunit and adjuvanted vaccines, respectively. Differences per vaccine, sex, and risk group did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Reported events of the two influenza vaccine types used were similar than in other seasons and consistent with their safety profiles.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , España/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Public Health ; 135: 66-74, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26976484

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The surveillance of vaccine safety is an essential requirement in vaccination programmes. Computerized immunization registries such as the Vaccination Information System (SIV) of Valencian Community (Spain) offer the opportunity to estimate the incidence of adverse events according to individual information. The aim of the study was to analyze adverse events following immunization reported through SIV from 2005 to 2011 by age, sex, type of vaccine and dose, and adverse event, and highlight the advantages of this type of reporting. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of subjects vaccinated in the Valencian Community using population health databases was carried out. METHODS: Analysis of vaccinations and reported AEFI via SIV in Valencian Community was carried out. RESULTS: More than 13 million vaccines doses were administered during 2005 through 2011, the reporting rate of adverse events was 12.4/100,000 doses administered with the highest value in 2009 (27.4), with differences by age and sex. DTaP vaccine had the highest reporting in children (96.6/100,000) while influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in adults (87.7/100,000). An increased reporting of adverse events was seen with DTaP in children 5-6 years of age, detected in real time, drove to swap this vaccine to a low dose Tdap which was followed by a decrease in administration site events. CONCLUSIONS: SIV demonstrates advantages for passive surveillance. Reporting rates by individual characteristics are calculated accurately and it also allows detecting shifts in reporting rate on real time for specific vaccines. The study shows that vaccines included in the routine vaccination schedule for children and adult vaccination programs are safe.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/métodos , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seguridad , España , Adulto Joven
4.
An Med Interna ; 22(3): 118-23, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15839820

RESUMEN

AIM: To know development pneumonias throughout 1995 to 2001. METHODS: The data source was obtained from the database of the Minimum Basic Data Set. We selected three pneumonia hospitalized causes in the Community of Valencia, Bronchopneumonia, and Pneumonia for not specified organism and invasive pneumococcal disease. It was realized the statistical analysis by SPSS programme. Calculating the pneumonia incidence rate and its time development and observing the interactions between age group, genre, mean of age, stay in the hospital and origin. RESULTS: The incidence for the period was 209 per 100,000 people, that increased significantly until it stabilized in 1999. The pneumonia affected more frequently men than women and specially aged 65 years or more. For age the pneumonias are more frequent in subjects younger than 5 and older than 65, (maximum 76-77 years old). It was observed statistically significant differences between provinces. The stays on hospital was greater for men and this ground with age groups, this is longer in people 65 years old or older. The average stay depending on the aged groups but do not exist statistically differences between genre and age group. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonia is a pathology originated from different causes, it affect principally men and more especially at younger than 5 years and older than 65 years. The incidences stabilizing on the studied period last years. This works must be continued for clarify if it is the same way for the development by the different pneumonias types on this time period and if exists the interactions between the different variables.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución por Sexo , España/epidemiología
5.
Vaccine ; 32(42): 5447-54, 2014 Sep 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25131737

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of intradermal vaccination or virosomal vaccines could increase protection against influenza among the vulnerable population of older adults. Studies assessing the comparative effectiveness of these two influenza vaccine types in this age group are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to estimate the comparative effectiveness of intradermal seasonal trivalent-influenza vaccine (TIV) delivered by a microneedle injection system and a virosomal-TIV intramuscularly delivered for prevention of influenza hospitalization in non-institutionalized adults aged ≥65 years. We obtained administrative data on immunization status and influenza hospitalization for the 2011-2012 influenza season, and used Cox regression models to assess comparative effectiveness. We estimated crude and adjusted (age, sex, comorbidity, pharmaceutical claims, recent pneumococcal vaccination and number of hospitalizations for all causes other than influenza between the previous and current influenza seasons) hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS: Overall, 164,021 vaccinated subjects were evaluated. There were 127 hospitalizations for influenza among 62,058 subjects, contributing 914,740 person-weeks at risk in the virosomal-TIV group, and 133 hospitalizations for influenza among 101,963 subjects, contributing 1,504,570 person-weeks at risk in the intradermal-TIV group. The crude HR of intradermal-TIV relative to virosomal-TIV was 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.81), and the adjusted Cox estimated HR was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.52-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: During the 2011-2012 influenza season the risk of hospitalization for influenza was reduced by 33% in non-institutionalized elderly adults who were vaccinated with intradermal-TIV compared with virosomal-TIV.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/clasificación , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Vacunas de Virosoma/uso terapéutico
6.
Vaccine ; 31(37): 3995-4002, 2013 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23731629

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adjuvanted influenza vaccines offer greater and broader immunogenicity to older adults than conventional vaccines. Studies assessing the comparative effectiveness of adjuvanted influenza vaccines in this age group are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to estimate the comparative effectiveness of MF59-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) and virosomal-TIV for prevention of influenza hospitalization in adults aged ≥65 years. We obtained administrative data on immunization status and influenza hospitalization for the 2010-2011 influenza season. We used Cox regression models to assess comparative effectiveness; crude and adjusted by age, sex, comorbidity, deprivation, type of insurance, and travel time to hospital. We accounted for data clustering at the hospital level by using a multilevel random effects model. RESULTS: Overall, 373,798 vaccinated subjects were evaluated. There were 40 hospitalizations for influenza among 176,618 subjects, contributing 4,288,109 person-weeks at risk in the virosomal-TIV group, and 37 hospitalizations for influenza among 197,180 subjects, contributing 4,786,360 person-weeks at risk in the MF59-TIV group. The crude hazard ratio (HR) was 0.83 (0.53-1.30), and the adjusted Cox estimated HR of MF59-TIV relative to virosomal-TIV was 0.86 (0.55-1.35). After accounting for data clustering, the HR of influenza hospitalization associated with MF59-TIV relative to virosomal-TIV was 0.94 (0.37-2.38). CONCLUSION: During the 2010-2011 influenza season, we found no differences in the risk of influenza hospitalization in subjects aged ≥65 years vaccinated with MF59-TIV compared with those vaccinated with virosomal-TIV.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Polisorbatos/uso terapéutico , Escualeno/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA