Multicenter Assessment of Cryoanalgesia Use in Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A 20-center Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical implications of cryoanalgesia for pain management in children undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). BACKGROUND: MIRPE entails significant pain management challenges, often requiring high postoperative opioid use. Cryoanalgesia, which blocks pain signals by temporarily ablating intercostal nerves, has been recently utilized as an analgesic adjunct. We hypothesized that the use of cryoanalgesia during MIRPE would decrease postoperative opioid use and length of stay (LOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of 20 US children's hospitals was conducted of children (age below 18 years) undergoing MIRPE from January 1, 2014, to August 1, 2019. Differences in total postoperative, inpatient, oral morphine equivalents per kilogram, and 30-day LOS between patients who received cryoanalgesia versus those who did not were assessed using bivariate and multivariable analysis. P value <0.05 is considered significant. RESULTS: Of 898 patients, 136 (15%) received cryoanalgesia. Groups were similar by age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, and Haller index. Receipt of cryoanalgesia was associated with lower oral morphine equivalents per kilogram (risk ratio=0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.57) and a shorter LOS (risk ratio=0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.87). Complications were similar between groups (29.8% vs 22.1, P =0.07), including a similar rate of emergency department visit, readmission, and/or reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Use of cryoanalgesia during MIRPE appears to be effective in lowering postoperative opioid requirements and LOS without increasing complication rates. With the exception of preoperative gabapentin, other adjuncts appear to increase and/or be ineffective at reducing opioid utilization. Cryoanalgesia should be considered for patients undergoing this surgery.

Connexins in endothelial cells as a therapeutic target for solid organ transplantation.

Connexins are a class of membrane proteins widely distributed throughout the body and have various functions based on their location and levels of expression. More specifically, connexin proteins expressed in endothelial cells (ECs) have unique roles in maintaining EC barrier integrity and function-a highly regulated process that is critical for pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant reactions. In this minireview, we discuss the regulatory influence connexin proteins have in maintaining EC barrier integrity and their role in ischemia-reperfusion injury as it relates to organ transplantation. It is evident that certain isoforms of the connexin protein family are uniquely positioned to have far-reaching effects on preserving organ function; however, there is still much to be learned of their roles in transplant immunology and the application of this knowledge to the development of targeted therapeutics.

Nanotherapeutics in transplantation: How do we get to clinical implementation?

Patients undergoing organ transplantation transition from one life-altering issue (organ dysfunction) to a lifelong commitment-immunosuppression. Regimens of immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) come with significant side effects and comorbidities. Recently, the use of nanoparticles (NPs) as a solution to the problems associated with the long-term and systemic use of ISAs in transplantation has emerged. This minireview describes the role of NPs in organ transplantation and discusses obstacles to clinical implementation and pathways to clinical translation.

Teaching on Rounds and in Small Groups.

Bedside teaching plays a vital role the training future physicians, allowing for instruction in history taking, physical examination skills, differential diagnosis development, professionalism, teamwork integration, effective communication, and discussions of medical ethics. Due to changes in the health care system, accreditation bodies, and shortened admittance of patients, rates of bedside teaching have declined. Attending surgeons feel increased external pressures to meet performance metrics while resident physicians adhere to duty hour restrictions. This article highlights popular methods, including bedside rounds, near-peer teaching, and resident versus attending preceptors, and discusses how teaching on rounds has an impact on patients.

Hospital-based intervention is rarely needed for children with low-grade blunt abdominal solid organ injury: An analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program registry.

BACKGROUND: Children with low-grade blunt solid organ injury (SOI) have historically been admitted to an inpatient setting for monitoring, but the evidence supporting the necessity of this practice is lacking. The purpose of this study was to quantify the frequency and timing of intervention for hemorrhage and to describe hospital-based resource utilization for low-grade SOI in the absence of other major injuries (OMIs). METHODS: A cohort of children (aged <16 years) with blunt American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade 1 or 2 SOI from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program registry (2007-2017) was analyzed. Children were excluded if they had confounding factors associated with intervention for hemorrhage (comorbidities, OMIs, or extra-abdominal surgical procedures). Outcomes included frequency and timing of intervention (laparotomy, angiography, or transfusion) for hemorrhage, as well as hospital-based resource utilization. RESULTS: A total of 1,019 children were identified with low-grade blunt SOI and no OMIs. Nine hundred eighty-six (96.8%) of these children were admitted to an inpatient unit. Admitted children with low-grade SOI had a median length-of-stay of 2 days and a 23.9% intensive care unit admission rate. Only 1.7% (n = 17) of patients with low-grade SOI underwent an intervention, with the median time to intervention being the first hospital day. No child who underwent angiography was transfused or had an abnormal initial ED shock index. CONCLUSION: Children with low-grade SOI are routinely admitted to the hospital and often to the intensive care unit but rarely undergo hospital-based intervention. The most common intervention was angiography, with questionable indications in this cohort. These data question the need for inpatient admission for low-grade SOI and suggest that discharge from the emergency room may be safe. Prospective investigation into granular risk factors to identify the rare patient needing hospital-based intervention is needed, as is validation of the safety of ambulatory management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.

Leadership skills curriculum development for residents and fellows: A needs-assessment.

BACKGROUND: Non-technical skills (NTS) curricula have demonstrated success in surgical residencies. The purpose of this study is to examine the need for a structured leadership curriculum at our institution. METHODS: A needs-assessment survey analyzing the importance of leadership domains, previously validated by Kazley et al. was delivered to 240 general surgery staff. Respondent groups were broken down into: Attendings, Residents, and Multi-Disciplinary. Statistical analyses were conducted using Cronbach's Alpha (α = 0.9259) and Fisher's exact test (pre-set p-value = 0.05). The importance of each competency was compared among groups and importance was defined as >75% important and very important responses. RESULTS: Nineteen of 33 competencies were important for all groups, including 3 with 100% importance: interpersonal communication, team-work, and problem-solving. Several competencies showed statistically significant differences among groups. CONCLUSION: A diverse range of surgery staff agreed that 19 leadership domains are important to teach residents, with some variance among respondent groups.

Isolated low-grade solid organ injuries in children following blunt abdominal trauma: Is it time to consider discharge from the emergency department?

INTRODUCTION: Acute intervention (AI) for solid organ injury (SOI) is rare in hemodynamically stable children. Pediatric guidelines recommend admission with follow-up laboratories, even for low-grade injuries. METHODS: Data sets from two large multicenter prospective observational studies were used to analyze a cohort of children (age, <17 years) with grade I to III SOI following blunt abdominal trauma. Children with hollow viscus injuries were excluded. Patients were divided into (a) those with or without other major injuries (OMIs) (traumatic brain injury, hemothorax or pneumothorax, pelvic fracture, urgent orthopedic or neurosurgical operations) and (b) with grade I or II versus grade III injuries. Outcomes included AIs (transfusion, angiography, abdominal operation) and disposition (admission unit and length of stay). RESULTS: There were 14,232 children enrolled in the two studies, and 791 patients had a SOI (5.6%). After excluding patients with hollow viscus injuries and higher-grade SOIs, 517 patients with a grade I to III SOI were included, and 262 of these had no OMI. Among patients with no OMI, none of 148 patients with grade I or II SOI underwent AI, while only 3 of 114 patients with grade III injuries underwent AI (3 transfusions/1 angioembolization). All three had hemoperitoneum; two of three had an additional organ with a grade II injury. Among grade I and II SOIs with no OMI, 28 (18.9%) of 148 were admitted to an intensive care unit, 110 (74.3%) of 148 to floor, and 7 (4.7%) of 148 discharged home from emergency department; median length of stay 2 days. Among grade III SOIs with no OMI, 38 (33.3%) of 114 were admitted to an intensive care unit and 61.4% to the floor; median length of stay was 4 days. Among 255 patients with a grade I to III SOI and other major organ system injuries, 31 (12.2%) underwent AI. CONCLUSION: No patient with a grade I and II SOI and no OMI following blunt abdominal trauma received intervention, suggesting that patients with low-grade SOI without OMIs could be safely observed and discharged from the emergency department. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Orthopedic In-Training Examination: An Analysis of the Sports Medicine Section-An Update.

OBJECTIVE: Previously published studies have evaluated Orthopedic In-Training Examination sports medicine questions, but none have evaluated whether question difficulty has changed over time. DESIGN: Sports medicine subsection questions between 2012 and 2016 were evaluated and compared with previously published data on Orthopedic In-Training Examination from 2004 to 2009. Question categories were classified into 1 of 3 taxonomy levels-basic recall, diagnosis, and advanced problem solving. SETTING: Medical University of South Carolina; Charleston, SC, 29425; Institution. PARTICIPANTS: Two residents evaluated the Sports Subsection questions separately. Then an attending physician evaluated the questions to resolve discrepancies. A statistician was used for analysis. RESULTS: Utilization of imaging modalities averaged 37%, with 28% (11/39) of the questions containing 2 or more imaging modalities. There were increases in utilization of advanced problem-solving questions (45% vs. 27%, p = 0.002) and decreases in basic recall questions (49% vs. 67%, p = 0.008) compared with previously published data. CONCLUSIONS: While the percentage of the Orthopedic In-Training Examination represented by sports medicine has remained relatively unchanged, there were fewer questions requiring residents to demonstrate simple recall and diagnosis, and increased demand to perform advanced problem solving while utilizing multiple imaging modalities.

Clinical and radiographic comparison of single-sugar-tong splint to long-arm cast immobilization for pediatric forearm fractures.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single-sugar-tong splint (SSTS) to a long-arm cast (LAC) in maintaining reduction of pediatric forearm fractures, while avoiding secondary intervention. One hundred patients age 3-15 with a forearm fracture requiring a reduction and immobilization were evaluated (50 LAC and 50 SSTS). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed at injury, postreduction, and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postinjury. Sagittal and coronal angular deformities were recorded. Any secondary intervention due to loss of reduction was documented. The groups were matched by age (P = 0.19), sex (P = 0.26), mechanism of injury (P = 0.66), average injury sagittal deformity (LAC 27.4°, SSTS 25.4°; P = 0.50), and average injury coronal deformity (LAC 15.5°, SSTS 16°; P = 0.80) At 4 weeks postinjury follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between use of an SSTS or LAC when comparing postimmobilization sagittal alignment (LAC 10.3 ± 7.2, SSTS 8.4 ± 5.1°; P = 0.46), coronal alignment (LAC 6.9 ± 4.6, SSTS 7.6 ± 9.3°; P = 0.46), or need for repeat manipulation or surgery (LAC 4/50, SSTS 3/50; P = 0.70).

Septic Arthritis of the Hip-Risk Factors Associated With Secondary Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Septic arthritis of the hip (SAH) is a common condition encountered by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons and is treated with arthrotomy and irrigation. Depending on the response to initial treatment, some patients require surgical treatment beyond the index procedure. The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors for repeat surgical intervention after initial arthrotomy for presumed SAH. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review of all children who underwent surgical arthrotomy for presumed SAH over a ten-year period was conducted. Variables queried included demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory parameters, imaging, infecting organism, presence of osteomyelitis, and surgical interventions performed. Logistic regression was used to predict the risk of a second procedure. Chi-square was used to compare patients who required further surgery and those who did not. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients (139 hips) qualified for inclusion. The average age at initial surgery was 6.1 years (range, zero to 17 years), and 57% of the patients were male. Concomitant osteomyelitis was diagnosed in 55 cases (40%). An infecting organism was identified from 70 (50%) index intraoperative cultures, with Staphylococcus aureus infections (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA], 27; methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 25) being the most frequent. Fifty-six patients (41%) underwent subsequent surgical intervention, at an average of 5.5 days (range, 2 to 95) from the index procedure. Independent risk factors for repeat surgical procedures included presenting C-reactive protein >10 mg/dL (P = 0.002) and presenting erythrocyte sedimentation rate >40 (P = 0.011). The odds of repeat surgical intervention were significantly increased by the presence of concomitant osteomyelitis (odds ratio, 3.4; P = 0.001) and positive index intraoperative cultures for MRSA (odds ratio, 1.19; P = 0.001). Preoperative MRI before the index procedure was not universal (73/138; 53%), and acquisition of preoperative MRI was not associated with secondary surgical intervention (P = 0.389). DISCUSSION: Forty-one percent of children in this multicenter cohort underwent at least one repeat surgical procedure after the index arthrotomy for management of presumed SAH. Risk factors for return to the operating room include elevated initial erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, infection with MRSA, and presence of osteomyelitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, case-cohort series. Type of evidence, therapeutic.

External validation of a five-variable clinical prediction rule for identifying children at very low risk for intra-abdominal injury after blunt abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: A clinical prediction rule was previously developed by the Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative (PedSRC) to identify patients at very low risk for intra-abdominal injury (IAI) and intra-abdominal injury receiving an acute intervention (IAI-I) who could safely avoid abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans after blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Our objective was to externally validate the rule. METHODS: The public-use dataset was obtained from the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Intra-abdominal Injury Study. Patients 16 years of age and younger with chest x-ray, completed abdominal history and physical examination, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and amylase or lipase collected within 6 hours of arrival were included. We excluded patients who presented greater than 6 hours after injury or missing any of the five clinical prediction variables from the PedSRC prediction rule. RESULTS: We included 2,435 patients from the PECARN dataset, with a mean age of 9.4 years. There were 235 patients with IAI (9.7%) and 60 patients with IAI-I (2.5%). The clinical prediction rule had a sensitivity of 97.5% for IAI and 100% for IAI-I. In patients with no abnormality in any of the five prediction rule variables, the rule had a negative predictive value of 99.3% for IAI and 100.0% for IAI-I. Of the "very low-risk" patients identified by the rule, 46.8% underwent abdominal CT imaging. CONCLUSIONS: A highly sensitive clinical prediction rule using history and abdominal physical examination, laboratory values, and chest x-ray was successfully validated using a large public-access dataset of pediatric BAT patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III; therapeutic care/management study, level IV.