High hydroxyurea usage in sickle cell anemia regardless of patient demographics.

Hydroxyurea is highly effective in sickle cell disease, but it is still underutilized. Reports of hydroxyurea utilization largely use Medicaid data, and socioeconomics is often cited as a barrier. To address whether patient demographics influenced the high hydroxyurea usage rate recently reported for the pediatric sickle cell program of Northern Virginia, analysis of data from 2011 to 2021 revealed no statistical difference in hydroxyurea usage rate between Medicaid and non-Medicaid, African American and African, or age less than 13 and age greater than or equal to 13 years cohorts, demonstrating that hydroxyurea can be successfully implemented across demographic groups.

Ten-year longitudinal analysis of hydroxyurea implementation in a pediatric sickle cell program.

Hydroxyurea (HU) has proven benefit in sickle cell anemia (SCA), but HU is still underutilized. The Pediatric Sickle Cell Program of Northern Virginia prescribes HU regardless of symptoms to all SCA patients age ≥ 9 months and prospectively tracks outcomes. HU is dosed to maximum tolerated dosing (MTD), targeting 30% Hgb F. Longitudinal data from 2009 to 2019 encompassing 1222 HU-eligible and 950 HU-exposure patient-years were analyzed in 2-year intervals for hemoglobin (Hgb), fetal hemoglobin (Hgb F), hospitalizations, transfusions, and treat-and-release ED visits. Comparing HU-eligible patients in the interval prior to HU implementation (2009-2011) to the last interval analyzed after HU implementation (2017-2019), HU usage increased from 33% to 93%, average Hgb increased from 8.3 ± 0.98 to 9.8 ± 1.3 g/dl (p < .0001), average Hgb F rose from 13 ± 8.7% to 26 ± 9.9% (p < .0001), hospitalizations decreased from 0.71 (95% CI 0.54-0.91) to 0.2 (95% CI 0.13-0.28) admissions/person-year, sporadic transfusions decreased from 0.4 (95% CI 0.27-0.55) to 0.05 (95% CI 0.02-0.12) transfusions/person-year. Treat-and-release ED visit rates remained unchanged, varying between 0.49 (95% CI 0.36-0.64) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.83) visits/person-year. By the last interval, 72% of patients had Hgb ≥ 9 g/dl, 42% had Hgb F ≥ 30%, 79% experienced no hospitalizations, and 94% received no transfusions. Uniform HU prescription for SCA patients with close monitoring to achieve high Hgb F resulted in significant improvements in laboratory and clinical outcomes within 2 years, which continued to improve over the next 6 years. Rigorous HU implementation in a pediatric sickle cell population is feasible, effective, and sustainable.

Developing technologies and areas of interest in lung cancer screening adjuncts.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality. Screening guidelines have been implemented in the past decade to aid in earlier detection of at-risk groups. Nevertheless, computed tomography (CT) scans, the principal screening modality in use today, are still low yield, with 3.6% of lung cancer confirmed amongst 39.1% of lesions detected over a 3-year period. They also carry relatively high false positive rates, between 9% and 27%, which can bear unnecessary financial and emotional costs to patients. As such, research efforts have been dedicated to the development of lung cancer screening adjuncts to improve detection reliability. We herein review several emerging technologies in this specific arena and their efficacy. These include plasma markers (microDNA, DNA methylation, and tumor-associated antibodies), breath/sputum biomarkers [volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC)], proteomics, metabolomics, and machine learning, such as radiomics technology. We find that, across the board, they offer promising results in terms of non-invasive diagnostics, genetic sequencing for higher-risk individuals, and accessibility for a diverse cohort of patients. While these screening adjuncts are unlikely to completely replace the current standard of care at the moment, continued research into these technologies is crucial to improve and personalize the identification, treatment, and outcome of lung cancer patients in the near future.

A computed tomography-based score indicative of lung cancer aggression (SILA) predicts lung adenocarcinomas with low malignant potential or vascular invasion.

BACKGROUND: Histologic grading of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is predictive of outcome but is only possible after surgical resection. A radiomic biomarker predictive of grade has the potential to improve preoperative management of early-stage LUAD. OBJECTIVE: Validate a prognostic radiomic score indicative of lung cancer aggression (SILA) in surgically resected stage I LUAD (n= 161) histologically graded as indolent low malignant potential (LMP), intermediate, or aggressive vascular invasive (VI) subtypes. METHODS: The SILA scores were generated from preoperative CT-scans using the previously validated Computer-Aided Nodule Assessment and Risk Yield (CANARY) software. RESULTS: Cox proportional regression showed significant association between the SILA and 7-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) in a univariate (p< 0.05) and multivariate (p< 0.05) model incorporating age, gender, smoking status, pack years, and extent of resection. The SILA was positively correlated with invasive size (spearman r= 0.54, p= 8.0 × 10 - 14) and negatively correlated with percentage of lepidic histology (spearman r=-0.46, p= 7.1 × 10 - 10). The SILA predicted indolent LMP with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.74 and aggressive VI with an AUC of 0.71, the latter remaining significant when invasive size was included as a covariate in a logistic regression model (p< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The SILA scoring of preoperative CT scans was prognostic and predictive of resected pathologic grade.

Novel Screening Tools for Lung Cancer.

Screening with low-dose computed tomography has been shown to decrease lung cancer mortality. However, the issues of low detection rates and false positive results remain, highlighting the need for adjunctive tools in lung cancer screening. To this end, researchers have investigated easily applicable, minimally invasive tests with high validity. We herein review some of the more promising novel markers utilizing plasma, sputum, and airway samples.