Analgesic effects of oral nalbuphine and codeine in patients with postoperative pain.

Efficacy and safety of oral nalbuphine in doses of 15 and 45 mg were compared with those of the standard oral analgesic codeine in single doses of 30 and 90 mg in 153 patients with acute postoperative pain; data on 20 more patients were excluded because they received potentially interfering medications. All patients had pain ranging from moderate to severe in intensity and most had severe pain related to orthopedic procedures or trauma. Estimates of relative potency showed that nalbuphine was three times as potent as codeine. The most common side effect was sedation, which was greatest in patients who received the higher doses of codeine and nalbuphine. The effects of oral nalbuphine are much like those of oral codeine in patients with acute postoperative pain.

Ticrynafen and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertension.

In a double-blind study, 28 patients having mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomly assigned to a 6-week regimen of ticrynafen, hydrochlorothiazide, or placebo. Blood pressure fell after ticrynafen and hydrochlorothiazide. Serum uric acid fell strikingly with ticrynafen whereas it rose with hydrochlorothiazide. Serum potassium declined very little with ticrynafen; much less than with hydrochlorothiazide. Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen rose slightly more with ticrynafen than with hydrochlorothiazide. There were no clinical adverse effects to either of the medications. Ticrynafen appears to be an effective antihypertensive with a substantial hypouricemic effect.

Prazosin versus captopril as initial therapy. Effect on hypertension and lipid levels.

A randomized, parallel group study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and effect of the alpha blocking agent prazosin and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor captopril on serum lipid levels in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Baseline evaluations were performed on 31 patients after a four-week placebo washout period. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either prazosin (n = 15) or captopril (n = 16). Daily doses were titrated as follows: for prazosin, 1 mg two times daily to maximum of 20 mg per day; for captopril, 25 mg three times daily to a maximum of 450 mg per day. If diastolic blood pressure was not adequately controlled (less than 85 mm Hg) after four weeks of monotherapy, 1 mg of polythiazide was added to the daily regimen. There were no statistically significant differences between the drug groups for the measured variables in either the parallel or crossover phase of the study. Five of 15 prazosin-treated patients and six of 16 captopril-treated patients required the addition of thiazide to achieve blood pressure control.

Effectiveness of prazosin as initial antihypertensive therapy.

After nearly 10 years in clinical use, prazosin has been shown in numerous studies worldwide to be an effective antihypertensive agent over the entire range of hypertension (mild, moderate, and severe), when used alone or in multitherapy. In addition to its general effectiveness, prazosin is particularly useful in specific subpopulations of hypertensive patients, such as those with impaired renal function, those on hemodialysis, and those with concomitant heart block, bronchospasm, diabetes mellitus, or disturbed carbohydrate metabolism, hyperlipidemia, or hyperuricemia. The side effects of prazosin are usually mild and transient and seldom require discontinuation of the drug. Sexual dysfunction is uncommon. In clinical experience with 22,000 patients receiving an initial dose of 1 mg of prazosin, syncope was reported in 1 of every 667 patients (0.15%). Withholding diuretics for 1 day before initiating prazosin therapy, utilizing prazosin as first-line therapy, limiting the initial dose to 1 mg, and taking it at bedtime are all helpful in eliminating many of the initial adverse effects. Fluid retention, although rare and not as pronounced as that with other antihypertensive agents, may develop on long-term therapy and may necessitate the addition of a diuretic later on.

A comparison of prazosin versus nadolol in combination with a diuretic.

The comparative efficacy and effects on total body potassium of prazosin and polythiazide vs nadolol and polythiazide in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension unresponsive to diuretic alone were compared in an open, crossover trial involving 20 male patients. Both prazosin and nadolol reduced blood pressure to goal values in both study phases. Side effects were minor, and only 1 patient dropped out of treatment for reasons unrelated to the study drugs. Neither prazosin nor nadolol in combination with thiazide had significant additional adverse effects on total body potassium. These findings confirm that the efficacy of prazosin is equivalent to that of nadolol in the long-term management of patients with essential hypertension.

Validation of a computer-assisted method for estimating the number and volume of gallstones visualized by cholecystography.

It is likely that in the near future there will be widespread use of medicinal therapy to dissolve gallstones. The efficacy of medicinal therapy can best be determined by attempting to relate the total surface area of a collection of gallstones to the composition of bile in patients undergoing therapy. Surface area, in turn, can be directly related to gallstone size and number. In this study, involving 48 cholecystectomized patients, we have shown that standard cholecystography, together with a computer-assisted method of metrology, can effectively monitor the above parameters. Determinations of the standard deviation of 1) replicate readings (35.8%) and 2) averaged metrology estimates compared with actual stone volumes (42.9%), as well as correlation of actual stone volumes with averaged metrology estimates (r = 0.961), indicated the magnitude of assessed change in stone volume that would be necessary to accept a roentgenographic decrease or increase in stone size with 95% confidence. Even with the increased precision found in the computer-assisted method as described, to attain a 98% certainty of some volume change it was necessary to have metrology volume change of 50% or more. Actual stone counts were without significant error in 87.5% of the determinations.

An analgesic comparison study of indoprofen versus aspirin and placebo in surgical pain.

Single oral doses of 100 and 200 mg indoprofen were compared with 600 mg aspirin and placebo in a double-blind, completely randomized study of hospitalized patients with postoperative, post-fracture, or musculoskeletal pain. The patients evaluated their pain for 5 hours after administration of the study drug. Each of the three active treatments performed significantly better than placebo. The 200-mg dose level of indoprofen demonstrated the greatest analgesic activity based on pain intensity and pain relief scores and on the patients' global evaluations. The analgesic activity of 100 mg indoprofen fell between that of 200 mg indoprofen and 600 mg aspirin and was not significantly different from either.

Double-blind comparison of triamterene plus hydrochlorothiazide and spironolactone plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension.

The results from this double-blind, multi-investigator study showed that a combination of 50 mg triamterene plus 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide and a combination of 25 mg spironolactone plus 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide were equally efficacious in lowering blood pressure in hypertensive outpatients, and that they produced the same type and incidence of adverse effects. Likewise, the two drug combinations produced similar effects on blood chemistry and hematology. There were no significant differences between the two combination drugs in efficacy laboratory studies, or adverse effects.

Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of concomitant administration of terazosin and methyclothiazide for the treatment of essential hypertension.

The efficacy and safety of once-daily 2.5- or 5.0-mg methyclothiazide (MCTZ) added to once-daily 5.0-mg terazosin (TRZ) versus 5.0-mg TRZ alone was evaluated in this double-blind, multicenter study. All patients received TRZ during a 6-week titration period. Hypertensive patients (222) (mean blood pressure of 159/104 mm Hg) were randomized to one of three treatment groups: TRZ alone (N = 76); TRZ+MCTZ-2.5 mg (N = 74); and TRZ+MCTZ-5.0 mg (N = 72) for the 8-week double-blind period. Changes in the supine and standing SBP/DBP from preTRZ period were: TRZ alone (-4.8/-8.1 and -2.6/-6.1 mm Hg); TRZ+MCTZ-2.5 mg (-17.3/-12.4 and -16.0/-11.2 mm Hg); and TRZ+MCTZ-5.0 mg (-20.6/-14.4 and -23.3/-14.6 mm Hg). Blood pressure changes in the combination groups were significantly greater than those in the TRZ alone group. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the TRZ+MCTZ-2.5-mg and TRZ+MCTZ-5.0-mg groups. The combination of TRZ and MCTZ tends to mitigate the adverse effects on serum glucose, uric, potassium and lipids usually associated with thiazide diuretics. Thus, combination treatment that begins with TRZ and adds MCTZ is effective in lowering blood pressure without any significant adverse metabolic effects.

Long-term efficacy and safety of prazosin in essential hypertension.

The long-term efficacy and safety of prazosin plus a thiazide diuretic in severe hypertension has been evaluated in an open trial that is now in its fifth year. The combination is consistently effective in reducing diastolic blood pressure to 90 mm Hg or less. No side effects or adverse reactions have been observed except a "first-dose" fall in blood pressure, and there is no evidence of development of tolerance to the agent.