In vitro prevention and inactivation of biofilms using controlled-release iodine foam dressings for wound healing.

Microbial biofilms are a major hindrance in the wound healing process, prolonging the inflammatory response phase, thus making them a target in treatment. The aim of this study is to assess the antibacterial properties of commercially available wound dressings, of various material composition and antibacterial agents, towards multiple in vitro microbial and biofilm models. A variety of in vitro microbial and biofilm models were utilised to evaluate the ability of wound dressing materials to sequester microbes, prevent dissemination and manage bioburden. Sequestering and dissemination models were used to evaluate the ability of wound dressing materials to prevent the biofilm-forming bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, from migrating through dressing materials over a 24-72 h challenge period. Additionally, Centre for Disease Control (CDC) Bioreactor and Drip Flow models were used to evaluate antibacterial killing efficacy towards established P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms using more challenging, wound-like models. Controlled-release iodine foam and silver-impregnated carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) wound dressing materials demonstrated potent biofilm management properties in comparison to a methylene blue and gentian violet-containing foam dressing. Both the iodine-containing foam and silver-impregnated CMC materials effectively prevented viable P. aeruginosa dissemination for up to 72 h. In addition, the controlled-release iodine foam and silver-impregnated CMC materials reduced P. aeruginosa bioburden in the Drip Flow model. The controlled-release iodine foam demonstrated superiority in the CDC Bioreactor model, as both the silver- and iodine-containing materials reduced S. aureus to the limit of detection, but P. aeruginosa growth was only completely reduced by controlled-release iodine foam dressing materials. The data generated within the in vitro biofilm models supports the clinical data available in the public domain for the implementation of iodine foam dressings for effective biofilm management and control in wound care.

A Sensor for Monitoring the Antimicrobial Activity of Wound Dressings for Both Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) and Chronic Wounds.

Antimicrobial impregnated wound dressings are a critical tool for the management, prevention, and control of surgical site infections (SSIs) and infected chronic wounds. However, the sustained therapeutic antimicrobial activity of the dressing when employed for extended periods cannot be readily determined in vivo. Consequently, dressings are changed frequently to ensure that their antimicrobial activity is maintained. Whilst frequent dressing changes allow the wound to be assessed, this is time-consuming and can cause disruption to the wound bed impairing the healing process. Furthermore, this increases medical costs for the patient and hospitals. This paper introduces a novel concept to monitor the therapeutic levels of an antimicrobial component within a wound dressing ensuring the wound dressing remains "fit for purpose" and avoiding indiscriminate use of antiseptics. This could help to inform clinicians whether the antimicrobial is still being delivered at therapeutic levels and as such when to change the dressing ensuring timely positive clinical outcomes. Silver has been used historically as an antimicrobial agent and is ubiquitous in current generations of antimicrobial wound dressings. However, its activity is complex due to the poor solubility of silver ions in the presence of chloride and the effect of complexation by other components in the dressing and wound ecosystem, not least by serum proteins. In this paper, we detail an electrochemical silver sensor (5D patent protected - WO2023275553A1), constructed using a platinum (Pt) nanoband array electrode, and characterise its response to silver ions. This is determined in the presence of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and simulated wound fluid (SWF) containing chloride and rationalised using atomic analysis of the composition of the SWF. The sensor response in SWF is compared with the antimicrobial activity of silver against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the planktonic and biofilm state, as a function of the amount of silver nitrate added. At low concentrations, silver in SWF has good solubility but reduced antimicrobial effect due to binding of silver by BSA as shown by the sensor response. At intermediate concentrations, above 10ppm, the silver was efficacious on both planktonic microorganisms and biofilm impregnated with microorganisms and readily detected with the sensor. At high concentrations, silver precipitates and both the silver in solution and the sensor response plateaus. The data demonstrates how the sensor correlates with the antimicrobial activity of the silver in vitro and how this could be used to actively monitor antimicrobials in vivo.

Antibiofilm Efficacy of Polihexanide, Octenidine and Sodium Hypochlorite/Hypochlorous Acid Based Wound Irrigation Solutions against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a Multispecies Biofilm.

Infection and the formation of biofilms have been shown to have a significant role in increased inflammation and delayed wound healing. Wound irrigation solutions are used to debride wounds, removing cell debris and infecting microorganisms, therefore preventing infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate a Polihexanide (PHMB) based wound irrigation solution, Octenidine HCl based wound irrigation solution and electrolysed water based wound care solution for antibiofilm efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a multispecies biofilm in several models to gain a broad understanding of ability. The PHMB based wound irrigation solution demonstrated broad range antibiofilm efficacy against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and the multispecies biofilm. The Octenidine HCl based wound irrigation solution and the electrolysed water based wound care solution demonstrated potent antibiofilm efficacy against S. aureus and to a lesser extent P. aeruginosa. Overall, less efficacy was observed in the drip flow bioreactor model for all 3 test solutions, which may be attributed to the continuous flow of nutrients during treatment, which may have diluted or washed away the solution. The data presented also highlights the importance of testing antibiofilm activity in a range of biofilm models and against different bacterial strains to get an overall representation of efficacy.

In Vitro Evaluation of Resistance Development to Silver Sulfadiazine and Subsequent Cross-Resistance to Antibiotics.

Treatment of chronic wounds that are at risk of infection, or that are infected, require the use of antimicrobial dressings, most often those that contain silver. Silver exerts its antimicrobial effects by binding to multiple cellular components and, as such, bacterial resistance to it is low; however, molecular silver resistance has been documented and is attributed to the presence of the sil operon or changes in genes encoding porin and efflux pump expression. The aim of this study was to evaluate spontaneous silver resistance development in common opportunistic pathogens, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas and Enterococcus cloacae, as well as resistance development when exposed to subtherapeutic concentrations over a prolonged period. Furthermore, following silver resistance development, cross-resistance to several classes of antibiotics was evaluated. Following exposure of the strains to silver sulfadiazine (SSD) at two times and four times minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the mutation rate was <1010 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL. Serial passage of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in subinhibitory concentrations of SSD selected for no resistant mutants. The SSD MIC of E. cloacae increased past the solubility limit of SSD at serial passage 17. MIC testing of this isolate showed a >2048-fold increase in MIC to silver in comparison to the parent strain. MIC testing of the serial passage isolates demonstrated no cross-resistance to antibiotics from six different classes. Overall, the results of this study show resistance development to silver is low and, if it does occur, it does not confer resistance to several antibiotic classes. However, as this study was carried out with a small number of strains, a study with a larger panel of strains and sequencing of the strains to determine the exact mechanism of resistance would be needed to investigate the threat of silver resistance further.

Controlled-release iodine foam dressings demonstrate broad-spectrum biofilm management in several in vitro models.

Multiple in vitro models were utilised to evaluate the biofilm management capabilities of seven commercially-available wound dressings, varying in composition and antibacterial ingredients, to reduce common aerobic, anaerobic, and multispecies biofilms. The Center for Disease Control bioreactor was used to evaluate single species Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) 24 and 48 hours biofilms, as well as a multispecies biofilm consisting of these two organisms in addition to Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). As wound biofilms often exist in hypoxic wound environments, a direct contact anaerobic model system was used to evaluate efficacy on Bacteroides fragilis (B. fragilis). Biofilm control was evaluated against P. aeruginosa in the drip flow bioreactor model, where a constant flow of proteinaceous media is used to create a more challenging and wound-like model. The results demonstrated that biofilm management capabilities varied amongst wound dressings. Two dressings, a controlled-release iodine foam dressing and a silver nanocrystalline dressing, showed potent >4 log reductions in recovered organisms compared with untreated controls in all biofilm models evaluated. The effectiveness of other dressings to manage bioburden varied between dressing, test organism, and model system. A silver foam dressing showed moderate biofilm control in some models. However, biofilm exposure to methylene blue and gentian violet-containing foam dressings showed negligible log reductions in all in vitro biofilm methods examined. The data outlined in this in vitro study support the use of the iodine foam dressing for wounds with infection and biofilm.

The Ability of a Concentrated Surfactant Gel to Reduce an Aerobic, Anaerobic and Multispecies Bacterial Biofilm In Vitro.

Biofilm formation in wounds can lead to increased inflammation, infection and delayed wound healing. Additionally, biofilms show increased recalcitrance to antimicrobials compared to their planktonic counterparts making them difficult to manage and treat. Biofilms are frequently polymicrobial, consisting of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, as well as fungi and yeasts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a concentrated surfactant gel with antibacterial preservative agents (CSG) against wound relevant opportunistic pathogens, including an aerobic biofilm, anaerobic biofilm and multispecies biofilm. The CSG was added to a 48 h anaerobic biofilm of Bacteroides fragilis, a 24 h multispecies biofilm of Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis and a 24 h biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa grown in an in vitro wound relevant environment. Following a contact time of 24 h with the CSG, the bacterial cell density of the biofilms was reduced by 2-4 log in comparison to an untreated control. The results demonstrate the ability of the CSG to disrupt wound relevant biofilms and support the use of the CSG in the clinic to treat wounds caused by biofilm related infections.

The Effects of a Concentrated Surfactant Gel on Biofilm EPS.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate if a poloxamer-based concentrated surfactant gel (CSG), containing antibacterial preservative agents, had the ability to reduce the levels of biofilm extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), specifically proteins and extracellular DNA (eDNA), as these are found to be the most immunogenic, within an in vitro biofilm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 24-hour biofilm of P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442 was grown in a 12-well plate and treated for 24 hours with a CSG coated onto Multisorb® (BSN Medical Limited, Hull, United Kingdom). EPS were extracted from each sample using 1M sodium chloride. Protein and DNA in EPS extractions was determined quantitatively using the Pierce™ Coomassie (Bradford) protein assay kit and a microplate SYTO 9™ (ThermoFisher Scientific, Paisley, United Kingdom) fluorescent assay, respectively. Protein and DNA was also determined qualitatively using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). RESULTS: Following 24-hour growth of P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442 biofilm, 7.38mg/mL protein was isolated from the extracted EPS in the untreated control. In comparison, the protein concentration found in the extracted EPS from biofilms treated with a CSG was 6.39mg/mL, showing a 13.4% reduction. Following 24-hour growth of P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442 biofilm, 11.71mg/mL eDNA was isolated from the extracted EPS in the untreated control. In comparison, the eDNA concentration found in the extracted EPS from biofilms treated with a CSG was 0.65mg/mL, showing a 94.5% reduction. Following statistical analysis of the data, the decrease in protein isolated following CSG treatment was within error; however, the decrease in eDNA isolated was statistically significant, showing the ability of the CSG to break up biofilm EPS in vitro. Using confocal laser microscopy and staining techniques, a large quantity of protein and eDNA could be observed in samples from the untreated control. In comparison, a reduction in EPS protein and eDNA was observed in samples that had been treated with a CSG. CONCLUSION: The data presented here potentially shows the ability of a CSG to reduce components of the P. aeruginosa biofilm EPS. The reduction in eDNA following CSG treatment may contribute to the dispersal of the biofilm, potentially increasing the susceptibility of it to antimicrobials, and should be explored further.

A comparative study on the cellular viability and debridement efficiency of antimicrobial-based wound dressings.

A concentrated surfactant gel containing polyhexamethylene biguanide (CSG-PHMB) (CSG: Plurogel) was evaluated for in vitro cell cytotoxicity using the direct contact, extraction, and cell insert assays, along with its ability to breakdown artificial wound eschar and slough, compared with other clinically available wound gels: a wound gel loaded with 0.13% benzalkonium chloride (BXG) and a highly viscous gel loaded with 0.1% polyhexamethylene biguanide (PXG). Following treatment with CSG-PHMB, BXG, and PXG at day 1, the viability of L929 and HDFa cells sharply decreased to lower than 20% of the culture media control in the direct contact assay; however, cell viability of L929 was 128.65 ± 1.41%, 99.90 ± 2.84%*, and 64.08 ± 5.99%* respectively; HDFa was 84.58 ± 10.41%, 19.54 ± 3.06%**, and 96.28 ± 33.67%, respectively, in the extraction assay. In the cell insert model, cell viability of L929 cells were 95.25 ± 0.96%, 47.49 ± 5.37%**, and 48.63 ± 7.00%**, respectively; HDFa cell viability were 92.80 ± 1.29%, 38.86 ± 4.28%**, and 49.90 ± 2.55%** (*: P < .01; **P < .001 compared with CSG-PHMB; cell viability of culture medium without treatment at day 1 was 100%). The cell extraction model on day 1 indicated that CSG-PHMB had higher viability of L929 cells compared with BXG. In addition, the cellular viability results indicated that CSG-PHMB gel exhibited lower cytotoxicity when compared with BXG and PXG in the cell insert model assay. Within the in vitro debridement model, CSG-PHMB exhibited an ability to potentially increase the loosening of the collagen matrix. The reason for this may be because of the concentrated surfactant found within the CSG-PHMB, which has the ability to lower the surface tension, aiding in the movements of fragments and debris in the fluorescent artificial wound eschar model (fAWE).

Silver, biofilms and wounds: resistance revisited.

Silver is added to an array of commercially available healthcare products including wound dressings. However, overuse of silver is being raised as a potential health concern due to the possible selection of tolerant or resistant bacteria and as a factor that may induce cross resistance to antibiotics. To date, there are only a limited number of studies that have documented evidence of silver resistance in bacteria isolated from medical situations. These studies have indicated low levels of silver resistance in bacteria. However, in comparison to antibiotics, only a small number of studies have been undertaken to investigate silver resistance. It is clear that more studies are required to confirm the most effective therapeutic levels of silver that are needed to kill microbes. In addition, it is probable that sub-therapeutic levels of silver may potentially select for enhanced microbial tolerance. Nevertheless, to date, there still remains very little evidence that silver resistance is a growing health concern in wound care; more studies are clearly needed to substantiate this concern, which has not been observed clinically to any major degree. The issue of biofilm tolerance to silver is more complicated and data on the effect of silver on biofilms is sparse at present.

The Efficacy of an Electrolysed Water Formulation on Biofilms.

Electrolysed water is a basic process whereby an electric current is passed through deionised water containing a low concentration of sodium chloride in an electrolysis chamber, which results in a more complex chemistry resulting in the production of a strong bactericidal and fungicidal solution at the anode. This microbicidal solution contains hypochlorous acid that is fast-acting and environmentally safe, as upon bacterial killing, the equilibrium shifts from hypochlorous acid back to salt and water. Other antimicrobial agents produced in this process include sodium hypochlorite and chlorine. The use of electrolysed water formulations in wound care to control wound bioburden is underway. However, there is limited evidence of the efficacy of electrolysed water on the control of biofilms, which are renowned for their tolerance to a variety of antimicrobials. Therefore this study aimed to assess a new electrolysed water formulation on in vitro Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Results showed that the electrolysed water formulation effectively reduced biofilm in all models following a 15 min contact time. Microbial cell counts confirmed the reduction biofilm bacteria. Additional cytotoxicity using L929 fibroblasts confirmed that a 50% and 25% dilution of the electrolysed water formulation was non-cytotoxic to cells. In conclusion, this study has confirmed that the application of a new electrolysed water product effectively removed biofilm after a short exposure time. The use of this technology as a wound cleanser may help to control existing biofilms in complicated, non-healing wounds.

Effects of a surfactant-based gel on acute and chronic paediatric wounds: a panel discussion and case series.

On 20 November 2018, following the International Society for Paediatric Wound Care conference, a closed panel meeting took place in which the use of a surfactant-based gel (PluroGel (PMM), Medline Industries, Illinois, US) in paediatric wound care was discussed. The authors shared their experiences, thoughts, experimental data and clinical results. The panel identified the need for a product that can gently cleanse paediatric wounds and remove devitalised tissue without causing discomfort or skin reactions, as well as potentially promote healing. In adults, PMM has been shown to assist healing by hydrating the wound, controlling exudate and debriding non-viable tissue. Islands of neo-epithelium have also been reported to appear rapidly in different parts of the wound bed. No adverse effects on these proliferating cells have been observed. In vitro data suggest that PMM can remove biofilm, as well as potentially promote healing through cell salvage. The panel, therefore, set out to discuss their experiences of using PMM in the paediatric patients and to establish a consensus on the indications for its use and application in this population. This article will describe the main outcomes of that discussion and present case studies from paediatric patients with a variety of wound types, who were treated with PMM by members of the panel.

In vitro cellular viability studies on a concentrated surfactant-based wound dressing.

In this study, three cellular cytotoxic assays (direct contact assay, extraction assay, and cell insert assay) were applied to evaluate the effects of a concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials and a concentrated surfactant gel with 1% silver sulfadiazine on both the mouse fibroblast cell line L929 and human dermal fibroblasts (HDFa). Also, the in vitro wound model was wounded by a 100 µL pipette tip and used to assess cell migration and wound closure after treatment with both gels. A needle-scratched membrane disruption model was used to preliminarily evaluate membrane stabilisation and the membrane-resealing effects of concentrated surfactant gels. It was demonstrated that the concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials was not toxic to both L929 and HDFa. However, the concentrated surfactant gel with 1% silver sulfadiazine demonstrated a degree of cytotoxicity to both cell types. After treatment with a concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials, cell movement to close the scratch gap was enhanced at 24 and 48 hours. The results also showed that cells treated with the concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials decreased cell necrosis and improved cell resistance of the f-actin rearrangement after a needle scratch. The results demonstrated that a concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials is non-cytotoxic and has ability to accelerate wound closure by enhancing cell mobility. Furthermore, the concentrated surfactant gel appeared to stabilise the plasma membrane and demonstrated a resealing ability and helped to retain the plasma membrane integrity and enhanced wound healing.

Surfactants: Role in biofilm management and cellular behaviour.

Appropriate and effective wound cleaning represents an important process that is necessary for preparing the wound for improved wound healing and for helping to dislodge biofilms. Wound cleaning is of paramount importance to wound bed preparation for helping to enhance wound healing. Surfactant applications in wound care may represent an important area in the cleaning continuum. However, understanding of the role and significance of surfactants in wound cleansing, biofilm prevention and control, and enhancing cellular viability and proliferation is currently lacking. Despite this, some recent evidence on poloxamer-based surfactants where the surfactants are present in high concentration have been shown to have an important role to play in biofilm management; matrix metalloproteinase modulation; reducing inflammation; and enhancing cellular proliferation, behaviour, and viability. Consequently, this review aims to discuss the role, mode of action, and clinical significance of the use of medically accepted surfactants, with a focus on concentrated poloxamer-based surfactants, to wound healing but, more specifically, the role they may play in biofilm management and effects on cellular repair.

Restoring balance: biofilms and wound dressings.

Biofilms are responsible for stimulating and maintaining wound inflammation, increasing infection risk and delaying wound closure. Appropriate biofilm management is required to fight against local and systemic infection and to restore balance to the wound environment. The most effective way to remove biofilms involves the use of mechanical techniques, with the wound dressing representing an important component of this strategy. Wound dressing fibres, such as polyacrylate fibres, have been shown to be effective in affecting biofilm architecture by disrupting the biofilm matrix. This helps enhance the efficacy of antimicrobials, such as silver. Focusing an antibiofilm strategy on active agents alone does not constitute a sustainable approach to biofilm management. Furthermore, adding too many active chemicals into a wound can be highly detrimental to the wound bed, and potentially may have both short- and long-term biological concerns. Particular attention on the characteristics and key features of wound dressings is discussed in this paper. The aim of the paper is to review the ideal characteristics of wound dressings, in conjunction with antimicrobials, that are considered a fundamental part of an antibiofilm strategy and growing requirement for enhanced wound healing.

Assessment of clinical effectiveness of haemoglobin spray as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sloughy wounds.

OBJECTIVE: To assess use of an adjunctive topical haemoglobin spray in the treatment of sloughy wounds. METHOD: In addition to a standard wound care regimen, consecutive patients with sloughy wounds self-administered haemoglobin spray treatment twice a week until the wound was healed. All patients were followed-up for 26 weeks. Results were compared with a retrospective cohort of 100 consecutive patients, treated during the same period the previous year with standard wound care alone. Data were collected on wound characteristics including percentage of slough, exudate levels, wound pain, and wound size. RESULTS: After 26 weeks, 94/100 patients (94%) treated with haemoglobin spray were completely healed compared with 63/100 control patients (63%). Positive results were evident as early as week one with 52% mean wound size reduction using the heamoglobin spray versus 11% in the retrospective control (p<0.001). At baseline, mean slough coverage was higher in the haemoglobin group, 58% versus 44% in the control group (p<0.001). By week four, mean slough coverage was 1% in the haemoglobin versus 29% in the control group (p<0.001). Reductions in exudate and pain levels (p<0.001) were also observed. CONCLUSION: Overall, results of this evaluation showed the addition of adjunctive haemoglobin spray to standard wound care treatment achieved positive clinical outcomes for patients self-managing complicated sloughy wounds, by supporting reduction of wound exudate and slough within the complex multifaceted process of wound healing.

Effect of a surfactant-based gel on patient quality of life.

The characteristic clinical signs of chronic wounds, which remain in a state of prolonged inflammation, include increased production of devitalised tissue and exudate, pain and malodour. The presence of necrotic tissue, slough and copious exudate encourages microbial proliferation, potentially resulting in planktonic and/or biofilm infection. For patients, the consequences can include leakage of exudate, pain and reduced mobility, which can impair their ability to socialise and perform activities of daily living. This can severely reduce their quality of life and wellbeing. Concentrated surfactant-based gels (Plurogel and Plurogel SSD) are used in wound cleansing to help manage devitalised tissue. In vitro studies indicate they can sequester planktonic microbes and biofilm from the wound bed, although there is, limited clinical evidence to support this. A group of health professionals who have used this concentrated surfactant gel, in combination with standard care, in their clinical practice for several years recently met at a closed panel session. Here, they present case studies where topical application of these gels resulted in positive clinical outcomes in previously long-standing recalcitrant wounds. In all cases, the reduction in inflammation and bioburden alleviated symptoms that previously severely impaired health-related quality of life and wellbeing.

Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Silver Impregnated Hydrophilic PU Foam.

A novel hydrophilic polyurethane (PU) foam dressing which is impregnated with silver chloride, Optifoam® Gentle (OG) Ag+ (Medline Industries Inc., Chicago, Illinois), was evaluated in this study. The aims of this study were to determine the rate of elution of silver from the foam dressing over a period of 168 hours into simulated wound fluid and an evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy using zone of inhibition (ZOI), direct kill, and time-kill viability. Thirty-two microorganisms associated with wounds including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Acinetobacter baumannii, Candida albicans, and antibiotic-resistant strains (Methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci [VRE]) were evaluated. Silver release from the wound dressing showed an exponential curve with a stable sustained release of 25ppm achieved after 24 hours, which was maintained for the full duration of the study. OG Ag+ caused inhibition zones ranging from 4-16mm after a 24-hour contact time. In the direct kill assay, OG Ag+ reduced the microbial numbers below the limit of detection and reduced viability by a log of four within 24 hours. For the time-kill viability studies, the results support the use of this hydrophilic polyurethane foam as a wound dressing for use in wounds at risk of infection or infected by achieving a four log kill within six hours and a six log kill in 16 hours. In conclusion, OG Ag+ was shown to be an effective wound dressing in the killing of a range of important opportunistic pathogens of relevance to wound healing and infections. Achieving a six log kill against S. aureus and E.coli, within 16 hours in the time kill assay, (ASTM E2315-03) demonstrates that OG Ag+ should be an important addition to the armoury available for the management of acute and chronic wounds at risk of infection or clinically infected.

Tolerance of Biofilms to Antimicrobials and Significance to Antibiotic Resistance in Wounds.

A biofilm is a community of microorganisms that adhere to each other and to surfaces and secrete extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) encasing themselves in a matrix. Biofilms are a major healthcare concern, as they can form on medical devices leading to infection. Additionally, there is growing evidence to show their ability to form in chronic wounds, which leads to delayed wound healing and inflammation. Due to a number of reasons, such as formation of the EPS resulting in sub-inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials reaching the bacterial cells, slow growth rate of bacterial cells rendering some antibiotics ineffective, and the presence of persister cells, biofilms show increased tolerance to many antimicrobials and antibiotics. Additionally, studies have started to emerge showing a link between resistance to antimicrobials and antibiotics. Cross-resistance can be attributed to a number of factors, for example, increased expression of multidrug efflux pumps that efflux a wide range of substrates and horizontal gene transfer of genetic material encoding multiple resistance genes between different species within the polymicrobial biofilm. Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing threat caused by multiple factors including cross-resistance, and it is a global health concern. This review focuses on current research on antimicrobial and antibiotic resistance and cross-resistance found between antimicrobials and antibiotics commonly used in woundcare to evaluate the significance of this acquired antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, the review discusses the significance of antimicrobial tolerance and the role biofilms play in enhancing antibiotic resistance.

Efficacy of a Surfactant-Based Wound Dressing in the Prevention of Biofilms.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the biofilm prevention action of two wound dressings, a concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials and a concentrated surfactant gel with 1% silver sulfadiazine. METHODS: The microorganisms Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis were used. Several biofilm models were used whereby the surfaces of each model were coated with either the concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials or the concentrated surfactant gel with SSD before biofilm growth. MAIN RESULTS: Results showed the concentrated surfactant gel with SSD prevented biofilm growth in the modified minimum biofilm eradication concentration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention biofilm models. The concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials prevented microbial penetration for up to 48 hours, whereas the concentrated surfactant with SSD prevented microbial penetration for at least 72 hours. Using confocal laser scanning microscopy, researchers showed that a surface coated with the concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials enhanced microbial sequestration of planktonic microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that a concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials can sequester and cause the immobilization of planktonic bacteria. Further, the concentrated surfactant gel with SSD can effectively kill planktonic and sessile microorganisms.

Mode of action of poloxamer-based surfactants in wound care and efficacy on biofilms.

Surfactants are widely used as detergents, emulsifiers, wetting agents, foaming agents, and dispersants in both the food and oil industry. Their use in a clinical setting is also common, particularly in wound care. Complicated or chronic wounds show clinical signs of delayed healing, persistent inflammation, and the production of non-viable tissue. These types of wounds also present challenges such as infection and potentially house antimicrobial-tolerant biofilms. The use of wound cleansers to aid cleaning and debridement of the wound is essential. A large proportion of skin and wound cleansers contain surfactants but there is only a small amount of data that shows the effectiveness of them in the enhancement of wound closure. This review paper aims to explore the available literature surrounding the use and mode of action of surfactants in wound healing, in particular Poloxamer 188 (Pluronic F-68) and Poloxamer 407 (Pluronic F-127), and also uncover the potential mechanisms behind the enhancement of wound healing and comparison to other surfactants used in wound care. Furthermore, the presence of a microbial biofilm in the wound is a significant factor in delayed wound healing. Therefore, the effect of clinically used surfactants on biofilms will be discussed, with emphasis on poloxamer-based surfactants.