[Challenges for home care services in the pain management of cancer patients : A qualitative study]. / Herausforderungen ambulanter Pflegedienste im Schmerzmanagement von Tumorpatienten : Eine qualitative Untersuchung.

BACKGROUND: People with cancer are increasingly supported by home care services. Pain is a relevant symptom of these diseases and nurses of home care services are involved in the treatment. The German National Expert Standard "Pain management in nursing" includes evidence-based recommendations for the implementation of adequate pain management. Considering the given structural conditions of home care services, nurses describe both barriers and challenges with the implementation. METHODS: By means of five guideline-based discussion groups, nurses of 14 home care services were questioned about the challenges they had experienced in pain management. The questioning focuses on the level of implementation of the recommendation for each aspect: pain assessment, pharmacological pain therapy, non-pharmacological pain therapy, pain-related side effects, information, training, and counseling in the care of people with cancer. A qualitative content analysis was conducted. RESULTS: On the one hand, the results illustrate a need for further knowledge and possibilities, e.g., for the assessment of pain as a multidimensional phenomenon and, on the other hand, that the conditions for continuous pain monitoring of cancer patients in home care services are limited. The need for short-term reconciliation with the treatment team and the practitioners proved to be more difficult than the cooperation with the palliative care network. Involvement of family members is important to ensure uninterrupted treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Beside knowledge and competencies regarding nursing care, structures and processes for interprofessional pain management need further development and research.

[Nursing pain experts in German hospitals : A compilation of activity profiles and tasks]. / Pflegerische Schmerzexperten an deutschen Kliniken : Eine Erfassung zu Tätigkeitsprofilen und Aufgaben.

BACKGROUND: In recent years nurses have come to play a professional role in pain management. In Germany, the publication of the national expert standards on pain management in nursing resulted in nurses being educated to be pain resource nurses; however, since education has started the continuance and commitments of specialized pain nurses in clinical practice is basically unclear. The goal of this evaluation was to identify how pain resource nurses are involved in pain management and organizational aspects in German hospitals. METHOD: Online survey of 374 directors of nursing services of different types of hospitals on the assignment of nursing pain experts. RESULTS: Pain resource nurses are involved in pain management in 70.6% of the hospitals responding to the questionnaire. Their task profile depends on the hospital size and 42.2% of the hospitals have documented task profiles. Pain resource nurses are primarily involved in invasive pain management processes (37.1%) and in the management of pain in patients with complex pain problems after surgery (33.2%). Educative tasks are training of colleagues and implementation and conversion of the national expert standards. Of the hospitals 36.1% implemented the national expert standards for acute pain and 57% of the medium-sized hospitals have at least also implemented the national expert standards for chronic pain. DISCUSSION: The study shows a first insight into the task profiles of pain resource nurses. The implementation of this special qualification is meaningful and seems to be well-recognized in the hospitals. The tasks of patient care are orientated to the spectrum of patients treated in the hospital. The tasks of education also show the importance for the education of colleagues.

[Restricted mobility in nursing home residents : The role of pain and cognitive capacity]. / Mobilitätseinschränkungen bei Altenheimbewohnern : Die Rolle von Schmerz und kognitiver Leistungsfähigkeit.

BACKGROUND: Pain, restriction of mobility and cognitive impairment are often present in old age and intensify each other. OBJECTIVES: Is there a relationship between mobility, pain, cognitive capacity, diagnoses and number of prescribed medication for residents of nursing homes? METHODS: Subgroup analysis of the baseline data from an intervention study for optimization of the medication safety of 120 nursing home residents. RESULTS: Pain was presumed in 77.8% of the residents. Persons with cognitive impairment were more frequently affected. The results of the observational and self-reported pain assessment in cognitively impaired patients did not agree for two-thirds of the cases. A correlation between prevalence of pain, pain intensity and mobility could only be shown for persons without cognitive impairment. Half of the persons were unable to walk; 80% of the residents with analgesics as a permanent medication were more restricted in their mobility. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment is associated with pain and reduced mobility, whereby self-rated pain did not concur with the observational pain assessment for two-thirds of the residents with cognitive impairment. This illustrates the difficulty of observational pain assessment.

[Pain in nursing homes]. / Schmerz in Einrichtungen der stationären Altenhilfe.

Elderly live in nursing homes if the necessary need for care cannot be realized in the home care setting. Dementia syndrome (60 % of nursing home residents) has a prominent role. Pain is a frequent problem in nursing homes, affecting functionality and quality of life. Studies often show inadequate pain therapy. Not only is the presentation of pain often atypical, but pharmacological and invasive pain therapy is limited by multimorbidity and increased risk of side effects. Nonpharmacological pain therapy is part of nursing therapy; however, the effect on nursing home residents has been insufficiently studied. This situation necessitates interprofessional coordination of all team members, in which the nursing pain assessment and the realization of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain therapy are very important.

[Standardized treatment protocols in acute postoperative pain therapy: analysis of contents of standardized medicinal concepts]. / Behandlungsstandards in der postoperativen Akutschmerztherapie: Analyse von Inhalten standardisierter medikamentöser Konzepte.

BACKGROUND: Standardized treatment approaches can improve the quality of the management of acute postoperative pain. AIM: The purpose of this study was to describe the content and structure of currently implemented standards for the management of acute postoperative pain in German hospitals and to better define the concept of a treatment standard for acute pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Written standardized treatment protocols from 68 hospitals for the management of acute postoperative pain were analyzed. The evaluation was based on the layout of processes, the baseline and rescue or on-demand analgesic medication and safety mechanisms. RESULTS: A treatment standard per hospital separated for adults (68 standards) and children (27 standards) was identified and analyzed. A baseline medication was provided in all standards for adults and in 89% for children. Of the 95 standards 68% routinely combined opioids and non-opioids as a basis (78% for adults and 42% for children). A way to adapt the baseline medication was described more often in standards for adults. Of the standards for adults 91% (85% for children) contained provisions for rescue or on-demand analgesia and half of them (both adults and children) included an immediate-release opioid formulation, which was readily available. For adults the availability was regulated by a predefined process in 29% of the standards (8% for children). In cases of persisting pain, repetition of the rescue medication was generally possible in 63% of adult standards (54% for children) but within 1 h after the first dose in only 43% (30% for children). Intervention limitations for application of the rescue medication (e.g., a defined score on the numeric rating scale) were set in 63% of adult standards (54% for children). A follow-up assessment of the pain intensity after a rescue medication was only required in approximately half of the standards and safety information or mechanisms were only rarely included. CONCLUSION: Content, structure and type of the evaluated treatment standards showed a considerable heterogeneity with respect to the availability of rescue and baseline medication. Safety aspects were not addressed in many cases. These findings show that despite the requirements of the German guidelines for treatment of perioperative and posttraumatic pain for treatment standards, there are still no practical recommendations with respect to contents and structure of such standards.

[Optimising pain therapy for neurological inpatients]. / Optimierung der Schmerztherapie an neurologischen Stationen.

BACKGROUND: The Department of Neurology at the Medical University Graz has implemented a multiprofessional pain management concept and evaluated the outcome by means of a patient survey. METHODS: Standard operating procedures for standardised pain measurement, documentation and therapy were developed. All engaged professional participants were trained before implementation. RESULTS: 88.7 % of the surveyed 63 patients reported pain during the hospitalisation. During the night and in the morning, the occurrence of severe pain was most likely. The position or activity most likely triggering severe pain was mobilisation (19 %). Patients with degenerative diseases of the spine without radiculopathy reported the highest levels of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is an important problem for neurological inpatients. Nocturnal pain, pain induced by mobilisation, and pain therapy for patients with degenerative diseases of the spine without radiculopathy require particular attention.

[Social desirability in pain therapy. Response behavior of various professional groups on the implementation of multi-professional pain management]. / Soziale Erwünschtheit in der Schmerztherapie. Antwortverhalten verschiedener Berufsgruppen zur Umsetzung eines berufsgruppenübergreifenden Schmerzmanagements.

BACKGROUND: Research on the quality of pain management is often based on self-reported data pertaining to internal regulations provided by employees. However, data examining the correctness of the information given are rare. The project "Pain-Free Hospital" facilitated such an analysis and compared the answers provided by staff members with currently existing regulations. METHODS: In the course of the project (2004-2006) data on internal pain-related therapy plans, pain management-related regulations as well as the level of knowledge of 3421 nurses, 1757 physicians (825 conservative ward physicians, 728 surgeons and 526 anesthesiologists) from a total of 19 hospitals were collected and examined prior to and after the implementation of a specific training intervention. The congruence of the answers given was measured. RESULTS: After training 16 surgical wards (previously 12) and 13 conservative wards (previously 2) had standardized therapy plans. Regulations existed in 13 conservative (previously 12) and 16 surgical wards (previously 12). In those hospitals with standardized therapy plans, a significantly higher level of knowledge was found among staff members after the intervention (p < 0.05), especially on surgical wards. In hospitals without therapy plans and regulations there were significantly more incongruent answers (p < 0.05). In comparison to colleagues from conservative wards, surgical nurses and physicians provided significantly more incongruent answers. CONCLUSION: Therapy plans and pain management-related regulations are known in hospitals after a systematic training. Data suggest that hospitals without regulations show a trend towards social desirability.

[Process control in acute pain management. An analysis of the degree of organization of applied standard protocols]. / Prozesssteuerung in der Akutschmerztherapie. Eine Analyse des Organisationsgrades angewandter Behandlungsstandards.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the degree of organization of different standard protocols for acute pain management, as well as the derivation and definition of typical but structurally different models. METHODS: A total of 85 hospitals provided their written standardized protocols for analysis. Protocols for defined target processes from 76 hospitals and another protocol used by more than one hospital were included into the analysis. The suggested courses of action were theoretically simulated to identify and characterize process types in a multistage evaluation process. RESULTS: The analysis included 148 standards. Four differentiated process types were defined ("standardized order", "analgesic ladder", "algorithm", "therapy path"), each with an increasing level of organization. These four types had the following distribution: 27 % (n = 40) "standardized order", 47 % (n = 70) "analgesic ladder", 22 % (n = 33) "algorithm", 4 % (n = 5) "therapy path". Models with a higher degree of organization included more control elements, such as action and intervention triggers or safety and supervisory elements, and were also associated with a formally better access to medication. For models with a lower degree of organization, immediate courses of action were more dependent on individual decisions. Although not quantifiable, this was particularly evident when simulating downstream courses of action. Interfaces between areas of hospital activity and a cross-departmental-boundary validity were only considered in a fraction of the protocols. Concepts from clinics with a certificate in (acute) pain management were more strongly process-oriented. For children, there were proportionately more simple concepts with a lower degree of organization and less controlling elements. CONCLUSION: This is the first analysis of a large sample of standardized protocols for acute pain management focusing on the degree of organization and the possible influence on courses of action. The analysis shows how different the structures and presumably the practical objectives of the various concepts are. The analyzed protocols with a lower degree of organization can manage only the assignment of a particular medication to the corresponding patient group, with a presumably high requirement for considerable implicit knowledge of the responsible employees. Accordingly, a requirement for such protocols should be that they not only describe the preferred standard therapy, but also define the interactions between the staff members involved. It remains questionable whether a protocol with a low level of organization and a comparably high requirement for implicit knowledge and individual action--also from nonmedical personnel--is able to ensure efficient pain therapy, particularly in view changing staff and dynamic responses to changing pain situations.

[Pain management in patients with cancer. Perspectives of various network participants]. / Schmerzmanagement bei Menschen mit Tumorerkrankung. Die Sicht einzelner Netzwerkakteure.

BACKGROUND: High healthcare needs are evident for pain caused by cancer. Those affected are not only looking for help in acute inpatient structures but also for a much larger part in outpatient care structures. To avoid mistreatment, undertreatment or overtreatment of pain in people with cancer, it is necessary to differentiate the tasks and roles of different providers while highlighting the specific aspects of pain management within the given network structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aspects, such as pain assessment and the necessary scope of action in pain treatment are illustrated from the perspective of nurses from home care services, primary physicians as well as the general or special ambulatory palliative care (AAPV or SAPV) on the basis of initial survey results and a documentation analysis. RESULTS: Ambulatory care nurses (93 %) and primary caregivers (64 %) use pain assessment scales. The kind of scales used varies. The ability to provide adequate pain care for patients in the immediate care situation is reported as given by more than half of the nurses (56.6 %). CONCLUSIONS: In order to ensure an adequate pain therapy targeted interprofessional coordination is required between outpatient and primary physicians with respect to aspects of pain assessment, scope of action and accessibility.

[Non-pharmacologic measures in pain therapy. Application in 25 German hospitals]. / Nichtmedikamentöse Massnahmen in der Schmerztherapie. Anwendung in 25 deutschen Krankenhäusern.

BACKGROUND: The application of non-pharmacologic therapy (NPT) within pain therapy increases patient satisfaction and is, in addition to pharmacologic methods, recommended in the National Expert Standard on Pain Management in Nursing of the German Network of Quality Development in Nursing. If and to what extent non-pharmacologic methods are applied within pain therapy in German hospitals has as yet been unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within the project "Pain-Free Hospital" 2,840 nurses in 25 hospitals were interviewed via questionnaire forms and oral interviews about the use of NPT. RESULTS: Of the nurses 80% confirmed the use of NPT. The majority of the interviewed nurses applied superficial cold, bedding and heat for pain relief. We identified barriers to the implementation of NPT, such as the scarce knowledge of nurses about these therapeutic areas and the uncertainty whether NPT needs to be described by doctors or not. CONCLUSION: Some of the NPTs are well established in hospitals. For nationwide use of NPT their systematic training and implementation is necessary.

[Health services research project "action alliance pain-free city Münster" : Objectives and methods]. / Versorgungsforschungsprojekt "aktionsbündnis schmerzfreie stadt Münster" : zielsetzung und methodik.

Inadequate pain care in health care facilities is still a major concern. Due to structural and organizational shortcomings the potential of modern analgesia is far from being exhausted. The project "Action Alliance Pain-free City Münster" is designed to analyze the multiprofessional pain management in health care facilities in the model City of Münster in an epidemiologic study and aims to optimize pain management in accordance with nursing standards and medical guidelines. Hospitals, nursing homes, outpatient nursing services, hospices and pain care centers will be examined. After an analysis of the current state on the basis of a pre-test, the necessary optimization measures will be developed and implemented. Subsequently, the pain management will be reevaluated in a post-test. In partly still unexplored health care areas of Germany, epidemiologic data will be generated, barriers to the implementation of standards and guidelines revealed and measures of improvements developed and tested. In addition, interface problems between the evaluated sectors will be identified. In this article the objective and the methods of the project are described.

[Procedure for certification of QST laboratories]. / Zertifizierungsrichtlinien für QST-Labore.

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is the standardized assessment of the somatosensory system comprising all sensory submodalities. In the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS), a QST-battery consisting of 13 parameters has been established and nationwide normative data have been collected. In contrast to conventional electrophysiology, QST allows detecting negative and positive sensory signs of both large and small fiber systems. However, as a subjective psychophysical method it is critically dependent on patients'/healthy subjects' cooperation thus strictly standardized protocols and instructions are needed to allow across laboratory comparisons. To facilitate more widespread use of QST, the German Pain Society (DGSS) and the DFNS have initiated a certification procedure for QST quality standards. Therefore, structural, procedural criteria and outcome parameters were establishd and are hereby presented. By maintaining high quality standards, the certification of QST is intended to contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms behind neuropathic pain syndromes and thereby improve patient care as well as sensory assessment in clinical studies on the treatment of neuropathic pain syndromes.