Daily Inhaled Corticosteroids Treatment Abolishes Airway Hyperresponsiveness to Mannitol in Defence and Police Recruits.

Background: Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a key pathophysiological feature of asthma and causes exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Indirect bronchial provocation tests (BPTs) (e.g., exercise, mannitol) aid to diagnose asthma and identify EIB. Daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) can abolish AHR caused by indirect stimuli. Where strenuous physical exertion is integral to an occupation, identification of those at risk of EIB is important and documentation of inhibition of AHR with ICS is required before recruitment. Methods/Objectives: A retrospective analysis was performed on 155 potential recruits with AHR to mannitol who underwent follow-up assessment after daily ICS treatment to determine the proportion that can abolish AHR using ICS and to determine any predictors of the persistence of AHR. Results: Airway hyperresponsiveness was abolished in the majority (84%, n = 130) over the treatment period (mean ± SD 143 ± 72days), and it was defined as the provoking dose of mannitol to cause a 15% fall in FEV1 (cumulative inhaled dose of mannitol to cause 15% fall in FEV1, PD15) improved from (GeoMean) 183 to 521 mg. Compared with recruits in whom AHR was abolished with daily ICS (i.e., no 15% fall in FEV1 to the maximum cumulative dose of mannitol of 635 mg), in those where AHR remained (16%, n = 25), baseline AHR was more severe (PD15: 85 mg vs. 213 mg, P < 0.001), baseline FEV1% was lower (89 vs. 96%; 95%CI:2-12, P=0.004), and they had a longer follow-up duration (180 vs. 136 days; 13-74, P = 0.006). Baseline FEV1% (adjusted odds ratio 0.85; 95%CI:0.77-0.93), FEV1/FVC (0.78; 0.67-0.90), FEF25-75% (1.15; 1.06-1.25), and airway reactivity to mannitol (%Fall/cumulative dose of mannitol multiplied by 100) (1.07; 1.03-1.11) predicted AHR remaining after daily ICS. Conclusion: Airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol can be abolished after 20 weeks of daily treatment with ICS. Inhibition of AHR is likely due to attenuation of airway inflammation in response to ICS treatment. Increased airway reactivity and lower spirometry variables predicted the persistence of AHR. Thus, those with a slower response to daily ICS on AHR can potentially be identified at the commencement of monitoring ICS using inhaled mannitol.

Sodium cromoglycate alone and in combination with montelukast on the airway response to mannitol in asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: Mannitol, inhaled as a dry powder, is used for bronchial provocation to identify bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Bronchoconstriction is associated with an increase in urinary excretion of the metabolites of prostaglandin D(2) and leukotriene E(4). Sodium cromoglycate provides about 60% protection against the fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) provoked by inhaled mannitol and appears to do so by inhibiting the release of prostaglandin D(2) but not leukotriene E(4).The leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast does not alter sensitivity to mannitol, as measured by the provoking dose to cause a 15% fall in FEV(1) to mannitol, but it significantly enhances recovery from the bronchoconstriction provoked by mannitol. OBJECTIVE: The authors proposed that the combination of these two drugs would be superior to sodium cromoglycate alone and result in greater protection from the bronchoconstriction provoked by mannitol. METHODS: The % fall in FEV(1) from baseline and the area under the 30-min FEV(1) time curve and time to recover to 95% baseline FEV(1) were used to express protection from 40 mg sodium cromoglycate alone, and in combination with 10 mg montelukast, in subjects with asthma. Mannitol was inhaled in the dose that caused a 20% fall in FEV(1) on the screening day. The prechallenge medications were randomised on the 3 treatment days and were (1) placebo sodium cromoglycate and placebo montelukast; (2) sodium cromoglycate and placebo montelukast; and (3) sodium cromoglycate and montelukast. RESULTS: The protection by sodium cromoglycate alone on the % fall in FEV(1) was 64.4% +/- 21.0% versus 65.8% +/- 62.8% (p = NS) on the combination. The protection on the area under the 30-min FEV(1) time curve for sodium cromoglycate was 81.8% +/- 14.0% (p <.04) and 89.3% +/- 9.8% for the combination (p <.001) compared with placebo. Recovery to 95% baseline FEV(1) by 5/10 min occurred in 58%/66% of subjects on sodium cromoglycate and 66%/83% on the combination compared with 0%/0% on placebo. CONCLUSION: The addition of montelukast to sodium cromoglycate provided only a small additional benefit against the airway response to mannitol.

The safety and efficacy of inhaled dry powder mannitol as a bronchial provocation test for airway hyperresponsiveness: a phase 3 comparison study with hypertonic (4.5%) saline.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled mannitol is a new bronchial provocation test (BPT) developed to improve portability and standardisation of osmotic challenge testing. Osmotic challenge tests have an advantage over the traditional methods of measuring airway hyperresponsiveness using methacholine as they demonstrate higher specificity to identify asthma and thus the need for treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The safety and the efficacy of mannitol (M) as a BPT to measure airway hyperresponsiveness were compared to hypertonic (4.5%) saline (HS) in people both with and without signs and symptoms of asthma. METHODS: A phase III, multi-centre, open label, operator-blinded, crossover design, randomised trial, with follow-up. Asthmatics and non-asthmatics (6-83 yr) were recruited and 592 subjects completed the study. Mannitol was delivered using a low resistance dry powder inhaler and HS was delivered using an ultrasonic nebuliser. The FEV1 was measured 60 seconds after each dose of mannitol (5,10,20,40,80,160,160,160 mg) and after each exposure to HS (0.5,1.0,2.0,4.0,8.0 minutes). A 15% fall in FEV1 defined a positive test. Adverse events were monitored and diaries kept for 7 days following the tests. RESULTS: Mean pre-test FEV1 (mean +/- SD) was 95.5 +/- 14% predicted. 296 were positive to mannitol (M+) and 322 positive to HS (HS+). A post study physician conducted clinical assessment identified 82.3% asthmatic (44% classified mild) and 17.7% non-asthmatic. Of those M+, 70.1% were taking ICS and of those mannitol negative (M-), 81.1 % were taking ICS. The % fall in FEV1 for mannitol in asthmatics was 21.0% +/- 5.7 and for the non-asthmatics, 5.5% +/- 4.8. The median PD15 M was 148 mg and PD15 HS 6.2 ml. The sensitivity of M to identify HS+ was 80.7% and the specificity 86.7%. The sensitivity of M compared with the clinical assessment was 59.8% and specificity 95.2% and increased to 88.7% and 95.0% respectively when the M- subjects taking ICS were excluded. Cough was common during testing. There were no serious adverse events. The diarised events were similar for mannitol and HS, the most common being headache (17.2%M, 19%HS), pharyngolaryngeal pain (5.1%M, 3%HS), nausea (4.3%M, 3%HS), and cough (2.2%M, 2.4%HS). CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of mannitol was demonstrated in non-asthmatic and clinically diagnosed asthmatic adults and children.

Inspiratory flows and volumes in subjects with cystic fibrosis using a new dry powder inhaler device.

INTRODUCTION: Drug inhalation via a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) is a convenient, time efficient alternative to nebulizers in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF). Efficient drug administration via DPIs depends on the device resistance and adequate (≥ 45L/min) inspiratory flows and volumes generated by individuals. Dry-powder mannitol is delivered using a RS01 breath-actuated device developed by Plastiape, for Pharmaxis. The study aim was to determine in vivo if CF patients' inspiratory flows and volumes are adequate to use the RS01 DPI device. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: An open, non-interventional study; enrolled 25 CF subjects, aged ≥ 6 years with FEV1 ≥ 30 to < 90‰ predicted. Inspiratory flows and volumes were measured when subjects inhaled in a controlled manner through the RS01 device in series with a spirometer. RESULTS: The mean inspiratory volume (IV) of CF subjects was 1.83L ± 0.97. Their achieved mean ± SD peak inspiratory flow (PIF) was 75.5 ± 27.2L/min. Twenty-three subjects (92%) achieved PIF of > 45L/min with the inhaler device; eighteen of those subjects (78%) had a baseline FEV1 of > 1L. CONCLUSION: Use of the RS01 DPI device allowed adequate inspiratory flow and volume for dispersion of dry-powder mannitol in CF patients.

Inspiratory Flows and Volumes in Subjects with Non-CF Bronchiectasis Using a New Dry Powder Inhaler Device.

INTRODUCTION: Drug inhalation via a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) is a convenient, time efficient alternative to nebulizers in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) or non-CF bronchiectasis. Efficient drug administration via DPIs depends on the device resistance and adequate (≥45L/min) inspiratory flows and volumes generated by individuals. Drypowder mannitol is delivered using a RS01 breath-actuated device developed by Plastiape, for Pharmaxis. The study aim was to determine in vivo if non-CF bronchiectasis patients' inspiratory flows and volumes are adequate to use the RS01 DPI device. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: An open, non-interventional study; enrolled 17 subjects with non-CF bronchiectasis, 18 to 80 years, with baseline FEV1 ≥1.0L and ≥50‰ predicted. Inspiratory flows and volumes were measured when subjects inhaled in a controlled manner through the RS01 device in series with a spirometer. RESULTS: The mean inspiratory volume (IV) of non-CF bronchiectasis subjects was 2.08 ± 0.5L and achieved a mean PIF of 78.6 ± 11.2L/min with the inhaler device. CONCLUSION: Use of the RS01 DPI device allowed adequate inspiratory flow and volume for dispersion of dry-powder mannitol in non-CF bronchiectasis patients.

The occurrence of refractoriness and mast cell mediator release following mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction.

For several hours after exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, there is diminished responsiveness to repeated challenge. The mechanism causing this refractoriness is unclear. Inhalation of dry powder mannitol is a new bronchial provocation test that has been suggested as a surrogate for an exercise challenge. Refractoriness to repeated mannitol challenge has however not been established. Our objective was to investigate if repeated challenge with mannitol is associated with refractoriness and diminished release of mast cell mediators of bronchoconstriction. Sixteen subjects with asthma underwent repeated inhalation of mannitol 90 min apart. Lung function was assessed by forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). The urinary excretion (ng/mmol creatinine) of the mediators 9α,11ß-prostaglandin (PG) F2 and leukotriene (LT) E4 were measured. The group mean fall in FEV1 after the second challenge was 48.5 ± 5.8% of the first (P < 0.001). The protection afforded by the initial challenge, however, varied considerably between subjects (range 88-0%). Furthermore, the urinary excretion of the two mediators was increased after both challenges. The average excretion of mediators after the challenges was significantly higher for the six most refractory subjects. This was observed both for LTE4 (95.6 ± 5.2 vs. 58.0 ± 2.4 for the 6 least refractory) (P < 0.001) and for 9α,11ß-PGF2 (137.6 ± 6.7 vs. 50.1 ± 1.1 for the 6 least refractory) (P = 0.002). As occurs with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, repeated inhalation of mannitol induced refractoriness. We propose that refractoriness is due to tachyphylaxis at the level of the airway smooth muscle responsiveness to mediators of bronchoconstriction rather than due to fatigue of their release from mast cells.

Bronchial challenges in athletes applying to inhale a beta2-agonist at the 2004 Summer Olympics.

BACKGROUND: The International Olympic Committee Medical Commission required a medical justification for athletes to inhale a beta2-agonist before an event at the Summer Games in Athens in 2004. OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish the percentage of athletes applying to use an inhaled beta2-agonist on the basis of the results of objective tests to establish a diagnosis of asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. We also sought to compare this percentage with the percentage of athletes simply notifying the intention to use a beta2-agonist at the previous Summer Games in Sydney in 2000. METHODS: An analysis was made of tests that measured the change in FEV1 in response to a bronchodilator or in response to a provoking stimulus, such as exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, hypertonic saline, or methacholine. RESULTS: Ten thousand six hundred fifty-three athletes competed in Athens; 4.2% were approved to use a beta2-agonist, and 0.4% were rejected. This approval rate was 26% less than the notifications in 2000 in Sydney (5.7%). Compared with Sydney 2000, there was a significant reduction of submissions and approvals for athletes from the United States, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada and in triathlon and swimming sports. CONCLUSION: The need to provide objective testing has resulted in a reduction in the number of athletes seeking approval to use an inhaled beta2-agonist. Objective evidence has provided information for the doctor that is likely to improve the health of the athlete because many athletes appeared to be undertreated at the time of testing. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: We show that documentation of airway narrowing in athletes, particularly in response to exercise or surrogate stimuli for exercise, aids in the diagnosis and management of asthma by providing evidence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness that will respond to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and is usually associated with a reduction in respiratory symptoms on exercise.

Responses to bronchial challenge submitted for approval to use inhaled beta2-agonists before an event at the 2002 Winter Olympics.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the number and percentage of athletes competing in Olympic Games notifying use of beta2-agonists, from 1.7% at Los Angeles (1984) to 5.5% at Sydney (2000). For Salt Lake City (2002), the International Olympic Committee requested objective evidence to use beta2-agonists for asthma or exercise-induced asthma (EIA). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence submitted for approval to use a beta2-agonist. METHODS: Objective evidence for asthma or EIA included (1) an increase of 12% or more of the predicted FEV1 in response to bronchodilator, (2) a reduction in FEV1 of 10% or greater from baseline in response to exercise or eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, (3) a PD20 FEV1 to methacholine or histamine at a dose of less than 200 microg (2 mg/mL) or less than 1320 microg (13.2 mg/mL) for those taking inhaled corticosteroids for 3 months. RESULTS: There were 165 applications. Of these, 147 (89%) included evidence of a challenge, bronchodilator response, or both, and 163 test results were submitted. One hundred thirty (5.2%) applications were approved. For those with positive responses, the median value (1) was 16.2% of predicted FEV1 for response to a bronchodilator (n = 13), (2) was a 15.9% decrease in FEV1 for response to a physical challenge (n = 36), and, (3) for PD20 FEV1, was 173 microg for response to a pharmacologic challenge (n = 45). CONCLUSION: The analysis demonstrated that it is feasible to request objective evidence to justify use of beta2-agonists on the medical grounds of asthma or EIA.