Ultrasound-guided lymph node sampling: accuracy of FNAC, end-cutting (Franseen), and side-cutting (Temno) needle biopsy techniques.

AIM: To compare technical success, diagnostic accuracy, and histological yield of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), side-cutting (Temno) needle biopsy, and end-cutting (Franseen) needle biopsy for ultrasound-guided sampling of groin and axillary lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 270 abnormal groin and axillary nodes were sampled using one of the three techniques. Nodes with a maximum length of <2.5 cm underwent FNAC or Franseen biopsy, while nodes >2.5 cm underwent Temno biopsy. Mean size of nodes sampled by FNAC (21.2 mm) and Franseen (19.7 mm) were similar while nodes sampled by Temno were larger (34.4 mm, p<0.0001). RESULTS: Technical success rates of FNAC (82/93, 88%), Franseen (105/111, 95%), and Temno (59/66, 89%) biopsies were similar (p>0.05 for all). Lymphoid tissue yield by FNAC (mean total area 1.51 mm2) was less than that by Franseen (7.14 mm2, p=0.002) or Temno biopsy (19.44 mm2, p<0.0001). Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was lower for FNAC (22/30, 73%) than Franseen (25/26, 96%, p=0.02) or Temno biopsy (32/32, 100%, p=0.002). For malignant nodes, determining the likely organ of origin was also lower for FNAC (7/30, 23%) than Franseen (19/26, 73%, p=0.0002) or Temno biopsy (29/32, 91%, p<0.0001), with a similar pattern observed in the identification of lymphoma. CONCLUSION: For similarly sized nodes, Franseen biopsy provided more lymphoid material, a higher diagnostic accuracy for malignancy including lymphoma, and better identification of the likely organ of origin than FNAC. Routine use of Franseen biopsy is advocated rather than FNAC for percutaneous sampling of lymph nodes not suitable for side-cutting needle biopsy.

MRI of carpal tunnel syndrome: before and after carpal tunnel release.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to diagnose CTS, exclude secondary causes of CTS, and investigate patients with persistent symptoms after carpal tunnel release. Median nerve compression may also be either subclinical in the early stages or present with atypical symptoms. Radiologists are therefore not infrequently the first to alert clinicians as to the possibly of subclinical or atypical CTS. This review shows the normal and abnormal appearances of the carpal tunnel before and after CTR.

Ultrasound carpal tunnel syndrome: additional criteria for diagnosis.

AIM: To define the usefulness of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve distal to the carpal tunnel in addition to other established common parameters in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four wrists from 24 symptomatic CTS patients and 32 wrists from 17 asymptomatic volunteers were evaluated by ultrasound. The CSA of the median nerve was measured at four pre-selected levels, i.e., proximal, inlet, outlet, and distal to the carpal tunnel. The flattening ratio, intraneural vascularity, neural fasciculation, and retinacular palmar bowing were also assessed. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the CTS and control groups for median nerve CSA proximal and distal (p<0.001) to the tunnel as well as retinacular bowing (p<0.001). Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of using a cut-off of >14 mm2 of CSA proximal and distal to the tunnel were 75%, 87.5%, 86.8% and 63.6%, 100%, 78.9%, respectively. Using either CSA proximal or distal to the tunnel or bowing retinaculum at the outlet >1 mm yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 84.3% and 93.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The median nerve CSA proximal and distal to the carpal tunnel and bowing of the retinaculum at the outlet are helpful in diagnosis of CTS.

Focal nodular and diffuse haematopoietic marrow hyperplasia in patients with underlying malignancies: a radiological mimic of malignancy in need of recognition.

AIM: To report the authors' experience of focal nodular haematopoietic marrow hyperplasia (FNHMH) and diffuse haematopoietic marrow hyperplasia (DHMH) clinically masquerading as skip, distant, or disseminated metastasis in seven patients with underlying malignant neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients with FNHMH and two with DHMH mistaken radiologically as skip and disseminated metastasis, respectively, were compared and contrasted with four patients with osteosarcomas and two with chondrosarcomas harbouring skip metastasis, noting the temporal relationship with their haematological profile. RESULTS: FNHMH and DHMH were undetectable by plain radiography and computed tomography (CT) except one showing subtle sclerosis on CT. They showed either isointense or hyperintense, but not hypointense, attenuation at T1-weighted imaging, and all showed hyperintense attenuation at T2-weighted MRI relative to skeletal muscle. Of the five patients who underwent bone scintigraphy, one showed mildly increased uptake, and one out of two showed markedly increased 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG)-positron-emission tomography (PET) uptake. The rates for sarcoma skip metastasis by plain radiography, CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy were 40%, 66.7%, 100%, and 66.7%, respectively. At MRI, 60% showed hypointense and 40% isointense attenuation at T1-weighted, 80% hyperintense and 20% hypointense attenuation at T2-weighted imaging. Combined FDG-PET and CT, which was performed in only one patient, failed to show the skip metastasis. Not every patient with FNHMH or DHMH received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), but all had low or falling haemoglobin levels, which may thus be the prime cause for HMH. CONCLUSIONS: Due to overlapping radiological features, FNHMH and DHMH are great radiological mimics of malignancy. In some cases, needle biopsy is required for their definitive differentiation.

Features discriminating SARS from other severe viral respiratory tract infections.

This study investigated the discriminatory features of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and severe non-SARS community-acquired viral respiratory infection (requiring hospitalization) in an emergency department in Hong Kong. In a case-control study, clinical, laboratory and radiological data from 322 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS from the 2003 SARS outbreak were compared with the data of 253 non-SARS adult patients with confirmed viral respiratory tract infection from 2004 in order to identify discriminatory features. Among the non-SARS patients, 235 (93%) were diagnosed as having influenza infections (primarily H3N2 subtype) and 77 (30%) had radiological evidence of pneumonia. In the early phase of the illness and after adjusting for baseline characteristics, SARS patients were less likely to have lower respiratory symptoms (e.g. sputum production, shortness of breath, chest pain) and more likely to have myalgia (p < 0.001). SARS patients had lower mean leukocyte and neutrophil counts (p < 0.0001) and more commonly had "ground-glass" radiological changes with no pleural effusion. Despite having a younger average age, SARS patients had a more aggressive respiratory course requiring admission to the ICU and a higher mortality rate. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for predicting SARS when all variables were considered was 0.983. Using a cutoff score of >99, the sensitivity was 89.1% (95%CI 82.0-94.0) and the specificity was 98.0% (95%CI 95.4-99.3). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for predicting SARS when all variables except radiological change were considered was 0.933. Using a cutoff score of >8, the sensitivity was 80.7% (95%CI 72.4-87.3) and the specificity was 94.5% (95%CI 90.9-96.9). Certain clinical manifestations and laboratory changes may help to distinguish SARS from other influenza-like illnesses. Scoring systems may help identify patients who should receive more specific tests for influenza or SARS.