Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Intern Emerg Med ; 17(4): 1175-1189, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103926

RESUMEN

The rapid worldwide spread of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) crisis has put health systems under pressure to a level never experienced before, putting intensive care units in a position to fail to meet an exponentially growing demand. The main clinical feature of the disease is a progressive arterial hypoxemia which rapidly leads to ARDS which makes the use of intensive care and mechanical ventilation almost inevitable. The difficulty of health systems to guarantee a corresponding supply of resources in intensive care, together with the uncertain results reported in the literature with respect to patients who undergo early conventional ventilation, make the search for alternative methods of oxygenation and ventilation and potentially preventive of the need for tracheal intubation, such as non-invasive respiratory support techniques particularly valuable. In this context, the Emergency Department, located between the area outside the hospital and hospital ward and ICU, assumes the role of a crucial junction, due to the possibility of applying these techniques at a sufficiently early stage and being able to rapidly evaluate their effectiveness. This position paper describes the indications for the use of non-invasive respiratory support techniques in respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19-related pneumonia, formulated by the Non-invasive Ventilation Faculty of the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine (SIMEU) on the base of what is available in the literature and on the authors' direct experience. Rationale, literature, tips & tricks, resources, risks and expected results, and patient interaction will be discussed for each one of the escalating non-invasive respiratory techniques: standard oxygen, HFNCO, CPAP, NIPPV, and awake self-repositioning. The final chapter describes our suggested approach to the failing patient.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Medicina de Emergencia , Ventilación no Invasiva , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Emerg Med ; 39(5): 676-84, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19818574

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Both non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and non-invasive pressure support ventilation (nPSV) have been shown to be effective treatment for acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE). In patients with severe ACPE who are treated with standard medical treatment, the baseline intubation rate is approximately 24%. STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the endotracheal intubation (ETI) rate using two techniques, nCPAP vs. nPSV. In addition, mortality rate, improvement in gas exchange, duration of ventilation, and hospital length of stay were also assessed. METHODS: This prospective, multi-center, randomized study enrolled 80 patients with ACPE who were randomized to receive nCPAP or nPSV (40 patients in each group) via an oronasal mask. Inclusion criteria were severe dyspnea, respiratory rate > 30 breaths/min, use of respiratory accessory muscles, or PaO(2)/FiO(2) < 200. RESULTS: ETI was required in 0 (0%) and in 3 (7.5%) patients in the nCPAP group and in the nPSV group, respectively (p = 0.241). No significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality: 2 (5%) vs. 7 (17.5%) in nCPAP and nPSV groups, respectively (p = 0.154). No difference in hospital length of stay was observed between the two groups, nor was there a difference observed in duration of ventilation, despite a trend for reduced time with nPSV vs. nCPAP (5.91 ± 4.01 vs. 8.46 ± 7.14 h, respectively, p = 0.052). Both nCPAP and nPSV were effective in improving gas exchange, including in the subgroup of hypercapnic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are effective treatment for patients with ACPE. Non-invasive CPAP should be considered as the first line of treatment because it is easier to use and less expensive than non-invasive PSV.


Asunto(s)
Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Edema Pulmonar/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Edema Pulmonar/epidemiología , Edema Pulmonar/etiología , Edema Pulmonar/mortalidad , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
West J Emerg Med ; 11(4): 400-1, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21079720

RESUMEN

Volvulus is a frequent condition in patients presenting in the emergency department (ED) with abdominal pain. While cecal volvulus occurs more often in young patients, sigmoid volvulus is more common in elderly patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA