Ejaculatory function following transperineal laser ablation vs TURP for benign prostatic obstruction: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of transperineal interstitial laser ablation of the prostate (TPLA) in preserving antegrade ejaculation compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label study, consecutive patients with indication for surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) were enrolled between January 2020 and September 2021 (NCT04781049). Patients were randomized to one of two treatment arms: Group A: TPLA (experimental group) and Group B: TURP (reference standard group). The primary endpoint was change in ejaculatory function (assessed by the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory function domain [EJ-MSHQ]) at 1 month after surgery. Secondary endpoints included comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, changes in sexual function (assessed using the five-item International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]), change in International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], change in quality of life score, and maximum urinary flow rate [Qmax ] improvement at 1-6 months, as appropriate. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (26 TPLA vs 25 TURP) were analysed. No differences in the perception of pain assessed by VAS and no differences in IIEF-5 score were found between the groups. The distribution of ejaculatory function assessed by the EJ-MSHQ remained unmodified after TPLA (P = 0.2), while a median 30% decrease in EJ-MSHQ score was observed after TURP (P = 0.01). Absence of antegrade ejaculation was reported in one patient in the TPLA group (vs 18 patients in the TURP group). A statistically significant difference between the treatment groups was found in terms of postoperative Qmax (TPLA vs TURP: 15.2 [interquartile range 13.5-18.3] mL/s vs 26.0 [interquartile range 22.0-48.0] mL/s; P < 0.001). Both treatments significantly improved Qmax , with a mean 23.9 mL/s improvement after TURP (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1-30.7) vs 6.0 mL/s after TPLA (95% CI 5.0-7.0), and IPSS, with a mean decrease of 11.6 (95% CI 9.7-13.5) vs 5.8 after TPLA (95% CI.2-9.6) with respect to baseline. CONCLUSION: In our study, TPLA preserved ejaculatory function in 96% of cases in addition to providing significant relief from BPO.

The efficacy of a suppository based on Phenolmicin P3 and Bosexil (Mictalase®) in control of irritative symptoms in patients undergoing thulium laser enucleation of prostate: a single-center, randomized, controlled, open label, phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies described post-operative irritative symptoms after laser enucleation of prostate, sometimes associated with urge incontinence, probably linked to laser-induced prostatic capsule irritation, and potential for lower urinary tract infections We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a suppository based on Phenolmicin P3 and Bosexil (Mictalase®) in control of irritative symptoms in patients undergoing thulium laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP). METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, randomized, open label, phase-III study, patients with indication to ThuLEP were enrolled (Dec2019-Feb2021-Institutional ethics committee STS CE Lazio approval no.1/N-726-ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05130918). The report conformed to CONSORT 2010 guidelines. Eligible patients were 1:1 randomized. Randomization defined Group A: patients who were administered Mictalase® suppositories twice a day for 5 days, then once a day for other 10 days; Group B: patients who did not receive Mictalase® ("controls"). Study endpoints were evaluated at 15 and 30 days postoperation. Primary endpoint included evaluation of effects of the suppository on irritative symptoms by administering IPSS + QoL questionnaire. Secondary endpoint included evaluation of effects on urinary tract infections by performance of urinalysis with urine culture. RESULTS: 111 patients were randomized: 56 in Group A received Mictalase®. Baseline and perioperative data were comparable. At 15-days, no significant differences were found in terms of IPSS + QoL scores and urinalysis parameters. A significant difference in the rate of positive urine cultures favored Group A (p = 0.04). At 30-days follow-up, significant differences were found in median IPSS score (6 [IQR 3-11] versus 10 [5-13], Group A vs B, respectively, p = 0.02). Urinalysis parameters and rate of positive urine cultures were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The present randomized trial investigated the efficacy of Mictalase® in control of irritative symptoms and prevention of lower urinary tract infections in patients undergoing ThuLEP. IPSS improvement 30-days postoperation was more pronounced in patients who received Mictalase®. Lower rate of positive urine culture favored Mictalase® group 15-days postoperatively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on November 23rd, 2021-Registration number NCT05130918.

Oral supplementation with probiotics, potassium citrate, and magnesium in reducing crystalluria in stone formers: A phase II study.

INTRODUCTION: Crystalluria is an important indicator of renal stone recurrence. Mechanisms underlying urinary stone formation are still not fully understood and raising interests has been giving to intestinal commensal bacteria for their contribute in maintaining urinary solutes equilibrium. The aim of our phase II study was to examine the administration of potassium citrate, magnesium and probiotics in order to reduce crystalluria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since May 2021, we enrolled 23 patients candidates for ureterorenolithotripsy for calcium oxalate kidney stones with crystalluria and a normal metabolic profile. The analysis was validated by the Institution's Ethical Committee (no. approval STS CE Lazio 1/N-823). At discharge, patients were provided with daily food supplementation for 20 days of 1 billion Lactobacillus paracasei LPC09, 1 billion Lactobacillus plantarum LP01, 1 billion Bifidobacterium breve BR03, potassium (520 mg), citrate (1400 mg), and magnesium (80 mg). Crystalluria was re-assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12-months follow-up by polarized light microscopy. RESULTS: After one month from the oral supplementation, no patient reported crystalluria; at 3 months, among the 20 participants available for re-evaluation, still no patient reported crystalluria. Instead, crystalluria was reported in three patients (15%) at 6 months, and in five patients (25%) at 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The oral supplementation with Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. was found able to reduce the prevalence of crystalluria in a cohort of patients with diagnosis of calcium oxalate kidney stones with crystalluria candidate to ureterorenolithotripsy.

Is thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate equally safe and effective in elderly patients? A propensity score matched analysis of early perioperative and functional outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) is equally safe and effective in a selected cohort of elderly patients when compared to "younger" patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent ThuVEP between September 2018 and February 2020. After application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, patients were stratified according to the 75 years-old cut-off point suggested by the WHO. Group A included patients ≤75 years-old; Group B included patients >75 years-old. Preoperative assessment included urological consultation, prostate specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life index, transrectal ultrasound to estimate prostate volume (PVol), and uroflowmetry to assess preoperative Qmax, Qave and post-void residual volume (PVR). Perioperative and postoperative data were analyzed during 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: After propensity-score analysis, 51 versus 51 patients were 1:1 matched according to PVol, PSA, Qmax, IPSS and QoL. Patients were comparable at baseline excluding age (65 (IQR 59-70) versus 79 (IQR 77-82) years, Group A versus B, respectively, P-value <.001). No differences were found in terms of hemoglobin drop, complications rate, catheterization time and length of hospital stay. Group A (younger) patients had more significant improvement in 30-days absolute Qmax, Qave and ΔQmax. At 90-days follow-up, the differences between the groups disappeared. Within the 90-days follow-up, no significant differences were found in the readmission rate, with no need of reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: In our hands, even in elderly patients affected by BPH, ThuVEP appears to be a safe and effective treatment option.

High levator myorraphy versus uterosacral ligament suspension for vaginal vault fixation: a prospective, randomized study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our study compared high levator myorrhaphy (HLM) and uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) for vaginal apex fixation from both an anatomical and functional point of view, and assessed the impact of surgery on quality of life (QoL) and sexuality. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients with symptomatic stage >or=2 apical prolapse were randomized to USLS or HLM. Those patients who also needed cystocele repair additionally underwent an anterior prosthetic reinforcement. We defined as cure no prolapse of stage 2 or greater in any compartments according to the POP-Q system. RESULTS: Correction of apical prolapse was observed in 96.6% of the HLM group and 98.3% of the USLS group. However, a persistent anterior wall prolapse occurred in 29.2% of the HLM group and in 35.4% of the USLS group. Both groups reported improvement in storage, voiding, and prolapse-related symptoms. Urodynamics of patients in the HLM group showed post-operative reduction in detrusor pressure at maximum flow and an increase in maximum flow. Both groups saw similar improvement in QoL. We did not encounter any serious side effects, except for nine cases of intraoperative ureteral occlusion following USLS. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates similar efficacy of HLM and USLS for vaginal apex suspension; however, USLS has a higher incidence of complications involving the upper urinary tract.

High levator myorrhaphy for transvaginal suspension of the vaginal apex: long-term results.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term outcome and complications of high levator myorrhaphy for vaginal apical defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 286 patients underwent high levator myorrhaphy. Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative urogynecologic assessment, including evaluation of prolapse stage according to the international pelvic organ prolapse staging system and conventional urodynamic testing. Quality of life was evaluated using the prolapse quality of life questionnaire. We considered failure as vaginal prolapse stage 2 or greater according to the pelvic organ prolapse staging system. RESULTS: A total of 272 patients with a mean age of 60.4 years were available for analysis. Mean followup was 5 years. In 247 patients we associated tension-free cystocele repair with Marlex mesh. In 50.7% of patients high levator myorrhaphy was done with curative intent, while in the remaining 49.3% it was a preventive measure. Complications included a rectal tear in 2 cases, Marlex mesh erosion in 23 (8.4%), vaginal vault abscess in 1, pararectal hematoma in 2 and buttock pain in 2. Anatomical evaluation at followup revealed a 96.7% cure rate for apical defects and a 26.8% incidence of cystocele. We observed improvement in filling, voiding and post-void symptoms. Quality of life evaluation showed improvement in all domains. We detected a 9.6% incidence of de novo dyspareunia. CONCLUSIONS: High levator myorrhaphy is a safe and effective procedure for preventing and curing vaginal apical defects. The simplicity of this surgical procedure, its short learning curve, the lack of severe complications and its low costs combined with symptomatic relief and improvement in quality of life encourage its use for the cure and routine prevention of vaginal apical prolapse.