Device safety assessment of bronchoscopic microwave ablation of normal swine peripheral lung using robotic-assisted bronchoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the safety of bronchoscopic microwave ablation (MWA) of peripheral lung parenchyma using the NEUWAVE™ FLEX Microwave Ablation System, and robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) using the MONARCH™ Platform in a swine model. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT)-guided RAB MWA was performed in the peripheral lung parenchyma of 17 Yorkshire swine (40-50 kg) and procedural adverse events (AEs) documented. The acute group (day 0, n = 5) received 4 MWAs at 100 W for 1, 3, 5, and 10 min in 4 different lung lobes. Subacute and chronic groups (days 3 and 30, n = 6 each) received one MWA (100 W, 10 min) per animal. RESULTS: The study was completed without major procedural complications. No postprocedural AEs including death, pneumothorax, bronchopleural fistula, hemothorax, or pleural effusions were observed. No gross or histological findings suggestive of thromboembolism were found in any organ. One 3-Day and one 30-Day swine exhibited coughing that required no medication (minor AEs), and one 30-Day animal required antibiotic medication (major AE) for a suspected lower respiratory tract infection that subsided after two weeks. CT-based volumetric estimates of ablation zones in the acute group increased in an ablation time-dependent (1-10 min) manner, whereas macroscopy-based estimates showed an increasing trend in ablation zone size. CONCLUSION: The NEUWAVE FLEX and MONARCH devices were safely used to perform single or multiple RAB MWAs. The preclinical procedural safety profile of RAB MWA supports clinical research of both devices to investigate efficacy in select patients with oligometastatic disease or primary NSCLC.

Augmented fluoroscopy guided transbronchial pulmonary microwave ablation using a steerable sheath.

Background: Transbronchial microwave ablation (MWA) is a promising novel therapy. Despite advances in bronchoscopy and virtual navigation, real time image guidance of probe delivery is lacking, and distal maneuverability is limited. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) based augmented fluoroscopy guidance using steerable sheaths may help overcome these shortcomings. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and accuracy of augmented fluoroscopy guided transbronchial MWA with a steerable sheath and without a bronchoscope. Methods: In this prospective study, procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Extra-bronchial lung synthetic targets were placed percutaneously. Target and airways extracted from CBCT, with planned bronchial parking point close to the target were overlaid on live fluoroscopy. Endobronchial navigation was solely performed under augmented fluoroscopy guidance. A 6.5 Fr steerable sheath was parked in the bronchus per plan, and a flexible MWA probe was inserted coaxially then advanced through the bronchus wall towards the target. Final in-target position was confirmed by CBCT. Only one ablation of 100 W-5 min was performed per target. Animals were euthanized and pathology analysis of the lungs was performed. Results: Eighteen targets with a median largest diameter of 9 mm (interquartile range, 7-11 mm) were ablated in 9 pigs. Median needle-target center distance was 2 mm (interquartile range, 0-4 mm), and was higher for lower/middle than for upper lobes [0 mm (interquartile range, 0-4 mm) vs. 4 mm (interquartile range, 3-8 mm), P=0.04]. No severe complications or pneumothorax occurred. Two cases of rib fractures in the ablation zone resolved after medical treatment. Median longest axis of the ablation zone on post-ablation computed tomography was 38 mm (interquartile range, 30-40 mm). Histology showed coagulation necrosis of ablated tissue. Conclusions: Transbronchial MWA under augmented fluoroscopy guidance using a steerable sheath is feasible and accurate.