Shared Neuroanatomical Substrates for Co-occurring Swallowing and Communication Impairments after Acute Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Post-stroke dysphagia and communication impairments occur in two-thirds of acute stroke survivors. Identifying the shared neuroanatomical substrate for related impairments could facilitate the development of cross-system therapies. Our purpose was to elucidate discrete brain regions predictive of the combined presence of dysphagia alongside dysarthria and/or aphasia post-stroke. METHODS: We included 40 right (RHS) and 67 left hemisphere (LHS) patients from an acute ischemic stroke cohort with lesions demarcated on diffusion weighted imaging. We undertook binary non-parametric voxel-lesion symptom mapping with a false discovery rate of p <0.05 for co-occurring dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia (LHS only). If no voxels survived the threshold, a cluster analysis of >20 voxels involving an uncorrected p <0.01 was applied to identify brain regions associated with the co-occurring impairments. RESULTS: Cluster analyses revealed that dysphagia and dysarthria were associated with insular and superior temporal gyrus (STG) involvement after RHS and with basal ganglia (BG), internal capsule, and thalamic involvement after LHS. Co-occurring dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia were associated with BG, STG, and insular cortex involvement. DISCUSSION: Our findings highlight the role of the insula and structures of the BG in co-occurrence patterns involving dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia. These newly identified biomarkers may inform new rehabilitation therapeutic targets for treating cross-system functions.

Accuracy of Dysphagia Screening by Non-clinical Research Staff in the Emergency Department.

Although the emergency department (ED) is the initial care setting for the majority of older adults requiring hospital admission, there is a paucity of ED-based dysphagia research in this at-risk population. This is driven by barriers to dysphagia evaluation in this complex care environment. Therefore, we assessed the reliability of trained, non-clinical ED research staff in administering dysphagia screening tools compared to trained speech pathologists (SLPs). We also aimed to determine perceptual screening discrepancies (e.g. voice change) between clinical and non-clinical staff. Forty-two older adults with suspected pneumonia were recruited during an ED visit and underwent dysphagia (Toronto Bedside Swallow Screening Tool; TOR-BSST©) and aspiration (3-oz water swallow test; 3-oz WST) screening by trained non-clinical research staff. Audio-recordings of screenings were re-rated post-hoc by trained, blinded SLPs with discrepancies resolved via consensus. Cohen's kappa (unweighted) revealed moderate agreement in pass/fail ratings between clinical and non-clinical staff for both the TOR-BSST© (k = 0.75) and the 3 oz WST (k = 0.66) corresponding to excellent sensitivity and good specificity for both the TOR-BSST (SN = 94%, SP = 85%) and the 3 oz WST (SN = 90%, SP = 81%). Further analysis of TOR-BSST perceptual parameters revealed that most discrepancies between clinicians and non-clinicians resulted from over-diagnosis of change in vocal quality (53%). These results support the feasibility of non-clinical research staff administering screening tools for dysphagia and aspiration in the ED. Dysphagia screening may not necessitate clinical staff involvement, which may improve feasibility of large-scale ED research. Future training of research staff should focus on perceptual assessment of vocal quality.

The Quantification of Radiation Fibrosis Using Clinically Indicated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Currently, no objective method exists to measure the extent of fibrosis in swallowing musculature in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. We developed and psychometrically tested a method of quantifying fibrosis volume using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The overall aim of this study was to determine if clinical MRI is a reliable tool to measure fibrosis of the pharyngeal musculature in patients with HNC managed with RT and to assess its potential to capture changes in fibrosis over time. Eligible participants were adults with HNC treated with radiation therapy (RT) who received minimally two MRIs and videofluoroscopic swallow (VFS) studies from baseline (pre-RT) up to 1-year post-RT. Two neuroradiologists independently contoured fibrosis volume in batches from MRIs using Vitrea™. Sufficient inter-rater reliability was set at Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) > 0.75. Two speech-language pathologists independently rated VFSs for swallowing impairment using standardized scales, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. MRI and VFS scores were correlated using Spearman's rank coefficient. Participants included 42 adults (male = 33); mean age 59 (SD = 8.8). ICC (95% Confidence Interval) for fibrosis volume was 0.34 (0, 0.76) for batch one and 0.43 (0, 0.82) for batch two. Consensus meetings were held after each batch. Sufficient reliability was reached by batch three (ICC = 0.95 (0.79, 0.99)). Fibrosis volume increased significantly from 3 to 12 months (mean change = 1.28 mL (SD = 5.21), p = 0.006), as did pharyngeal impairment from baseline to 12 months (mean score change = 3.05 (SD = 3.02), p = 0.003). Fibrosis volume moderately correlated with pharyngeal impairment at 3 and 12 months (0.49, p = 0.004 and 0.59, p = 0.005, respectively). We demonstrated a reliable measure of fibrosis volume in swallowing musculature from existing clinical MRIs and identified that larger fibrosis volume was associated with worse swallowing function. The reliable capture of fibrosis volume offers a pragmatic method for early detection of fibrosis and concomitant dysphagia.

Changes in Cardiac Function During a Swallow Exercise Program in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Research regarding risks of swallow treatment suggests that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) experience changes in heart rate/rhythm when completing the supraglottic swallow and super-supraglottic swallow. The current study evaluated cardiac function during multiple swallowing exercises in patients with dysphagia and CAD. Eligible patients had CAD and confirmed pharyngeal dysphagia from VFS and sufficient cognitive ability to follow direction. The protocol included an a priori concealed randomized order of seven swallowing exercises (supraglottic swallow, super-supraglottic swallow, Mendelsohn and Masako maneuvers, effortful swallow with and without breath hold, and jaw opening exercise). Objective measures of heart rate/rhythm, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure were compared before vs after the overall session and each exercise using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and McNemar's and Cochran's Q tests with alpha at 0.05 and power at 0.80. Participants were 20 adults (15 male), aged 28-88 (median 76.5 years). 90% were intubated during their hospital stay (44% > 1 intubation) and 20% suffered post-op stroke. Severe dysphagia, marked by NPO status, occurred in 30% of patients. Sessions were 26 min long (mean; SD = 2.29). With few exceptions, objective measures were stable pre vs post overall and after each exercise. Potential vulnerability was noted with increased heart rate after the super-supraglottic swallow and increased arrhythmias after the effortful swallow (p < 0.05 for both). The order that swallowing exercises were completed did not significantly impact cardiovascular function. Telemetry and pulse oximetry proved to be feasible tools to monitor for subtle changes in cardiovascular function during completion of swallowing exercises.

Generating Items for a Novel Bedside Dysphagia Screening Tool Post Acute Pediatric Stroke.

Bedside dysphagia assessment protocols are not well developed in acute pediatric stroke unlike adults. The objective of this study was to identify items deemed relevant and feasible by expert consensus to inform the development of a bedside dysphagia screening tool for acute pediatric stroke. A two-phase study was conducted: (1) literature review and expert consultation generated a comprehensive list of dysphagia assessment items; (2) items were formatted in an online survey asking respondents opinion of relevance to acute pediatric stroke and feasibility for bedside administration by a trained health professional. The Dillman Tailored Design approach optimized response rate. Respondents were identified using the snowball method. Speech-language pathologists with > 2 years in pediatric dysphagia were invited to complete the survey. Demographic and practice variables were compared using univariate statistics. Item relevance and feasibility were made using binary or ordinal responses, combined to derive item-content validity indices (I-CVI) to guide item reduction. Items with I-CVI > 0.78 (excellent content validity) were moved forward to tool development. Of the 71 invited respondents, 57(80.3%) responded, of which 34(59.6%) were from North America. Sixty-one items were generated of which 4(6.6%) items were rated 'to keep'. These were face symmetry (I-CVI:0.89), salivary control (I-CVI:0.95), alertness (I-CVI:0.89) and choking (I-CVI:0.84). Of all respondents, 31(54.4%) endorsed swallowing trials, of which 25(80.6%) endorsed thin liquid by teaspoon (n = 17, 68%) or open cup (n = 20, 80%). We identified candidate items for bedside dysphagia screening with excellent content validity for acute pediatric stroke patients. Next steps include assessment of the psychometric value of each item in identifying dysphagia in children in the acute stage of recovery from stroke.

The Acceptability of Behavioural Swallowing Interventions for Head and Neck Cancer Patients During Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study Exploring Experiences of Clinical Trial Speech-Language Pathologists.

The PRO-ACTIVE randomized clinical trial offers 3 swallowing therapies to Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients during radiotherapy (RT) namely: reactive, proactive low- ("EAT-RT" only) and high-intensity ("EAT-RT + exercises"). Understanding the experiences of the trial Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) will be useful to inform clinical implementation. This study assessed SLP opinions of acceptability and clinical feasibility of the 3 trial therapies. 8 SLPs from 3 Canadian PRO-ACTIVE trial sites participated in individual interviews. Using a qualitative approach, data collection and thematic analysis were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Member checking was conducted through a follow-up focus group with willing participants. Seven themes were derived: intervention coherence, burden, barriers/facilitators, self-efficacy, attitude, ethicality, and perceived effectiveness. SLPs felt all 3 therapies had potential benefit yet perceived more advantages of proactive therapies compared to reactive. Compared to exercises, SLPs particularly endorsed the EAT-RT component. A major barrier was keeping patients motivated, which was impacted by acute toxicity and sometimes conflicting instructions from the healthcare team. Strategies utilized by to overcome barriers included: scaling exercises and/or diet up/down according to the changing patient needs and communicating therapy goals with healthcare team. A model was derived describing the perceived acceptability of the swallowing therapies according to SLPs, based on the interconnection of main themes. Proactive therapies were perceived as more acceptable to trial SLPs, for facilitating patient engagement. The perceived acceptability of the swallowing therapies was related to seven interconnected aspects of providers' experience. These findings will inform the implementation and potential uptake of the PRO-ACTIVE swallowing therapies in clinical practice.

Exploring the Acceptability of Behavioral Swallowing Interventions for Head and Neck Cancer Patients During Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experience.

The PRO-ACTIVE randomized clinical trial offers 3 swallowing therapies to Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients during radiotherapy namely: reactive, proactive low- ("EAT-RT" only), and high-intensity ("EAT-RT + exercises"). Understanding the perceived acceptability of these interventions is important to inform eventual implementation into clinical practice. This study explored patients' perspectives using qualitative methodology. At 2 Canadian PRO-ACTIVE trial sites, 24 trial participants were recruited for individual semi-structured interviews, representing each of the 3 trial arms. Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Member checking was conducted through follow-up focus groups. Seven themes were derived reflecting the TFA constructs. Overall, regardless of trial arm, patients reported a positive experience with therapy. Patients identified benefits of EAT-RT therapy, reporting that it provided meaningful feedback on diet progress and supported goal setting for oral intake. Patients who received proactive therapies valued the opportunity to set expectations early, build mealtime routine iteratively over time, and have an extended engagement with the SLP. Regardless of trial arm, patients agreed proactive therapy aligned with what they think is best and that therapy intensity should accommodate individual needs. This study identified the value to HNC patients of receiving swallowing interventions during RT and setting realistic expectations around swallowing. Compared to reactive care, proactive therapies were perceived helpful in consolidating habits early, establishing realistic expectations around swallowing and building an extended rapport with the SLP. These findings will inform the implementation of proactive versus reactive swallowing therapies in clinical practice.

Swallowing, Oral Motor, Motor Speech, and Language Impairments Following Acute Pediatric Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Following adult stroke, dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia are common sequelae. Little is known about these impairments in pediatric stroke. We assessed frequencies, co-occurrence and associations of dysphagia, oral motor, motor speech, language impairment, and caregiver burden in pediatric stroke. METHODS: Consecutive acute patients from term birth-18 years, hospitalized for arterial ischemic stroke (AIS), and cerebral sinovenous thrombosis, from January 2013 to November 2018 were included. Two raters reviewed patient charts to detect documentation of in-hospital dysphagia, oral motor dysfunction, motor speech and language impairment, and caregiver burden, using a priori operational definitions for notation and assessment findings. Other variables abstracted included demographics, preexisting conditions, stroke characteristics, and discharge disposition. Impairment frequencies were obtained by univariate and bivariate analysis and associations by simple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were stratified into neonates (N=67, mean age 2.9 days, 54 AIS, 15 cerebral sinovenous thrombosis) and children (N=106, mean age 6.5 years, 73 AIS, 35 cerebral sinovenous thrombosis). Derived frequencies of impairments included dysphagia (39% neonates, 41% children); oral motor (6% neonates, 41% children); motor speech (37% children); and language (31% children). Common overlapping impairments included oral motor and motor speech (24%) and dysphagia and motor speech (23%) in children. Associations were found only in children between stroke type (AIS over cerebral sinovenous thrombosis) and AIS severity (more severe deficit at presentation) for all impairments except feeding impairment alone. Caregiver burden was present in 58% patients. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we systematically report the frequencies and associations of dysphagia, oral motor, motor speech, and language impairment during acute presentation of pediatric stroke, ranging from 30% to 40% for each impairment. Further research is needed to determine long-term effects of these impairments and to design standardized age-specific assessment protocols for early recognition following stroke.

Biomechanical Biomarkers of Tongue Impairment During Swallowing in Persons Diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of tongue dysfunction on deglutition in persons diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is not well understood. This information is needed to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of swallowing impairment, for identifying risk factors of dysphagia, and for establishing impairment-specific treatments aimed at slowing the loss of swallow function. OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to determine the relation between biomechanical measures of oral tongue movements using electromagnetic articulography (EMA) and measures of swallow physiology, swallow safety and efficiency, and self-reported swallowing function. METHODS: Participants were diagnosed with ALS by a neurologist following the El Escorial Criteria from the World Federation of Neurology. Twelve participants underwent (1) EMA to derive biomechanical measures of the tongue, (2) videofluoroscopic evaluation to measure swallow physiology, safety, and efficiency, and (3) maximal tongue strength testing using the Iowa Oral Pressure Instrument (IOPI). Participants completed self-reported functional assessments. Spearman's rank correlations assessed for associations between lingual biomechanics and swallowing physiology, swallow safety and efficiency, and self-reported bulbar function. RESULTS: Results demonstrated strong associations between biomechanical and swallowing physiology, swallow safety, and self-reported measures. Notably, swallowing safety during thin liquid intake was associated with tongue speed (r = - 0.7, p < 0.05) and range of motion (r = - 0.71, p < 0.05), and swallowing safety during puree intake was associated with tongue strength (r = - 0.69, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the importance of tongue movements on swallowing physiology and safety, help improve our understanding of mechanisms of swallowing impairment, and highlight a potential clinical tool to index bulbar impairment.

Translation and Validation of the TOR-BSST© into Brazilian Portuguese for Adults with Stroke.

Brazil has a higher rate of dysphagia in stroke patients compared to developed countries, but does not have a fully validated method for early identification of dysphagia in this population. The aim of this study is to translate the TOR-BSST© into Brazilian Portuguese and assess the newly translated version for reliability and validity with Brazilian adult patients with stroke. The translation of the TOR-BSST© followed a multi-step process, according to the International Quality of Life Assessment project. For validation, we included patients with age ≥ 18 years and stroke diagnosis confirmed by neuroimaging and tolerance for videofluoroscopic swallowing assessment. The BR-PTfinal TOR-BSST© was administered by two trained screeners within two hours of videofluoroscopy. All assessors were independent and blinded. Estimates for reliability used the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and for accuracy both sensitivity (SN) and negative predictive (NP) values were used, along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sixty patients were enrolled and tested for a mean (SD) of 14.4 (6.9) days from last seen normal. Of all the patients, 41 (68.3%) failed the BR-PTfinal TOR-BSST© and 21 (35%) were scored to have dysphagia on videofluoroscopy, of which 11 (52.4%) had mild dysphagia. The overall reliability between screeners was satisfactory (ICC = 0.59; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.76). The SN and NP values for the BR-PTfinal TOR-BSST© were 85.7% (95% CI 0.62-0.96) and 84.2% (95% CI 0.72-0.95), respectively. The TOR-BSST© was successfully translated to Brazilian Portuguese with the BR-PTfinal TOR-BSST© proven to have high sensitivity and negative predictive values when compared to gold standard videofluoroscopy.

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Tool for Direct Enteral Tube Insertion After Acute Stroke.

Background and Purpose- We aimed to create a novel prognostic risk score to estimate outcomes after direct enteral tube placement in acute stroke. Methods- We used the Ontario Stroke Registry and linked databases to obtain clinical information on all patients with direct enteral tube insertion after ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage from July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2010 (derivation cohort) and July 1, 2010 to March 31, 2013 (validation cohort). We used multivariable regression to assign scores to predictor variables for 3 outcomes after tube placement: favorable outcome (discharge modified Rankin Scale score 0-3 and alive at 90 days), poor outcome (discharge modified Rankin Scale score 5 or death at 90 days), and 30-day mortality. Results- Variables associated with a favorable outcome were younger age, preadmission independence, ischemic stroke rather than intracerebral hemorrhage, lower stroke severity, and a shorter time between stroke and tube placement. Variables associated with a poor outcome were older age, preadmission dependence, atrial fibrillation, greater stroke severity, and tracheostomy. Age, preadmission dependence, atrial fibrillation, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and shorter time to tube placement were associated with increased 30-day mortality. Using these variables, we created an online calculator to facilitate estimation of individual patient risk of favorable and poor outcomes. C-statistic in the validation cohort was 0.82 for favorable outcome, 0.65 for poor outcome, and 0.62 for 30-day mortality, and calibration was adequate. Conclusions- We developed risk scores to estimate outcomes after direct enteral tube insertion for acute dysphagic stroke. This information may be useful in discussions with patients and families when there is prognostic uncertainty surrounding outcomes with direct enteral tube placement after stroke.

Measuring financial toxicity incurred after treatment of head and neck cancer: Development and validation of the Financial Index of Toxicity questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) may cause significant financial toxicity to patients. Herein, the authors have presented the development and validation of the Financial Index of Toxicity (FIT) instrument. METHODS: Items were generated using literature review and were based on expert opinion. In item reduction, items with factor loadings of a magnitude <0.3 in exploratory factor analysis and inverse correlations (r < 0) in test-retest analysis were eliminated. Retained items constituted the FIT. Reliability tests included internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation). Validity was tested using the Spearman rho by comparing FIT scores with baseline income, posttreatment lost income, and the Financial Concerns subscale of the Social Difficulties Inventory. Responsiveness analysis compared change in income and change in FIT between 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 14 items were generated and subsequently reduced to 9 items comprising 3 domains identified on exploratory factor analysis: financial stress, financial strain, and lost productivity. The FIT was administered to 430 patients with HNC at 12 to 24 months after treatment. Internal consistency was good (α = .77). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory (intraclass correlation, 0.70). Concurrent validation demonstrated mild to strong correlations between the FIT and Social Difficulties Inventory Money Matters subscale (Spearman rho, 0.26-0.61; P < .05). FIT scores were found to be inversely correlated with baseline household income (Spearman rho, -0.34; P < .001) and positively correlated with lost income (Spearman rho, 0.24; P < .001). Change in income was negatively correlated with change in FIT over time (Spearman rho, -0.25; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The 9-item FIT demonstrated internal and test-retest reliability as well as concurrent and construct validity. Prospective testing in patients with HNC who were treated at other facilities is needed to further establish its responsiveness and generalizability.

Feeding and swallowing impairment in children with stroke and unilateral cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

AIM: This systematic review targeted frequency estimates of dysphagia (feeding and swallowing problems), related health outcomes, and caregiver burden in children with stroke or unilateral cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: Six electronic databases were searched from their inception to November 2017 along with a manual search of eight relevant journals. Two blinded raters assessed abstracts and full articles for eligibility. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Accepted articles were evaluated for quality. Data were extracted and analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Of 1660 abstracts, five met inclusion criteria, of which three focused on stroke and two unilateral CP. Across studies, operational definitions of feeding and swallowing varied. Insufficient details were provided on assessment methods and timing. Reported frequencies of dysphagia ranged from 24.2% to 88.6%. One study reported dysphagia-related health outcomes and none reported caregiver burden. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that dysphagia is common in children with stroke and unilateral CP; however, its frequency is yet unknown as is its impact on health and caregiver burden. Availability of a standardized tool to identify dysphagia in these children accurately is a recommended first step to address this evidence gap. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: There is limited data on the incidence of dysphagia after childhood stroke and unilateral cerebral palsy. Available evidence shows reported dysphagia frequencies from 24.2% to 88.6%. Only one study reported on dysphagia-related health outcomes. No study reported on caregiver burden.

What Are We Really Measuring? A Content Comparison of Swallowing Outcome Measures for Head and Neck Cancer Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

A combination of outcome measures are required to provide important information on the physiological profile and associated impact of dysphagia in head and neck cancer (HNC). Choosing the most appropriate tool can be a difficult and time-consuming process. The aim of this study was to identify and then compare the content of tools commonly used to assess swallowing post HNC care using the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. A literature audit of 11 databases was conducted for relevant articles published between January 2004 and June 2017 and total of 502 papers met the inclusionary criteria. These papers were audited and 27 tools were identified which met the study criteria. The meaningful concepts contained in each tool were mapped to the ICF. Within the 27 tools, 898 meaningful concepts were identified and matched to 60 ICF categories. The most frequently matched ICF categories related to body functions, while comparatively few concepts matched to activity and participation and environmental factors. This study has identified that a large number of tools are currently being used in HNC research to measure swallowing outcomes. The sheer number of tools available to explore dysphagia post HNC highlights the lack of a uniform approach to outcome measurement which limits the potential to compare and combine research studies in order to strengthen treatment evidence. There is a need to develop an international consensus for a core outcome set of swallowing related measures, that capture the holistic impact of dysphagia, for HNC.

Dysphagia and Associated Pneumonia in Stroke Patients from Brazil: A Systematic Review.

Dysphagia and its associated complications are expected to be relatively more frequent in stroke patients in Brazil than in similar patients treated in developed countries due to the suboptimal stroke care in many Brazilians medical services. However, there is no estimate of dysphagia and pneumonia incidence for the overall stroke population in Brazil. We conducted a systematic review of the recent literature to address this knowledge gap, first screening citations for relevance and then rating full articles of accepted citations. At both levels, judgements were made by two independent raters according to a priori criteria. Fourteen accepted articles underwent critical appraisal and data extraction. The frequency of dysphagia in stroke patients was high (59% to 76%). Few studies assessed pneumonia and only one study stratified patients by both dysphagia and pneumonia, with an increased Relative Risk for pneumonia in patients with stroke and dysphagia of 8.4 (95% CI 2.1, 34.4). Across all articles, we identified bias related to: heterogeneity in number and type of stroke; no rater blinding; and, assessments that were not reproducible, reliable or validated. Despite the high frequency of dysphagia and associated pneumonia in stroke patients in Brazil, the quality of the available literature is low and that there is little research focused on these epidemiologic data. Future rigorously designed studies are in dire need to accurately determine dysphagia incidence and its impact on stroke patients in Brazil. These data will be critical to properly allocate limited national resources that maximize the quality of stroke care.

Baseline executive control ability and its relationship to language therapy improvements in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To review current evidence on the relationship between executive control (EC) and post-treatment language gains in adults with post-stroke aphasia. METHOD: Electronic databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE-in-Process and PsycINFO) were systematically searched (year 2000 - present). Abstracts and full-text articles were reviewed by two independent raters against pre-specified criteria: original research with N > 2; at least 90% adults with stroke, all undergoing treatment for acquired aphasia; pre-treatment EC abilities were compared to language gains post-treatment across studies. Critical appraisal was conducted using the Cochrane group and Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) methods. Data were extracted and summarised descriptively. RESULTS: Search results yielded 2272 unique citations; ultimately 15 studies were accepted for review. Both pre-treatment EC and language abilities appear to be important indicators of treatment success, especially in moderate-severe aphasia. This relationship emerged when EC was measured using specific (e.g., divided attention), as opposed to broad (e.g., reasoning) tasks, and primarily when naming therapy was administered; intensive constraint-induced therapy did not correlate with treatment success. CONCLUSIONS: EC is a promising prognostic variable regarding language recovery, but further research is required using a-priori declared theoretical EC models, along with properly powered samples, standardised EC tasks and treatment protocols.

Timing of Direct Enteral Tube Placement and Outcomes after Acute Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Direct enteral feeding tube (DET) placement for dysphagia after stroke is associated with poor outcomes. However, the relationship between timing of DET placement and poststroke mortality and disability is unknown. We sought to determine the risk of mortality and severe disability in patients who receive DET at different times after stroke. METHODS: We used the Ontario Stroke Registry and linked administrative databases to identify patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage between 2003 and 2013 who received DET (gastrostomy or jejunostomy) during their hospital admission. We grouped patients by week of DET placement and evaluated mortality at 30 days and 6 months after DET insertion, and disability at discharge. We used Cox proportional hazard models and multiple logistic regression to determine the association between time from admission to DET placement and outcomes, adjusting for patient and hospital factors. RESULTS: In the study sample of 1367 patients, the median time from admission to DET placement was 17 days. After adjustment, each week of delay to DET placement was associated with lower mortality at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] .88, 95% confidence interval [CI] .79-.98), but not at 6 months (aHR .98, 95% CI .91- 1.05), and a higher likelihood of severe disability at discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.13- 1.60). CONCLUSIONS: Later DET placement after stroke was associated with lower 30-day mortality but higher severe disability at discharge. Further research is needed to understand the reasons for these observations and to optimize patient selection and timing of DET.

Predictors of Direct Enteral Tube Placement After Acute Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of direct enteral tube (DET) placement after acute stroke. METHODS: We used the Ontario Stroke Registry to identify patients who received direct enteral tubes (gastrostomy or jejunostomy) during hospital stay after acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage from July 1, 2003 to March 31, 2013. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of receiving DET after stroke. RESULTS: Among 38,192 patients with acute stroke who met inclusion criteria, 1851 (4.9%) had DET placement during admission. We identified multiple variables significantly associated with DET placement, spanning patient demographics, comorbid illnesses, clinical, and hospital factors. The strongest predictors of receiving DET were stroke severity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.77 for severe versus mild stroke, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.20-5.41), receiving a swallowing test within 72 hours (aOR 3.46, 95% CI 3.0-3.99), and in-hospital stroke (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.57-2.72). CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of predictors of DET placement within multiple domains. These findings may facilitate discussions around the possibility of requiring DET during admission. Further work is required to improve patient selection and timing of DET placement after acute stroke.

Screening for Dysphagia in Adult Patients with Stroke: Assessing the Accuracy of Informal Detection.

Early identification of dysphagia by screening is recommended best practice for patients admitted to hospital with acute stroke. Screening can reduce the risk of pneumonia and promote stroke recovery, yet some institutions do not utilize a formal screening protocol. This study assessed the accuracy of informal dysphagia detection prior to implementation of a formal screening protocol. We conducted a secondary analysis of data captured between 2003 and 2008 from a sample of 250 adult stroke survivors admitted to a tertiary care centre. Using a priori criteria, patient medical records were reviewed for notation about dysphagia; if present, the date/time of notation, writer's profession, and suggestion of dysphagia presence. To assess accuracy of notations indicating dysphagia presence, we used speech language pathology (SLP) assessments as the criterion reference. There were 221 patient medical records available for review. Patients were male (56%), averaged 68 years (SD = 15.0), with a mean Canadian Neurological Scale score of 8.1 (SD = 3.0). First notations of swallowing by SLP were excluded. Of the remaining 170 patients, 147 (87%) had first notations (104 by nurses; 40 by physicians) within a median of 24.3 h from admission. Accuracy of detecting dysphagia from informal notations was low, with a sensitivity of 36.7% [95% CI, 24.9, 50.1], but specificity was high (94.2% [95% CI, 86.5, 97.9]). Informal identification methods, although timely, are suboptimal in their accuracy to detect dysphagia and leave patients with stroke at risk for poor health outcomes. Given these findings, we encourage the use of psychometrically validated formal screening protocols to identify dysphagia.

Lingual and Jaw Kinematic Abnormalities Precede Speech and Swallowing Impairments in ALS.

Early identification of bulbar involvement in persons with ALS is critical for improving diagnosis and prognosis; however, efficacious diagnostic markers have not yet been identified. The purpose of this study was to determine whether kinematic changes of the tongue and jaw during swallowing, measured using 3D electromagnetic articulography (EMA), predate clinically identifiable symptoms of speech and swallowing impairment in persons diagnosed with ALS. Data were collected from 16 adults diagnosed with ALS and 18 neurotypical controls. Groups were aged matched. Eligible participants with ALS were tolerating an unrestricted diet (FOIS = 7), produced intelligible speech (> 97%), and had a speaking rate greater than 150 words per minute. Participants completed a 3-mL water swallow task, during which EMA recorded kinematic measures of the anterior and posterior regions of tongue including lingual speed, range of motion, duration, coordination, and efficiency. Jaw speed and range of motion were also recorded. Persons diagnosed with ALS demonstrated reduced posterior lingual range of motion (11.40 mm ± 4.01 vs. 16.07 mm ± 5.27), slower posterior lingual speeds (83.67 mm/s ± 47.96 vs. 141.35 mm/s ± 66.54), increased lingual movement duration (13.46 s ± 6.75 vs. 9.21 s ± 3.28), and reduced lingual coordination (0.04 s ± 0.11 vs. 17 s ± 0.19) during the 3-oz water swallow task compared to controls. Persons diagnosed with ALS demonstrated increased range of motion (9.86 mm ± 5.38 vs. 6 mm ± 3.78) and increased jaw speed (68.62 mm/s ± 50.13 vs. 34.72 mm/s ± 17.75) during swallowing compared to controls. The current findings suggest that changes in lingual and jaw motor performance during a simple water swallow task are present in persons with ALS who are pre-symptomatic of clinically detectable bulbar impairment.