Predicting and tuning physicochemical properties in lead optimization: amine basicities.

This review describes simple and useful concepts for predicting and tuning the pK(a) values of basic amine centers, a crucial step in the optimization of physical and ADME properties of many lead structures in drug-discovery research. The article starts with a case study of tricyclic thrombin inhibitors featuring a tertiary amine center with pK(a) values that can be tuned over a wide range, from the usual value of around 10 to below 2 by (remote) neighboring functionalities commonly encountered in medicinal chemistry. Next, the changes in pK(a) of acyclic and cyclic amines upon substitution by fluorine, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur functionalities, as well as carbonyl and carboxyl derivatives are systematically analyzed, leading to the derivation of simple rules for pK(a) prediction. Electronic and stereoelectronic effects in cyclic amines are discussed, and the emerging computational methods for pK(a) predictions are briefly surveyed. The rules for tuning amine basicities should not only be of interest in drug-discovery research, but also to the development of new crop-protection agents, new amine ligands for organometallic complexes, and in particular, to the growing field of amine-based organocatalysis.

Influence of a long-term, high-dose volume therapy with 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or crystalloid solution on hemodynamics, rheology and hemostasis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to investigate the clinical effects of a 4-day volume therapy with a newly developed, 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 versus crystalloid solution, with particular regard to systemic and cerebral hemodynamics, rheology and safety. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 40 patients suffering from an acute ischemic stroke received either 6% HES 130/0.4 or crystalloid solution as continuous infusion over 4 days with a total dose of 6.5 liters. Efficacy parameters studied included hemodynamics (cardiac output, blood pressure, flow velocity with transcranial Doppler) and rheology (hematocrit and plasma viscosity). Safety parameters examined included laboratory, hemostaseology (including factor VIII) and an adverse event questionnaire (including pruritus). RESULTS: In both groups, a small, but not significant increase in cardiac output was observed. There were no significant changes regarding the remaining efficacy or safety parameters, except for the well-known increase in serum alpha-amylase through the infusion of HES. CONCLUSION: In our study with patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke, continuous infusion (1 ml/min) of HES 130/0.4 or crystalloid solution did not differ regarding safety or hemodynamic efficacy.