Comparing gastrointestinal stromal tumor outcomes between geriatric and non-geriatric patients: A population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. SEER is an extensive cancer database which proves useful in analyzing population trends. This analysis investigated GIST outcomes between geriatric & non-geriatric patients. METHODS: SEER*STAT 8.4.0.1 was used to extract relevant GIST data from 2000 to 2019. Geriatric age was defined as ≥70 years. Variables included age, sex, surgery, cancer-specific death, and overall survival. Statistical tests included univariate analysis using KM survival estimate (95% confidence interval) to calculate 5-year survival (5YS). Log-Rank tests determined statistical significance. Multivariable Cox's PH regression estimated the geriatric hazard death ratio adjusted for sex, stage, and surgery. RESULTS: The number of patients included was 13,579, yielding overall 5YS of 68.6% (95% CI 67.7-69.5). Cancer-specific death was 39.11% in 2000 & 3.33% in 2019. Non-geriatric & geriatric patient data yielded 5YS of 77.4% (76.4%-78.3%) and 53.3% (51.7%-54.8%) respectively (p < 0.0001). For no surgery/surgery, younger patient data yielded 5YS of 48.7% (45.8%-51.4%) and 83.7% (82.7%-84.7%) respectively (p < 0.0001); geriatric data yielded 5YS of 29.3% (26.5%-32.1%) and 62.8% (60.8%-64.6%) respectively (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis yielded a geriatric hazard death of 2.56 (2.42-2.70) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer-specific death decreased since 2000, indicating an improvement in survival & treatment methods. Observed lower survival rates overall in the geriatric group. Surgery appeared to enhance survival rates in both groups, suggesting that surgery is an important factor in GIST survival regardless of age. Large prospective studies will help define clinical management for geriatric patients.

Osteoradionecrosis versus Cancer Recurrence: An Unresolved Clinical Dilemma.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoradionecrosis is a rare and debilitating risk of definitive chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. It is difficult to distinguish between osteoradionecrosis and recurrent or progressive disease, as clinical and radiologic features may be similar. Our aim was to compare the clinical presentation and radiologic features of osteonecrosis with those of recurrent or progressive cancer. METHODS: We conducted a single-center case series of 19 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed between 2011 and 2019 who subsequently developed clinical and/or radiological suspicion of osteoradionecrosis. The population was a referred sample from head and neck cancer physicians at Northwell Health Cancer Institute. Clinician notes and imaging reports were reviewed to assign a final diagnosis of either cancer, osteonecrosis, or indeterminate. RESULTS: No differences were found in the clinical presentation or radiologic features between groups. Median time between treatment and development of symptoms was longer in patients with a final diagnosis of osteoradionecrosis than recurrent or progressive disease (5 vs. 3 months), but this difference was not statistically significant. Radiation dose and type were not associated with diagnosis. Mean standard uptake value maximums on positron emission tomography/computed tomography were significantly higher in the cancer group (median 14.8 vs. 9.1, p < 0.0152). At 1 year after first suspicion of osteoradionecrosis, 100% of osteoradionecrosis patients were alive, versus 28.6% of cancer patients. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: There is significant overlap in clinical and radiologic features of osteoradionecrosis and cancer. Standard uptake maximums may be helpful in predicting diagnosis. Occurrence of symptoms within 6 months of completing chemoradiotherapy should raise the concern for malignancy.

Guidelines for Palliative Treatment of Spinal Metastases: Choosing Between Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Conventional Fractionation.

Symptomatic spinal metastasis is a frequent complication of cancer that had been treated, until relatively recently, with primitive techniques to modest radiation dose levels, with a baseline assumption of limited survival and poor patient performance in that setting. In the era of targeted and personalized therapies, many patients are living longer and more functionally and are able to manage their disease on the model of chronic illness. Given these developments, an attractive option is the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to deliver high biologically effective doses of radiation conformally to maximize the palliative gains of treatment. However, randomized data to guide practice are scarce. We review the extant literature and present an algorithmic approach to selecting patients with metastatic disease for palliative spinal SBRT favoring the results of available randomized studies and remaining within the safety constraints supported by evidence from randomized trials.

Addition of Surgery After Radiation Significantly Improves Survival in Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Limited work, either retrospective or prospective, has been done to investigate whether or not there is a cause-specific mortality (CSM) or all-cause mortality (ACM) benefit to adding surgery following neoadjuvant treatment for Stage IIIB NSCLC. METHODS: We extracted patients with Stage IIIB NSCLC from the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database treated from 2004 to 2012 with either radiation alone or radiation followed by surgery. Other variables extracted were age, sex, race, and tumor location. The impact of patient and treatment variables on CSM and ACM was explored using Cox multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 14,065 patients were extracted from the SEER database. On multivariable analysis, even after adjustment for age, gender, race, and site, radiation followed by surgery was associated with a reduction in cause-specific mortality compared to radiation alone (adjusted HR 0.46; 95 % CI 0.41, 0.52; p < 0.0001). Median overall survival was 11 months in the radiotherapy alone arm versus 29 months in the radiotherapy plus surgery arm (p < 0.0001 by log-rank test). After adjustment for these same factors, radiation followed by surgery was also associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality compared with radiation alone (adjusted HR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.42, 0.52; p < 0.0001). Median cause-specific survival was 12 months in the radiotherapy alone arm versus 33 months in the radiotherapy plus surgery arm (p < 0.0001 by log-rank test). DISCUSSION: In the SEER database, there appears to be both a CSM and ACM benefit to adding surgery following radiation for Stage IIIB NSCLC.

Impact of Radiation Therapy in Surgically Resected Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the role of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of surgically resected limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma (LSCLC). METHODS: We queried the SEER database from 1998 to 2012 to identify patients who were diagnosed with LSCLC as their only primary tumor. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to determine disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS), while multivariate analysis was used to compare survival in terms of patients and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-three LSCLC patients were identified for inclusion within the study. 12-month DSS for patients who did not receive surgery or RT was 31.9% (95% CI 27.7-36.3), 93.3% (95% CI 71.6-90.5) for surgery alone, and 81.0% (95% CI 69.3-88.6) for surgery + RT. 12-month OS was 27.2% (95% CI 23.4-31.1), 74.7% (95% CI 62.6-83.4), and 78.3% (95% CI 66.4-86.4) for no surgery or RT, for surgery alone, and for surgery + RT, respectively. In terms of multivariate analysis, patients receiving surgery alone and patients receiving surgery + RT had a better DSS and OS than those who received neither treatment. However, OS (HR 1.60; 95% CI 0.93-2.75, p = 0.09) and DSS (HR 1.34; 95% CI 0.72-2.51, p = 0.37) were not significantly associated with patients receiving surgery alone compared to surgery + RT. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery alone and surgery + RT were positively associated with DSS and OS compared to patients who did not receive surgery or RT. However, the addition of RT to surgery did not significantly predict DSS or OS compared to surgery alone.

Adjuvant radiation therapy in uterine carcinosarcoma: A population-based analysis of patient demographic and clinical characteristics, patterns of care and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical and demographic characteristics of a population-based cohort of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), to assess access to treatment and survival patterns. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was queried for patients diagnosed in 1999-2010 and treated with surgery with or without adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival functions, and Cox proportional hazards regression - to analyze the effect of covariates on survival. RESULTS: 2342 patients were eligible. African Americans presented with more advanced AJCC stages than other races (35.4% vs. 29.1%; p<0.01). African Americans vs. others, and women diagnosed in 1999-2004 vs. in 2005-2010, received aRT at a similar rate: 36.5% vs. 39.9% (p=NS), and 39.5% vs. 38.9% (p=NS), respectively. There was a trend towards higher aRT utilization among patients younger than 65 vs. older (41.4% vs. 37.5%; p<0.06). We observed better overall and cause-specific survival in the aRT group: 42 vs. 22 (p<0.0001) and 57 vs. 28months (p<0.0001), respectively. Black race, diagnosis in 1999-2004, advanced stage and age≥65years carried a higher risk of UCS death. CONCLUSIONS: We observed greater survival rate in the aRT group. African Americans were more likely to present with later stage disease and die of UCS than non-African Americans. Age and stage, but not race, influenced receipt of aRT. Patients treated more recently survived longer.

The cost-effectiveness of surgical resection and cesium-131 intraoperative brachytherapy versus surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of metastatic brain tumors.

This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surgical resection (S) and Cesium-131 (Cs-131) [S + Cs-131] intraoperative brachytherapy versus S and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) [S + SRS] for the treatment of brain metastases. Treatment records as well as hospital and outpatient charts of 49 patients with brain metastases between 2008 and 2012 who underwent S + Cs-131 (n = 24) and S + SRS (n = 25) were retrospectively reviewed. Hospital charges were compared for the single treatment in question. Means and curves of survival time were defined by the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with the cost analysis focusing on the time period of the relevant treatment. Quality adjusted life years (QALY) and Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated for each treatment option as a measure of cost-effectiveness. The direct hospital costs of treatments per patient were: S + Cs131 = $19,271 and S + SRS = $44,219. The median survival times of S + Cs-131 and S + SRS were 15.5 and 11.3 months, and the 12 month survival rates were 61 % and 49 % (P = 0.137). The QALY for S + SRS when compared to S + Cs-131 yielded a p < 0.0001, making it significantly more cost-effective. The ICER also revealed that when compared to S + Cs-131, S + SRS was significantly inferior (p < 0.0001). S + Cs-131 is more cost-effective compared with S + SRS based on hospital charges as well as QALYs and ICER. Cost effectiveness, in addition to efficacy and risk, should factor into the comparison between these two treatment modalities for patients with surgically resectable brain metastases.

Neurocognitive function and quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis after treatment with intra-operative cesium-131 brachytherapy: a prospective trial.

Intraoperative permanent Cesium-131 (Cs-131) brachytherapy can provide a viable alternative to WBRT with excellent response rates and minimal toxicity. This study reports the results of the prospective trial of the impact of intraoperative Cs-131 on neurocognitive function and quality of life (QoL) in patients with resected brain metastases. Between 2010 and 2012, 24 patients with newly diagnosed metastasis to the brain were accrued on a prospective protocol and treated with Cs-131 brachytherapy seeds after surgical resection. Physicians administered the mini-mental status examination (MMSE) and functional assessment of cancer therapy-brain (FACT-Br) questionnaire to all patients before treatment and again every 2 months for the duration of 6 months with additional follow-up again at 12 months. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to analyze statistically significant changes in MMSE over time and paired t test was used to analyze changes in FACT-BR. There was a statistical improvement in overall FACT-BR score at 4 and 6 months of follow-up when compared to baseline (162 vs. 143, P = 0.004; 164 vs. 143, P = 0.005 respectively) with a non-significant trend toward improvement at 2 and 12 months (154 vs. 143, P = 0.067; 159 vs. 149, P = 0.4). MMSE score was statistically improved at 4 and up to 12 months compared to pre-treatment MMSE (30 vs. 29, P = 0.017; 30 vs. 29, P = 0.001 respectively). Patients with brain metastasis who received intra-operative permanent Cs-131 brachytherapy implants saw an improvement of their neurocognitive status and self-assessment of QoL. In addition to the excellent local control of metastasis, this approach may contribute to the improvements in cognitive function and QOL.

Financial Toxicity in Radiation Oncology.

Financial toxicity details the financial burden patients face due to a variety of medical costs. Cancer patients, especially those receiving radiation therapy, are at a much higher risk of experiencing economic hardships than healthy people or people with other conditions. There are a variety of risk factors associated with financial toxicity as well as numerous tools to assess the toxicity experienced by patients. In this review article, we present a concise overview of contributors, risk factors, case studies, tools, impacts, and potential interventions of financial toxicity.

Clinical predictors of premature radiotherapy terminations in senior adults with oral cavity and laryngeal carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The underlying factors that contribute to early radiotherapy (RT) termination are understudied, especially in the era of hypofractionated treatment regimens. In this retrospective investigation, we examined the characteristics and causes of premature RT terminations in senior adults (>70 years old) with oral cavity (OC) and laryngeal carcinomas. METHODS: Hundred and eighty-eight patients treated with RT ± systemic therapy for OC and laryngeal cancer from 2017 to 2022 were identified. Premature termination was defined as completion of less than 95% of the prescribed RT. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine factors predictive of premature termination, and survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty patients (10.6%) experienced premature RT terminations. On regression analysis, ECOG score at initiation of RT was the only covariate studied to be independently associated with premature termination (OR 2.00, 95%CI: [1.21, 3.30], p = 0.007). Three-year overall survival (49.1% vs. 77.3%) was significantly reduced in the termination cohort (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated over 1 in 10 patients had premature RT termination, which prognosticated inferior survival outcomes. Poor performance status may highlight patients at risk for premature termination and thus identify good candidates for hypofractionated protocols.

Rates of Occult Invasive Disease in Patients With Biopsy-Proven Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Situ.

Importance: The likelihood that an oral cavity lesion harbors occult invasive disease after biopsy demonstrating carcinoma in situ (CIS) is unknown. While de-escalated treatment strategies may be appealing in the setting of CIS, knowing whether occult invasive disease may be present and its association with survival outcomes would lead to more informed management decisions. Objective: To evaluate rate of occult invasive disease and clinical outcomes in patients with oral cavity CIS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study using the National Cancer Database and included adults with biopsy-proven oral cavity CIS as the first diagnosis of cancer between 2004 and 2020. Data were analyzed from October 10, 2022, to June 25, 2023. Exposures: Surgical resection vs no surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Analyses calculated the rate of occult invasive disease identified on resection of a biopsy-proven CIS lesion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression with odds ratios and 95% CIs were used to identify significant demographic and clinical characteristics associated with risk of occult invasion (age, year of diagnosis, sex, race and ethnicity, oral cavity subsite, and comorbidity status). Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS) were calculated for both unresected and resected cohorts (stratified by presence of occult invasive disease). Results: A total of 1856 patients with oral cavity CIS were identified, with 122 who did not undergo surgery (median [range] age, 65 [26-90] years; 48 female individuals [39.3%] and 74 male individuals [60.7%]) and 1458 who underwent surgical resection and had documented pathology (median [range] age, 62 [21-90] years; 490 female individuals [33.6%] and 968 male individuals [66.4%]). Of the 1580 patients overall, 52 (3.3%) were Black; 39 (2.5%), Hispanic; 1365 (86.4%), White; and 124 (7.8%), other, not specified. Among those who proceeded with surgery with documented pathology, 408 patients (28.0%) were found to have occult invasive disease. Higher-risk features were present in 45 patients (11.0%) for final margin positivity, 16 patients (3.9%) for lymphovascular invasion, 13 patients (3.2%) for high-grade invasive disease, and 14 patients (3.4%) for nodal involvement. For those patients with occult disease, staging according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer's AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, eighth edition, was pT1 in 341 patients (83.6%), pT2 in 41 (10.0%), and pT3 or pT4 disease in 26 (6.4%). Factors associated with greater odds of occult invasive disease at resection were female sex, Black race, and alveolar ridge, vestibule, and retromolar subsite. With median 66-month follow-up, 5-year OS was 85.9% in patients who proceeded with surgical resection vs 59.7% in patients who did not undergo surgery (difference, 26.2%; 95% CI, 19.0%-33.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study assessed the risk of concurrent occult invasion with biopsy-proven CIS of the oral cavity, demonstrating that 28.0% had invasive disease at resection. Reassuringly, even in the setting of occult invasion, high-risk disease features were rare, and 5-year OS was nearly 80% with resection. The findings support the practice of definitive resection if feasible following biopsy demonstrating oral cavity CIS.

Tissue compliance meter is a more reproducible method of measuring radiation-induced fibrosis than late effects of normal tissue-subjective objective management analytical in patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation: results of a prospective trial.

Identification of radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) remains a challenge with Late Effects of Normal Tissue-Subjective Objective Management Analytical (LENT-SOMA). Tissue compliance meter (TCM), a non-invasive applicator, may render a more reproducible tool for measuring RIF. In this study, we prospectively quantify RIF after intracavitary brachytherapy (IB) accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with TCM and compare it with LENT-SOMA. Thirty-nine women with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stages 0-I breast cancer, treated with lumpectomy and intracavitary brachytherapy delivered by accelerated partial breast irradiation (IBAPBI), were evaluated by two raters in a prospective manner pre-IBAPBI and every 6 months post-IBAPBI for development of RIF, using TCM and LENT-SOMA. TCM classification scale grades RIF as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe, corresponding to a change in TCM (ΔTCM) between the IBAPBI and nonirradiated breasts of ≤2.9, 3.0-5.9, 6.0-8.9, ≥9.0 mm, respectively. LENT-SOMA scale employs clinical palpation to grade RIF as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. Correlation coefficients-Intraclass (ICC), Pearson (r), and Cohen's kappa (κ)-were employed to assess reliability of TCM and LENT-SOMA. Multivariate and univariate linear models explored the relationship between RIF and anatomical parameters [bra cup size], antihormonal therapy, and dosimetric factors [balloon diameter, skin-to-balloon distance (SBD), V150, and V200]. Median time to follow-up from completion of IBAPBI is 3.6 years (range, 0.8-4.9 years). Median age is 69 years (range, 47-82 years). Median breast cup size is 39D (range, 34B-44DDD). Median balloon size is 41.2 cc (range, 37.6-50.0 cc), and median SBD is 1.4 cm (range, 0.2-5.5 cm). At pre-IBAPBI, TCM measurements demonstrate high interobserver agreement between two raters in all four quadrants of both breasts ICC ≥ 0.997 (95% CI 0.994-1.000). After 36 months, RIF is graded by TCM scale as 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 10/39 (26%), 17/39 (43%), 9/39 (23%), and 3/39 (8%) of patients, respectively. ΔTCM ≥6 mm (moderate-severe RIF) is statistically different from ΔTCM ≤3 mm (none-mild RIF) (p < 0.05). At 36 months post-IBAPBI, TCM measurements for two raters render ICC = 0.992 (95% CI 0.987-0.995) and r = 0.983 (p < 0.0001), whereas LENT-SOMA demonstrates κ = 0.45 (95% CI 0.18-0.80). SBD and V150 are the only factors closest to 0.05 significance of contributing to RIF. This prospective study indicates that TCM is a more reproducible method than LENT-SOMA in measuring RIF in patients treated with IBAPBI. This tool renders a promising future application in assessing RIF.

Assessment of pain as a sequela in patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation (IBAPBI): preliminary results of a prospective study.

To assess pain rates and relationship to radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) in patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation (IBAPBI). Thirty-nine patients treated with IBAPBI were assessed prospectively for development of pain pretreatment, 1 month post-IBAPBI, and every 6 months thereafter. A qualitative subjective Late Effects of Normal Tissue-Subjective Objective Management Analytical (LENT-SOMA) questionnaire assessed pain. Use of pain medications was assessed as "no", "sometimes", or "regularly". A quantitative objective validated pressure threshold (PTH) measured pain in the site of IBAPBI breast (index) and its mirror-image in the nonirradiated breast (control). A validated tissue compliance meter (TCM) quantitatively assessed RIF in the index and control breasts at all time points. Mean ΔPTH(kg) and ΔTCM(mm) values reflected mean difference between the index and control breasts. Median follow-up is 44 months (range 5-59 months). According to LENT-SOMA, pain occurred in 89% at 1 and 24 months, 67% at 30 months, 30% at 36 months, 29% at 40 months, and 20% at 48 months. No patient used pain medication "regularly" but the use "sometimes" decreased over time: 61% at 1 month, 42% at 18 and 24 months, 13% at 36 months, and 10% at 40 months. Mean ΔPTH values, compared to Δ0 kg at baseline, peaked in absolute value by 1 month to -1.36 kg (p < 0.0001), persisted after 18 months at -0.99 kg (p < 0.0001) and 24 months at -0.73 kg (p < 0.0001), and returned to nearly baseline by 40 months at -0.11 kg (p < 0.57). Mean ΔPTH and ΔTCM correlated significantly with subjective patient reports of pain at each time point (p < 0.0001). To date, this is the first report to prospectively assess pain employing quantitative and qualitative inventories in patients treated with IBAPBI. Pain is experienced in the majority of patients experienced pain within the first 2 years, sometimes requiring a medication, and though subsides, it may persist 4 years after IBAPBI.

Effect of Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Sequencing on Local Control and Survival in Patients With Spine Metastases.

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly used to treat spinal metastases in combination with immunotherapy (IT). The optimal sequencing of these modalities is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether sequencing of IT and SBRT was associated with differences in local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity when treating spine metastases. Methods and Materials: All patients at our institution who received spine SBRT from 2010 to 2019 with systemic therapy data available were reviewed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was LC. Secondary endpoints were toxicity (fracture and radiation myelitis) and OS. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine whether IT sequencing (before versus after SBRT) and use of IT were associated with LC or OS. Results: A total of 191 lesions in 128 patients met inclusion criteria with 50 (26%) lesions in 33 (26%) patients who received IT. Fourteen (11%) patients with 24 (13%) lesions received the first IT dose before SBRT, whereas 19 (15%) patients with 26 (14%) lesions received the first dose after SBRT. LC did not differ between lesions treated with IT before SBRT versus after SBRT (1 year 73% versus 81%, log rank = 0.275, P = .600). Fracture risk was not associated with IT timing (χ2 = 0.137, P = .934) or receipt of IT (χ2 = 0.508, P = .476), and no radiation myelitis events occurred. Median OS was 31.8 versus 6.6 months for the IT after SBRT versus IT before SBRT cohorts, respectively (log rank = 13.193, P < .001). On Cox univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, receipt of IT before SBRT and Karnofsky performance status <80 were associated with worse OS. IT treatment versus none was not associated with any difference in LC (log rank = 1.063, P = .303) or OS (log rank = 1.736, P = .188). Conclusions: Sequencing of IT and SBRT was not associated with any difference in LC or toxicity, but delivering IT after SBRT versus before SBRT was associated with improved OS.

Partial-Length Treatment With Brachytherapy in Patients With Endometrial Cancer With High-Risk Features Is as Effective as Full-Length Vaginal Brachytherapy but With Reduced Toxicity.

PURPOSE: Full-length vaginal (FLV) brachytherapy for patients with endometrial cancer and high-risk features should be considered as per the American Brachytherapy Society to reduce distal vaginal recurrence in patients with endometrial cancers with papillary serous/clear cell histologies, grade 3 status, or extensive lymphovascular invasion. We sought to investigate this patient population and report outcomes of treatment with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in women treated with FLV brachytherapy versus partial-length vaginal (PLV) brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: With institutional review board approval, we identified patients with endometrial cancer meeting American Brachytherapy Society criteria of high-risk features treated with adjuvant HDR between 2004 and 2010. HDR doses were 21Gy in 3 fractions delivered to either the full-length or partial-length vagina. Acute and late toxicities were evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer grading, respectfully. Vaginal recurrences were assessed by physical examination and pap smears. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 software. RESULTS: Of 240 patients treated with HDR brachytherapy, 121 were treated with FLV brachytherapy, and 119, with PLV brachytherapy. The median follow-up was 9.5 years (range, 8-11 years) for FLV patients and 8.5 years (range, 7-10 years) for PLV patients; 0% of patients had vaginal recurrences, and 1.4% and 0.9% had proximal vaginal recurrences, respectively (P = .54). All patients treated with FLV brachytherapy developed grade 3 mucositis of the lower vagina/introitus (P < .0001) and had increased analgesics use compared with those treated with PLV brachytherapy (P < .0001). In total, 23% of patients treated with FLV brachytherapy developed grade 3 stenosis of the lower vagina/introitus, in contrast to 0% of patients treated with PLV brachytherapy (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: PLV brachytherapy is as effective as FLV brachytherapy in reducing local recurrence and causes a significantly lower incidence of acute and late toxicities. The results of this study caution radiation oncologists regarding the careful use of FLV brachytherapy in patients with endometrial cancer and high-risk features.

Efficacy of ketamine mouthwash in the management of oral and pharyngeal toxicity associated with head and neck chemoradiotherapy: protocol for a phase II, Simon's two-stage trial.

INTRODUCTION: Curative intent treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) is frequently radiation therapy over 7 weeks with concurrent chemotherapy. This regimen is effective but carries a burden of toxicity leading to severe pain and treatment breaks portending inferior outcomes. Conventional palliation methods include opioids, anticonvulsants and local anaesthetics. Breakthrough toxicities are nevertheless ubiquitous and present an urgent unmet need. Ketamine is an inexpensive drug with mechanisms of analgesia outside the opioid pathway including N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism and a pharmacologically unique property of opioid desensitisation. Systemic ketamine is validated in randomised controlled trials for efficacy in reducing pain and/or opioid burden in the oncologic setting. Literature supports peripherally administered ketamine for pain control without systemic toxicity. These data support our rationale of using ketamine mouthwash to decrease acute toxicity of curative treatment of HNC, the efficacy of which is our aim to elucidate. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a phase II, Simon's two-stage trial. Patients have pathologically confirmed HNC and an intended regimen of 70 Gy of radiation with concurrent cisplatin. The protocol is initiated on diagnosis of grade 3 mucositis and consists of 2 weeks of 4 times daily (QID) ketamine mouthwash use. The primary endpoint is pain response defined as a combination of pain score and opioid use. 23 subjects will be enrolled in stage 1. If statistical criteria are met, 33 subjects will be enrolled in stage 2. Secondary endpoints include daily pain, daily opioid use, dysphagia at baseline and completion, nightly sleep quality, feeding tube placement and any unscheduled treatment breaks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All trial data will be stored in an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved database. The protocol is registered under Northwell IRB registration number #22-0292 and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational New Drug (IND) approval has been granted under IND number 161609. Results are intended to be published in an open-source journal and further data, statistics and source documents are available on request. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05331131.

Patient Experience Performance at a Primary Cancer Center Versus Affiliated Community Facilities.

Purpose: Patient experience tools are used throughout health care to evaluate physician and departmental performance. In radiation medicine, these tools are important in evaluating patient-specific metrics throughout their care journey. This study compared patient experience outcomes from a central tertiary cancer program with network clinics in a health care network. Methods and Materials: Radiation medicine patient experience surveys (Press Ganey, LLC) were collected from a central facility and 5 network locations from January 2017 through June 2021. Surveys were distributed to patients after treatment completion. The study cohort was divided into the central facility and satellites. Questions were converted to a 0 to 100 scale from the Likert scale (1-5). To compare scores between site types, 2-way analysis of variance tests for the significance of sites adjusted for years of operations and adjustments for multiple comparisons (Dunnett's test) were completed on each question. Results: The number of consecutively returned surveys analyzed was 3777; a response rate of 33.3% was observed. The central site conducted 117,583 linear accelerator, 1425 Gamma Knife, 273 stereotactic radiosurgery, and 830 stereotactic body radiation therapy procedures. All satellites combined conducted 76,788 linear accelerator, 131 Gamma Knife, 95 stereotactic radiosurgery, and 355 stereotactic body radiation therapy procedures. The central facility fared better than the satellites on "Convenience of parking" (95.9 vs 87.9; P = .0001) but worse in other domains of care. Conclusions: All sites yielded exemplary patient experience rates. Community clinics scored higher than the main campus. The higher scores at the network sites require a deeper analysis of factors influencing the central facility, as the survey did not account for varying patient volumes and disparities in care complexity across sites. Attributes to satellites include lower patient volumes and easily navigable layouts. These results counter the impression that increased resources at the main campus create a better patient experience relative to network clinics and suggest that high-volume tertiary facilities will require unique initiatives to improve the patient experience.

Burnout in Radiation Oncology Physician Workforce: The Effect of Mindfulness and Fulfillment.

Purpose: Mindfulness, defined as awareness of the moment while acknowledging and accepting one's feelings, thoughts, and sensations, is the aim of mindfulness meditation. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between burnout, mindfulness, fulfillment, and other personal characteristics in radiation oncology (RO) residents/attendings compared with other specialties. Methods and Materials: From December 2019 to February 2020, residents and attendings in multiple specialties at a single tertiary care academic institution were sent surveys, including the mindfulness attention awareness scale, Stanford professional fulfillment index, and a personal questionnaire. A Pearson correlation was conducted on the relationship between mindfulness, fulfillment, disengagement, and exhaustion. To determine risk factors for burnout (overall burnout ≥ 1.33), a univariate analysis was conducted to yield odds ratios (ORs) on debt, specialty, income, sleep, exercise, marital status, number of children, work hours, mindfulness (mindfulness attention awareness scale ≥ 4), fulfillment (professional fulfillment ≥ 3), and time with family/friends. Significant factors on univariate analysis were entered into multivariate analysis. Results: There were 180 surveys completed by 60 residents and attendings across 17 specialties. Eighteen (30%) respondents were in RO. Mindfulness positively correlated with fulfillment (P < .001, r = 0.534), negatively correlated with exhaustion (P < .001, r = -0.578), and negatively correlated with disengagement (P < .001, r = -0.483). Univariate analysis for factors associated with burnout was significant for mindfulness (OR = 0.065, P < .001), RO versus other specialty (OR = 0.024, P = .044), working >60 h/wk (OR = 5.091, P = .018), spending >10 h/wk with family or friends (OR = 0.120, P = .001), and fulfillment (OR = 0.103, P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed mindfulness and fulfillment to significantly decrease odds of burnout. Conclusions: RO physicians experienced less burnout than physicians in other specialties at our institution. Mindfulness, professional fulfillment, moderate work hours, and spending time with loved ones protected against burnout. Further study of interventions to promote mindfulness and fulfillment may help us understand how best to improve the mental and emotional health of RO physicians.

A Retrospective Analysis of Three Focused Attention Meditation Techniques: Mantra, Breath, and External-Point Meditation.

Objective The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three different meditation techniques (two internal focus techniques and one external focus technique) using a low-cost portable electroencephalography (EEG) device, namely, MUSE, for an objective comparison. Methods This is an IRB-approved retrospective study. All participants in the study were healthy adults. Each study participant (n = 34) was instructed to participate in three meditation sessions: mantra (internal), breath (internal), and external point. The MUSE brain-sensing headband (EEG) was used to document the "total time spent in the calm state" and the "total time spent in the calm or neutral state" (outcomes) in each three-minute session to conduct separate analyses for the meditation type. Separate generalized linear models (GLM) with unstructured covariance structures were used to examine the association between each outcome and the explanatory variable (meditation type). For all models, if there was a significant association between the outcome and the explanatory variable, pairwise comparisons were carried out using the Tukey-Kramer correction. Results The median time (in seconds) spent in the calm state while practicing mantra meditation was 131.5 (IQR: 94-168), while practicing breath meditation was 150 (IQR: 113-164), and while practicing external-point meditation was 100 (IQR: 62-126). Upon analysis, there was a significant association between the meditation type and the time spent in the calm state (p-value = 0.0006). Conclusion This is the first study comparing "internal" versus "external" meditation techniques using an objective measure. Our study shows the breath and mantra technique as superior to the external-point technique as regards time spent in the calm state. Additional research is needed using a combination of "EEG" and patient-reported surveys to compare various meditative practices. The findings from this study can help incorporate specific meditation practices in future mindfulness-based studies that are focused on healthcare settings and on impacting clinical outcomes, such as survival or disease outcomes.

A 10-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in patients with early stage breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes treated with tangential breast irradiation following sentinel lymph node dissection or axillary clearance.

We compare long-term outcomes in patients with node negative early stage breast cancer treated with breast radiotherapy (RT) without the axillary RT field after sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We hypothesize that though tangential RT was delivered to the breast tissue, it at least partially sterilized occult axillary nodal metastases thus providing low nodal failure rates. Between 1995 and 2001, 265 patients with AJCC stages I-II breast cancer were treated with lumpectomy and either SLND (cohort SLND) or SLND and ALND (cohort ALND). Median follow-up was 9.9 years (range 8.3-15.3 years). RT was administered to the whole breast to the median dose of 48.2 Gy (range 46.0-50.4 Gy) plus boost without axillary RT. Chi-square tests were employed in comparing outcomes of two groups for axillary and supraclavicular failure rates, ipsilateral in-breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), distant metastases (DM), and chronic complications. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared using log-rank test. There were 136/265 (51%) and 129/265 (49%) patients in the SLND and ALND cohorts, respectively. The median number of axillary lymph nodes assessed was 2 (range 1-5) in cohort SLND and 18 (range 7-36) in cohort ALND (P < 0.0001). Incidence of AFR and SFR in both cohorts was 0%. The rates of IBTR and DM in both cohorts were not significantly different. Median PFS in the SLND cohort is 14.6 years and 10-year PFS is 88.2%. Median PFS in the ALND group is 15.0 years and 10-year PFS is 85.7%. At a 10-year follow-up chronic lymphedema occurred in 5/108 (4.6%) and 40/115 (34.8%) in cohorts SLND and ALND, respectively (P = 0.0001). This study provides mature evidence that patients with negative nodes, treated with tangential breast RT and SLND alone, experience low AFR or SFR. Our findings, while awaiting mature long-term data from NSABP B-32, support that in patients with negative axillary nodal status such treatment provides excellent long-term cure rates while avoiding morbidities associated with ALND or addition of axillary RT field.