Angiotensin II formation in the intact human heart. Predominance of the angiotensin-converting enzyme pathway.

It has been proposed that the contribution of myocardial tissue angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) to angiotensin II (Ang II) formation in the human heart is low compared with non-ACE pathways. However, little is known about the actual in vivo contribution of these pathways to Ang II formation in the human heart. To examine angiotensin II formation in the intact human heart, we administered intracoronary 123I-labeled angiotensin I (Ang I) with and without intracoronary enalaprilat to orthotopic heart transplant recipients. The fractional conversion of Ang I to Ang II, calculated after separation of angiotensin peptides by HPLC, was 0.415 +/- 0.104 (n = 5, mean +/- SD). Enalaprilat reduced fractional conversion by 89%, to a value of 0.044 +/- 0.053 (n = 4, P = 0.002). In a separate study of explanted hearts, a newly developed in vitro Ang II-forming assay was used to examine cardiac tissue ACE activity independent of circulating components. ACE activity in solubilized left ventricular membrane preparations from failing hearts was 49.6 +/- 5.3 fmol 125I-Ang II formed per minute per milligram of protein (n = 8, +/- SE), and 35.9 +/- 4.8 fmol/min/mg from nonfailing human hearts (n = 7, P = 0.08). In the presence of 1 microM enalaprilat, ACE activity was reduced by 85%, to 7.3 +/- 1.4 fmol/min/mg in the failing group and to 4.6 +/- 1.3 fmol/min/mg in the nonfailing group (P < 0.001). We conclude that the predominant pathway for angiotensin II formation in the human heart is through ACE.

Changes in gene expression in the intact human heart. Downregulation of alpha-myosin heavy chain in hypertrophied, failing ventricular myocardium.

Using quantitative RT-PCR in RNA from right ventricular (RV) endomyocardial biopsies from intact nonfailing hearts, and subjects with moderate RV failure from primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC), we measured expression of genes involved in regulation of contractility or hypertrophy. Gene expression was also assessed in LV (left ventricular) and RV free wall and RV endomyocardium of hearts from end-stage IDC subjects undergoing heart transplantation or from nonfailing donors. In intact failing hearts, downregulation of beta1-receptor mRNA and protein, upregulation of atrial natriuretic peptide mRNA expression, and increased myocyte diameter indicated similar degrees of failure and hypertrophy in the IDC and PPH phenotypes. The only molecular phenotypic difference between PPH and IDC RVs was upregulation of beta2-receptor gene expression in PPH but not IDC. The major new findings were that (a) both nonfailing intact and explanted human ventricular myocardium expressed substantial amounts of alpha-myosin heavy chain mRNA (alpha-MHC, 23-34% of total), and (b) in heart failure alpha-MHC was downregulated (by 67-84%) and beta-MHC gene expression was upregulated. We conclude that at the mRNA level nonfailing human heart expresses substantial alpha-MHC. In myocardial failure this alteration in gene expression of MHC isoforms, if translated into protein expression, would decrease myosin ATPase enzyme velocity and slow speed of contraction.

Effect of baseline or changes in adrenergic activity on clinical outcomes in the beta-blocker evaluation of survival trial.

BACKGROUND: Adrenergic activation is thought to be an important determinant of outcome in subjects with chronic heart failure (CHF), but baseline or serial changes in adrenergic activity have not been previously investigated in a large patient sample treated with a powerful antiadrenergic agent. METHODS AND RESULTS: Systemic venous norepinephrine was measured at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months in the beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST), which compared placebo treatment with the beta-blocker/sympatholytic agent bucindolol. Baseline norepinephrine level was associated with a progressive increase in rates of death or death plus CHF hospitalization that was independent of treatment group. On multivariate analysis, baseline norepinephrine was also a highly significant (P<0.001) independent predictor of death. In contrast, the relation of the change in norepinephrine at 3 months to subsequent clinical outcomes was complex and treatment group-dependent. In the placebo-treated group but not in the bucindolol-treated group, marked norepinephrine increase at 3 months was associated with increased subsequent risks of death or death plus CHF hospitalization. In the bucindolol-treated group but not in the placebo-treated group, the 1st quartile of marked norepinephrine reduction was associated with an increased mortality risk. A likelihood-based method indicated that 18% of the bucindolol group but only 1% of the placebo group were at an increased risk for death related to marked reduction in norepinephrine at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In BEST, a subset of patients treated with bucindolol had an increased risk of death as the result of sympatholysis, which compromised the efficacy of this third-generation beta-blocker.

Aspirin impairs reverse myocardial remodeling in patients with heart failure treated with beta-blockers.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that aspirin (ASA) might alter the beneficial effect of beta-blockers on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with chronic heart failure. BACKGROUND: Aspirin blunts the vasodilation caused by both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers in hypertensive patients and in patients with heart failure. Several studies suggest that ASA also blunts some of beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors on mortality in patients with heart failure. To our knowledge, there have been no data evaluating the possible interaction of ASA and beta-blockers on left ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients entered into the Multicenter Oral Carvedilol Heart failure Assessment (MOCHA) trial, a 6-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-response evaluation of carvedilol in patients with chronic stable symptomatic heart failure. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if aspirin independently influenced the improvement in LVEF. RESULTS: Over all randomized patients (n = 293), LVEF improved 8.2 +/- 0.8 ejection fraction (EF) units in ASA nonusers and 4.5 +/- 0.7 EF units in ASA users (p = 0.005). In subjects randomized to treatment with carvedilol (n = 231), LVEF improved 9.5 +/- 0.9 EF units in ASA nonusers and 5.8 +/- 0.8 EF units in ASA users (p = 0.02). In subjects randomized to treatment with placebo (n = 62), LVEF improved 2.8 +/- 1.2 EF units in ASA nonusers and 0.5 +/- 1.4 EF units in ASA users (p = 0.20). Aspirin did not significantly affect the heart rate or systolic blood pressure response in either the placebo or carvedilol groups. The effect of ASA became more significant on multivariate analysis. The change in LVEF was also influenced by carvedilol dose, etiology of heart failure, baseline heart rate, EF and coumadin use. The detrimental effect of ASA on the improvement in LVEF was dose-related and was present in both placebo and carvedilol groups, although the effect was statistically significant only in the much larger carvedilol group. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin significantly affects the changes in LVEF over time in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction treated with carvedilol. The specific mechanism(s) underlying this interaction are unknown and further studies are needed to provide additional understanding of the molecular basis of factors influencing reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure.

Combined oral positive inotropic and beta-blocker therapy for treatment of refractory class IV heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the effects of combined oral positive inotropic and beta-blocker therapy in patients with severe heart failure. BACKGROUND: Patients with severe, class IV heart failure who receive standard medical therapy exhibit a 1-year mortality rate >50%. Moreover, such patients generally do not tolerate beta-blockade, a promising new therapy for chronic heart failure. Positive inotropes, including phosphodiesterase inhibitors, are associated with increased mortality when administered over the long term in these patients. The addition of a beta-blocker to positive inotropic therapy might attenuate this adverse effect, although long-term oral inotropic therapy might serve as a bridge to beta-blockade. METHODS: Thirty patients with severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 17.2+/-1.2%, cardiac index 1.6+/-0.1 liter/min per m2) were treated with the combination of oral enoximone (a phosphodiesterase inhibitor) and oral metoprolol at two institutions. Enoximone was given at a dose of < or = 1 mg/kg body weight three times a day. After clinical stabilization, metoprolol was initiated at 6.25 mg twice a day and slowly titrated up to a target dose of 100 to 200 mg/day. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of the patients tolerated enoximone, whereas 80% tolerated the addition of metoprolol. The mean duration of combination therapy was 9.4+/-1.8 months. The mean length of follow-up was 20.9+/-3.9 months. Of the 23 patients receiving the combination therapy, 48% were weaned off enoximone over the long term. The LVEF increased significantly, from 17.7+/-1.6% to 27.6+/-3.4% (p=0.01), whereas the New York Heart Association functional class improved from 4+/-0 to 2.8+/-0.1 (p=0.0001). The number of hospital admissions tended to decrease during therapy (p=0.06). The estimated probability of survival at 1 year was 81+/-9%. Heart transplantation was performed successfully in nine patients (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with a positive inotrope and a beta-blocker appears to be useful in the treatment of severe, class IV heart failure. It may be used as a palliative measure when transplantation is not an option or as a bridge to heart transplantation. Further study of this form of combined therapy is warranted.

Low-dose enoximone improves exercise capacity in chronic heart failure. Enoximone Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of low-dose enoximone on exercise capacity. BACKGROUND: At higher doses the phosphodiesterase inhibitor, enoximone, has been shown to increase exercise capacity and decrease symptoms in heart failure patients but also to increase mortality. The effects of lower doses of enoximone on exercise capacity and adverse events have not been evaluated. METHODS: This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (nine U.S. centers) conducted in 105 patients with New York Heart Association class II to III, ischemic or nonischemic chronic heart failure (CHF). Patients were randomized to placebo or enoximone at 25 or 50 mg orally three times a day. Treadmill maximal exercise testing was done at baseline and after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment, using a modified Naughton protocol. Patients were also evaluated for changes in quality of life and for increased arrhythmias by Holter monitoring. RESULTS: By the protocol-specified method of statistical analysis (the last observation carried-forward method), enoximone at 50 mg three times a day improved exercise capacity by 117 s at 12 weeks (p = 0.003). Enoximone at 25 mg three times a day also improved exercise capacity at 12 weeks by 115 s (p = 0.013). No increases in ventricular arrhythmias were noted. There were four deaths in the placebo group and 2 and 0 deaths in the enoximone 25 mg three times a day and enoximone 50 mg three times a day groups, respectively. Effects on degree of dyspnea and patient and physician assessments of clinical status favored the enoximone groups. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve weeks of treatment with low-dose enoximone improves exercise capacity in patients with CHF, without increasing adverse events.

Prevalence of depression in congestive heart failure.

Patients with congestive heart failure had higher scores than control subjects using a case-finding instrument for depression; such patients also were more likely to exceed the diagnostic threshold for depression with this instrument. Identification and treatment of depressed CHF patients may significantly improve level of functioning in these patients.

Effects of carvedilol on left ventricular mass, chamber geometry, and mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure.

We and others have previously shown that carvedilol improves left ventricular (LV) function and symptoms in chronic heart failure. This improvement in LV function has also been shown to be associated with an improvement in survival. This study evaluates the effect of carvedilol on LV mass, geometry, and degree of mitral regurgitation (MR). In 59 patients with symptomatic heart failure and LV ejection fraction <0.35, previously randomized to either treatment with carvedilol or placebo, we evaluated LV mass, geometry, and degree of MR over the time period of carvedilol treatment. LV mass decreased as early as 4 months into the treatment protocol and continued to decrease over a period of 1 year. LV geometry, defined by the length/diameter ratio, and severity of MR also improved with 4 months of therapy. Thus, compared with placebo treatment, carvedilol decreases LV mass while improving cardiac geometry and decreasing MR in patients with chronic heart failure. These changes occur in association with an improvement in LV systolic function. This process begins by 4 months of treatment and continues for 12 months.

Milrinone versus dobutamine in heart failure subjects treated chronically with carvedilol.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of milrinone and dobutamine in patients chronically treated with carvedilol. BACKGROUND: Milrinone and dobutamine are used to manage decompensated heart failure, but their efficacy in patients on beta-blocker therapy was unknown. METHODS: Twenty patients with decompensated heart failure were prospectively enrolled. Inotropic responses to milrinone (12.5, 25 or 50 microg/kg bolus infusions) or dobutamine (5, 10, 15 or 20 microg/kg/min infusions) were evaluated by right-heart catheterization. RESULTS: Milrinone increased cardiac index (2.0-2.6 l/min/m2, P=0.0001) without significantly altering heart rate (70-75 bpm, P=0.19). Milrinone decreased mean pulmonary artery pressure (36-29 mm Hg, P=0.0001), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (24-18 mm Hg, P=0.0001) and mean arterial blood pressure (78-75 mm Hg, P=0.0002). Left ventricular stroke volume index increased in the milrinone group (31-35 ml/beat/m2, P=0.0001). Dobutamine produced an increase in cardiac index (2.4-3.3 l/min/m2, P=0.0001) only at doses that are not typically used to treat heart failure (15-20 microg/kg/min). At these doses, dobutamine increased heart rate (68-82 bpm, P=0.008), mean systemic pressure (90-117 mm Hg, P=0.0001) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (21-30 mm Hg, P=0.001). Dobutamine did not alter left ventricular stroke volume index or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine and milrinone have different hemodynamic effects in patients treated chronically with carvedilol. These differences should be considered when selecting inotropic therapy for decompensated heart failure.

The role of third-generation beta-blocking agents in chronic heart failure.

Third-generation beta-blocking agents developed for the hypertension market are proving useful in the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF). These compounds share the ancillary property of vasodilation, which improves acute tolerability by unloading the failing left ventricle at a time when beta-adrenergic withdrawal produces myocardial depression. In the case of carvedilol and bucindolol, this allows for the administration of nonselective beta blockade. Because of blockade of both beta 1 and beta 2 adrenergic receptors as well as other properties, these compounds possess a more comprehensive antiadrenergic profile than second-generation, beta 1-selective compounds. For this and potentially other reasons, third-generation beta-blocking agents have theoretical efficacy advantages that have yet to be demonstrated in large-scale trials. Ongoing trials with either second- or third-generation compounds and one trial directly comparing a compound from each class will provide the answer as to whether third-generation compounds have an advantage in the treatment of chronic HF.

Inotropes in the beta-blocker era.

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents are now standard treatment for mild to moderate chronic heart failure (CHF). However, although many subjects improve on beta blockade, others do not, and some may even deteriorate. Even when subjects improve on beta blockade, they may subsequently decompensate and need acute treatment with a positive inotropic agent. In the presence of full beta blockade, a beta agonist such as dobutamine may have to be administered at very high (> 10 micrograms/kg/min) doses to increase cardiac output, and these doses may increase afterload. In contrast, phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEIs) such as milrinone or enoximone retain their full hemodynamic effects in the face of beta blockade. This is because the site of PDEI action is beyond the beta-adrenergic receptor, and because beta blockade reverses receptor pathway desensitization changes, which are detrimental to PDEI response. Moreover, when the combination of a PDEI and a beta-blocking agent is administered long term in CHF, their respective efficacies are additive and their adverse effects subtractive. The PDEI is administered first to increase the tolerability of beta-blocker initiation by counteracting the myocardial depressant effect of adrenergic withdrawal. With this combination, the signature effects of beta blockade (a substantial decrease in heart rate and an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction) are observed, the hemodynamic support conferred by the PDEI appears to be sustained, and clinical results are promising. However, large-scale placebo-controlled studies with PDEIs and beta blockers are needed to confirm these results.

Hypotension with dobutamine: beta-adrenergic antagonist selectivity at low doses of carvedilol.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of marked hypotension resulting from the concomitant use of low-dose carvedilol and intravenous dobutamine. CASE SUMMARY: A 54-year-old white man with severe heart failure was placed on carvedilol 3.125 mg orally twice a day; three days later the dosage was increased to 6.25 mg orally twice a day. His symptoms of heart failure worsened with increasing fluid retention, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, and elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine. He was admitted for treatment of decompensated heart failure with intravenous dobutamine. With each increase in intravenous dobutamine, systolic blood pressure fell. Dobutamine was discontinued when systolic blood pressure reached 56 mm Hg. In a subsequent admission for decompensated heart failure, when the patient was not taking carvedilol, he was treated with intravenous dobutamine and systolic blood pressure increased. DISCUSSION: Although carvedilol is a nonselective beta-adrenergic antagonist, at low doses it is a selective beta1-adrenergic antagonist. Dobutamine is a beta1-, beta2-, and alpha1-adrenergic agonist. Typically, patients with heart failure treated with intravenous dobutamine have a small increase in systolic blood pressure. We propose that the drop in blood pressure with dobutamine in this patient was caused by a fall in systemic vascular resistance due to vascular beta2-adrenergic receptor activation. The normal increase in cardiac output was partially blocked by selective beta1-adrenergic blockade at low doses of carvedilol. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-adrenergic blockade with carvedilol is now common therapy for patients with congestive heart failure. Intravenous dobutamine is often used when these patients have worsening heart failure. Recognition that treatment with dobutamine in patients taking low doses of carvedilol may result in hypotension is important for appropriate monitoring and therapy.

Inotropes and beta-blockers: is there a need for new guidelines?

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents are standard treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure. When patients receiving beta-blockers decompensate they often need treatment with a positive inotropic agent. The beta-agonist dobutamine may not produce much increase in cardiac output during full-dose beta-blocker treatment and may increase systemic vascular resistance via alpha-adrenergic stimulation. In contrast, phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEIs) such as milrinone or enoximone retain full hemodynamic effects during complete beta-blockade because the site of action of PDEIs is beyond the beta-adrenergic receptor and because beta-blockade reverses some of the desensitization phenomena that account for the attenuation of PDEI response in heart failure related to upregulation in G(alphai). Inotrope-requiring subjects with decompensated heart failure who are undergoing long-term therapy with beta-blocking agents should be treated with a type III-specific PDEI, not a beta-agonist such as dobutamine.

Beta-blockade in adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy.

Beta-blockade consistently improves myocardial systolic function in patients with both nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The effects of beta-blockade on Adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy (ACM), however, are unknown. We retrospectively evaluated the effects of beta-blockade on patients with ACM by using a case-controlled design. The control group consisted of 16 consecutively chosen age- and sex-matched patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) who were treated with beta-blockers. Patients with ACM had a baseline mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 28%, which improved to 41% (P = .041) after treatment with beta-blockers. The control group had a baseline mean LVEF of 26%, which improved to 32% (P = .015) after treatment. The mean duration of beta-blocker therapy in the Adriamycin and control groups was 8 and 9 months, respectively. The degree of improvement between the 2 groups was not significantly different. Beta-blockers have a beneficial effect on cardiac function in patients with ACM, which is at least comparable with other forms of heart failure with systolic dysfunction.

Patient preferences for heart failure treatment: utilities are valid measures of health-related quality of life in heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Current standards hold that cost-effectiveness analyses should incorporate measures of both quantity and quality of life, and that quality of life in this context is best measured by a utility. We sought to measure utility scores for patients with heart failure and to assess their validity as measures of health-related quality of life (HRQL). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 50 patients with heart failure. We measured utilities with the time trade-off technique, exercise capacity with a 6-minute walk test, and HRQL with the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, and a visual analogue score. Validity was assessed by establishing correlation between utilities and these other measures. Mean utility score was 0.77 +/- 0.28. There were significant (P < .05) curvilinear relationships between utility score and visual analogue score, the physical function summary scale of the SF-36, 6-minute walk distance, and the Living With Heart Failure score. Utility scores on retest at 1 week were unchanged in a subset of 12 patients. Utilities did not vary systematically with age, sex, or ethnicity. CONCLUSION: Utilities are valid measures of HRQL in patients with heart failure, and cost-effectiveness analyses of heart failure treatments incorporating utilities in the outcome measure can be meaningful.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype in patients with ischaemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been shown to correlate with circulating ACE concentrations, and also to be an independent risk factor for the development of myocardial infarction, particularly in men thought to be at low risk by standard criteria. We determined the genotypes of individuals with end-stage heart failure due to either ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (102) or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (112) and compared these to organ donors with normally functioning hearts (79). Genotypes were determined by the polymerase chain reaction with oligonucleotide primers flanking the polymorphic region in intron 16 of the ACE gene to amplify template DNA isolated from patients. Compared with the DD frequency in the control population, the frequency of the ACE DD genotype was 48% higher in individuals with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (p = 0.008) and 63% higher in subjects with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.008), suggesting that an ACE gene variant may contribute to the pathogenesis of both types of cardiomyopathy.

Comparative hemodynamic effects of OPC-18790 and dobutamine in patients with advanced heart failure.

OPC-18790 (Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Rockville, MD), a novel positive inotropic agent, produces titratable hemodynamic benefits in patients with advanced heart failure. In such patients, OPC-18790 has been shown to acutely increase the cardiac index, while reducing systemic vascular resistance and left ventricular filling pressure, without an associated increase in heart rate. This study was performed to compare the acute hemodynamic effects of OPC-18790 and the beta-adrenergic receptor agonist, dobutamine, in patients with advanced heart failure. OPC-18790 and dobutamine were compared on successive days in 13 patients with worsening New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure. The mean (+/- SEM) left ventricular ejection fraction was 15 +/- 2% (range, 6-29%). Pretreatment hemodynamics were: heart rate, 96 +/- 2 beats/min; mean arterial pressure, 77 +/- 3 mmHg; cardiac index, 1.80 +/- 0.10 L/min/m2; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 27 +/- 1 mmHg; mean pulmonary arterial pressure, 41 +/- 2 mmHg; and systemic vascular resistance, 1,732 +/- 152 dynes.s/cm5. At infusion rates yielding comparable increases in the cardiac index (5 micrograms/kg/min for 2 hours for each drug), OPC-18790 produced significantly more favorable effects on heart rate (-2 +/- 3% vs 11 +/- 4%; P = .01), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (-32 +/- 4% vs -17 +/- 8%; P = .04), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (-14 +/- 3% vs 6 +/- 11%; P = .06), stroke volume index (48 +/- 8% vs 29 +/- 7%; P = .02), stroke work index (70 +/- 11 vs 42% +/- 12%; P = .03), and rate pressure product (2 +/- 4% vs 14 +/- 4%; P = .05). The hemodynamic profile for OPC-18790 differs from dobutamine, with OPC-18790 exhibiting no increase in heart rate, greater preload reduction, and an increase in cardiac performance at a lower estimated metabolic cost.