Endovascular Aortic Repair With the E-Tegra Device: Preliminary Outcomes From a Multicenter National Registry.

PURPOSE: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is currently expanding its feasibility thanks to design innovations, but hostile proximal necks and narrow iliac arteries are still a constraint, as expressed by the Instructions for Use (IFU) of most devices. Our aim is to report the preliminary results of the E-Tegra endograft in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) performed in 15 high-volume centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The e-Tegra Italian endoGraft REgistry (TIGRE) is a prospectively maintained database of consecutive EVAR with the E-Tegra stent-graft across 15 participating centers between March 2021 and March 2023. The registry records baseline clinical data, anatomic measurements of the abdominal aorta, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, with a scheduled follow-up period of 3 years for all patients. This is a preliminary analysis of the first results updated to January 2024. The primary endpoints are technical and clinical success, perioperative mortality, freedom from endograft rupture, and aortic-related mortality. The secondary endpoints are freedom from reintervention, and any type of endoleak (EL). The results were analyzed in relation with the anatomic characteristics of the AAAs, namely, iliac axes tortuosity and proximal neck hostility. RESULTS: The registry included 147 consecutive EVAR (138 elective and 9 in emergent setting), 7 of which were associated with an iliac branch implantation. Ninety patients had at least 1 criterion of anatomical hostility, and 25 were treated outside the device IFU. Primary technical success was achieved in 146 cases (99.3%) and assisted success in 147 (100%), with no perioperative mortality. After a median follow-up period of 20 months, no aneurysm-related mortality occurred. Reinterventions were 5: 2 for type IB EL and 3 for type II ELs with aneurysm sac increase. Five more type II ELs with aneurysm sac stability are under observation. No differences in terms of reinterventions were noted between aneurysms with standard and hostile anatomy. CONCLUSION: The E-Tegra endograft is safe and effective in treating AAAs with standard and hostile anatomy, with a low rate of complications and reinterventions, although longer-term outcomes and larger numbers are needed to compare its performances related to specific anatomic criteria. CLINICAL IMPACT: This multi-center nationwide Registry reports a real-world experience of EVAR performed with the E-Tegra abdominal endograft across 15 high-volume Centers, providing early- and mid-term device-specific results, which will help vascular surgeons in endograft selection. In particular, this study focuses on clinical results obtained in treating aneurysms with hostile anatomy, analyzing the performances of the E-Tegra endograft in cases of hostile proximal necks and narrow or tortuous iliac axes.

Post-dissection abdominal aorto-iliac aneurysm open repair: a surgical technique description and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Post-dissection abdominal aortic aneurysms (pDAAA) may develop in up to 7% of patients affected by aortic dissection. However, there is no consensus on the optimal management. Different endovascular and open surgical techniques have been reported. This case-series describes the open surgical technique employed at a tertiary vascular surgery center to manage this complex pathology to allow future treatment of the visceral aorta if needed. A systematic review of the relevant literature on surgical and endovascular management of pDAAA was conducted. METHOD: Consecutive patients surgically treated at a single center for pDAAA metachronous to a Stanford type A or type B aortic dissection from January 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively retrieved. The surgical technique we employed entails the use of large-diameter bifurcated grafts (≥ 9 mm branches) with longer main body, fenestration of the septum at renal arteries ostia and landing on a common femoral artery in case of small caliber iliac arteries (< 8 mm) to provide a suitable landing zone and access route for future endovascular thoracoabdominal repair in case of subsequent aneurysmal degeneration. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were major complications, late mortality, aortic-related mortality, and aortic-related reinterventions. Then, a systematic review of the literature until March 2023 was conducted. RESULTS: Five patients were included, all males with a mean age of 61 years. 30-day mortality was 0. One patient suffered from post-operative acute kidney injury and acute distress respiratory syndrome, and another one underwent repeat laparotomy for abdominal seroma. The mean follow-up was 44 months with no aortic-related reinterventions to date. One patient died from non-aortic-related causes 9 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Open repair of pDAAA appears to be an effective treatment in selected patients, with low mortality rates, and technical choices should consider future endovascular treatment of the thoracoabdominal aorta.

External validation of Traditional and Modified Harborview Risk Scores for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm 30-day mortality prediction.

OBJECTIVE: To validate traditional and modified Harborview Risk Score (tHRS and mHRS) for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in an external population. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing rAAA repair from January 2012 to January 2024 at a tertiary Vascular Surgery Center were retrospectively reviewed. The scores were calculated for each patient; receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and calibration plots were built to evaluate discrimination and calibration. Furthermore, the relationship of mortality with score variables was updated running a multivariate logistic model, then applied to one thousand bootstrap samples. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients treated for rAAA (97 males, 92.4%) were included in the study (77±8.5 years). An endovascular repair (rEVAR) was performed in 35 patients (3 women, 80±9.0 years) while an open repair (rOAR) in 70 patients (5 women, 75±8.0 years). The 30-day mortality rate was 31.4%. (33/105), 25.7% (9/35) and 34.3% (24/70) for rEVAR and rOAR respectively (p 0.5). Eight patients (7.6%) were on therapy with warfarin at the time of admission. AUC for tHRS was 0.56 while AUC for mHRS was 0.68 (DeLong test = 0.29). The tHRS' calibration showed underestimation for patients with predicted mortality < 25% and overestimation for the remaining; for mHRS, the predictions were well calibrated for patients with estimated mortality < 40% with overprediction afterward. The model update demonstrated that the wider effects are due to the interaction between the HRS factors. CONCLUSIONS: THRS and mHRS showed limited prediction capability with 30-day mortality overestimation in an external validation, raising many concerns about their extended and systematic application. Interaction between factors should be taken into account to enhance the score's performance, especially in high risk patients.

Multicenter Comparison of Aortic Arch Aneurysms and Dissections Zone 0 Hybrid and Total Endovascular Repair.

PURPOSE: Comparison of hybrid and total endovascular aortic arch repair at two tertiary vascular surgery centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing hybrid (HG) or total endovascular (TEG) total aortic arch repair for aneurysms or dissections were included (2008-2022). Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were major complications, technical success (defined as absence of surgical conversion/mortality, high-flow endoleaks or branch/limb occlusion), clinical success (defined as absence of disabling clinical sequelae), late and aortic-related mortality/reinterventions, freedom from endoleaks, aortic diameter growth > 5 mm, graft migration and supra-aortic trunks (SAT) patency. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients were included, 17 in HG and 13 in TEG. TEG presented shorter intervention time (240.5 vs 341 min, p = 0.01), median ICU stay (1 vs 4.5 days, p < 0.01) and median length of stay (8 vs 17.5 days, p < 0.01). No intraoperative deaths occurred. Technical success was 100%; clinical success was 70.6% in HG and 100% in TEG (p = 0.05). Thirty-day mortality was 13.3%, exclusively in HG (p = 0.11). Nine major complications occurred in 8 patients, 5 in HG and 3 in TEG (p = 0.99), among which five strokes, two in HG and three in TEG (p = 0.62). Late mortality was 38.5%, six patients in HG and four in TEG, p = 0.6. Two late aortic-related deaths occurred in HG (p = 0.9). Two aortic-related reinterventions, no graft migration or SAT occlusion was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Total endovascular repair seems to shorten operative times and provide higher clinical success compared with hybrid solutions, without significant 30-day mortality differences. The most common major complication is stroke.

EVAR Solution For Acutely Thrombosed Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in a Patient with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Acute thrombosis of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (ATAAA) represents an uncommon but catastrophic pathology, which can lead to life threatening complications. This is a report of the infrequent use of an endovascular solution to successfully treat ATAAA in a patient with COVID-19 viral pneumonia and ischaemia induced lower extremity neurological deficits. REPORT: An 89 year old white male, with a history of cardiovascular comorbidities was admitted to the emergency room with dyspnoea associated with the sudden onset of abdominal and back pain followed by partial motor and sensory deficits in both legs. The CT scan showed both an 8 cm infrarenal AAA with middle (inferior mesenteric artery patent) and distal thrombotic occlusion of the sac and non-aneurysmal but thrombosed common iliac arteries. An additional finding was imaging features typical of interstitial pneumonia. After the molecular test detected active COVID-19 infection, the patient was treated as an emergency with an aorto-uni-iliac stent graft and femorofemoral crossover graft. The post-operative course was uneventful with AAA exclusion and disappearance of ischaemic symptoms. There were no vascular complications. At three month follow up the patient remained asymptomatic and was looking after himself. DISCUSSION: This case supports the feasibility and safety of a minimally invasive endovascular procedure to treat ATAAA in selected patients with favourable anatomy and high risk of respiratory complications in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.