RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Epistemic violence is enacted in medical curricula in mundane ways all the time, negatively impacting learners, teachers and patients. In this article, we address three forms of such violence: White supremacy, indigenous erasure and heteronormativity. METHODS: In this article, we examine the knowledge systems of medicine as a global phenomenon, impacted by Western and European ideologies of race and colonisation, both produced by them, helping to reproduce them through authoritative and hegemonic ideologies. We seek not only to problematise but also to propose alternative teaching approaches rooted in the Global South and in Indigenous ways of knowing. Taking inspiration from Paulo Freire, we advocate for the development of critical consciousness through the integration of critical pedagogies of love, emancipation and shared humanity. Drawing on Irihapeti Ramsden, we advocate for cultural safety, which emphasises power relations and historical trauma in the clinical encounter and calls for a rights-based approach in medical education. Deliberately holding space for our own vulnerabilities and that of our students requires what Megan Boler calls a pedagogy of discomfort. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Our perspectives converge on the importance of critical consciousness development for culturally safe practice in medical education, acknowledging the need to emphasise a curriculum of shared humanity, introducing the concept of Ubuntu from Southern Africa. Ubuntu can be encapsulated in the phrase 'I am because we are', and it promotes a collective approach to medical education in which there is active solidarity between the profession and the diverse populations which it serves.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The inclusion of quality improvement (QI) and patient safety (PS) into CanMEDS reflects an expectation that graduating physicians are competent in these areas upon training completion. To ensure that Canadian postgraduate specialty training achieves this, the translation of QI/PS competencies into training standards as part of the implementation of competency-based medical education requires special attention. METHODS: We conducted a cross-specialty, multi-method analysis to examine how QI/PS was incorporated into the EPA Guides across 11 postgraduate specialties in Canada. RESULTS: We identify cross-specialty variability in how QI/PS is incorporated, positioned, and emphasized in EPAs and milestones. QI/PS was primarily referenced alongside clinical activities rather than as a sole competency or discrete activity. Patterns were characterized in how QI/PS became incorporated into milestones through repetition and customization. QI/PS was also decoupled, conceptualized, and emphasized differently across specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in the inclusion of QI/PS in EPAs and milestones has important implications considering the visibility and influence of EPA Guides in practice. As specialties revisit and revise EPA Guides, there is a need to balance the standardization of foundational QI/PS concepts to foster shared understanding while simultaneously ensuring context-sensitive applications across specialties. Beyond QI/PS, this study illuminates the challenges and opportunities that lie in bridging theoretical frameworks with practical implementation in medical education, prompting broader consideration of how intrinsic roles and emergent areas are effectively incorporated into competency-based medical education.
RESUMEN
ISSUE: Asians have experienced a rise in racialized hate crimes due to the anti-Asian rhetoric that has accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there has been little acknowledgement of anti-Asian discrimination within the medical education community. While anti-Asian hate is not new or unfamiliar to us, four authors of Asian descent, it has given us an opportunity to reflect on how we have been complicit in and resistant to the larger racial narratives that circulate in our communities. EVIDENCE: In this article, we provide a brief history of Asians in the Americas with a focus on anti-Asian hate. Next, while presenting stories from the perspective of Asian medical education researchers who were born/have settled in the U.S. and Canada, we take the opportunity to reflect on how our personal experiences have shaped our perceptions of ourselves, and the representations of Asians in the field of medicine. IMPLICATIONS: We hope to create awareness about how stereotypes of success tied to Asians can be used as a tool of oppression creating strife between Black communities, Asian communities, and other people of color. There is a need to develop critical consciousness to address the issues of equity in academia and in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe the reasoning processes used by pediatric intensivists to make antibiotic-related decisions. DESIGN: Grounded theory qualitative study. SETTING: Three Canadian university-affiliated tertiary medical, surgical, and cardiac PICUs. PATIENTS: Twenty-one PICU physicians. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We conducted field observation during morning rounds followed by semistructured interviews with participants to examine the clinical reasoning behind antibiotic-related decisions (starting/stopping antibiotics, or treatment duration) made for patients with a suspected/proven bacterial infection. We used a grounded theory approach for data collection and analysis. Thematic saturation was reached after 21 interviews. Of the 21 participants, 10 (48%) were female, 15 (71%) were PICU attending staff, and 10 (48%) had greater than 10 years in clinical practice. Initial clinical reasoning involves using an analytical approach to determine the likelihood of bacterial infection. In case of uncertainty, an assessment of patient safety is performed, which partly overlaps with the use of intuitive clinical reasoning. Finally, if uncertainty remains, physicians tend to consult infectious diseases experts. Factors that override this clinical reasoning process include disease severity, pressure from consultants, and the tendency to continue antibiotic treatment initiated by colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic-related decisions for critically ill children are complex, and pediatric intensivists use several clinical reasoning strategies to decrease the uncertainty around the bacterial etiology of infections. However, disease severity and patient safety concerns may overrule decisions based on clinical evidence and lead to antibiotic use. Several cognitive biases were identified in the clinical reasoning processes.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Bacterianas , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Canadá , Niño , Razonamiento Clínico , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , MasculinoRESUMEN
The importance of advancing equity, diversity, and inclusion for all members of the academic medical community has gained recent attention. Academic medical organizations have attempted to increase broader representation while seeking structural reforms consistent with the goal of enhancing equity and reducing disproportionality. However, efforts remain constrained while minority groups continue to experience discrimination. In this study, the authors sought to identify and understand the discursive effects of discrimination policies within medical education. The authors assembled an archive of 22 texts consisting of publicly available discrimination and harassment policy documents in 13 Canadian medical schools that were active as of November 2019. Each text was analysed to identify themes, rhetorical strategies, problematization, and power relations. Policies described truth statements that appear to idealize equity, yet there were discourses related to professionalism and neutrality that were in tension with these ideals. There was also tension between organizations' framing of a shared responsibility for addressing discrimination and individual responsibility on complainants. Lastly, there were also competing discourses on promoting freedom from discrimination and the concept of academic freedom. Overall, findings reveal several areas of tension that shape how discrimination is addressed in policy versus practice. Existing discourses regarding self-protection and academic freedom suggest equity cannot be advanced through policy discourse alone and more substantive structural transformation may be necessary. Existing approaches may be inadequate to address discrimination unless academic medical organizations interrogate the source of these discursive tensions and consider asymmetries of power.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Canadá , Libertad , Humanos , Políticas , Facultades de MedicinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We examine the cultural myth of the medical meritocracy, whereby the "best and the brightest" are admitted and promoted within the profession. We explore how this narrative guides medical practice in ways that may no longer be adequate in the contexts of practice today. METHODS: Narrative analysis of medical students' and physicians' stories. RESULTS: Hierarchies of privilege within medicine are linked to meritocracy and the trope of the "hero's story" in literature. Gender and other forms of difference are generally excluded from narratives of excellence, which suggests operative mechanisms that may be contributory to observed differences in attainment. We discuss how the notion of diversity is formulated in medicine as a "problem" to be accommodated within merit, and posit that medical practice today requires a reformulation of the notion of merit in medicine, valorising a diversity of life experience and skills, rather than "retrofitting" diversity concerns as problems to be accommodated within current constructs of merit. CONCLUSIONS: Three main action-oriented outcomes for a better formulation of merit relevant to medical practice today are suggested: (a) development of assessors' critical consciousness regarding the structural issues in merit assignment; (b) alignment of merit criteria with relevant societal outcomes, and (c) developing inclusive leadership to accommodate the greater diversity of excellence needed in today's context of medical practice. A reformulation of the stories through which medical practitioners and educators communicate and validate aspects of medical practice will be required in order for the profession to continue to have relevance to the diverse societies it serves.
Asunto(s)
Éxito Académico , Antropología Cultural , Diversidad Cultural , Liderazgo , Narración , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Factores Sexuales , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicologíaRESUMEN
Aim: While diversity, equity, and inclusion are much proclaimed aspirational goals in education programs, the clinical learning environment (CLE) frequently falls short of meaningful incorporation of these concepts in processes, policies, and local culture. In this paper, we explore how inclusion, diversity, and equity can and should be defined and operationalized within medical education. Methods: Three cases, organized around Hafferty's curricular framework (formal, informal, and hidden), we illustrate lapses and potential best practices in inclusion in the CLE. Results: The essential "best-practice" of programs inclusive of diverse individuals is the design of policies, processes, and behavioral norms co-creatively with all community members. Potential pitfalls to greater inclusion include nostalgic reference to "the past", a neutrality that is operationalized without the rudder of explicit values and not recognizing that ethical obligations between teachers, learners, and programs are at the heart of the discussion of how inclusive learning and work environments are built. Conclusion: Inclusive CLE's provide space for co-creation, understand the need to ensure the voices of the vulnerable (i.e. learners) are heard and valued and through this promote the flourishing of diverse human capital, in keeping with a model that views diversity as a key attribute or organizational excellence.
Asunto(s)
Diversidad Cultural , Personal de Salud/educación , Personal de Salud/psicología , Aprendizaje , Medio Social , Competencia Clínica/normas , Ambiente , Humanos , Grupos Minoritarios/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/psicologíaRESUMEN
Purpose: We examined studies of the clinical learning environment from the fields of sociology and organizational culture to (i) offer insight into how workplace culture has informed research on postgraduate trainee learning and professional development; (ii) highlight limitations of the literature; and (iii) suggest practical ways to apply sociocultural concepts to challenges in the learning environment. Materials and methods: Concepts were explored by participants at a consensus conference in October 2018. Results: We identified three enduring foci for research using a sociocultural lens: the hidden curriculum, exploration of medical errors, and the impact of time pressures on the relational nature of clinical education. Limitations included the lower value attributed to informal learning and a pejorative valuation of the hidden curriculum; and disconnect between practices in clinical settings and the priorities of the larger organization. Conclusions: Research on the learning environment using a sociocultural lens suggest workplace goals, norms and practices determined which learners engage in learning-relevant activities, to what extent, and the degree of guidance provided, with these factors creating "tacit" curricula that may support or compete with formal learning goals. We close with guidance on how sociocultural constructs could inform research to improve the learning environment.
Asunto(s)
Aculturación , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Aprendizaje , Cultura Organizacional , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Competencia Clínica/normas , Diversidad Cultural , Curriculum , Ambiente , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Investigación Cualitativa , Medio Social , Sociología , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Factores de Tiempo , Confianza , Lugar de Trabajo/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
Learning in a clinical context is foundational in the training of health professionals; there is simply no alternative. The subject of the clinical learning environment (CLE) is at the forefront of discussions. In this introduction to a themed issue on the CLE, we present an expanded conceptual model that approaches the CLE through six different lenses, termed "avenues:" architectural, digital, diversity and inclusion, education, psychological, and sociocultural, with each avenue represented by a paper. The aim is to facilitate dialog around the contributions of different academic disciplines to research on the CLE. Collectively the papers highlight the overlap between the various "avenues" in how they influence each other, and how they collectively have shaped the work to understand and improve the CLE. The expectation is that the various avenues can add to existing knowledge and create new ideas for interventions to improve the clinical learning environment across nations for learners and teachers with the ultimate aim of improving patient care. Research and efforts to improve the CLE are critical to learning, professional socialization and well-being for trainees as they learn and participate in patient care, and to the quality of care they will deliver over decades of practice after graduation.
Asunto(s)
Ambiente , Personal de Salud/educación , Aprendizaje , Medio Social , Acreditación/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Diversidad Cultural , Evaluación Educacional/normas , Humanos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Social distance between patients and physicians has been shown to affect the quality of care that patients receive. Little is known about how social distance between students and patients is experienced by learners during early clinical exposures in medical school. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore students' stories of experiencing social distance with patients with concordant and discordant social characteristics as themselves, respectively, as well as students' needs from medical curricula regarding developing social competence. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews of medical students [n = 16] were performed, and a post-interview survey and a visual analog scale were completed. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The written transcripts were coded using the constant comparison method and analyzed for emerging themes. RESULTS: Students experience social distance with patients; yet, they are not taught explicitly by their preceptors how to manage these experiences. Students identified their needs for the curriculum in regard to developing social competence and proposed various strategies and curriculum recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support that students believe that social competence training is important for their professional development to improve relationship-building with diverse patients. As such, it would be valuable to incorporate student recommendations in the formation of a social competence curriculum.
Asunto(s)
Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Distancia Psicológica , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Interprofessional education (IPE) has been widely incorporated into health professional curricula and accreditation standards despite an arguably thin base of evidence regarding its clinical effects, theoretical underpinnings, and social implications. To better understand how and why IPE first took root, but failed to grow, this study examines one of the earliest documented IPE initiatives, which took place at the University of British Columbia between 1960 and 1975. We examined a subset of 110 texts (academic literature, grey literature, and unpublished records) from a larger study that uses Critical Discourse Analysis to trace the emergence of IPE in Canada. We asked how IPE was promoted and received, by whom, for what purposes, and to what effects. Our analysis demonstrates that IPE was promoted as a response to local challenges for the Faculty of Medicine as well as national challenges for Canada's emerging public healthcare system. These dual exigencies enabled the IPE initiative, but they shaped it in somewhat divergent ways: the former gave rise to its core component (a health sciences centre) and the latter its ultimate purpose (increasing the role of non-medical professions in primary care). Reception of the initiative was complicated by a further tension: nurses and allied health professionals were sometimes represented as independent experts with unique knowledge and skills, and sometimes as assistants or substitutes for medical doctors. We relate the successes and frustrations of this early initiative to particular (mis)alignments of purpose and relationships of power, some of which continue to enable and constrain IPE today.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Poder Psicológico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Colombia Británica , Canadá , Curriculum , Educación Médica/métodos , Docentes Médicos , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Humanos , NegociaciónAsunto(s)
Estudiantes de Medicina , Australia , Humanos , Políticas , Criterios de Admisión Escolar , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Calls to increase medical class representativeness to better reflect the diversity of society represent a growing international trend. There is an inherent tension between these calls and competitive student selection processes driven by academic achievement. How is this tension manifested? METHODS: Our three-phase interdisciplinary research programme focused on the discourses of excellence, equity and diversity in the medical school selection process, as conveyed by key stakeholders: (i) institutions and regulatory bodies (the websites of 17 medical schools and 15 policy documents from national regulatory bodies); (ii) admissions committee members (ACMs) (according to semi-structured interviews [n = 9]), and (iii) successful applicants (according to semi-structured interviews [n = 14]). The work is theoretically situated within the works of Foucault, Bourdieu and Bakhtin. The conceptual framework is supplemented by critical hermeneutics and the performance theories of Goffman. RESULTS: Academic excellence discourses consistently predominate over discourses calling for greater representativeness in medical classes. Policy addressing demographic representativeness in medicine may unwittingly contribute to the reproduction of historical patterns of exclusion of under-represented groups. In ACM selection practices, another discursive tension is exposed as the inherent privilege in the process is marked, challenging the ideal of medicine as a meritocracy. Applicants' representations of self in the 'performance' of interviewing demonstrate implicit recognition of the power inherent in the act of selection and are manifested in the use of explicit strategies to 'fit in'. CONCLUSIONS: How can this critical discourse analysis inform improved inclusiveness in student selection? Policymakers addressing diversity and equity issues in medical school admissions should explicitly recognise the power dynamics at play between the profession and marginalised groups. For greater inclusion and to avoid one authoritative definition of excellence, we suggest a transformative model of faculty development aimed at promoting multiple kinds of excellence. Through this multi-pronged approach, we call for the profession to courageously confront the cherished notion of the medical meritocracy in order to avoid unwanted aspects of elitism.
Asunto(s)
Diversidad Cultural , Criterios de Admisión Escolar , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administración , Responsabilidad Social , Estudiantes de Medicina , Canadá , Comunicación , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Política Organizacional , Facultades de Medicina/normasRESUMEN
An interdisciplinary faculty development workshop on cultural competency (CC) was implemented and evaluated for the Faculty of Medicine at McGill University. It consisted of a 4-hour workshop and 2 follow-up sessions. A reflective practice framework was used. The project was evaluated using the Multicultural Assessment Questionnaire (MAQ), evaluation forms completed by participants, and detailed field notes taken during the sessions. The workshop was attended by 49 faculty members with diverse professional backgrounds. Statistically significant improvements were measured using the MAQ. On a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = very useful) on the evaluation form, the majority of participants (76.1%) gave the workshop a score of 4 or 5 for overall usefulness. A thematic analysis of field-note data highlighted participant responses to specific activities in the workshop. Participants expressed a need for faculty development initiatives on CC such as this one.
Les auteurs ont présenté et évalué une formation interdisciplinaire sur les compétences culturelles (CC) s'adressant au corps professoral de la Faculté de médecine de l'Université McGill. Le projet consistait en un atelier de quatre heures et deux séances de suivi. Il a été évalué au moyen du Multicultural Assessment Questionnaire (MAQ), de formulaires d'évaluation remplis par les participants et de notes détaillées prises lors des séances. La formation a été suivie par 49 professeurs aux antécédents professionnels variés. Le MAQ a permis de relever une amélioration notable des compétences. Sur le formulaire d'évaluation, la majorité des participants (76,1 %) ont accordé à l'utilité globale de la formation une note de 4 ou 5 (sur une échelle de 1 à 5, 5 = très utile). Une analyse thématique des notes d'observation a permis de mettre en lumière les réactions à l'égard d'activités précises. Les participants ont exprimé le besoin de suivre des activités de formation professionnelle sur les CC comme celle-ci.
RESUMEN
Multiple-Mini Interviews (MMIs) were used to assess professional attributes of candidates seeking admission to an occupational therapy professional entry-level master's program. Candidates and interviewers were invited to complete a questionnaire comprised of quantitative and open-ended questions following the MMIs. The MMIs were perceived to be fair, enjoyable, and capable of capturing professional attributes. Descriptive analysis of candidates' data revealed perceptions regarding logistics, interview station content, process, and interviewers. Interviewers commented on the positive and challenging aspects of the scenarios and the MMI process. Admissions committees need to consider several logistical, content, and process issues when designing and implementing MMIs as a selection tool.