Effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of non-powered mechanical sheaths for transvenous lead extraction.

Aims: To analyse the effectiveness, safety and long-term outcomes of conventional non-powered mechanical systems for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) performed by experienced first operators. Outcomes were assessed according to lead location and type of operating room in which the procedure was performed. Methods and results: Data from 2049 patients (mean age: 65 years), with infectious (40%) or non-infectious (60%) indications, were analysed over a mean of 3.37 (±2.29) years. A total of 3426 leads were extracted; and, overall, 95% full procedural, 4% partial procedural, and 98% clinical success were demonstrated. Within the patient cohort, 1.8% (37/2049) experienced major complications, with cardiac tamponade being predominant (30/37). Cardiac tamponade was identified as the main cause of mortality, as well as the cause of all procedure-related deaths (6/2049; 0.3%). Cardiac tamponade occurred in 1.8% of atrial and 0.3% of right ventricular lead extractions, with fatal tamponade reported in 9% of atrial, 40% of ventricular, and 67% of coronary sinus lead extractions. No association between lead location and cardiac tamponade-related mortality was observed; however, lead location did affect the success of pericardiocentesis. The cardiac tamponade-related mortality rate was 37% when TLE was performed in an electrophysiology laboratory. No deaths were reported when the procedure was performed in a cardiac surgery or hybrid operating room. Long-term survival was improved when TLE was performed due to non-infectious indications, rather than pocket infection or lead-related endocarditis (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Using conventional non-powered mechanical sheaths, TLE was effective even in patients at high risk of complications.

Lightning-induced pacing system malfunction: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Atmospheric electrical discharge is an extremely powerful natural phenomenon which can have dangerous and lethal effects on the human body. However, there is no evidence to indicate whether and, if so, to what extent the electric current travelling through the body can affect proper pacemaker function. CASE SUMMARY: An 80-year-old patient admitted to emergency department after being struck by a lightning bolt while riding a bike. The patient had a DDD pacemaker implanted 4 years prior to the incident. The ECG on admission depicted pacemaker spikes and native sinus rhythm at 50-60 b.p.m. On the 3rd day after admission the patient developed recurrent pacing-induced tachycardia. Pacemaker interrogation showed high pacing thresholds (failure to pace in the atrial channel). When the patient's condition stabilized she was transferred to the tertiary hospital for transcutaneous lead extraction. The extracted pacing system was sent to Biotronik for thorough evaluation. DISCUSSION: Injuries due to a lightning strike are considered a rare occurrence but being struck by lightning with a pacemaker or an ICD is even less common. In the present case, the cause of cardiac arrhythmia was most probably electrical burn at the endocardial-electrode interface and a sudden elevation of the pacing threshold leading to transient pacing failure in both PM channels. To the best of our knowledge, in this case presentation we first described permanent lightning-induced pacemaker dysfunction.

Long-term follow-up after pacemaker implantation via persistent left superior vena cava.

BACKGROUND: The persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a relatively common con-genital venous return anomaly. It may have serious clinical implications especially in case of pacemaker/cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, venous catheter insertion, radio-frequency ablation and cardiac surgery. There is also some evidence that PLSVC may be accompanied by arrhythmias. The aim of this report is to present the effectiveness and safety of cardiac pacing via PLSVC, clinical outcome and appearance of arrhythmias in a long-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four cases of pacing electrodes implanted via PLSVC in patients without any other cardiac congenital heart anomalies were observed for at least 6 years. There was 1 patient with AAI, 2 patients with VVI, and 1 with DDD pacemaker. Atrial electrodes were implanted on the free right atrial wall, 2 ventricular electrodes were implanted in right ventricular outflow tract, 1 in postero-lateral cardiac vein. During the mean 110 months of observation, pacing was efficient. One patient underwent an upgrade from AAI to biatrial pac-ing due to progressive interatrial conduction delay during the follow-up. No other intervention or pacemaker related events were noticed except for battery replacement. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of PSVC may complicate implantation, but it does not influence the long-term follow-up of pacing parameters.