PITX2 as a Sensitive and Specific Marker of Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results from a Cohort of 1157 Primary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

As neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) often present as metastatic lesions, immunohistochemical assignment to a site of origin is one of the most important tasks in their pathologic assessment. Because a fraction of NETs eludes the typical expression profiles of their primary localization, additional sensitive and specific markers are required to improve diagnostic certainty. We investigated the expression of the transcription factor Pituitary Homeobox 2 (PITX2) in a large-scale cohort of 909 NET and 248 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) according to the immunoreactive score (IRS) and correlated PITX2 expression groups with general tumor groups and primary localization. PITX2 expression (all expression groups) was highly sensitive (98.1%) for midgut-derived NET, but not perfectly specific, as non-midgut NET (especially pulmonary/duodenal) were quite frequently weak or moderately positive. The specificity rose to 99.5% for a midgut origin of NET if only a strong PITX2 expression was considered, which was found in only 0.5% (one pancreatic/one pulmonary) of non-midgut NET. In metastases of midgut-derived NET, PITX2 was expressed in all cases (87.5% strong, 12.5% moderate), whereas CDX2 was negative or only weakly expressed in 31.3% of the metastases. In NEC, a fraction of cases (14%) showed a weak or moderate PITX2 expression, which was not associated with a specific tumor localization. Our study independently validates PITX2 as a very sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker of midgut-derived NET in a very large collective of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Therefore, our data argue toward implementation into diagnostic panels applied for NET as a firstline midgut marker.

[Local resection of small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NEN) : Current principles]. / Lokale Resektion von neuroendokrinen Tumoren des Dünndarms (SI-NEN) : Aktuelle Prinzipien.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowel (small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms, SI-NEN) are the most frequent tumors of the small intestine and approximately 30-40% are still surgically treatable with curative intent at the time of diagnosis. Certain surgical principles must be followed for optimal oncological outcomes and good postoperative quality of life. METHODS: Based on international guidelines and own experiences, the locoregional surgical treatment of SI-NENs is presented. RESULTS: Locoregional SI-NENs should always be resected if technically feasible, as only this approach can achieve a long-term cure and even small primary tumors (< 10 mm) often already show lymphatic metastasis. The resectability of SI-NENs and their difficulty depend on the extent of lymphatic metastasis, which should be assessed based on preoperative imaging of the extent around the superior mesenteric artery. Currently, the surgical gold standard for SI-NENs is open surgery with bidigital palpation of the entire small intestine followed by primary tumor resection via small bowel segment resection, right hemicolectomy or ileocecal resection and vessel-sparing, and therefore organ-preserving lymphadenectomy (≥ 8 lymph nodes). The guidelines consider that laparoscopic or robotic approaches are justified only for early stages of SI-NENs. CONCLUSION: Guideline-compliant surgical treatment of locoregional SI-NEN enables recurrence-free long-term survival with good quality of life.

Surgical aspects related to hereditary pancreatic cancer.

The goal of surveillance programs for individuals at risk (IAR) from familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families or families with other inherited tumor syndromes predisposing to the development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), such as hereditary pancreatitis or Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, is the dectection and consecutive curative resection of early PDAC or even better its high-grade precursor lesions. Although the indication for surgery is quite established, the extent of surgery is not well defined due to the lack of evidence-based data. In addition, multiple factors have to be taken into account to determine an optimal personalized surgical strategy. This holds especially true since pancreatic surgery is associated with a relatively high morbidity and might impair the quality of life significantly. In this article the surgical aspects in the setting of hereditary PDAC are discussed.

Acinar content at pancreatic resection margin is significantly associated with clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of acinar content at the pancreatic resection margin after partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: A total of 228 consecutive patients undergoing PD were included for analysis. Resection margins were assessed for acinar, fibrosis, and fat contents by 2 pathologists blinded to the patients' clinical data. Univariate and multivariable analyses of possible predictors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (cr-POPF) were performed. RESULTS: The median acinar, fibrosis, and fat contents were 70% (IQR, 25%-82%), 13% (IQR, 5%-40%), and 15% (IQR, 9.25%-25%), respectively. The rates of cr-POPF were significantly higher in patients with an acinar content of >70% than in patients with an acinar content of ≤70% (26.4% vs 5.5%, respectively; P < .001). In addition, the rates of postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) were significantly higher in patients with an acinar content of ≥70% than in patients with an acinar content of ≤70% (55.2% vs 13.8%, respectively; P < .001). The median fat content did not differ between patients with and without cr-POPF (13.0% [IQR, 7.5%-20.0%] vs 15.0% [IQR, 10.0%-30.0%], respectively; P = .06). An acinar content of >70% at the pancreatic resection margin (odds ratio [OR], 4.85; 95% CI, 1.61-14.58; P = .005) and a soft pancreatic texture (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.02-7.76; P = .046) were independent predictive factors of cr-POPF in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: An acinar content of ≥70% at the pancreatic resection margin was a significant predictive factor for cr-POPF after PD and was also significantly associated with POH, a precursor of cr-POPF after PD in many cases. Fatty infiltration of the pancreatic resection margin was not associated with cr-POPF.

Pancreatic cancer screening is effective in individuals at risk with predisposing germline gene variants, but not in gene variant-negative familial pancreatic cancer families.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of pancreatic cancer screening in individuals at risk (IAR) from familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families with respect to the presence or absence of pathogenic germline variants predisposing to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). DESIGN: In a 20 years period, IAR from FPC families were enrolled in a prospective screening program of the national case collection for FPC of Germany, including magnet resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The diagnostic yield was analyzed regarding significant pancreatic lesions such as PDAC, high-grade pancreatic-intraepithelial-neoplasia (PanIN3) and intraductal-papillary-mucinous-neoplasia (IPMN) with high-grade dysplasia. Screening results were compared between carriers of pathogenic variants and variant-negative IAR. RESULTS: 337 IAR, including 74 (22%) variant-carriers and 263 IAR of variant-negative FPC families (mean age 49; standard deviation [SD] + 8.9) were followed 64 (SD + 55) months. IAR underwent 5.1 (SD + 3.9) screening visits with 1733 MRI (5.1,SD + 3.9 per IAR) and 728 EUS (2.2,SD + 1.7 per IAR). In 12 (4%) cases, significant pancreatic lesions were detected, including 4 PDAC, 3 PanIN3 and 5 high-grade IPMN. Three of 4 IAR with PDAC died after a mean of 27 months postoperatively, and one IAR is alive without evidence of disease after 31 months. The diagnostic yield for significant lesions was 13.5% (10/74) for variant carriers compared to 0.8% (2/263) for IAR of variant-negative FPC families (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a negative variant status was almost always accompanied by the absence of a significant lesion over time with a negative predictive value of 99.2% (95% CI 97.3%-99.9%). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic yield seems to justify PDAC screening in IAR of FPC-families with pathogenic germline variants in PDAC predisposing genes, not in IAR of variant-negative families.