Molecular Analysis of Rabies Virus Using RNA Extracted from Used Lateral Flow Devices.

Molecular analysis of rabies virus can provide accurate diagnosis and information on its genetic diversity. The transportation of rabies brain samples from remote areas to a central laboratory is challenging owing to biohazard risks and decomposability. We investigated the utility of used lateral flow devices (LFDs) for subsequent molecular analysis and assessed the necessary storage temperatures. Using RNA extracted from used LFD strips, we performed conventional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using an LN34 primer set to amplify short fragments (165 bp) for rabies virus detection and the P1-304 primer set to amplify long fragments of the entire N gene amplicon (1,506 bp) for phylogenetic analysis. Among 71 used LFDs stored in a refrigerator and 64 used LFDs stored at room temperature, the LN34 assay showed high sensitivities (96.2% and 100%, respectively) for the diagnosis of rabies, regardless of the storage temperature. A significant reduction in the sensitivity of rabies diagnosis was observed when using the P1-304 primer set for used LFDs stored at room temperature compared to those stored at refrigeration temperature (20.9% versus 100%; P < 0.05). Subsequent sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were successfully performed using the amplicons generated by the P1-304 RT-PCR assays. Used LFDs are thus promising resources for rabies virus RNA detection and sequence analysis. Virus detection via RT-PCR, amplifying a short fragment, was possible regardless of the storage temperature of the used LFDs. However, refrigerated storage is recommended for RT-PCR amplification of long fragments for phylogenetic analysis.

Evaluation of lateral flow devices for postmortem rabies diagnosis in animals in the Philippines: a multicenter study.

Expansion of the use of lateral flow devices (LFD) for animal rabies diagnosis can help mitigate the widespread underreporting of rabies. However, this has been hindered by the limited number and small sample size of previous studies. To overcome this limitation, we conducted a multicenter study with a larger sample size to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the ADTEC LFD for postmortem rabies diagnosis in animals. Thirteen governmental animal diagnostic laboratories in the Philippines were involved in this study, and 791 animals suspected of having rabies were tested using both the direct fluorescence antibody test (DFAT) and ADTEC LFD between August 2021 and October 2022. The LFD demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 94.1%-97.9%] and a specificity of 99.7% (95% CI: 98.4%-100%). Notably, false-negative results were more likely to occur in laboratories with lower annual processing volumes of rabies samples in the previous years (adjusted odds ratio 4.97, 95% CI: 1.49-16.53). In this multicenter study, the high sensitivity and specificity of the LFD for the diagnosis of animal rabies, compared to that of the DFAT, was demonstrated, yet concerns regarding false-negative results remain. In areas with limited experience in processing rabies samples, it is essential to provide comprehensive training and careful attention during implementation.

Puppies as the primary causal animal for human rabies cases: three-year prospective study of human rabies in the Philippines.

Introduction: While rabies remains a global concern, detailed studies on human rabies, particularly regarding causal animals and the reasons for not receiving postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), are lacking. Methods: We conducted a 3-year prospective study (October 2019-September 2022) at the Philippines' largest rabies referral center. We interviewed patients with suspected rabies and their families. We used LN34 qRT-PCR and rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test on saliva samples. We also compared our findings with two retrospective studies at the same hospital. Results: We enrolled 151 patients, including 131 with potential rabies exposure. Similar to retrospective studies, the participants were predominantly males (75.5%), adults (76.8%), low-income individuals (91.4%), and rural dwellers (62.3%). The causal animals were mainly dogs (97.0%), with similar incubation periods, clinical symptoms, and a high proportion not receiving vaccines or immunoglobulins (93.2%). Most causal animals were owned by either the patients' households or their neighbors (60.2%), with a significant proportion being puppies (58.8%). Most patients had knowledge of rabies; however, reasons for not seeking PEP included misconceptions about minor bites not causing rabies (51.3%), beliefs in traditional healers (33.9%), and economic constraints (22.6%). Despite completing the WHO regimen, two PEP failures were observed. LN34 qRT-PCR detected 98 positive cases (sensitivity, 64.9%; 95% CI 56.7-72.5). These strains belong to the Southeast Asia 4 subclade. Discussion: In conclusion, this study highlights the role of puppies as primary causal animals and the presence of misconceptions that preclude patients from acquiring PEP.