Phase III double-blind placebo-controlled study of farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 in patients with refractory advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether R115777 improves survival in patients with refractory advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) in a multicenter, double-blind, prospective randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixty-eight patients were randomly assigned to R115777 (300 mg twice daily) orally for 21 days every 28 days or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. All patients received best supportive care. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression free survival, tumor response, toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were well balanced for baseline demographics, including previous chemotherapy for advanced CRC. The median overall survival for R115777 was 174 days (95% CI, 157 to 198 days), and 185 days (95% CI, 158 to 238 days) for those patients receiving placebo (P =.376). One patient achieved a partial response in the R115777 arm. Stable disease (> 3 months) was observed in 24.3% patients in the R115777 group compared to 12.8% in the placebo arm. This did not translate into a statistically significant increase in progression-free survival. Overall, treatment was well tolerated. There was an increased incidence of reversible myelosuppression (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia), rash, and grade 1 to 2 diarrhea in the R115777 arm. There was no statistically significant difference in quality of life between arms. CONCLUSION: Single agent R115777, given at this dose and schedule, has an acceptable toxicity profile, but does not improve overall survival compared to best supportive care alone in refractory advanced CRC.

Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of chronic oral administration of the farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor R115777 in advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of R115777, a farnesyl transferase inhibitor, when administered continuously via the oral route. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with R115777 using an interpatient dose escalation scheme starting at 50 mg bid. Pharmacokinetics were assessed on days 1, 28, and 56. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were entered onto the study and the median duration of treatment was 55 days. The dose-limiting toxicities were myelosuppression and neurotoxicity. At a dose of 400 mg bid, grade 4 leukocytopenia and neutropenia were seen in two of four patients. Neurotoxicity grade 3 developed in one of five patients at 500 mg bid and in one of 13 at 300 mg bid after 8 weeks of treatment. Common nonhematologic toxicities were nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The recommended dose for phase II/III testing in this scheme is 300 mg bid. The pharmacokinetic studies indicated dose proportionality. Little accumulation occurred and steady-state levels were reached within 2 to 3 days. Analyses of historic tumor material showed that five of 15 of patients had a K-ras mutation in codon 12. Three patients with pancreatic, colon, and cervix carcinomas had stable disease and one patient with a colon carcinoma had a minor response accompanied by a more than 50% decrease in carcinoembryonic antigen tumor marker. A fifth patient, with platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer, showed a partial response that lasted for 5 months. CONCLUSION: Continuous dosing of R115777 is feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile at a dose of 300 mg bid.

The orally administered P-glycoprotein inhibitor R101933 does not alter the plasma pharmacokinetics of docetaxel.

This Phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of combining docetaxel with the new P-glycoprotein inhibitor R101933 and to determine the dose limiting toxicity of this combination. Fifteen patients received oral R101933 alone at a dose escalated from 200 to 300 mg twice daily (b.i.d.; cycle 0), an escalating i.v. dose of docetaxel (60, 75, and 100 mg/m2) as a 1-h infusion (cycle 1), and the combination (cycle 2 and further). Dose limiting toxicity consisting of mucositis and neutropenic fever was reached at the combination of docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and R101933, 300 mg b.i.d., and the maximum tolerated dose was established at docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and R101933, 200 mg b.i.d. Plasma concentrations of R101933 achieved in patients were in the same range as required in preclinical rodent models to overcome paclitaxel resistance. The plasma pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not influenced by the R101933 regimen at any dose level tested, as indicated by plasma clearance values of 26.5 +/- 7.78 liters/h/m2 and 23.4 +/- 4.52 liters/h/m2 (P = 0.15) in cycles 1 and 2, respectively. These findings indicate that the contribution of a P-glycoprotein inhibitor to the activity of anticancer chemotherapy can now be assessed in patients for the first time independent of its effect on drug pharmacokinetics.

Phase I trial of recombinant interleukin-2 followed by recombinant tumor necrosis factor in patients with metastatic cancer.

In this Phase I trial, the feasibility of sequential administration of continuous intravenous recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) at 18 x 10(6) IU/m2/day for 6 days, followed by three daily bolus intravenous recombinant tumor necrosis factor (rTNF) infusions at doses escalating between 10 and 120 micrograms/m2/day, was investigated in 31 patients with metastatic malignancies. Prophylactic use of indomethacin prior to and during rTNF administration was found to significantly reduce toxicity. However, despite prophylactic indomethacin, a maximum tolerated dose of rTNF of 120 micrograms/m2 was reached. The limiting toxicity was hypotension. Predictable flu-like toxicities (i.e., fever/chills, hypotension, gastrointestinal toxicity, edema, malaise) were seen in most patients. These started during the rIL-2 infusion and continued during rTNF administration, particularly in the absence of indomethacin. Hematological, renal, and hepatic toxicities were not dose limiting. These toxicities were all reversible after treatment interruption. Pulmonary toxicity [i.e., anaphylactic-like reactions, bronchospasms, and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)] was seen in several patients immediately after rTNF infusions, irrespective of the rTNF dose or treatment cycle, and mainly in patients with extensive pulmonary metastases. The combined effect of treatment-related ARDS, lung metastases, and a Guillain-Barré syndrome led to the death of one patient. Two partial responses were seen in this study (i.e., breast and renal cancer). Based on these results, a Phase II trial of rIL-2 followed by rTNF has been initiated in metastatic breast cancer patients.

The development of anti-interleukin-2 (IL-2) antibodies in cancer patients treated with recombinant IL-2.

Serum samples from 217 cancer patients participating in phase I/II clinical trials were analysed for the development of anti-interleukin-2 (IL-2) antibodies. Patients received recombinant human IL-2 (rIL-2) by continuous intravenous infusion (c.i.v.; n = 86) or by subcutaneous (s.c.) injections (n = 131). Both patient groups developed anti-rIL-2 antibodies as detected by ELISA with similar frequencies and titres: 52% (median titre, 23) and 47% (median titre, 24), respectively. Using an IL-2-dependent T-cell proliferation assay, sera from 5 c.i.v.-treated patients (6%) and 13 s.c.-treated patients (10%) exhibited neutralising activity. Immunoabsorption studies with rIL-2-coated beads, demonstrated that in 8 of 15 patients with neutralising sera, the neutralising activity was correlated with specific anti-rIL-2 immunoglobulin. All 8 patients had received at least two cycles of rIL-2 by s.c. injections. Specific IL-2 neutralising activity affected both recombinant and natural IL-2 in all 8 patients. Development of anti-rIL-2 antibodies, irrespective of whether these exhibited neutralising activity or not, did not affect the frequency or duration of clinical responses.

Continuous infusion of recombinant interleukin-2 with or without autologous lymphokine activated killer cells for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Data have been analysed for 327 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving a continuous infusion of recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL-2) alone (225 patients) or rIL-2 plus lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells (102) on a normal oncology ward. Eligibility criteria were uniform across protocols, all patients having advanced progressive disease, but with an ambulatory performance status. The baseline characteristics of patients receiving rIL-2 alone did not differ significantly from those receiving LAK, with the exception that the LAK treated patients had a better performance status. Despite similar treatment intensity, toxicity was more severe in the patients receiving LAK. The addition of LAK did not lead to higher response rates or to prolonged response duration, progression-free survival or survival. This review confirms the activity of rIL-2 for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and demonstrates that the addition of LAK cells does not lead to increased efficacy.

A phase II study of sequential recombinant interleukin-2 followed by dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma.

16 patients with disseminated malignant melanoma (1 with primary ocular melanoma) entered a multicentre phase II study of recombinant interleukin-2, (rIL-2) given by continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-5 at 18 x 10(6) IU/m2 per day, followed by dacarbazine 850 mg/m2 on day 8. After a 2 week rest, a second course was given. In the absence of disease progression, monthly maintenance cycles were given for up to four cycles. 16 patients received one cycle, 14 received two and 6 patients three or more. All 16 patients are evaluable for toxicity and 15 for response. 2 patients responded (13%). 1 patient with lung and pleural metastases achieved partial remission after two cycles and went off treatment after six cycles. 3 months later a complete response was noted lasting 396+ days. A second patient with lung metastases had a partial response lasting 153 days. 3 patients (20%) had stable disease. Mean rebound lymphocytosis (24-48 h after the end of rIL-2 therapy), cell count 4.9 x 10(9)/l (2.6-8.8 x 10(9)/l) was within the expected limits. Other toxicity was as expected. Thus sequential treatment with rIL-2 and dacarbazine is feasible but synergy did not occur.

A phase III study of recombinant interleukin-2, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

135 patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer were entered into a phase III trial evaluating the efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy [recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL2)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV)] versus chemotherapy alone (5-FU/LV). A cycle of chemoimmunotherapy comprised a constant intravenous infusion of rIL2 at a dose of 18 x 10(6) U/m2/24 h for 120 h, followed by three bolus injections of 5-FU (600 mg/m2) and LV (25 mg/m2) at weekly intervals. Patients receiving chemotherapy alone received 5-FU/LV at the same dose at weekly intervals for 6 weeks followed by a rest period of 2 weeks, constituting one cycle of therapy. A maximum of 6 months therapy was given in both arms of the study. The response rates (complete and partial responses) were 17% in patients receiving rIL2/5-FU/LV versus 16% in those in the 5-FU/LV arm of the study. Median survival and progression-free survival were comparable for the two groups of patients, although there was a trend for a prolongation of survival in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone, beyond 12 months. Retrospective subgroup analyses revealed a significantly increased survival in poor prognosis patients (ECOG 1) treated with rIL2/5-FU/LV when compared to those receiving chemotherapy alone. Therefore, further studies evaluating the dose and duration of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer seem warranted.

Disposition of docetaxel in the presence of P-glycoprotein inhibition by intravenous administration of R101933.

Recently, a study of docetaxel in combination with the new orally administered P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor R101933 showed that this combination was feasible. However, due to the low oral bioavailability of R101933 and high interpatient variability, no further attempts to increase the level of P-gp inhibition were made. Here, we assessed the feasibility of combining docetaxel with intravenously (i.v.) administered R101933, and determined the disposition of docetaxel with and without the P-gp inhibitor. Patients received i.v. R101933 alone at a dose escalated from 250 to 500 mg on day 1 (cycle 0), docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) as a 1-h infusion on day 8 (cycle 1) and the combination every 3 weeks thereafter (cycle 2 and further cycles). 12 patients were entered into the study, of whom 9 received the combination treatment. Single treatment with i.v. R101933 was associated with minimal toxicity consisting of temporary drowsiness and somnolence. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of neutropenic fever was seen in cycles 1 and 2 or in further cycles at both dose levels. The plasma pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not changed by the R101933 regimen at any dose level tested, as indicated by plasma clearance values of 22.5+/-6.2 l/h/m(2) and 24.2+/-7.4 l/h/m(2) (P=0.38) in cycles 1 and 2, respectively. However, the faecal excretion of unchanged docetaxel decreased significantly after the combination treatment from 2.5+/-2.1% to less than 1% of the administered dose of docetaxel, most likely due to inhibition of the intestinal P-gp by R101933. Plasma concentrations of R101933 were not different in cycles 0 or 2 and the concentrations achieved in the first 12-h period after i.v. infusion were capable of inhibiting P-gp in an ex vivo assay. We conclude that the combination of 100 mg/m(2) i.v. docetaxel and 500 mg i.v. R101933 is feasible, lacks pharmacokinetic interaction in plasma, and shows evidence of P-gp inhibition both in an ex vivo assay and in vivo as indicated by the inhibition of intestinal P-gp.

Recombinant interleukin 2 for acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission: a pilot study.

We treated nine patients in first remission from AML with rhIL-2. The toxic effects of rhIL-2 infusion were, malaise, pyrexia, and hypotension, which resolved rapidly on cessation of rhIL-2 infusion. No patient required transfer to an intensive care unit. Following rhIL-2 infusions patients developed eosinophilia, and a modest lymphocytosis, involving both NK cells, and T lymphocytes. Relapse occurred in six patients at a median of 39 weeks from remission. A particular concern was rapid relapse in the two patients with AML FAB type M5. There was no survival advantage from rhIL-2 treatment when compared to a similar group of chemotherapy only treated AML patients from this institution.

Atrial natriuretic factor prohormone peptides are present in a variety of tissues.

Utilizing two sensitive and specific radioimmunoassays which immunologically recognize 1) the 98 amino acid (a.a.) N-terminus and 2) the 28 a.a. C-terminus (i.e., a.a. 99-126) of the 126 a.a. atrial natriuretic (ANF) prohormone, various tissues including aorta, kidney, small intestine, colon, liver, spleen, lung, and testis were investigated to determine if the ANF prohormone was present in any of these tissues in addition to its previously demonstrated presence in heart and brain. Aorta with 62.3 +/- 3 ng of the N-terminus/g of tissue and 51.6 +/- 1.8 ng of the C-terminus of the ANF prohormone/g of tissue had the highest concentration of the ANF prohormone of the previously undescribed ANF prohormone-containing tissues. The next highest concentration of the ANF prohormone was in the intestine, followed by lung and spleen. Pancreas, liver and kidney had similar levels of immunologically recognized ANF prohormone (approximately 1/50 of the aorta), while the testis and cerebrum had low levels. These results suggest that a much larger variety of tissues synthesize and/or store the ANF prohormone than is presently thought.

Treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis with continuous intraventricular infusion of recombinant interleukin-2.

A 42-year-old man developed leptomeningeal carcinomatosis 6 years after treatment of a malignant melanoma. He was treated with two courses of recombinant interleukin-2, administered as a continuous intraventricular infusion (6 X 10E5 U/24 h) during 5 days. During the first day of the first course he also received 5 X 10E9 lymphokine-activated killer cells intraventricularly. This gave rise to a severe elevation of intracranial pressure, with headaches and meningismus. During the second course no LAK cells were administered. This course was tolerated much better. The neurological status did not change during the treatment. Recombinant interleukin-2 levels were maintained at about 300 U/mL during both courses.

Evaluation of the bioequivalence of tablets and capsules containing the novel anticancer agent R115777 (Zarnestra) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

R115777 (Zamestra) is a novel anticancer agent, currently undergoing phase III clinical testing. An open, cross-over trial was performed in 24 patients with solid tumors to compare the bioavailability of a new tablet formulation with the standard capsule formulation. Both dosage forms were administered once daily in doses of 300 or 400 mg. Patients received R115777 as a capsule on day I and as a tablet on day 2, or vice versa. Blood samples were drawn up to 24 hours after drug intake and R115777 levels were measured using a validated high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were determined and compared for the two formulations: time to maximal plasma concentration (Tmax), half-life (t 1/2), maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve at twenty-four hours (AUC24h). For the latter two parameters, 90% classical confidence intervals of the ratio tablet/capsule were calculated after a log-transformation, using an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). For t 1/2 and Tmax, no statistically significant differences were found between tablet and capsule. The point estimates of the ratio's of the log-normalized Cmax and AUC24h were 0.94 and 0.92, respectively, and the 90% confidence intervals were 0.81-1.09 and 0.83-1.03, which is within the critical range for bioequivalence of 0.80-1.25. In conclusion, the established pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrate that the capsule and tablet formulations of R115777 are interchangeable.

A phase I safety, pharmacological and biological study of the farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor, tipifarnib and capecitabine in advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the toxicity and pharmacological and biological properties of the farnesyl protein transferase (FPTase) inhibitor, tipifarnib (R115777, ZARNESTRAtrade mark) and capecitabine administered for 14 days every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancers received twice daily tipifarnib (100-500 mg) and capecitabine (1000-1125 mg/m(2)) for 14 days every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetics of tipifarnib, capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were determined. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed for farnesylation of the HDJ2 chaperone protein and FPTase activity. RESULTS: Forty-one patients received 185 courses of treatment. Diarrhea and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were dose limiting at 300 mg tipifarnib/1125 mg/m(2) capecitabine b.i.d. When the capecitabine dose was fixed at 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d., neutropenia was dose limiting at 400 and 500 mg b.i.d. of tipifarnib. Capecitabine did not affect the pharmacology of tipifarnib at 100-300 mg b.i.d., although tipifarnib significantly increased the C(max) of 5-FU at 400 mg b.i.d. HDJ2 farnesylation and FPTase activity decreased between 200 and 400 mg b.i.d. doses of tipifarnib, without a dose-response relationship. Five patients demonstrated partial remissions and 11 patients maintained prolonged stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Tipifarnib and capecitabine are well tolerated at 300 mg/1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d., respectively, resulting in biologically relevant plasma concentrations and antitumor activity. The recommended dose for further disease-focused studies is 300 mg b.i.d. tipifarnib and 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. capecitabine, given for 14 days every 3 weeks.

Treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with recombinant subcutaneous human interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha.

We treated 17 patients who had progressive metastatic renal carcinoma with a combination of subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin-2 (administered every 12 hours, at 9.0 million IU/m2 on days one and two, followed by 1.8 million IU/m2, five days per week, over six consecutive weeks) and interferon-alpha 2b (given at 5 million U/m2 three times weekly, for six consecutive weeks). Treatment courses were repeated in patients presenting with stable or regressive disease after the six weeks of combination therapy (11 of 14 evaluable). Two and three of 14 evaluable patients achieved complete and partial remissions, respectively. Toxicity of this regimen was moderate, with local inflammation of the injection sites, grade I-II (WHO) fevers, chills, malaise, nausea/vomiting, and anorexia in more than two-thirds of the patients treated.

Intravesical therapy of superficial bladder transitional cell carcinoma with tumor necrosis factor-alpha: preliminary report of a phase I-II study.

A phase I-II trial of intravesical immunotherapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha in 24 patients affected by superficial bladder tumors is herein presented. Of these, 11 patients were submitted, at weekly intervals, after complete TUR, to 8 instillations of TNF-alpha at increasing doses from 50 to 600 micrograms. Tolerability was excellent, even at the highest dose. In a second group of 13 patients with a histologically proved papillary marker lesion, TNF-alpha was instilled at weekly intervals at the dose of 500 micrograms for 8 weeks. Three complete responses (23%) were obtained.

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with recombinant interleukin-2.

A database of 327 patients with advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) has been analyzed in order to identify potential baseline prognostic factors predicting for survival, following recombinant Interleukin-2 treatment (rIL-2). All patients received a continuous infusion (CIV). Eligibility criteria were uniform across studies, and included patients with an ambulatory performance status (PS), measurable disease, no CNS metastases, and no major organ compromise. Multivariate analyses identified baseline PS (ECOG 0 vs. 1), time from diagnosis to treatment (DTI greater than 24 months vs. less than or equal to 24 months), and the number of metastatic sites (1 vs. greater than or equal to 2, where lung, bone and other sites are considered as separate sites) as important predictors for survival. Patients can be classified into 4 subgroups, which are a function of the number of risk factors present. Median survival for each subgroup is 28, 17, 10 and 5 months, respectively. The model was validated in an independent cohort of 125 patients with RCC treated with subcutaneous (s/c) rIL-2, and predicted for survival accurately. By determining in which risk group category patients may fall, treating physicians may be better equipped to decide on patient management. The model may also be of value in order to stratify patients in randomized clinical trials.

Subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha 2b in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: the German outpatient experience.

A phase II clinical trial was conducted using subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin-2 (rIL-2, EuroCetus) and subcutaneous interferon-alpha 2b (rIFN-alpha 2b, Essex) in patients with advanced cancer. Safety and tolerance of this outpatient regimen were assessed in 17 patients with progressive metastatic renal carcinoma, 14 of whom were evaluable for clinical response to combined rIL-2 and rIFN-alpha 2b. In this study, rIL-2 was administered every 12 hours, at 1.5 million (Cetus) U/m2 on days 1 and 2, followed by 0.3 million U/m2 5 days per week for 6 consecutive weeks. Concomitantly, rIFN-alpha 2b was given as 5 million U/m2 three times weekly for 6 consecutive weeks. Patients presenting with stable or regressive disease after 6 weeks of rIL-2 and rIFN-alpha 2b (11 of 14) were scheduled to repeat combination therapy. After one treatment cycle, five of 14 patients presented with partial remission; two of these patients achieved complete regression of metastatic lesions. After therapy, six patients have been in stable disease for up to 8 months. toxicity of this regimen was moderate, with local inflammation of the injection sites, grade I-II (World Health Organization criteria) fevers, chills, malaise, nausea and/or vomiting, and anorexia in 70% to 100% of patients treated. After 6 weeks of rIL-2 and rIFN-alpha 2b, laboratory evidence of treatment-related hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism was obtained in one and four patients, respectively. Immunogenicity of sc rIL-2 was mostly limited to the development of nonneutralizing antibodies that occurred in approximately 40% of patients. None of the patients exhibited antibodies specific to rIFN-alpha 2b.

Sequential dacarbazine chemotherapy followed by recombinant interleukin-2 in metastatic melanoma. A pilot multicentre phase I-II study.

Between April 1988 and August 1989, 30 melanoma patients were entered in a multicentre Phase II study of dacarbazine (DTIC) 850 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on day 1, and recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) (Cetus) 18 x 10(6) IU/m2/day i.v. continuous infusion on days 4-9. Six treatment cycles were given: the first two at an interval of 13 days, and further cycles at intervals of 20 days. Twenty patients are currently evaluable for toxicity and 18 for response. Two of these patients presented with metastatic intraocular melanoma. Median age was 48 years (range 18-83), and median Karnofsky index was 100 (range 80-100). Four patients had received prior radiotherapy and one had received prior immunotherapy. Seventeen patients received two cycles of treatment and nine patients received three or more cycles. Four patients responded (22%): two complete remissions and two partial remissions. Stable disease was seen in six patients (33%). Responses occurred in the lung, skin, spleen and lymph nodes. Seventy-five percent of the patients received the full dose of rIL-2 during cycle 1, whilst only 2 out of 9 (22%) received the planned dose on the third cycle. Rebound lymphocytosis of 5.3 x 10(3)/L (range 1.2-18.1) occurred 24-48 h after rIL-2, but was not predictive for response. Currently, there is no evidence that pretreatment with DTIC impacts negatively on the rIL-2-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation. The toxicity profile of this treatment regimen did not differ significantly from that already described for similar regimens of rIL-2. However, in this interim analysis, there was a trend for a higher percentage of patients (25%) to experience severe weight gain (greater than 10%). This study shows that this treatment regimen is active in metastatic melanoma, with acceptable toxicity. Further research will focus on using other chemotherapeutic agents and/or other biological response modifiers (e.g. interferons, tumour necrosis factor) in combination with rIL-2.