Effect of gabapentin on length of stay, opioid use, and pain scores in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective review across a multi-hospital system.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin has been adopted in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols as a means to reduce opioid consumption while maintaining adequate post-operative analgesia. The purpose of our study was to review and compare changes in length of stay, opioid use, and patient reported pain scores after the addition of gabapentin into five, distinct pain protocols for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: A retrospective review was completed using a database of electronic medical data from a single pediatric orthopedic healthcare system that was queried for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent first-time posterior spinal fusion. Perioperative data including demographics, hospital length of stay, surgical details, opioid use, patient reported pain scores, and non-opioid analgesic use were collected. RESULTS: From December 2012 to February 2019, 682 hospitalizations for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were identified with complete inpatient data; 49% were administered gabapentin. For the gabapentin cohort, the system saw no statistically significant effect on length of stay or pain averaged over POD#0-3. Opioid use was statistically lower averaged over POD#0-3. Individual sites saw variation on length of stay and opioid use compared to the system. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, system-wide data showed gabapentin containing protocols reduced opioid use while maintaining clinically equivalent analgesia. However, variations of individual site results make it difficult to conclude the degree to which gabapentin were responsible for this effect.

Race, But Not Gender, Is Associated With Admissions Into Orthopaedic Residency Programs.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most competitive but least diverse surgical specialties, with ever-increasing academic achievements (such as test scores) shown by applicants. Prior research shows that white applicants had higher United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores as well as higher odds of Alpha Omega Alpha status compared with Black, Hispanic, and other applicant groups. Yet, it still remains unknown whether differences in application metrics by race/ethnicity sufficiently explain the underrepresentation of certain racial or ethnic minority groups in orthopaedic residency programs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study, we sought to determine (1) the relative weight of academic variables for admission into orthopaedic residency, and (2) whether race and gender are independently associated with admission into an orthopedic residency. METHODS: The Electronic Residency Application System (ERAS) data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) of first-time MD applicants (n = 8966) for orthopaedic surgery residency positions in the United States and of admitted orthopaedic residents (n = 6218) from 2005 to 2014 were reviewed. This dataset is the first and most comprehensive of its kind to date in orthopaedic surgery. Academic metrics, such as USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores, number of publications, Alpha Omega Alpha status, volunteer experiences, work experience, as well as race and gender, were analyzed using hierarchical logistic regression models. The first model analyzed the association of academic metrics with admission into orthopaedic residency. In the second model, we added race and gender and controlled for metrics of academic performance. To determine how well the models simulated the actual admissions data, we computed the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) including the area under curve (AUC), which measures the model's ability to simulate which applicants were admitted or not admitted, with an AUC = 1.0 representing a perfect simulation. The odds ratio and confidence interval of each variable were computed. RESULTS: When only academic variables were analyzed in the first model, Alpha Omega Alpha status (odds ratio 2.12 [95% CI 1.80 to 2.50]; p < 0.001), the USMLE Step 1 score (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.04]; p < 0.001), the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge score (OR 1.01 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.02]; p < 0.001), publication count (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.05]; p < 0.001), and volunteer experience (OR 1.03 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.04]; p < 0.001) were associated with admissions into orthopaedics while work and research experience were not. This model yielded a good prediction of the results with an AUC of 0.755. The second model, in which the variables of race and gender were added to the academic variables, also had a good prediction of the results with an AUC of 0.759. This model indicates that applicant race, but not gender, is associated with admissions into orthopaedic residency. Applicants from Asian (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.67 to 0.92]), Black (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.51 to 0.77], Hispanic (OR 0.48 [95% CI 0.36 to 0.65]), or other race groups (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.55 to 0.77]) had lower odds of admission into residency compared with white applicants. CONCLUSION: Minority applicants, but not women, have lower odds of admission into orthopaedic surgery residency, even when accounting for academic performance metrics. Changes in the residency selection processes are needed to eliminate the lower admission probability of qualified minority applicants in orthopaedic residency and to improve the diversity and inclusion of orthopaedic surgery. Changes including increasing the diversity of the selection committee, bias training, blinding applications before review, removal of metrics with history of racial disparities from an interviewer's candidate profile before an interview, and use of holistic application review (where an applicants' experiences, attributes, and academic metrics are all considered) can improve the diversity landscape in training. In addition, cultivating an environment of inclusion will be necessary to address these long-standing trends in orthopaedic surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Race, but not gender, is associated with the odds of acceptance into orthopaedic surgery residency despite equivalent academic metrics. Changes in residency selection processes are suggested to eliminate the lower admission probability of qualified minority applicants into orthopaedic residency and to improve the diversity and inclusion of orthopaedic surgery.

The Effect of Surgeon Experience on Outcomes Following Growth Friendly Instrumentation for Early Onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to utilize a multicenter, multisurgeon cohort to assess the effect of surgeon experience on outcomes of growth friendly instrumentation (GFI) in early onset scoliosis (EOS). We hypothesized that unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR), estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time would be greater amongst early career surgeons (ECSs) when compared with advanced career surgeons (ACSs). METHODS: An international pediatric spine database was queried for patients ages 2 to 10 years treated by posterior distraction-based GFI with at least of 2-year follow up. Two groups were created for analysis based on surgeon experience: ECSs (with ≤10 y of experience) and ACSs (with >10 y of experience). The primary outcome was UPROR. Additional outcomes included: operating room time, EBL, neurological deficits, infection rate, hardware failure, and the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). Subgroup analysis was performed for further assessment based on procedure type, superior anchor type, etiology, and curve severity. RESULTS: A total of 960 patients met inclusion criteria including 243 (25.3%) treated by ECS. Etiology, sex, superior anchor, and EOSQ-24 scores were similar between groups (P>0.05). There were no clinically significant differences in patient age or preoperative major coronal curve. UPROR (35.8% vs. 32.7%, P=0.532), infection (17.0% vs. 15.6%, P=0.698), operating room time (235 vs. 231 min, P=0.755), and EBL (151 vs. 155 mL, P=0.833) were comparable between ECS and ACS groups. The frequency of having at least 1 complication was relatively high but comparable among groups (60.7% vs. 62.6%, P=0.709). EOSQ-24 subdomain scores were similar between groups at 2-year follow-up (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that ECS had increased surgical time compared with ACS in severe curves >90 degrees (270 vs. 229 min, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first multicenter assessment of surgeon experience on outcomes in EOS. Overall, surgeon experience did not significantly influence UPROR, complication rates, EBL, or surgical time associated with GFI in this cohort of EOS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Mortality in Early-Onset Scoliosis During the Growth-friendly Surgery Era.

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is a spinal deformity that occurs in patients 9 years of age or younger. Severe deformity may result in thoracic insufficiency, respiratory failure, and premature death. The purpose of this study is to describe the modern-day natural history of mortality in patients with EOS. METHODS: The multicenter Pediatric Spine Study Group database was queried for all patients with EOS who are deceased, without exclusion. Demographics, underlying diagnoses, EOS etiology, operative and nonoperative treatments or observation, complications, and date of death were retrieved. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves were performed. RESULTS: There were 130/8009 patients identified as deceased for a registry mortality rate of 16 per 1000 patients. The mean age at death was 10.6 years (range: 1.0 to 30.2 y) and the most common EOS etiology was neuromuscular (73/130, 56.2%; P<0.001). Deceased patients were more likely be treated operatively than nonoperatively or observed (P<0.001). The mean age of death for patients treated operatively (12.3 y) was older than those treated nonoperatively (7.0 y) or observed (6.3 y) (P<0.001) despite a larger deformity and similar index visit body mass index and ventilation requirements. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed an increased survival time in patients with a history of any spine operation compared with patients without a history of spine operation (P<0.0001). Operatively treated patients experienced a median of 3.0 complications from diagnosis to death. Overall, cardiopulmonary related complications were the most common (129/271, 47.6%; P<0.001), followed by implant-related (57/271, 21.0%) and wound-related (26/271, 9.6%). The primary cause of death was identified for 78/130 (60.0%) patients, of which 57/78 (73.1%) were cardiopulmonary related. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest collection of EOS mortality to date, providing surgeons with a modern-day examination of the effects of surgical intervention to better council patients and families. Both fatal and nonfatal complications in children with EOS are most likely to involve the cardiopulmonary system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.

Diversity and Inclusion in an Orthopaedic Surgical Society: A Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: Diversity and inclusion are critical to providing the best possible health care. Previous studies have shown that diversity among physicians increases cultural competency, which in turn enhances the quality of care provided and increases minoritized patients' participation in decisions regarding their health care. However, physician diversity in both race and sex is lacking in orthopaedic surgery. This study seeks to determine the sex and racial diversity in the membership and leadership of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA). METHODS: POSNA membership and leadership were reviewed for the years 2010, 2015, and 2020. This data was gathered from membership directories and committee reference books. All North American Active Members' race/ethnicity and sex were recorded for each year. The categories for race/ethnicity are Caucasian, East/South/Middle Eastern Asian American (Asian), Hispanic/Latin/South American (HLSA), and African American. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2020, Active Members of POSNA increased from 608 to 818, and the percentage of female (14.6% to 23.7%), Asian (7.4% to 11.2%), HLSA (2.5% to 2.9%), and African American membership (1.6% to 1.8%) increased. Male (85.4% to 76.3%) and Caucasian (88.5% to 84.0%) membership decreased. From 2010 to 2020, male leadership decreased on both the Board of Directors and Committee Chairs (89.5% to 81.8% and 86.4% to 64.7%, respectively), as did Caucasians (94.7% to 81.8% and 90.9% to 88.2%, respectively). The number of Asian members holding positions on both the Board of Directors and Committee Chairs increased (0% to 18.2% and 4.5% to 11.8%, respectively) as did the number of females (10.5% to 18.2% and 13.6% to 35.3%, respectively). HLSA and African American members were proportionally represented in leadership for the years 2010 and 2015. CONCLUSIONS: Membership in POSNA has increased between 2010 to 2020 for every diversity category examined and POSNA membership exhibits significantly more diversity than the orthopaedic specialty as a whole. Leadership as a whole is more diverse in 2020 than it was in 2010. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-retrospective.

Characterizing antibiotic prophylaxis practices in pediatric deformity spinal surgery and impact on 30-day postoperative infection: an NSQIP pediatric database study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to characterize antibiotic prophylaxis practices in pediatric patients who have received posterior arthrodesis for spinal deformity and understand how these practices impact 30-day postoperative infection rates. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database for year 2021. Patients 18 years of age or younger who received posterior arthrodesis for scoliosis or kyphosis correction were included. The outcome of interest was 30-day postoperative infection. Fisher's exact test and multivariable regression analysis were used to analyze the impact of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis, intraoperative intravenous antibiotic redosing after 4 h, postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, intraoperative topical antibiotics on 30-day postoperative infection, and various antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. RESULTS: A total of 6974 patients were included in this study. The 30-day infection rate was 2.9%. Presurgical intravenous antibiotic (11.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.005), postoperative antibiotic (5.7% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.01), and intraoperative topical antibiotic (4.0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.019) were associated with significantly reduced infection rates. There was no significant difference in infection rates between patients that received cefazolin versus vancomycin versus clindamycin. The addition of Gram-negative coverage did not result in significant differences in infection rates. Multivariable regression analysis found postoperative intravenous antibiotics and intraoperative topical antibiotics to reduce infection rates. CONCLUSIONS: We found the use of presurgical intravenous antibiotics, postoperative intravenous antibiotics, and intraoperative topical antibiotics to significantly reduce infection rates. Results from this study can be applied to future research on implementation of standardized infection prevention protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Musculoskeletal Care.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article provides a review of recent published research studying racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in pediatric musculoskeletal care. RECENT FINDINGS: Disparities in pediatric musculoskeletal care are demonstrated in two general realms: access to care and health outcomes. Though initiatives have been proposed or enacted to address disparities, underrepresented minorities and patients from lower socioeconomic statuses continue to face barriers across the spectrum of orthopedic care and poorer ultimate outcomes after both non-operative and operative management. Minority pediatric patients and those from lower socioeconomic statuses experience delays across the spectrum of orthopedic care for both urgent and non-urgent conditions. They wait longer between injury date and initial orthopedic evaluation, longer to receipt of diagnostic imaging, and longer to ultimate treatment than their counterparts. When finally able to obtain musculoskeletal care and treatment, they are at higher risk of poor in-hospital outcomes and inpatient complications, worse patient reported outcomes, and suboptimal pain management. In the outpatient setting, they receive less physical therapy and follow-up clinic visits, resulting in greater stiffness and strength deficits, and are ultimately less likely to meet return to sport criteria.

The other side of conflict: Examining the challenges of female orthopaedic surgeons in the workplace.

BACKGROUND: As more women begin to enter the traditionally male-dominated field of orthopaedics, it is critical to examine their experiences in navigating gender-based conflicts in the workplace. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed via a web link to approximately 1,100 members of Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society (RJOS) and 1,600 members of Women in Orthopaedics (WIO) Facebook group, with an estimated response rate of 50% and 50% respectively and protocols to mitigate duplicate response. Questions included demographics and presented several workplace scenarios. RESULTS: Of the 373 respondents, 72% described experiencing some type of workplace conflict self-attributed to being female. Additionally, 8% reported either being forced out or leaving their previous job due to workplace conflict, leading to depression, anxiety, and burnout. 17% of respondents would not choose the same career again if given the opportunity. CONCLUSIONS: Workplace conflict diminishes a surgeon's career satisfaction and may ultimately contribute to burnout. Understanding the relationship between gender bias and orthopaedic surgery is essential in moving towards change, and addressing these issues will create a more positive working environment for female surgeons.

Racial and Sex Disparities in Resident Attrition Among Surgical Subspecialties.

Importance: Racial and sex disparities are prevalent in surgical trainees. Although retrospective studies on resident attrition have been conducted for individual specialties, this study analyzes racial and sex differences in resident attrition among all surgical subspecialties over an 18-year period. Objective: To evaluate the racial and sex differences in resident attrition among surgical specialties over an 18-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a large, cross-sectional, database study that analyzed program-reported resident censuses (program information, resident demographics, and attrition status) obtained by the Association of American Medical Colleges from 2001 to 2018 for trainees in surgical residency programs. Data were analyzed from March 20, 2021, to June 8, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic trends (including race and ethnicity and sex) for all surgical subspecialty training programs over an 18-year period. Resident attrition includes all-cause withdrawals, dismissals, and transfers to another specialty. Unintended attrition encompasses all withdrawals, dismissals, and transfers except for changing career plans. Results: This study included 407 461 program-reported resident years collected from 112 205 individual surgical residents (67 351 male individuals [60.0%]). The mean percentage of female trainees was 40.0% (44 835) and increased over the study period. Sex disparity remained greatest in orthopedic surgery. Residents who were underrepresented in medicine (URiM) comprised 14.9% (16 695) of all surgical trainees but demonstrated a 2.1% decrease over the study period. Overall attrition rate among all specialties was 6.9% (7759), with an unintended attrition rate of 2.3% (2556). Female residents had a significantly higher relative risk (RR) of attrition (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11-1.22; P < .001) and unintended attrition (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26; P < .001) compared with their male counterparts. URiM residents were at significantly higher RR for attrition (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.32-1.48; P < .001) and unintended attrition (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.75-2.11; P < .001) compared with non-URiM residents. The highest attrition (10.6% [746 of 7043]) and unintended attrition (5.2% [367 of 7043]) rates were in Black/African American residents. The lowest attrition and unintended attrition rates were seen in White residents at 6.2% (4300 of 69 323) and 1.8% (1234 of 69 323), respectively. Black/African American residents were at disproportionate risk for attrition (RR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.53-1.80; P < .001) and unintended attrition (RR, 2.59; 95% CI, 2.31-2.90; P < .001) compared with all other residents. Orthopedic surgery had the highest attrition (RR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.84-5.09; P < .001) and unintended attrition (RR, 7.20; 95% CI, 4.84-10.71; P < .001) for Black/African American residents. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that the percentage of female residents in surgical specialties has improved over the last 18 years, and the percentage of URiM residents has remained relatively unchanged. Risk for attrition and unintended attrition was significantly elevated for female and URiM residents, specifically Black/African Americans. These results highlight current racial and sex disparities in resident attrition and demonstrate the importance of developing strategies to recruit, retain, and support residents.

Racial and Sex Disparities in Resident Attrition in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Studies have suggested that female individuals and individuals from backgrounds under-represented in medicine (URiM) are at increased risk of attrition during residency. This likely exacerbates the lack of diversity in our field. The aims of this study were to (1) characterize demographic composition in orthopaedic residency from 2001 to 2018 and (2) determine the race/ethnicity and identify any disparities. Methods: Demographic and attrition data from 2001 to 2018 were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges. Attrition data comprised the following categories: withdrawals, dismissals, and transfers to another specialty. Analysis compared demographic composition and determined attrition rates with subgroup analysis by race/ethnicity and sex. Results: From 2001 to 2018, female orthopaedic residents increased from 8.77% to 15.54% and URiM residents from 9.49% to 11.32%. The overall and unintended attrition rates in orthopaedic surgery were 3.20% and 1.15%, respectively. Among female residents, the overall and unintended attrition rates were 5.96% and 2.09% compared with 2.79% and 1.01%, respectively, in male residents. URiM residents had overall and unintended attrition rates of 6.16% and 3.11% compared with 2.71% and 0.83%, respectively, for their White counterparts. Black/African American residents had an attrition rate of nearly 10%. Female residents averaged 12.9% of all residents but 24% of those leaving orthopaedics. URiM residents were 10.14% of all residents but 19.51% of those experiencing attrition. In logistic regression models, female residents had a relative risk (RR) of 2.20 (p < 0.001) for experiencing all-cause attrition and 2.09 (p < 0.001) for unintended attrition compared with male residents. Compared with their White male counterparts, URiM residents had a RR for overall and unintended attrition of 2.36 and 3.84 (p < 0.001), respectively; Black/African American residents had a RR for the same of 3.80 and 7.20 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Although female resident percentage has increased, orthopaedics continues to train fewer female surgeons than all other fields. Female and URiM residents in orthopaedic surgery are disproportionately affected by attrition. While recruitment has been the primary focus of diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, this study suggests that resident retention through appropriately supporting residents during training is equally critical.

Residency Match Rates in Orthopaedic Surgery Based on Sex, Under-Represented in Medicine Status, and Degree Type.

Orthopaedic surgery is well recognized as one of the most competitive and least diverse medical specialties. Despite efforts toward improving diversity, studies have shown that gender and racial/ethnic disparities continue to persist in orthopaedic graduate medical education. Therefore, we sought to identify the match rates of traditionally under-represented groups within orthopaedic surgery-female candidates, racial and ethnic minorities under-represented in medicine (URiM), and osteopathic physicians-compared with their application rates. Methods: A retrospective review of the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application data from the 2017 to 2021 application cycles was performed, and the total number of applicants, sex, race/ethnicity, and degree type of all students applying for orthopaedic surgery were recorded. A separate database, the Orthopaedic Residency Information Network (ORIN), which is a database self-reported by residency programs to provide information to applicants, was also queried to identify the total number of residents, sex, race/ethnicity, and degree type of all current residents in June 2022, corresponding to those residents who matched in 2017 to 2021. Results: From the ERAS application data, a total of 7,903 applicants applied to orthopaedic surgery during the study period. A total of 1,448 applicants (18%) were female, 1,307 (18%) were URiM, and 1,022 (15%) were from an osteopathic medical school. Based on the ORIN database, 688 of 3,574 residents (19%) were female, 1,131 of 7,374 (19%) were URiM, and 1,022 of US medical school graduates (12%) had a DO degree. The application and match rates were not significantly different for female (p = 0.249) and URiM (0.187) applicants; however, there was a significant difference in the application and match rates (15% vs 12%; p = 0.035) for US medical graduates with a DO degree. Conclusion: In recent years, there has been a significant and necessary push to increase diversity in the field of orthopaedic surgery. From 2017 to 2021, match rates of female and URiM candidates are reflective of their application rates. Osteopathic applicants in orthopaedic surgery have a lower match rate than their allopathic counterparts. Level of Evidence: III.

Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink system is reliable for classifying complications following surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis.

PURPOSE: Appropriately measuring and classifying surgical complications is a critical component of research in vulnerable populations, including children with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of a modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink system (CDS) classification system for EOS patients among a group of pediatric spinal deformity surgeons. METHODS: Thirty case scenarios were developed and presented to experienced surgeons in an international spine study group. For each case, surgeons were asked to select a level of severity based on the modified CDS system to assess inter-rater reliability. The survey was administered on two occasions to allow for assessment of intra-rater reliability. Weighted Kappa values were calculated, with 0.61 to 0.80 considered substantial agreement and 0.81 to 1.00 considered nearly perfect agreement. RESULTS: 11/12 (91.7%) surgeons completed the first-round survey and 8/12 (66.7%) completed the second. Inter-observer weighted kappa values for the first and second survey were 0.75 [95% CI 0.56-0.94], indicating substantial agreement, and 0.84 [95% CI 0.70-0.98], indicating nearly perfect agreement, respectively. Intra-observer reliability was 0.86 (range 0.74-0.95) between the first and second surveys, indicating nearly perfect agreement . CONCLUSION: The modified CDS classification system demonstrated substantial to nearly perfect agreement between and within observers for the evaluation of complications following the surgical treatment of EOS patients. Adoption of this reliable classification system as a standard for reporting complications in EOS patients can be a valuable tool for future research endeavors, as we seek to ultimately improve surgical practices and patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Microdose protocol stereoradiography has similar reliability to standard low-dose protocol during concurrent Sanders skeletal maturity staging.

PURPOSE: Decreasing radiation exposure is important for scoliosis patients who require serial imaging. Microdose protocol stereoradiography is now increasingly utilized. Previous studies have reported similar reliability of concurrent Sanders skeletal maturity staging based on standard low-dose stereoradiography and standard hand radiographs. The purpose of our study was to investigate the reliability and radiation exposure of concurrent Sanders staging using microdose protocol compared to a standard protocol for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. We hypothesized that surgeon-performed Sanders staging would have similar reliability when comparing microdose and standard-dose imaging protocols. METHODS: A randomized survey of 30 hand images using standard protocol spinal stereoradiography and an equal number from microdose protocol were distributed to six experienced pediatric orthopaedic spine surgeons. Images were graded by each surgeon according to the Sanders skeletal maturity grading system. Items were again randomized and graded after a 2-week interval. Fleiss' weighted kappa for inter and intraobserver reliability was calculated and an unpaired t test was used to test for significance. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for all modalities was in the strong to almost perfect agreement (average weighted κ > 0.8) range. For the microdose protocol, κ was 0.82 and 0.84 for each separate round of grading. Standard low-dose protocol κ was 0.83 and 0.79. Intraobserver κ was 0.86 for microdose and 0.82 for standard. Average radiation for microdose was significantly less radiation (82.6%) than standard stereoradiography (0.3 ± 0.1 mGy vs. 1.9 ± 0.4 mGy, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sanders staging reliability of a well-positioned hand during scoliosis stereoradiography was similarly excellent for both microdose and standard low-dose protocol. Microdose protocol used less radiation while still preserving the reliability of Sanders staging.