Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of dexibuprofen and celecoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip.

CONTEXT: Osteoarthritis (OA) is often treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). OBJECTIVE: This clinical trial aimed to assess directly the relative therapeutic efficacy of the isolated active enantiomer of ibuprofen, named dexibuprofen (S(+)-ibuprofen) in a special crystal form, and the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in adults with OA of the hip. Moreover, the hypothesis that the tolerability/safety profile of dexibuprofen is comparable to celecoxib is to be tested. METHODS: The investigation was a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, active controlled clinical trial, conducted from January 2001 to February 2002 in 4 rehabilitation centers in Austria. 148 inpatients were randomly assigned to dexibuprofen 800 mg or celecoxib 200 mg daily. The primary criterion was the improvement in the Western Ontario and' McMasters osteoarthritis index (WOMAC OA index) after 15 days of therapy. RESULTS: Evaluation of the WOMAC OA index proved that dexibuprofen 400 mg b.i.d. is not inferior to celecoxib 100 mg b.i.d. with the Mann-Whitney estimator equal to 0.5129 and the corresponding lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval equal to 0.4409. The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was 12.16% in the dexibuprofen group and 13.51% in the celecoxib group. 8.1% of patients on dexibuprofen and 9.5% on celecoxib suffered from gastrointestinal disorders. CONCLUSION: In the presented clinical trial dexibuprofen has at least equal efficacy and a comparable safety/tolerability profile as celecoxib in adult patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the hip.

Evaluation of the efficacy and dose-response relationship of dexibuprofen (S(+)-ibuprofen) in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and comparison with racemic ibuprofen using the WOMAC osteoarthritis index.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is the most common pharmacological therapy of rheumatic diseases. For the symptomatic treatment of painful disorders a dose-response relationship of the NSAID should be a basic requirement, which is difficult to be proven in studies because rheumatic diseases are heterogenous in terms of clinical involvement. The aim of this double-blind randomized trial was to compare the isolated active enantiomer dexibuprofen (S(+)-ibuprofen) with the double dose of racemic ibuprofen and to show a dose-response relationship of dexibuprofen in painful osteoarthritis of the hip. METHODS: 178 patients were randomly assigned to dexibuprofen 600/1,200 mg or racemic ibuprofen 2,400 mg daily. The primary endpoint was the improvement of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index after 15 days of therapy. The analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: The evaluation of the WOMAC OA index showed statistically significant equivalence of dexibuprofen 400 mg t.i.d. compared with racemic ibuprofen 800 mg t.i.d. by a Mann-Whitney statistic of 0.578 and the corresponding lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of 0.498. The test for superiority of dexibuprofen was borderline significant with p = 0.055. Dexibuprofen 400 mg t.i.d. and dexibuprofen 200 mg t.i.d. showed a statistically significant dose-response relationship in improving the WOMAC OA index (p = 0.023). Patients suffered from adverse drug reactions, mainly gastrointestinal disorders, 13.34% on dexibuprofen 200 mg, 15.25% on dexibuprofen 400 mg and 16.94% on racemic ibuprofen 800 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The active enantiomer dexibuprofen (S(+)-ibuprofen) proved to be an effective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with a significant dose-response relationship in patients with painful osteoarthritis of the hip. Compared with racemic ibuprofen half of the daily dose of dexibuprofen shows at least equivalent efficacy. In contrast to pharmacokinetic data, the additional administration of R(-)-ibuprofen in form of racemate does not contribute to the clinical efficacy of racemic ibuprofen.

Efficacy and long-term safety of dexibuprofen [S(+)-ibuprofen]: a short-term efficacy study in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and a 1-year tolerability study in patients with rheumatic disorders.

The efficacy study was performed to prove the equivalent efficacy of dexibuprofen compared to the double dose of racemic ibuprofen and to show a clinical dose-response relationship of dexibuprofen. The 1-year tolerability study was carried out to investigate the tolerability of dexibuprofen. In the efficacy study 178 inpatients with osteoarthritis of the hip were assigned to 600 or 1200 mg of dexibuprofen or 2400 mg of racemic ibuprofen daily. The primary end-point was the improvement of the WOMAC OA index. A 1-year open tolerability study included 223 outpatients pooled from six studies. The main parameter was the incidence of clinical adverse events. In the efficacy study the evaluation of the improvement of the WOMAC OA index showed equivalence of dexibuprofen 400 mg t.i.d. compared to racemic ibuprofen 800 mg t.i.d., with dexibuprofen being borderline superior (P = 0.055). The comparison between the 400 mg t.i.d. and 200 mg t.i.d. doses confirmed a significant superior efficacy of dexibuprofen 400 mg (P = 0.023). In the tolerability study the overall incidence of clinical adverse events was 15.2% (GI tract 11.7%, CNS 1.3%, skin 1.3%, others 0.9%). The active enantiomer dexibuprofen proved to be an effective NSAID with a significant dose-response relationship. Compared to the double dose of racemic ibuprofen, dexibuprofen was at least equally efficient, with borderline superiority over dexibuprofen (P = 0.055). The tolerability study in 223 patients on dexibuprofen showed an incidence of clinical adverse events of 15.2% after 12 months. The results of the studies suggest that dexibuprofen is an effective NSAID with good tolerability.

The use of questionnaires in the evaluation of the functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis.

The functional capacity of 46 patients with rheumatoid arthritis was assessed by means of two systems of investigation. Three different questionnaires were used. One set of each was filled out by the patient himself; the other with the help of the occupational therapist. The results obtained were tested for their reliability. In addition they were also compared to the Ritchie-Index (method of simple measurement of disease activity) of thirty patients. The disability of each patient could be assessed with sufficient precision. A correlation to the Ritchie-Index was also registered.

Concentrations of lonazolac in serum and synovial fluid of patients with inflammatory or degenerate joint disease.

In 15 patients with inflammatory and degenerative joint disease the concentrations of lonazolac were measured in serum and synovial fluid at steady state conditions. The mean concentration in the synovial fluid in 14 patients was 0.275 microgram/ml, which was 48% of that in the serum. For the patients with inflammatory joint disease, the synovial fluid concentration of lonazolac was 61% of that in the serum whereas in degenerative joint disease it reached only 39%.

The efficacy and safety of fentiazac and diclofenac sodium in peri-arthritis of the shoulder: a multi-centre, double-blind comparison.

In a double-blind parallel group comparison of efficacy and safety, 19 patients with peri-arthritis of the shoulder received 200 mg fentiazac twice daily and 19 received 50 mg diclofenac sodium twice daily, with both drugs given orally for 3 weeks. In both groups, observers' verbal rating scales of pain severity at rest and on movement showed decreases that were significant by week 1. Both groups also had significant improvement in abduction, external rotation, retroversion and anteversion. At week 1, the patients reported improvement, on a verbal rating scale, of global effectiveness, but there were no subsequent changes. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatments in any of these variables. Five (26%) fentiazac-treated patients and four (21%) diclofenac sodium-treated patients reported adverse effects, mostly gastro-intestinal. One case of rash in each group and one case of pruritus in a diclofenac sodium-treated patient were severe enough for the patients to be withdrawn from therapy. There were no clinically significant changes in laboratory values. It was concluded that fentiazac (400 mg/day) and diclofenac sodium (100 mg/day) were equally effective within 1 week in decreasing pain severity and improving shoulder mobility.

A Smoothened receptor agonist is neuroprotective and promotes regeneration after ischemic brain injury.

Ischemic stroke occurs as a result of blood supply interruption to the brain causing tissue degeneration, patient disabilities or death. Currently, treatment of ischemic stroke is limited to thrombolytic therapy with a narrow time window of administration. The sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway has a fundamental role in the central nervous system development, but its impact on neural cell survival and tissue regeneration/repair after ischemic stroke has not been well investigated. Here we report the neuroprotective properties of a small-molecule agonist of the Shh co-receptor Smoothened, purmorphamine (PUR), in the middle cerebral artery occlusion model of ischemic stroke. We found that intravenous administration of PUR at 6 h after injury was neuroprotective and restored neurological deficit after stroke. PUR promoted a transient upregulation of tissue-type plasminogen activator in injured neurons, which was associated with a reduction of apoptotic cell death in the ischemic cortex. We also observed a decrease in blood-brain barrier permeability after PUR treatment. At 14 d postinjury, attenuation of inflammation and reactive astrogliosis was found in PUR-treated animals. PUR increased the number of newly generated neurons in the peri-infarct and infarct area and promoted neovascularization in the ischemic zone. Notably, PUR treatment did not significantly alter the ischemia-induced level of Gli1, a Shh target gene of tumorigenic potential. Thus our study reports a novel pharmacological approach for postischemic treatment using a small-molecule Shh agonist, providing new insights into hedgehog signaling-mediated mechanisms of neuroprotection and regeneration after stroke.

[Local and systemic parameters in the synovial milieu]. / Lokale und systemische Parameter im synovialen Milieu.

Our own results as well as recent data from the literature confirm the already long known fact, that synovial fluid analysis allows only in very few diseases as for example a crystal synovitis a definite diagnosis in the individual case. In the majority of the patients this technique permits only to differentiate between inflammatory and non-inflammatory joint disease as well as an estimation of the local inflammatory activity of joint. The simultaneous histologic examination of synovial membrane according to our experience seems to bring no major additional information which exceeds the information given by each technique alone.

HLA antigens and toxicity to gold and penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis.

One hundred sixty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with chloroquine (n = 87), gold salts (n = 133) and/or penicillamine (n = 77) were investigated for possible associations between HLA antigens and toxic reactions. Patients with 2 or more side effects to gold and/or penicillamine had a significantly increased frequency of antigens HLA-B8 and DR3 compared to patients with one or without adverse reactions. Proteinuria to gold or penicillamine was significantly associated with HLA-B8 (relative risk [RR] 4.2) and DR3 (RR 14.0) whereas nonnephrologic side effects to gold or penicillamine were associated with B7 and DR2 (RR 3.5 and 2.8). Patients with skin reactions to gold had a significantly greater frequency of HLA-B7. We found no correlation between chloroquine side effects and any HLA antigen. The results suggest a genetic predisposition to toxic reactions to gold or penicillamine based on an immunologic dysregulation.

[Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Efficacy and tolerance to acemetacin slow release in comparison to celecoxib]. / Behandlung der Gonarthrose. Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von retardiertem Acemetacin im Vergleich zu Celecoxib.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial was to compare acemetacin (ACE) with celecoxib (CEL) in terms of tolerability and efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint. METHODS: A total of 105 patients (26-64 years old) suffering from primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee were enrolled in this international, multicenter, randomized, double blind controlled trial. Fifty three patients were given ACE and 52 CEL. They were treated with either 90 mg bid of slow release ACE or 200 mg bid of CEL for 6 weeks. Additional gastroprotective therapy was not provided. Tolerability was assessed by physical examination, laboratory tests, vital signs and reports of side effects, as well as by patient and physician global assessments. Efficacy parameters comprised pain assessment by visual analogue scale (VAS) and ordinal scale, WOMAC, SF-36 and patient and physician global impressions of efficacy. In addition, acetaminophen consumption was recorded. RESULTS: In 21 ACE (39.6%) and 19 CEL patients (36.5%), the number of side effects totaled 56 (ACE n=29; CEL n=27) (ns). Mean pain reduction at week 6 was highly significant ( P<0.0001) in both groups and amounted to 38.7 mm (+/-20.3) in the ACE group and to 35.1 mm (+/-18.7) in the CEL group (ns). Very similar results were seen with respect to the other efficacy parameters. CONCLUSION: ACE is not inferior to CEL for the short-term treatment of knee OA in terms of tolerability and efficacy.