Cardiac troponin T in chest pain unit patients without ischemic electrocardiographic changes: angiographic correlates and long-term clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: We prospectively evaluated the relation between cardiac troponin T (cTnT) level, the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and long-term prognosis in patients with chest pain but no ischemic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes who had short-term observation. BACKGROUND: Cardiac TnT is a powerful predictor of future myocardial infarction (MI) and death in patients with ECG evidence of an acute coronary syndrome. However, for patients with chest pain with normal ECGs, it has not been determined whether cTnT elevation is predictive of CAD and a poor long-term prognosis. METHODS: In 414 consecutive patients with no ischemic ECG changes who were triaged to a chest pain unit, cTnT and creatine kinase, MB fraction (CK-MB) were evaluated > or = 10 h after symptom onset. Patients with adverse cardiac events, including death, MI, unstable angina and heart failure were followed for as long as one year. RESULTS: A positive (>0.1 ng/ml) cTnT test was detected in 37 patients (8.9%). Coronary artery disease was found in 90% of 30 cTnT-positive patients versus 23% of 144 cTnT-negative patients who underwent angiography (p < 0.001), with multivessel disease in 63% versus 13% (p < 0.001). The cTnT-positive patients had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher percent diameter stenosis and a greater frequency of calcified, complex and occlusive lesions. Follow-up was available in 405 patients (98%). By one year, 59 patients (14.6%) had adverse cardiac events. The cumulative adverse event rate was 32.4% in cTnT-positive patients versus 12.8% in cTnT-negative patients (p = 0.001). After adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics, positive cTnT was a stronger predictor of events (chi-square = 23.56, p = 0.0003) than positive CK-MB (>5 ng/ml) (chi-square = 21.08, p = 0.0008). In a model including both biochemical markers, CK-MB added no predictive information as compared with cTnT alone (chi-square = 23.57, p = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: In a group of patients with chest pain anticipated to have a low prevalence of CAD and a good prognosis, cTnT identifies a subgroup with a high prevalence of extensive and complex CAD and increased risk for long-term adverse outcomes.

Randomized comparison of a strategy of predischarge coronary angiography versus exercise testing in low-risk patients in a chest pain unit: in-hospital and long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This randomized trial compared a strategy of predischarge coronary angiography (CA) with exercise treadmill testing (ETT) in low-risk patients in the chest pain unit (CPU) to reduce repeat emergency department (ED) visits and to identify additional coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Patients with chest pain and normal electrocardiograms (ECGs) have a low likelihood of CAD and a favorable prognosis, but they often seek repeat evaluations in EDs. Remaining uncertainty regarding their symptoms and diagnosis may cause much of this recidivism. METHODS: A total of 248 patients with no ischemic ECG changes triaged to a CPU were randomized to CA (n = 123) or ETT (n = 125). All patients had a probability of myocardial infarction < or =7% according to the Goldman algorithm, no biochemical evidence of infarction, the ability to exercise and no previous documented CAD. Patients were followed up for > or =1 year and surveyed regarding their chest pain self-perception and utility of the index evaluation. RESULTS: Coronary angiography showed disease (> or =50% stenosis) in 19% and ETT was positive in 7% of the patients (p = 0.01). During follow-up (374+/-61 days), patients with a negative CA had fewer returns to the ED (10% vs. 30%, p = 0.0008) and hospital admissions (3% vs. 16%, p = 0.003), compared with patients with a negative/nondiagnostic ETT. The latter group was more likely to consider their pain as cardiac-related (15% vs. 7%), to be unsure about its etiology (38% vs. 26%) and to judge their evaluation as not useful (39% vs. 15%) (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: In low-risk patients in the CPU, a strategy of CA detects more CAD than ETT, reduces long-term ED and hospital utilization and yields better patient satisfaction and understanding of their condition.

Diagnostic accuracy, angiographic correlates and long-term risk stratification with the troponin T ultra sensitive Rapid Assay in chest pain patients at low risk for acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: This prospective study of acute chest pain patients clinically at low risk for a myocardial infarction was designed to: determine the diagnostic accuracy of a cardiac troponin T (cTnT) ultra sensitive Rapid Assay (RAII) compared with the quantitative cTnT assay; evaluate the association of a positive RAII with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD); and determine the ability of the RAII result to predict adverse events during long-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 199 patients referred for chest pain, without ST segment elevation on presenting ECG, underwent RAII, quantitative cTnT, CK and CK-MB tests drawn simultaneously > or = 10 h after symptom onset. An abnormal value for cTnT was defined as >0.1 ng.mL(-1). The presence and extent of CAD was recorded in patients undergoing angiography. Adverse events, including cardiac death, non-fatal infarction, and readmission for unstable angina or heart failure, were assessed long-term. An abnormal RAII was found in 41 (20-6%) patients. The RAII sensitivity for detecting abnormal quantitative cTnT levels was 100%, specificity 96.3% (158/164) and overall concordance 97.5%. Although the presenting ECG was normal or non-specific in 95%, ST depression or T wave inversion occurred in 17% of RAII-positive versus 2%, RAII-negative patients (P=0.004). Of RAII-positive patients who underwent angiography (79%), 87% had CAD and 60% had multivessel disease. Kaplan Meier event-free survival curves showed early separation and continued to modestly diverge for patients with positive and negative RAII (69% versus 90% one-year event-free survival, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: In a chest pain population anticipated to have a low prevalence of acute coronary syndromes and a good prognosis, the RAII is a quick and reliable test. It provides an important initial opportunity to identify patients with a high prevalence of CAD and increased incidence of future cardiac events.