Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dermatology ; 235(2): 137-143, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30463069

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Potassium iodide (KI) is a medication that has been used for decades in dermatology and it is mentioned as a treatment option in all major dermatology textbooks. Yet, there is little recent information on its efficacy. In our study, we wanted to retrospectively evaluate the therapy response to KI in our patients. METHODS: The hospital information system was searched for patients treated with KI at the Department of Dermatology (University Hospital Zurich) in the last 20 years (January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2017). A total of 52 patients were found and, subsequently, 35 patients were included in our study. RESULTS: KI was prescribed for the following skin conditions: erythema nodosum, disseminated granuloma anulare, necrobiosis lipoidica, nodular vasculitis, cutaneous sarcoidosis, and granulomatous perioral dermatitis/ rosacea. The median duration of KI intake was 5 ± 7.7 weeks (range 1-26). The global assessment of efficacy by the treating physician showed an improvement of disease in about a third of all patients. No response was seen in 14 patients and 9 even had a progression of disease. An adverse event was documented in 16 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that an improvement was reached in only about a third of all cases. High response rates with only mild side effects (in 16 out of 35 patients) were observed.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Yoduro de Potasio/uso terapéutico , Sarcoidosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Piel/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Dermatitis Perioral/tratamiento farmacológico , Eritema Nudoso/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Granuloma Anular/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrobiosis Lipoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rosácea/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasculitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven
2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2017: 9804693, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30035116

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Therapy with local anesthetics (LAs), also known as neural therapy, is used in integrative medicine because of its anti-inflammatory properties. Ester-linked LAs are often avoided because of their alleged high allergenicity. Little data supports this assumption and hence the importance of our investigation on type-1 allergies against ester- and amide-linked LAs. We performed a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled observational study. METHODS: 177 patients received 340 intracutaneous injections with 1% procaine, 0.5% lidocaine, 1% mepivacaine, or saline solution. Every patient received two different tests on each forearm. Reactions were monitored for 15 minutes. RESULTS: No type-1 allergy was observed. The mean erythema diameter of the wheals after 10 minutes was procaine 8.0 ± 6.4 mm, mepivacaine 7.6 ± 6.3 mm, lidocaine 4.4 ± 4.8 mm, and NaCl 3.7 ± 3.2 mm. The wheal diameter of all substances showed a crescendo-decrescendo phenomenon. The procaine and mepivacaine wheals were significantly larger than those of lidocaine and NaCl. No general signs of hypersensitivity were observed. Diameter and intensity were independent of the injection site, order of injection, age, gender, and body mass index. CONCLUSION: This study shows no higher type-1 allergenicity of the ester-linked LA procaine, compared to the amide-linked LAs lidocaine and mepivacaine, and supports its use in therapy and short-track surgery.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA