Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in allogeneic stem cell transplantation is highly related to cytomegalovirus reactivation.

Monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) load and pre-emptive rituximab is an appropriate approach to prevent post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) occurring after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This pre-emptive approach, based on EBV-DNA monitoring through a quantitative polymerase chain reaction, was applied to 101 consecutive patients who underwent allo HSCT at our Institute (median age 50). A single infusion of rituximab was administered to 11 of 16 patients who were at high risk for progression to PTLD, defined as a DNA value >10 000 copies/mL. All patients cleared EBV DNAemia, without any recurrences. Main factors significantly associated with high risk for PTLD were as follows: (i) unrelated vs. sibling (26% vs. 7%; p = 0.011); (ii) T-cell depletion (29% vs. 6%; p = 0.001); (iii) graft versus host disease (GVHD; 30% vs. 7%; p = 0.002); and (iv) cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (29% vs. 4%; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that CMV reactivation was the only independent variable associated with EBV reactivation. We conclude that: (i) a single infusion of rituximab is able to prevent the risk of progression into EBV-related PTLD; and (ii) CMV reactivation is strongly associated with EBV reactivation; therefore, an intensive EBV monitoring strategy could be advisable only in case of CMV reactivation.

Results of a multicenter, controlled, randomized clinical trial evaluating the combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and tigecycline in high-risk hematologic patients with cancer with febrile neutropenia.

PURPOSE: Empiric antibiotic monotherapy is considered the standard of treatment for febrile neutropenic patients with cancer, but this approach may be inadequate because of the increasing prevalence of infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, superiority trial, adult, febrile, high-risk neutropenic patients (FhrNPs) with hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned to receive piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g intravenously every 8 hours) with or without tigecycline (50 mg intravenously every 12 hours; loading dose 100 mg). The primary end point was resolution of febrile episode without modifications of the initial allocated treatment. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety FhrNPs were enrolled (combination/monotherapy, 187/203) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (ITTA). The ITTA revealed a successful outcome in 67.9% v 44.3% of patients who had received combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively (127/187 v 90/203; absolute difference in risk (adr), 23.6%; 95% CI, 14% to 33%; P < .001). The combination regimen proved better than monotherapy in bacteremias (adr, 32.8%; 95% CI, 19% to 46%; P < .001) and in clinically documented infections (adr, 36%; 95% CI, 9% to 64%; P < .01). Mortality and number of adverse effects were limited and similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and tigecycline is safe, well tolerated, and more effective than piperacillin/tazobactam alone in febrile, high-risk, neutropenic hematologic patients with cancer. In epidemiologic settings characterized by a high prevalence of infections because of MDR microorganisms, this combination could be considered as one of the first-line empiric antibiotic therapies.