Focused Neck Ultrasound and Lymph Node Sampling by Respiratory Physicians in Suspected Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy in the setting of lung cancer represents N3 disease, and neck ultrasound (NUS) with sampling is described in the Royal College of Radiologists ultrasound training curriculum for the non-radiologists. This study reviews the incorporation of NUS +/- biopsy in the routine practice of a lung cancer fast-track clinic in the UK. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 29 months of activity of a lung cancer fast-track clinic. Systematic focused NUS was conducted in suspected thoracic malignancy, sampling nodes with a ≥5-mm short axis, under real-time US using a linear probe (5-12 Mhz). Fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) with or without 18 Ga core biopsies were taken. RESULTS: Between August 2017 and December 2019, of 152 peripheral lymph nodes (LNs)/deposits sampled, 98 (64.5%) were supraclavicular fossa LNs with median [IQR] size 12 [8-18] mm. Core biopsies were performed in 54/98 (55%) patients, while all patients had FNAs. No complications occurred. The representative yield was 90/95 (94.7%) in cases with suspected cancer. No difference was seen between FNA versus core biopsy (p = 0.44). Of the 5 non-diagnostic samples, one was FNA only. The commonest diagnosis was lung cancer in 66/98 (67.3%). PDL-1 was sufficient in 35/36 tested (97.2%). ALK-FISH was successful in 24/25 (96%) cases. EGFR mutation analysis was successful in 28/31 (90.3%) cases. Median time from clinic to initial diagnosis was 7 [5-10] days. Computed tomography (CT) scans reported no significant lymphadenopathy in 18/96 (18.7%) cases, yet 10/18 (55.5%) cases were positive for malignancy. CONCLUSION: Neck nodal sampling by respiratory physicians was safe, timely, with a high diagnostic yield and suitability for molecular testing. Neck US can provide a timely diagnosis in cases that may be missed by CT alone.

To drain or not to drain? Abscess or empyema?

We present a case posing the clinical dilemma of differentiating a large peripheral lung abscess from an empyema, discussing the imaging and management and the clinical issues posed.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Centrally Located Intrapulmonary Tumors Provides Suitable Material for Diagnostic and Molecular Testing.

BACKGROUND: Curvilinear endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a key diagnostic and staging procedure for patients with suspected lung cancer. However, sampling centrally located intrapulmonary tumors is feasible but less well established. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic utility of EBUS-TBNA in patients who underwent sampling of centrally located intrapulmonary tumors. Diagnostic accuracy, sample suitability for molecular testing, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and April 2021, 102 EBUS-TBNA procedures sampled centrally located intrapulmonary tumors in 99 patients. The median age was 70 [interquartile range, 63 to 75] years and 51% (51/99) were male. The commonest site was the right upper lobe (n=42/99; 42%). The median tumor size was 29 [interquartile range, 21 to 35] mm. The diagnostic yield was 88/102 (86%) with a false negative rate of 14% (14/102). In addition to intrapulmonary tumor sampling, lymph nodes were sampled in 65/102 procedures and 30/65(46%) were positive for lung cancer. Cancer was diagnosed in 87/99 (88%) cases. When requested, molecular testing was adequate in ≥94% of samples. Complications included minor bleeding in 6/102 (6%) with 2 requiring cold saline instillation, desaturation in 1/102 (1%), and tachycardia in 1/102(1%). One procedure was abandoned due to patient tachycardia. Delayed complications occurred in 1 patient who was hospitalized ≤7 days with pneumonia. CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA sampling of centrally located intrapulmonary tumors provides similar diagnostic accuracy to lymph node sampling, provides suitable material for molecular testing, and has a low complication rate.

Time between endobronchial ultrasound needle passes as a metric to monitor progress of trainees.

BACKGROUND: Methods to assess and track progress of new endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) operators and trainees is desirable to ensure training goals and procedural competence are achieved. Relying on the diagnostic yield or on question-based assessments alone is not sufficient. This study examined the longitudinal change in times taken between needle passes (needle pass time; NPT) during EBUS lymph node sampling as a metric to monitor progress. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: :The EBUS database of a tertiary hospital was accessed to extract data on the first 50 EBUS procedures for three trainees. The NPT was derived using PACS images that are stored to document every needle pass during an EBUS procedure and an average NPT was calculated. RESULTS: Between the three trainees, 157 procedures were carried out within the study period with 302 nodal stations sampled. The mean NPT (n = 204 stations) was 2:49 ± 0:49 mins. The mean node short axis diameter was 15.5 ± 8.7 mm. There was a negative correlation between node size and time per pass (r - 0.146, p = 0.045).The average NPT showed a negative correlation with procedure order through the first 50 procedures. Less variation between procedures was noted for the three trainees from the 30th procedure onward. On multivariate regression, NPT was significantly associated with procedure order regardless of station sampled or lymph node diameter. CONCLUSION: NPT is novel, easy, and robust metric that can potentially help ensure EBUS trainees are advancing in a given training program.

Setting up a Pleural Disease Service.

Pleural disease incidence is continuing to rise internationally and management is becoming increasingly complex. There are now many more options for patients, with access to thoracic ultrasound, image-guided biopsies, indwelling pleural catheters, and local-anesthetic pleuroscopy (thoracoscopy). Safety reports have also highlighted the need for specialist operator knowledge and skill. Consequently, the development of a specialized pleural service can manage patients entirely as an outpatient, limit the number of procedures, and improve patient safety, it also fosters opportunities to enhance specialist procedural skills, engage in clinical research, and reduce the costs of care.