The integration of Coxiella burnetii PCR testing in serum into the diagnostic algorithm of suspected acute Q fever in an endemic setting.

Serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA has been suggested for rapid Q fever diagnosis. We evaluated the role of PCR testing in serum in the diagnosis of acute Q fever in an endemic setting. We examined patients suspected of acute Q fever tested for C. burnetii-specific serum real-time PCR in a tertiary hospital between January 2019 toand December 2022. In the first half, PCR orders were consultation-based by infectious diseases specialists, while in the second half, they were guided by serology, positive IgM2, and negative IgG1 and IgG2, indicating early acute infection. Logistic regression analyzed independent predictors for positive PCR. PCR positivity rates were calculated using various clinical criteria in the diagnostic algorithm. Out of 272 patients, 13 (4.8%) tested positive and 130 exhibited serologically suspected early infection. Presentation during April-July and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3× upper normal limit (UNL) were independently associated with positive PCR with an odds ratio (OR) = 15.03 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58-142.46], P = 0.018 and OR = 55.44 [95% CI, 6.16-498.69], P < 0.001, respectively. PCR positivity rate was 8.5% in serologically suspected early infection vs 1.4% in other serology, yielding OR = 6.4 [95% CI, 1.4-29.7], P = 0.009. Adding AST > 3× UNL increased OR to 49.5 [95% CI, 5.9-408.7], P ≤ 0.001 reducing required PCR tests for a single acute Q fever case from 11.8 to 3. Elevated AST in serologically suspected early Q fever is proposed to be used in a diagnostic stewardship algorithm integrating PCR in serum in an endemic setting. IMPORTANCE: Our study suggests in a diagnostic stewardship approach the integration of molecular testing (Coxiella burnetii targeted PCR) for the diagnosis of acute Q fever in a reliable time in the endemic setting. Integrating PCR detecting Coxiella burnetii in serum in routine testing of suspected early acute Q fever based on serology result increased the PCR positivity rate significantly. Adding increased transaminases optimizes PCR utility which is highly requested particularly in endemic areas.

Effect of ArtemiC in patients with COVID-19: A Phase II prospective study.

Despite intensive efforts, there is no effective remedy for COVID-19. Moreover, vaccination efficacy declines over time and may be compromised against new SARS-CoV-2 lineages. Therefore, there remains an unmet need for simple, accessible, low-cost and effective pharmacological anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. ArtemiC is a medical product comprising artemisinin, curcumin, frankincense and vitamin C, all of which possess anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties. The present Phase II placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multi-centred, prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ArtemiC in patients with COVID-19. The study included 50 hospitalized symptomatic COVID-19 patients randomized (2:1) to receive ArtemiC or placebo oral spray, twice daily on Days 1 and 2, beside standard care. A physical examination was performed, and vital signs and blood tests were monitored daily until hospital discharge (or Day 15). A PCR assessment of SARS-CoV-2 carriage was performed at screening and on last visit. ArtemiC improved NEWS2 in 91% of patients and shortened durations of abnormal SpO2 levels, oxygen supplementation and fever. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. These findings suggest that ArtemiC curbed deterioration, possibly by limiting cytokine storm of COVID-19, thus bearing great promise for COVID-19 patients, particularly those with comorbidities.

Integration of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnostic Workup for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Prospective Interventional Matched-cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is uniquely characterized by focal pyogenic complications that might not be apparent clinically. We investigated the benefit of adding fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the workup of patients with SAB. METHODS: In a matched-cohort study patients with SAB (intervention group) were prospectively recruited to undergo FDG-PET/CT 7-14 days after diagnosis. Treatment was directed by FDG-PET/CT findings. Clinical outcomes were compared with a control group of patients with SAB who had not undergone FDG-PET/CT, matched by age, Charlson score, methicillin susceptibility, and survival duration to FDG-PET/CT. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Residual confounding was controlled through regression analyses. RESULTS: During the study period 149 patients with 151 separate episodes of SAB underwent FDG-PET/CT and were compared with 150 matched patients with 151 SAB episodes. Patients in the intervention group acquired infections more frequently in the community and had less frequently solid malignancies and more frequently high-risk SAB. Ninety-day mortality in the intervention group was significantly lower than in the control group (21/151 [13.9%] vs 43/151 [28.5%], P = .002). The difference remained significant in a subgroup analysis of patients with community-onset infections without malignancy and among patients with low-risk SAB. Controlling for other risk factors for mortality, FDG-PET/CT performance among all patients was independently associated with lower mortality (OR, .39; 95% CI, .18-.84). Patients in the intervention group had longer duration of treatment and more focus control procedures performed compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT in patients with SAB seems to improve survival through guidance of treatment duration and co-interventions.

Endovascular Infection with Kingella kingae Complicated by Septic Arthritis in Immunocompromised Adult Patient.

We report a case of Kingella kingae endovascular infection in an immunocompromised elderly patient in Israel who had culture-negative septic arthritis. This case highlights potential sources of metastatic infection other than infective endocarditis, and emphasizes the need for molecular diagnostic methods in detection of pathogens in culture-negative septic arthritis in immunocompromised patients.

Predictors of infectious foci on FDG PET/CT in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

We looked for predicting factors for the detection of infectious foci on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in combination with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) among patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) who participated in an interventional study that was conducted at Rambam Health Care Campus, between July 1, 2015 and February 1, 2019. The primary outcome was an infectious focus detected by FDG PET/CT. Independent predictors for detection of focal infection were identified using univariate followed by a logistic regression multivariate analysis. We included 149 patients with 151 separate episodes of SAB who underwent FDG-PET/CT. Focal infections were detected in 107 patients (70.8%). Independent predictors for focal infection detection were community acquisition of bacteremia with odds ratio (OR) 3.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-8.77], p-0.042 and C reactive protein (CRP) with OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.04-1.14], p < 0.001. Primary bacteremia was inversely associated with focal infection detection with OR 0.27 [0.10-0.69], p = 0.007, as were the pre-scan blood glucose levels OR 0.9 [0.98-0.99], p-0.004. The latter stayed significant in the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus. To conclude, patients with community-acquired bacteremia or high CRP levels should be carefully investigated for focal infection. Patients who present with primary bacteremia seem to be at low risk for focal infection.

Nucleic acid amplification tests on respiratory samples for the diagnosis of coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Management and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relies on reliable diagnostic testing. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for the diagnosis of coronavirus infections. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Open Grey and conference proceeding until May 2019. PubMed and medRxiv were updated for COVID-19 on 31st August 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY: Studies were eligible if they reported on agreement rates between different NAATs using clinical samples. PARTICIPANTS: Symptomatic patients with suspected upper or lower respiratory tract coronavirus infection. METHODS: The new NAAT was defined as the index test and the existing NAAT as reference standard. Data were extracted independently in duplicate. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Confidence regions (CRs) surrounding summary sensitivity/specificity pooled by bivariate meta-analysis are reported. Heterogeneity was assessed using meta-regression. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies were included, 22 of which included 10 181 persons before COVID-19 and 29 including 8742 persons diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The overall summary sensitivity was 89.1% (95%CR 84.0-92.7%) and specificity 98.9% (95%CR 98.0-99.4%). Nearly all the studies evaluated different PCRs as both index and reference standards. Real-time RT PCR assays resulted in significantly higher sensitivity than other tests. Reference standards at high risk of bias possibly exaggerated specificity. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of studies evaluating SARS-COV-2 were 90.4% (95%CR 83.7-94.5%) and 98.1% (95%CR 95.9-99.2), respectively. SARS-COV-2 studies using samples from the lower respiratory tract, real-time RT-PCR, and tests targeting the N or S gene or more than one gene showed higher sensitivity, and assays based on reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), especially when targeting only the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene, showed significantly lower sensitivity compared to other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Pooling all studies to date shows that on average 10% of patients with coronavirus infections might be missed with PCR tests. Variables affecting sensitivity and specificity can be used for test selection and development.