[Muscle cramps]. / Crampes musculaires.

Muscle cramps are very common and can reduce quality of life. There are multiple causes, including some physiological conditions, metabolic, endocrine, vascular disorders or neuromuscular diseases. Adequate management first requires differentiating cramps from other muscular phenomena. In most cases, the investigations are limited to a comprehensive history and clinical examination, but a biological, radiological and/or electrophysiological work-up may be useful. Treatment, when needed, is most often symptomatic and is unfortunately based on little evidence.

Les crampes musculaires sont fréquentes dans la population générale avec, dans certains cas, une altération importante de la qualité de vie. Leur cause est très variée, pouvant être en lien avec certaines conditions physiologiques ou avec des troubles métaboliques, endocriniens, vasculaires ou neuromusculaires. Une prise en charge adéquate nécessite dans un premier temps de différencier les crampes d'autres phénomènes musculaires. Dans la plupart des cas, les investigations se limitent à une anamnèse et un examen clinique, mais un bilan biologique, radiologique et/ou électrophysiologique peut être parfois indiqué. Le traitement, si nécessaire, est le plus souvent symptomatique et repose malheureusement sur peu d'évidences scientifiques.

[Cramps and fasciculations: is it amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?] / Crampes et fasciculations : est-ce une sclérose latérale amyotrophique ?

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common motor neuron disease of the adult age. It is an aggressive condition with a mean disease duration of only 3 to 5 years, characterized by progressive weakness and atrophy of limb, bulbar, and respiratory muscles. In general, death is caused by chronic hypoventilation due to respiratory insufficiency. No causal treatment is known today, but the two therapeutic agents authorized in Switzerland for the treatment of ALS can slow disease progression significantly. Other important therapeutic strategies include invasive/non-invasive ventilation, pain therapy, as well as physio-, ergo- and speech therapy on a regular basis.

La sclérose latérale amyotrophique (SLA) est la maladie du motoneurone la plus fréquente de l'adulte. C'est une maladie sévère (la survie moyenne est d'environ 3 à 5 ans), caractérisée par une dégénérescence des premier et deuxième motoneurones. Elle se manifeste par un déficit moteur amyotrophiant progressif des membres, de la langue, des muscles bulbaires et respiratoires. En général, le décès est causé par une hypoventilation chronique. Il n'existe actuellement aucun traitement curatif. Les deux médicaments autorisés en Suisse peuvent ralentir significativement la progression de la maladie et plusieurs nouvelles molécules sont à l'essai. Les traitements non médicamenteux/symptomatiques constituent le deuxième pilier de la prise en charge : ventilation non invasive, traitement des symptômes bulbaires, stabilisation du poids, physio et ergothérapie.

[Muscle disease in the adults: when to suspect it?] / Maladies musculaires de l'adulte : quand évoquer le diagnostic ?

Muscle diseases or myopathies have heterogeneous clinical presentations and etiologies. The principal sign is muscular weakness, whose distribution can help diagnostic orientation. Exercise intolerance, even without weakness at rest, can indicate an underlying myopathy. An isolated CK elevation can have multiple causes, but its persistence after a period of rest can point towards a subclinical myopathy. Isolated myalgia, especially at rest, are usually not associated with muscle disease. If the suspicion of myopathy is high, the patient will be assessed by a neurologist trained in muscle disorders, with correlation of clinical and neurophysiological findings, muscle imaging and, if indicated, muscle biopsy and genetic analysis. Cardiac and respiratory assessments are mandatory if a myopathy is suspected.

Les myopathies sont d'étiologie et de présentation hétérogènes. Le signe principal est la faiblesse musculaire, dont la distribution peut orienter le diagnostic. L'intolérance à l'effort, même isolée, peut indiquer une myopathie, en particulier métabolique. Une élévation isolée des créatines kinases (CK) peut avoir des causes multiples mais la persistance d'une valeur anormalement élevée au repos peut être un indice de myopathie subclinique. Les myalgies isolées, notamment au repos, ne sont en général pas associées aux myopathies. Si la suspicion de myopathie est retenue, le patient sera évalué par un neurologue expert en pathologie musculaire, pour complément d'explorations par bilan neurophysiologique (ENMG (électroneuromyographique)), imagerie musculaire et biopsie musculaire ou analyse génétique. Les bilans cardiaque et respiratoire sont indispensables dans tous les cas.

[What have we learned about chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathyin the last twenty years ?] / Qu'avons-nous compris en 20 ans sur la polyradiculoneuropathie inflammatoire démyélinisante chronique ?

chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) has been widely described during the last quarter of the twentieth century. The last 20 years have seen decisive progress in its understanding. The diagnostic criteria have been simplified and the steps of the diagnostic process have been clarified. The phenotypic contours of the disease are now well known, as are the diagnostic pitfalls. From a pathophysiological point of view, the discovery of autoantibodies directed against nodal and paranodal proteins has been a major advance, although it concerns only a minority of patients. These discoveries have a major impact on the therapeutic management of these patients, often suffering from a very active form of the disease. The next 20 years will surely see a further deepening of knowledge about this fascinating disease.

La polyradiculoneuropathie inflammatoire démyélinisante chronique est une entité largement décrite au cours du dernier quart du 20e siècle. Les 20 dernières années ont vu s'accomplir des progrès décisifs dans sa compréhension. Les critères diagnostiques se sont simplifiés et les étapes de la démarche diagnostique se sont précisées. Les contours phénotypiques de l'affection sont désormais bien connus, de même que les pièges diagnostiques. Sur le plan physiopathologique, la découverte des autoanticorps dirigés contre les protéines nodales et paranodales a été une avancée majeure qui ne concerne toutefois qu'une minorité de patients. Ces découvertes ont un impact majeur sur la prise en charge thérapeutique de ces patients, souffrant souvent d'une forme très active de la maladie. Les 20 prochaines années verront sûrement s'approfondir encore les connaissances sur cette maladie fascinante.

[Treating hereditary neuropathies : a dream come true?] / Traiter les neuropathies héréditaires : un rêve qui devient réalité ?

Hereditary neuropathies have been the subject of recent major therapeutic advances. Treatments based on antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) have been developed and are now commercially available to treat hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hTTR) and porphyria. More recently, a CRISPR-Cas9 genomic editing treatment targeting the TTR gene has been developed and is being tested in patients with hTTR. Based on their success in hTTR and porphyria, innovative treatments targeting mRNA and DNA are being evaluated in other hereditary neuropathies, including Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT).

Les neuropathies héréditaires ont fait l'objet d'avancées thérapeu­tiques majeures. Ainsi, des traitements à base d'oligonucléotides antisens (ASO) et d'ARN interférentiels (ARNi) ont récemment été développés et sont maintenant disponibles pour traiter efficacement la neuropathie amyloïde familiale à transthyrétine (NAF-TTR) et la porphyrie. Encore plus récemment, des traitements d'édition génomique de type CRISPR-Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-Cas9) ciblant le gène TTR ont été mis au point et sont testés chez des patients avec une NAF-TTR. Forts de leur succès dans la NAF-TTR et la porphyrie, ces traitements innovants ciblant l'ARNm et l'ADN sont en cours d'évaluation dans d'autres neuropathies héréditaires, dont la maladie de Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT).

[Neurological shoulder pain and weakness : practical attitudes]. / Douleurs et faiblesse de l'épaule neurologique : attitudes pratiques.

Shoulder pain or paresis should be assessed carefully, as there are many possible causes, which can be osteoarticular, degenerative, inflammatory, or neurological. Weakness or pain can be related to cervicobrachialgia, plexitis, or focal mononeuropathy. The clinical picture should identify any muscular or mechanical origin of paresis responsible for pseudo-paretic functional limitation. Neurogenic scapulalgia with functional deficit implies the compression or entrapment of a nerve trunk including the axillary, long thoracic, accessory, suprascapular, or dorsal scapular nerves. Nerve conduction study and myography together with medical imaging help to identify the relevant etiology. Treatment mostly includes pain relief and physiotherapy, but surgery is rarely necessary.

L'épaule douloureuse ou parétique est d'appréhension délicate et de causes variées : ostéoarticulaire, dégénérative, inflammatoire ou neurologique. La faiblesse ou la douleur peuvent être liées à une cervicobrachialgie, une plexite ou une mononeuropathie focale. Le tableau clinique doit distinguer une parésie d'origine musculaire ou mécanique responsable alors d'une limitation fonctionnelle pseudo-parétique. Une scapulalgie déficitaire neurogène implique la recherche d'une mononeuropathie d'enclavement ou compressive d'un tronc nerveux, axillaire, long thoracique, accessoire du XIe nerf crânien, suprascapulaire ou dorsal de la scapula. Au besoin l'ENMG (électroneuromyogramme)et l'imagerie débrouilleront les multiples étiologies. Le traitement requiert le plus souvent une antalgie et une rééducation, rarement une chirurgie.

[Small fiber neuropathy diagnosis]. / Diagnostiquer une neuropathie des petites fibres.

Small fiber neuropathies affect small, poorly myelinated sensory Aδ and amyelinated C autonomic fibers. Neuropathic pain is often the main symptom. Positive diagnosis is based on the presence of deficient thermo-algesic sensory signs and/or dysautonomic signs with normal neurography. Several tests help to confirm the involvement of small fibers, ranging from simple tests such as the sympathetic skin response to skin biopsy, which measures the density of intraepidermal nerve fibers. The availability of these different tests varies greatly from one center to another. There are multiple etiologies, from rare genetic causes to the more frequent acquired dysimmune or metabolic causes. However, in more than half of the cases, no etiology is identified.

Les neuropathies des petites fibres touchent les petites fibres peu myélinisées sensitives Aδ et amyéliniques C autonomes. La douleur neuropathique est souvent le symptôme principal. Le diagnostic positif repose sur la présence de signes sensitifs thermo-algiques déficitaires et/ou de signes dysautonomiques avec des neurographies normales. Plusieurs examens aident à confirmer l'atteinte des petites fibres, allant de tests simples comme la réponse cutanée sympathique à la biopsie de peau qui mesure la densité des fibres nerveuses intra-épidermiques. L'accessibilité de ces différents examens est très variable d'un centre à l'autre. Les étiologies sont variées, des causes génétiques rares aux causes acquises dysimmunes ou métaboliques plus fréquentes. Toutefois, dans plus de la moitié des cas, aucune étiologie n'est retrouvée.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease misdiagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: An international multicentric retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease, an untreatable hereditary polyneuropathy, may mimic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), a treatable neuropathy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the characteristics of CMT patients misdiagnosed as CIDP at 16 university hospitals in three countries, compared these patients with a reference group of CIDP patients, and estimated the cost of misdiagnosis. RESULTS: Among 1104 CIDP cases, we identified 35 CMT patients misdiagnosed as CIDP (3.2%). All were initially diagnosed with definite or probable CIDP (European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society criteria), and mutations in PMP22, MPZ, and 10 other CMT genes were found in 34%, 31%, and 35% of cases, respectively. In comparison with a reference group of 35 CIDP patients, CMT patients were younger (median age at disease onset = 39 vs. 56 years) and more frequently had motor weakness at disease onset (80% vs. 29%), hearing loss (14% vs. 0%), normal brachial plexus imaging (70% vs. 40%), lower cerebrospinal fluid protein content (median = 0.5 vs. 0.8 g/L), and lower treatment response (20% vs. 69%). Treatment cost in these 35 misdiagnosed patients was estimated at 4.6 million euros (M€), whereas the cost of CMT genetic analysis in 1104 patients was estimated at 2.7 M€. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 35 of 1104 (3.2%) patients initially diagnosed with CIDP had CMT. Importantly, the cost of treating these 35 misdiagnosed patients was significantly higher than the cost of performing CMT genetic analysis in 1104 patients (4.6 M€ vs. 2.7 M€), suggesting that CMT genetic investigations should be more widely used before diagnosing CIDP.

Multifocal Motor Neuropathy with Persistent Conduction Block: The Seminal Case.

Although multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is now recognized as a distinct, albeit rare, neurological condition, the path to its recognition was long and winding. This article provides an insight into the medical history of MMN "patient zero" and the first scientific publication that led to the recognition of MMN by the medical community. Multifocal motor neuropathy is nowadays recognized as a disease that produces asymmetric muscle weakness and cramping, with spontaneous motor unit activity (fasciculations and myokymia) but without sensory disorder. From an electrophysiological point of view, the neuropathy is characterized by persistent conduction blocks that usually initially affect the proximal upper extremity. The path to recognizing this rare entity was long and winding. In this article, we describe the first known patient suffering from this disease and the scientific context of its emergence, leading to the first publication on the subject, written by Gérard Roth (1923-2006) and his colleagues at the Neurology Department of Geneva University Hospital (Switzerland) [Eur Neurol. 1986;25(6):416-23].

Anti-TNF alpha medications and neuropathy.

We studied the clinical, electrophysiological, and pathological features, outcome, and frequency of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (a-TNF) medications-induced neuropathies (ATIN) in patients with inflammatory disorders. Of 2,017 patients treated with a-TNF medication, 12 patients met our inclusion criteria for a prevalence of 0.60% and an incidence of 0.4 cases per 1,000 person-years. The median time from a-TNF medication treatment to ATIN was 16.8 months (range 2-60 months). Six patients had focal or multifocal peripheral neuropathies. The other six had generalized neuropathies. For all, a-TNF medication was stopped. Seven patients received immunoglobulin infusions. ATIN outcome was favorable in all but one patient. ATINs are rare and heterogeneous neuropathies. In 10 patients, the neuropathy was "inflammatory", suggesting that it could be due to systemic pro-inflammatory effects of a-TNF agents.

[Neurological manifestations in musculoskeletal disorders]. / Manifestations neurologiques des troubles musculosquelettiques.

Musculoskeletal disorders are a crossroad among diverse specialties: neurology, rehabilitation, orthopedics, occupational medicine and psycho-traumatology. They are integrated into occupational medicine and encompass overuse syndromes, repeated micro-trauma and focal compressive neuropathies linked with professional or sports' activity. Neurological manifestations are omnipresent. Yet, their importance is not always recognized despite frequent resort to neurologists specialized in peripheral nervous system disorders and neurophysiology, as well as, to behavioral cognition specialists. Therapeutic approaches require preventive and work organization measures, neurophysiologic investigations and imaging in expert hands, and conservative treatment with physiotherapy, with or without paraneural and intra-articular injections.

Motor unit number index as an individual biomarker: Reference limits of intra-individual variability over time in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Motor unit number index (MUNIX) is proposed to monitor neuromuscular disorders. Our objective is to determine the intra-individual variability over time of the MUNIX. METHODS: In 11 different hospital centres, MUNIX was assessed twice, at least 3 months apart (range 90-360 days), in tibialis anterior (TA), abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and deltoid muscles in 118 healthy subjects. MUNIX sum score 2, 3 and 4 were respectively the sum of the MUNIX of the TA and ADM, of the TA, APB and ADM and of the TA, APB, ADM and deltoid muscles. RESULTS: The repeatability of the MUNIX was better for sum scores than for single muscle recordings. The variability of the MUNIX was independent of sex, age, interval between measurements and was lower for experienced than non-experienced operators. The 95th percentile of the coefficient of variability of the MUNIX sum score 2, 3 and 4 were respectively 22%, 18% and 15% for experienced operators. CONCLUSIONS: The MUNIX technique must be performed by experienced operators on several muscles to reduce its variability and improve its reliability. SIGNIFICANCE: A variation of the MUNIX sum score ≥20% can be interpreted as a significant change of muscle innervation.

Clinical, Biomarker, and Molecular Delineations and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations of Ataxia With Oculomotor Apraxia Type 1.

Importance: Ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 1 (AOA1) is an autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia due to mutations in the aprataxin gene (APTX) that is characterized by early-onset cerebellar ataxia, oculomotor apraxia, axonal motor neuropathy, and eventual decrease of albumin serum levels. Objectives: To improve the clinical, biomarker, and molecular delineation of AOA1 and provide genotype-phenotype correlations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective analysis included the clinical, biological (especially regarding biomarkers of the disease), electrophysiologic, imaging, and molecular data of all patients consecutively diagnosed with AOA1 in a single genetics laboratory from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2014. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical, biological, and molecular spectrum of AOA1 and genotype-phenotype correlations. Results: The diagnosis of AOA1 was confirmed in 80 patients (46 men [58%] and 34 women [42%]; mean [SD] age at onset, 7.7 [7.4] years) from 51 families, including 57 new (with 8 new mutations) and 23 previously described patients. Elevated levels of α-fetoprotein (AFP) were found in 33 patients (41%); hypoalbuminemia, in 50 (63%). Median AFP level was higher in patients with AOA1 (6.0 ng/mL; range, 1.1-17.0 ng/mL) than in patients without ataxia (3.4 ng/mL; range, 0.8-17.2 ng/mL; P < .01). Decreased albumin levels (ρ = -0.532) and elevated AFP levels (ρ = 0.637) were correlated with disease duration. The p.Trp279* mutation, initially reported as restricted to the Portuguese founder haplotype, was discovered in 53 patients with AOA1 (66%) with broad white racial origins. Oculomotor apraxia was found in 49 patients (61%); polyneuropathy, in 74 (93%); and cerebellar atrophy, in 78 (98%). Oculomotor apraxia correlated with the severity of ataxia and mutation type, being more frequent with deletion or truncating mutations (83%) than with presence of at least 1 missense variant (17%; P < .01). Mean (SD) age at onset was higher for patients with at least 1 missense mutation (17.7 [11.4] vs 5.2 [2.6] years; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The AFP level, slightly elevated in a substantial fraction of patients, may constitute a new biomarker for AOA1. Oculomotor apraxia may be an optional finding in AOA1 and correlates with more severe disease. The p.Trp279* mutation is the most frequent APTX mutation in the white population. APTX missense mutations may be associated with a milder phenotype.

[The entrapment neuropathy: a treatable cause of musculoskeletal pain]. / Neuropathie d'enclavement: une cause traitable de douleurs musculosquelettiques.

A canal syndrome induces clinical manifestations secondary to the entrapment of a peripheral nerve passing through an inextensible anatomical structure. The injured nerve induces stereotyped or atypical semiology requiring frequently a neurophysiological examination. The most frequently encountered entrapment neuropathies of the upper and lower extremities are reviewed and the treatment discussed, based on immobilization, prescription of oral prednisone, local steroid injection or surgical decompression.

Acute painful diabetic neuropathy: an uncommon, remittent type of acute distal small fibre neuropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Acute painful diabetic neuropathy (APDN) is a distinctive diabetic polyneuropathy and consists of two subtypes: treatment-induced neuropathy (TIN) and diabetic neuropathic cachexia (DNC). The characteristics of APDN are (1.) the small-fibre involvement, (2.) occurrence paradoxically after short-term achievement of good glycaemia control, (3.) intense pain sensation and (4.) eventual recovery. In the face of current recommendations to achieve quickly glycaemic targets, it appears necessary to recognise and understand this neuropathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Over 2009 to 2012, we reported four cases of APDN. Four patients (three males and one female) were identified and had a mean age at onset of TIN of 47.7 years (±6.99 years). Mean baseline HbA1c was 14.2% (±1.42) and 7.0% (±3.60) after treatment. Mean estimated time to correct HbA1c was 4.5 months (±3.82 months). Three patients presented with a mean time to symptom resolution of 12.7 months (±1.15 months). One patient had an initial normal electroneuromyogram (ENMG) despite the presence of neuropathic symptoms, and a second abnormal ENMG showing axonal and myelin neuropathy. One patient had a peroneal nerve biopsy showing loss of large myelinated fibres as well as unmyelinated fibres, and signs of microangiopathy. CONCLUSIONS: According to the current recommendations of promptly achieving glycaemic targets, it appears necessary to recognise and understand this neuropathy. Based on our observations and data from the literature we propose an algorithmic approach for differential diagnosis and therapeutic management of APDN patients.

Efficacy of lidocaine patch 5% in the treatment of focal peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes (PNPS) are difficult to treat because commonly used analgesics are often ineffective when, for example, touch-evoked allodynia, hyperalgesia, and pain paroxysms are present. To investigate whether lidocaine patch 5% treatment is also effective in postherpetic neuropathy (PHN) and in other PNPS, 40 patients with various forms and localizations of PNPS completed a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way, cross-over study in three medical hospitals. Patients suffering from pain in a localized skin area with intensity above 40 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and a stable consumption of pain medication were included in this study. The study was divided into four phases: 3-day run-in phase, treatment phase 1, wash-out period, and treatment phase 2, each lasting 1 week. At the discretion of the patients, up to four patches (covering a maximum of 560 cm2) were applied onto the maximally painful area for 12 consecutive hours daily, always either by day or at night. Throughout the four phases, ongoing pain, allodynia, quality of neuropathic symptoms, quality of sleep, and adverse events were assessed. When, after the wash-out period, the pain intensity scores did not return to the pre-treatment values (+/-20%), these patients were excluded from the study. The present study revealed that, as an add-on therapy, the lidocaine patch 5% was clearly effective in reducing ongoing pain (P=0.017) and allodynia (P=0.023) during the first 8 h after application and that the patches also worked well over a period of 7 days (P=0.018) in diverse focal PNPS. Calculation of the numbers needed to treat (NNT) to obtain one patient with more than 50% relief of ongoing pain revealed that the NNT of 4.4 in the present study compared reasonably well with other studies of PHN, such as topically applied capsaicin (NNT: 5.3-infinity) or systemic treatment with gabapentin (NNT: 3.2-5.0).