Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(1): 58-64, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30109585

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite years of intense focus, inpatient and observation readmission rates remain high and largely unchanged. Hospitals have little, robust evidence to guide the selection of interventions effective at reducing 30-day readmissions in real-world settings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if implementation of recent recommendations for hospital transition programs is effective at reducing 30-day readmissions in a population discharged to home and at high-risk for readmission. DESIGN: A non-blinded, pragmatic randomized controlled trial ( Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT02763202) conducted at two hospitals in Charlotte, North Carolina. PATIENTS: A total of 1876 adult patients, under the care of a hospitalist, and at high risk for readmissions. INTERVENTION: Random allocation to a Transition Services (TS) program (n = 935) that bridges inpatient, outpatient, and home settings, providing patients virtual and in-person access to a dedicated multidisciplinary team for 30-days, or usual care (n = 941). MAIN MEASURE: Thirty-day, unplanned, inpatient, or observation readmission rate. KEY RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate was 15.2% in the TS group and 16.3% in the usual care group (RR 0.93; 95% [CI, 0.76 to 1.15]; P = 0.52). There were no significant differences in readmissions at 60 and 90 days or in 30-day Emergency Department visit rates. Patients, who were referred to TS and readmitted, had less Intensive Care Unit admissions 15.5% vs. 26.8% (RR 0.74; 95% [CI, 0.59 to 0.93]; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: An intervention inclusive of contemporary recommendations does not reduce a high-risk population's 30-day readmission rate. The high crossover to usual care (74.8%) reflects the challenge of non-participation that is ubiquitous in the real-world implementation of population health interventions. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov ; registration ID number: NCT02763202, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02763202.


Asunto(s)
Guías como Asunto , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Cuidado de Transición/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidado de Transición/tendencias
2.
Trials ; 17(1): 603, 2016 12 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions remain highly prevalent despite being the target of policies and financial penalties. Evidence comparing the effectiveness and costs of interventions to reduce readmissions is lacking, leaving healthcare systems with little guidance on how to improve quality and avoid costly penalties. Effective interventions likely need to bridge inpatient and outpatient settings, incorporate information technology, and use dedicated providers. Such complex innovations will require rigorous evaluation. The framework of quality improvement research provides an approach that both improves care locally and contributes to closing the current knowledge gaps for readmissions. In this trial, we will study a comprehensive intervention that incorporates these recommendations into an integrated practice unit, called transition services, with an aim of reducing 30-day readmission rates. METHODS/DESIGN: We describe a nonblinded, pragmatic, controlled trial with two parallel groups comprising an evaluation of the effect of referral to a provider-led integrated practice unit, inclusive of comprehensive multidisciplinary care, dedicated paramedicine providers, and virtual visits, on 30-day readmission rates for high-risk hospitalized patients. An automated risk-scoring system will randomly generate referrals to either transition services or usual care for 1520 hospitalized patients who score as high-risk for readmission. Transition services will then engage with patients in the hospital setting using a patient navigator and provide bridging outpatient services for the 30 days following discharge. All outcome data are retrieved electronically from administrative medical records. After reapplication of inclusion and exclusion criteria at the time of hospital discharge, analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle such that patients will be analyzed on the basis of the referral group to which they were initially randomized. DISCUSSION: The hospital transition program under study is complex and integrates the latest recommendations for readmission reduction strategies. As healthcare systems innovate to address readmissions through such complex interventions, there is significant benefit for stakeholders to have a clear understanding of the potential reach, cost, and real-world effectiveness. The pragmatic methods described here provide a template for conducting quality improvement research that fits seamlessly into existing care delivery and improvement efforts, leading to better-informed strategic decisions and the investments necessary to transform care and value for patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02763202 . Registered 3 March 2016 (retrospectively registered).


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Readmisión del Paciente , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Humanos , North Carolina , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/normas , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA