Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound utilization between radiology and point of care ultrasound in first trimester pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Transvaginal (TVUS) and transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) are both utilized in the evaluation of early pregnancy patients. While many practitioners using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) will generally not pursue TVUS in cases where an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is visualized on TAUS, this may not be true in Radiology performed ultrasound. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate for differences in transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) utilization between Radiology performed (RP) ultrasound and point of care ultrasound (POCUS) by Emergency Department (ED) physicians in early pregnancy patients. Secondarily, to assess length of stay (LOS) differences and the impact of specialized emergency ultrasound training on TVUS utilization. METHODS: This was a retrospective study at a single academic ED. Study population was all ED patients who underwent first trimester ultrasound during the one year period of March 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022. Variables evaluated were chief complaint, gestational age, LOS, TAUS and TVUS utilization, ultrasound findings, and ultrasound specialty training of the ED physician. RESULTS: There were 133 cases of POCUS ultrasound and 254 cases of RP ultrasound. All cases had TAUS imaging performed. Median LOS for patients when POCUS was utilized was 207 min (IQR 151-294) and 258 min (IQR 208-328) for those only using RP ultrasound, p ≤ 0.001. In the POCUS cohort, 38% (95% CI 30%-46%) received TVUS, while 94% received TVUS in the RP cohort (95% CI 90%-96%), p ≤ 0.001. Patients seen by ED faculty with ultrasound specialty training had TVUS 53% of the time (95% CI 41%-65%), while those seen by other ED faculty had TVUS 79% (95% CI 74%-83%) of the time, p = 0.035. CONCLUSION: POCUS in early pregnancy is associated with a significant reduction in TVUS usage. We suspect that POCUS users elect not to pursue TVUS after an IUP is identified on TAUS, while technicians perform protocol-based TVUS irrespective of TAUS findings. Patients seen by ultrasound trained ED physicians are less likely to receive TVUS.

It's Not Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome Until Dietl's is Ruled Out: A Case for Point of Care Renal Ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain and vomiting are frequent complaints for pediatric patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). When a diagnosis such as chronic abdominal pain, cyclic vomiting, or abdominal migraine has previously been made, it can lead to diagnostic momentum and confirmation bias on behalf of the treating physician. Dietl's crisis is a commonly missed diagnosis in the pediatric population that presents with intermittent episodes of pain and vomiting. It can be readily diagnosed at the bedside by the emergency physician (EP) through the employment of point of care ultrasound (POCUS). CASE SERIES: We present two cases of pediatric patients with episodic abdominal pain and vomiting who were previously diagnosed with cyclic vomiting syndrome. In both cases, pediatric gastroenterology evaluations had occurred with negative diagnostic testing having been performed. Both patients also presented to their primary pediatrician and the ED multiple times with each encounter resulting in treatment of symptoms and discharge. Each patient eventually presented to the ED when an EP was present who performed a renal POCUS. In each patient, the POCUS revealed severe unilateral hydronephrosis. Subsequent workup confirmed the diagnosis of Dietl's crisis as the etiology of symptoms. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: In pediatric patients, EPs should be wary of the diagnosis of cyclic vomiting syndrome until ureteral obstruction has been ruled out. A bedside POCUS can rapidly establish this diagnosis and potentially preclude recurrent health care visits, unnecessary diagnostic testing, and permanent loss of renal function.

Asymptomatic ventricular fibrillation in continuous flow left-ventricular assist device.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have increased survival for heart failure patients. Individuals with LVADs are a growing patient population with frequent complications and Emergency Department (ED) visits. A 50-year-old female presented to the ED due to a low flow alarm on her LVAD. Upon arrival in the ED she was noted to be in ventricular fibrillation. She was defibrillated with restoration to normal sinus rhythm and was started on amiodarone. An implantable cardiac defibrillator was placed during hospital admission. Amiodarone was continued as an outpatient. Patients with continuous flow LVADs can be in dysrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation and remain relatively asymptomatic. We present a rare case of a patient with an LVAD and ventricular fibrillation who was completely asymptomatic in the ED.

Ultrasound-Guided Talonavicular Arthrocentesis.

BACKGROUND: Joint arthrocentesis is a commonly performed procedure by the emergency physician (EP). Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has demonstrated promise in identifying joint effusions and guiding arthrocentesis procedures. EP-performed talonavicular joint arthrocentesis has not been previously described in the literature. We present a case in which an isolated talonavicular joint effusion was identified and then subsequently aspirated using POCUS. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old man presented with atraumatic right ankle pain. On arrival, he was noted to have diffuse warmth and edema around the ankle and midfoot. POCUS was performed to evaluate for an ankle joint effusion, which was not present. The ultrasound was then moved distally, where a talonavicular joint effusion was noted. Inflammatory markers were found to be elevated. A magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed an isolated talonavicular joint effusion without additional acute findings. POCUS was then used to perform an arthrocentesis, which revealed monosodium urate crystals consistent with an initial episode of gouty arthritis. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: POCUS provides the EP with an efficient tool to diagnose joint effusions and guide arthrocentesis procedures. The foot is composed of several small joints where ultrasound can be particularly helpful. Similar to the ankle joint, these joints can be afflicted with pyogenic infections and crystalline arthropathies. To our knowledge, we present the first report of EP-performed talonavicular arthrocentesis guided by POCUS. The approach to this joint and technique for arthrocentesis are presented.

Can Ultrasound Identify Traumatic Knee Arthrotomy in a Cadaveric Model?

BACKGROUND: Traumatic arthrotomy of the knee (TAK) involves the violation of the knee capsule. TAK differs from simple lacerations because it requires operative management to prevent resultant septic arthritis. The diagnostic test of choice in the emergency department is the saline load test (SLT). SLT sensitivity ranges from 34% to 99%, depending on volume used. Computed tomography (CT) is a possible alternative, using intra-articular air as a diagnostic marker. Ultrasound can identify air in various tissues, given its highly echogenic nature. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for detecting intra-articular air in cadaveric knee joints. METHODS: Soft embalmed cadavers were utilized. The knees were block randomized to having 1 mL of air injected into the joint or sham skin injection. Two blinded, expert operators scanned the knees with a high-frequency linear transducer. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty knees were included. Knees that had any prior dissection were excluded from analysis. Ten knees were randomized for air injection. The pooled sensitivity was 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.85) with a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI 0.48-0.93). Mean time taken was 143 s. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound may have utility in evaluation of TAK. There were limitations. Some knees had effusions with echogenic material present, which could have led to false-positive results. It is also unknown how much air is typical of TAK. One milliliter was used based on previous work with CT. The use of ultrasound for diagnosis of TAK warrants further study.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Identifies Urinoma Complicating Simple Renal Colic: A Case Series and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Renal colic is a frequently encountered diagnosis among emergency department patients. Point-of-care (POC) ultrasound has taken on an increasingly important role in the diagnostic strategy of this disease, as it has been shown to be an effective modality for diagnosis and for guiding management. The primary pathology that the emergency physician will evaluate for in cases of suspected renal colic is hydronephrosis, which is a dilatation of the renal pelvis and calyces resulting from a distal obstruction such as a ureteral stone. However, other significant findings can be seen, one of which is the extravasation of urine around the kidney secondary to a forniceal, or calyceal, rupture. CASE SERIES: We present three cases of unanticipated perinephric fluid collections identified initially on POC ultrasound in cases of suspected simple renal colic. Concomitant hydronephrosis was also seen in each of these cases. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? While the utilization of POC ultrasound in cases of suspected renal colic increases, we should be prepared to encounter and identify perinephric fluid collections in our evaluations. Although the ideal management of these cases is not completely defined from the current literature, we benefit from knowing how to identify these on POC ultrasound, understanding the underlying pathophysiology, and appreciating the possibility of complications that may arise.

Feasibility of sonographic localization of the inferior epigastric artery before ultrasound-guided paracentesis.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided paracentesis is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED) setting. Injury to the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of paracentesis. Use of anatomic landmarks has been recommended to avoid this structure. If feasible, sonographic localization of the IEA before ultrasound-guided paracentesis may provide the operator with anatomic mapping of this vascular structure. CASE REPORTS: We present 5 cases demonstrating the feasibility of identifying the IEA in ED patients with ascites. Why should an emergency physician be aware of this? Sonographic localization of the IEA before ultrasound-guided paracentesis may provide a more reliable means of avoiding iatrogenic injury to this vessel. Further study is warranted to determine whether routine IEA visualization before paracentesis results in a decreased complication rate.

Negative predictive value of excluding an embedded snake foreign body by ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous reputable sources for healthcare providers advocate routine imaging to rule out an embedded tooth or fang after a snake bite. The objective of this study was to determine whether these foreign bodies can be reliably excluded by bedside ultrasonography. METHODS: All emergency medicine (EM) residents and faculty at a single institution were invited to participate. Two sets of 5 ultrasound gel phantoms were prepared using a method previously validated to have the same density as human tissue. In the first set of 5 phantoms, 1 snake fang was embedded to simulate a retained foreign body. Similarly, in the second set of 5 phantoms, 1 snake tooth was also embedded. Participants were asked to identify the presence or absence of a foreign body in each phantom using bedside ultrasonography. Year of training and confidence in excluding a snake foreign body were also recorded. RESULTS: Each participant (n=27) performed ultrasound imaging on 10 phantoms for a total of 270 samples. Range of experience included postgraduate year 1 (25.9%), postgraduate year 2 (29.6%), postgraduate year 3 (33.3%), and graduates of EM residency (11.1%). The sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out an embedded fang was 92.6% and 98.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out an embedded tooth was 77.8% and 93.7%, respectively. Among all the phantoms, there was a sensitivity of 85.2% and a negative predictive value of 96%. CONCLUSION: Bedside ultrasonography performed by an EM physician is a feasible option to rule out embedded foreign bodies after a snake bite if imaging is warranted.

The Utility of Transvaginal Ultrasound After Intrauterine Pregnancy Identification on Transabdominal Ultrasound in Emergency Department Patients.

Introduction: Ultrasonography has an important role in the evaluation of Emergency Department (ED) patients presenting with early pregnancy complaints. Both transabdominal (TAUS) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) can be utilized. While TVUS generally allows for greater detail, it is unclear how much added benefit exists in performing TVUS once an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) has been identified on TAUS. Methods: This was a retrospective study utilizing Radiology Department ultrasound examinations obtained in first trimester pregnancy ED patients during a consecutive four month period in 2019. Studies wherein both TAUS and TVUS were both performed were included. Two ED physicians with specialized training in point of care ultrasound reviewed only the TAUS images from these studies. Their findings were compared to the Radiologist interpretation, which was inclusive of both TAUS and TVUS components of the study. Results: 108 studies met inclusion criteria. Amongst these, 82 had IUP's identified on the radiologist report. 69 studies had an IUP identified by ED physician review of the TAUS images, with 1 false positive. Each case of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) was identified on ED physician review of TAUS. Two ectopic pregnancies were present, neither of which was mistaken for IUP on ED physician TAUS review. There were 15 studies with subchorionic hemorrhage and 3 studies with an ovarian cyst noted on the radiologist report. Conclusion: Following the identification of an IUP on TAUS, the added diagnostic value of TVUS amongst this cohort of ED patients was low. Given the added time and cost of TVUS, selective instead of routine usage should be encouraged.

Bedside renal ultrasound in the evaluation of suspected ureterolithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ultrasound changes emergency physicians' estimated likelihood of acute ureterolithiasis in patients with flank pain. METHODS: This prospective, observational study enrolled patients awaiting computed tomographic (CT) scan for presumed renal colic. Using a visual analogue scale, treating physicians estimated the likelihood of acute ureterolithiasis based first on clinical findings and urinalysis, then after ultrasound, and finally after CT. A 20% change in estimated likelihood was considered clinically significant. Test characteristics of ultrasound for any ureteral stone and for those greater than or equal to 5 mm in size were determined. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients were enrolled. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of ultrasound for stones observed on CT were 76.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.4%-88.0%), 78.3% (95% CI, 66.4%-86.9%), and 85.7% (95% CI, 74.1%-92.9%) respectively, and for stones >5 mm 90.0% (95% CI, 54.1%-99.5%), 63.9% (95% CI, 53.4%-73.2%), and 98.4% (95% CI, 90.3%-99.9%), respectively. Ultrasound significantly impacted the estimated likelihood of disease in 33 of 107 cases (30.8%, 95% CI, 22.5%-40.6%). Computed tomography further significantly changed physicians' impression of disease in 55 of 107 cases (51.4%, 95% CI, 41.6%-61.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Bedside renal ultrasound had only a limited impact on the physicians' clinical impression of patients with possible ureterolithiasis. The sensitivity of sonographic hydronephrosis was modest for detecting any ureteral stone, but much better for detecting a large stone. Further study is needed to define the precise role ultrasound should play in evaluating patients with suspected ureterolithiasis.

Fatal Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Due to Constipation: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a rare condition in which increased intra-abdominal pressure causes multiorgan dysfunction through decreased perfusion. Causes of this condition are variable, and early recognition is critical for favorable patient outcomes. Measurement of bladder pressure is recommended for diagnosis. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old female on clozapine with a two-year history of chronic constipation presented to the emergency department in extremis with a protuberant abdomen. After resuscitative measures, computed tomography showed a dilated, stool-filled colon with a decompressed inferior vena cava and decreased perfusion. She died despite surgical decompression. CONCLUSION: Severe constipation is a rare cause of ACS, and there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines. Options for bedside decompression are limited. To reduce morbidity and mortality in this population, early recognition of ACS is imperative. Initial interventions should support hemodynamics and respiration. Definitive management is surgical decompression.

Needle and guidewire visualization in ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Reimbursement for ultrasound-guided central lines requires documenting the needle entering the vessel lumen. We hypothesized that physicians often successfully perform ultrasound-guided internal jugular (IJ) cannulation without visualizing the needle in the lumen and that guidewire visualization occurs more frequently. METHODS: This prospective, observational study enrolled emergency physicians performing ultrasound-guided IJ cannulations over an 8-month period. Physicians reported sonographic visualization of the needle or guidewire and recorded DVD images for subsequent review. Outcome measures were the proportion of successful procedures in which the operator reported seeing the needle or guidewire in the vessel lumen and the proportion of successful, recorded procedures, in which a reviewer noted the same findings. Procedures were deemed successful when functioning central venous catheters were placed. Fisher exact test was used for comparisons. RESULTS: Of 41 attempted catheterizations, 35 (85.4%) were successful. Eighteen of these were recorded on DVD for review. The operator reported visualizing the needle within the vessel lumen in 23 (65.7%) of 35 successful cannulations (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.7%-80.3%). In 27 cases, the operator attempted to view the guidewire and reported doing so in 24 cases (88.9%; 95% CI, 69.7%-97.1%). On expert review, the needle was seen penetrating the vessel lumen in 1 (5.6%) of 18 cases (95% CI, 0.3%-29.4%). Among recorded procedures in which the operator also attempted wire visualization, the reviewer could identify the wire within the vessel lumen in 12 (75.0%) of 16 cases (95% CI, 47.4%-91.7%). CONCLUSIONS: During successful ultrasound-guided IJ cannulation, physicians can visualize the guidewire more readily than the needle.

Point-of-care hip ultrasound leads to expedited results in emergency department patients with suspected septic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of septic hip arthritis often incorporates the utilization of hip ultrasonography to determine the presence of a hip joint effusion, as well as to guide arthrocentesis. Point-of-care (POC) hip ultrasound has previously been demonstrated to be accurate when performed by the emergency physician. Time to diagnosis and subsequent intervention in septic arthritis (SA) is critical to favorable outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study of all emergency department (ED) patients who had a POC or radiology hip ultrasound or arthrocentesis as part of their ED evaluation for SA in a 3-year period. We investigated the difference in time to obtain hip ultrasonography results and the time to arthrocentesis between radiology and emergency physician-performed studies in cases of suspected septic hip arthritis. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria. The median time to hip ultrasound completion was 68 (interquartile range [IQR], 38.8-132) minutes in the emergency physician-performed ultrasound group versus 208.5 (IQR, 163.8-301.3) minutes for the radiology group (P < 0.001). A total of 17 patients had a hip arthrocentesis performed. Time to arthrocentesis was 211 (IQR 141.3-321.5) minutes in the emergency physician-performed arthrocentesis group and 602 (IQR 500-692) minutes in the radiology arthrocentesis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically shorter time to ultrasound result and arthrocentesis when POC hip ultrasound was utilized by the emergency physician. Given that unfavorable outcomes in SA are associated with delay in treatment, further study is warranted to determine if emergency physician-performed hip ultrasound and arthrocentesis could lead to improved patient-centered clinical end points.

Training in transvaginal sonography using pelvic ultrasound simulators versus live models: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To compare pelvic ultrasound simulators (PSs) with live models (LMs) for training in transvaginal sonography (TVS). METHOD: The authors conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 145 eligible medical students trained in TVS in 2011-2012 with either a PS or an LM. A patient educator was used for LM training. Simulated intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy models were used for PS training. Students were tested using a standardized patient who evaluated their professionalism. A proctor, blinded to training type, scored their scanning technique. Digital images were saved for blinded review. Students rated their training using a Likert scale (0 = not very well; 10 = very well). The primary outcome measure was students' overall performance on a 40-point assessment tool for professionalism, scanning technique, and image acquisition. Poisson regression and Student t test were used for comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 134 students participated (62 trained using a PS; 72 using an LM). Mean overall test scores were 56% for the PS group and 69% for the LM group (P = .001). A significant difference was identified in scanning technique (PS, 60% versus LM, 73%; P = .001) and image acquisition (PS, 37% versus LM, 59%; P = .001). None was observed for professionalism. The PS group rated their training experience at 4.4, whereas the LM group rated theirs at 6.2 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Simulators do not perform as well as LMs for training novices in TVS, but they may be useful as an adjunct to LM training.

The core content of clinical ultrasonography fellowship training.

The purpose of developing a core content for subspecialty training in clinical ultrasonography (US) is to standardize the education and qualifications required to provide oversight of US training, clinical use, and administration to improve patient care. This core content would be mastered by a fellow as a separate and unique postgraduate training, beyond that obtained during an emergency medicine (EM) residency or during medical school. The core content defines the training parameters, resources, and knowledge of clinical US necessary to direct clinical US divisions within medical specialties. Additionally, it is intended to inform fellowship directors and candidates for certification of the full range of content that might appear in future examinations. This article describes the development of the core content and presents the core content in its entirety.

The wire is really easy to see (WIRES): sonographic visualization of the guidewire by novices.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether novices can distinguish between properly and improperly placed guidewires in a vascular access model after only minimal training. METHODS: This was a prospective study involving trainees with no previous training in sonographic guidewire visualization. A vascular access model was created with guidewires positioned inside or adjacent to simulated veins. Subjects were taught to scan each wire to determine its location. Afterward, participants scanned a test model of five vein-wire pairs and recorded their answers as "inside," "outside," or "unsure." The test characteristics of sonographic guidewire localization were determined using actual wire location as the criterion standard. RESULTS: Forty trainees (21 emergency medicine residents, 19 medical students) participated, and each examined five simulated veins. There were 156 true positives (intravascular wire correctly identified), 38 true negatives (extravascular wire correctly identified), 2 false negatives, 2 false positives, and 2 cases in which the participant marked "not sure," which were reclassified as false negatives. Test characteristics were sensitivity 97.5% (95% CI 93.3-99.2) and specificity 95.0% (95% CI 81.8-99.1). The overall accuracy was 97.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic guidewire visualization, a step recommended for ensuring proper vessel cannulation during central venous access, can be accomplished by novices with a high degree of accuracy.