Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
World J Urol ; 39(2): 621-627, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32363451

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is the gold-standard procedure for kidney procurement. Ipsilateral orchialgia has barely been described. Some authors reported that ligation of gonadal vein (GV) above iliac vessel bifurcation could prevent orchialgia. We aimed to assess incidence and duration of orchialgia after LLDN in male donors despite distal ligation of GV. METHODS: Patients who underwent LLDN from 2014 to 2017 were included. Standard procedure consisted in distal ligation of GV, close to the renal vein confluence and proximal ureteral ligation. Patients' demographics, per-operative data, and post-operative consultation reports were retrospectively reviewed. Orchialgia and scrotal symptoms were assessed through a non-validated questionnaire by phone interview. RESULTS: Sixty-nine donors were included. Orchialgia incidence and testicular swelling were 31.9% (n = 22) and 15.9% (n = 11), respectively. Median symptom duration was 15.5 months. Orchialgia led to medical consultation in 41.7% (n = 10) of cases. All patients declared having been informed, prior to donation, about possible residual pain but not specifically orchialgia. CONCLUSION: Orchialgia after LLDN affects more than 30% of donors, despite distal ligation of GV and led less than 50% of them to medical consultation, suggesting a large underestimation in clinical practice. Emphasis should be put on this complication during pre-donation information.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Laparoscopía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Dolor/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades Testiculares/epidemiología , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Adulto , Humanos , Incidencia , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 32(6): 1579-1587, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33620535

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate vaginal hysterectomy (VH) associated with vaginal native tissue repair (VNTR) using Campbell uterosacral ligament suspension (C-USLS) for the treatment of predominant uterine prolapse associated with cystocele. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study including patients who underwent VH and C-USLS, without concomitant mesh, for primary urogenital prolapse between January 2011 and June 2018. We evaluated the anterior and apical prolapse recurrence rate, using a composite criterion (symptomatic, asymptomatic recurrence, POP-Q stage ≥ 2). We analyzed 2-year recurrence-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with recurrence. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual satisfaction. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included. Eighty-three (88.3%) and 65 (69.1%) patients had stage ≥ 3 uterine prolapse and cystocele, respectively. Mean follow-up was 36 months. Prolapse recurrence rate was 21.3% including 3.2% of cystocele. Two-year recurrence-free survival was 80%. Age, body mass index, POP-Q stage and associated surgical procedure were not significantly associated with recurrence. Early complications were reported for 20 patients (21.2%), mostly grade ≤ 2 (95%). De novo LUTS were reported in 11 cases (11.7%). Preoperative stress urinary incontinence and urgency were cured for 12 (80%) and 29 (80.6%) patients, respectively. Sexual satisfaction rate for patients with preoperative sexual activity was 95.8%. CONCLUSION: C-USLS following VH as primary treatment for predominant uterine prolapse with associated cystocele is a safe procedure with satisfying mid-term functional results. This VNTR could be an alternative in light of the worldwide market withdrawal of actual vaginal mesh.


Asunto(s)
Histerectomía Vaginal , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , Ligamentos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Clin Transplant ; 30(8): 964-71, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27251769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) incidence is expected to increase in renal transplant recipients (RTR) with no clear nor contemporary data on management and oncological outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single center study of RTR diagnosed with PCa after transplantation between 2000 and 2013. Demographics, PCa characteristics, and treatment were assessed. For each RTR in radical prostatectomy (RP) subset, we included 4 non-organ transplant patients who underwent RP by the same surgeons, and compared pre-operative and post-operative oncological features, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate. RESULTS: Twenty-four RTR were included (PCa incidence 1.5%). Mean follow-up was 47 months. PCa was mostly localized (n=21, 87.5%) with treatments including RP (n=16, 76.2%), brachytherapy (n=3, 14.3%), radiation therapy (n=1, 4.7%), and active surveillance (n=1, 4.7%). No graft loss due to PCa treatment was reported. Nineteen RTR with localized PCa (90.5%) were free from BCR. Considering RP subset, no difference in PCa characteristics at diagnosis and BCR rate was found between RTR (n=16) and control patients (n=64). CONCLUSIONS: Localized PCa following renal transplantation was not associated with adverse features as compared with non-transplant patients. Standard treatments could be proposed to RTR with satisfying results both on oncological outcome and graft function.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etiología , Receptores de Trasplantes , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo
4.
World J Urol ; 33(12): 1973-8, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25939539

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) are a known factor associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and raise the issue of adjuvant treatment by radiotherapy versus salvage treatment at recurrence. To help this choice, our study aimed to analyze BCR-free survival and factors associated with BCR in patients with PSM and undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA). METHODS: Between 2005 and 2008, 630 patients had RP for localized prostate cancer in our center. We included patients with PSM, uninvaded nods, undetectable postoperative PSA and no adjuvant treatment. The 5-year BCR-free survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression models were used to determine the factors associated with BCR in univariate and multivariate analyses (Cox model). RESULTS: The PSM rate was 32.7 % (n = 206 patients), and 110 patients corresponded to the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 72 months. The BCR rate was 30 % with a 5-year BCR-free survival of 83.9 %. The factors significantly associated with BCR were preoperative PSA, predominance and percentage of Gleason 4, tumor volume, PSM length and predominance of Gleason 4 at the margin. In the multivariate analysis, the remaining two significant factors were PSM length [OR 4.35, 95 % CI (1.011-1.421), p = 0.037] and tumor volume [OR 4.29, 95 % CI (1.011-1.483), p = 0.038]. CONCLUSION: Over a 5-year follow-up, only one-third of patients experienced BCR. It might be reasonable to postpone adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with PSM and undetectable PSA after RP. Tumor volume and PSM length were associated with BCR and should be taken into account in the postoperative treatment management.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Nat Rev Urol ; 15(10): 615-625, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29991725

RESUMEN

BCG immunotherapy is the gold-standard treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer at high risk of recurrence or progression. Preclinical and clinical studies have revealed that a robust inflammatory response to BCG involves several steps: attachment of BCG; internalization of BCG into resident immune cells, normal cells, and tumour urothelial cells; BCG-mediated induction of innate immunity, which is orchestrated by a cellular and cytokine milieu; and BCG-mediated initiation of tumour-specific immunity. As an added layer of complexity, variation between clinical BCG strains might influence development of tumour immunity. However, more than 40 years after the first use of BCG for bladder cancer, many questions regarding its mechanism of action remain unanswered. Clearly, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying BCG-mediated tumour immunity could lead to improved efficacy, increased tolerance of treatment, and identification of novel immune-based therapies. Indeed, enthusiasm for bladder cancer immunotherapy, and the possibility of combining BCG with other therapies, is increasing owing to the availability of targeted immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors. Understanding of the mechanism of action of BCG immunotherapy has advanced greatly, but many questions remain, and further basic and clinical research efforts are needed to develop new treatment strategies for patients with bladder cancer.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna BCG/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Animales , Vacuna BCG/inmunología , Humanos
7.
Cent European J Urol ; 66(3): 309-13, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24707370

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the effect of the presence of a double J stent on the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of lumbar ureteral stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and February 2012, we performed a retrospective cohort study. Forty-four patients were treated by ESWL for lumbar ureteral stones and included into two groups for the analysis: group 1, non-stented (n = 27) and group 2, stented patients (n = 17). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by abdominal X-ray or CT-scan at 1 month. Stone-free patients and those with a residual stone ≤4 mm were considered to be cured. RESULTS: Mean stone size and density in groups 1 and 2 were 8.2mm/831HU, and 9.7 mm/986HU respectively. Both groups were comparable for age, BMI, stone size and density, number, and power of ESWL shots given. The success rates in groups 1 and 2 where 81.5% and 47.1%, respectively (p = 0.017). There was no difference between the groups for stones measuring 8 mm or less (p = 0.574). For stones >8 mm, the success rates were respectively 76% and 22.2% for groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.030). Logistic regression analysis revealed a higher failure rate when a double J stent was associated with a stone >8 mm (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a double J stent affects the efficacy of ESWL in the treatment of lumbar ureteral stones. This effect is significant for stones >8 mm. Ureteroscopy should be considered as the first-line treatment in such patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA