Profiles of Burnout and Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Among General Surgery Residents at a Large Academic Training Program.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has placed demands on General Surgery residents, who are already at high risk of burnout. This study examined the pandemic's impact on burnout and wellness among General Surgery residents at a large training program. METHODS: General Surgery residents at our institution completed a survey focused on self-reported burnout, mental health, perceptions of wellness resources, and changes in activities during the pandemic. Burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Unsupervised machine learning (k-means clustering) was used to identify profiles of burnout and comparisons between profiles were made. RESULTS: Of 82 eligible residents, 51 completed the survey (62% response rate). During COVID-19, 63% of residents had self-described burnout, 43% had depression, 18% acknowledged binge drinking/drug use, and 8% had anxiety. There were no significant differences from pre-pandemic levels (p all >.05). Few residents perceived available wellness resources as effective (6%). Based on MBI scores, the clustering analysis identified three clusters, characterized as "overextended", "engaged", and "ineffective". Engaged residents had the least concerning MBI scores and were significantly more likely to exercise, retain social contact during the pandemic, and had less self-reported anxiety or depression. Research residents were overrepresented in the ineffective cluster (46%), which had high rates of self-reported burnout (77%) and was characterized by the lowest personal accomplishment scores. Rates of self-reported burnout for overextended and engaged residents were 73% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Surgical residents have high rates of self-reported burnout and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clusters of burnout may offer targets for individualized intervention.

Axillary surgery and complication rates after mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer: an analysis of the NSQIP database.

PURPOSE: Some series have shown increased complications with extended nodal surgery and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with implants. We aim to explore complications associated with axillary dissection compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy at a population level. METHODS: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant user files from 2008-2018 were searched to create a cohort of female patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy with IBR and axillary surgery for non-metastatic breast cancer. Patients were classified as having sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary dissection (ALND), or sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection (SLNB + ALND). Baseline demographics were compared, and multivariable logistic regression was to assess for independent predictors of the primary outcome of 30-day morbidity. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2018, 18,232 patients had mastectomy and IBR with axillary surgery; 12,632 patients underwent SLNB, 3727 had ALND and 1,873 underwent SLNB + ALND. Mean age of patients in the cohort was 52.5 (SD 11). There was no difference in 30-day morbidity between groups (SLNB: 4.3%, ALND: 4.9%, SLNB + ALND: 4.2%, p = 0.207). Multivariable regression showed that type of axillary surgery was not an independent predictor of 30-day complications (OR 0.78 (95% CI 0.52-1.15) for ALND, and OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.52-1.45) for ALND + SLNB vs SLNB alone). Significant independent predictors for complications were increased BMI (OR 1.06 (95%CI 1.04-1.08)) and increased operative time (OR 1.003 (95% CI 1.001-1.005)). CONCLUSIONS: ALND does not increase 30-day morbidity in patients undergoing IBR when compared to SLNB. This supports concurrent axillary dissection for IBR patients when indicated.

Challenges in Cross-Cultural Communication in Breast Cancer Surgery: Is there a Gender Gap?

The aim of this study is to identify [1] facilitators and barriers to cross-cultural communication with Canadian immigrants during the breast cancer (BC) surgical consultation and [2] the impact of cultural sensitivity training on the perception of cross-cultural communication barriers. A 29-item questionnaire mailed to 450 surgeons was developed based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, informed by interviews with BC practitioners and a literature review. The inclusion criteria are English-speaking general surgeons practicing in Vancouver, Montréal, and Toronto, home to > 60% of Canada's immigrant population. The association between surgeon characteristics and barriers to communication was assessed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between frequent perception of each barrier to communication and gender, career stage, and percentage of foreign-born patients. Between June and September 2017, 130 surveys were returned for a 29% response rate. The majority of practitioners reported experiencing language barriers in consultation with immigrant patients (71.4%). In the patient-provider relationship, the most commonly reported barrier was the patient's lack of medical understanding (81.4%). At the system level, the absence of a relative for translation was the most frequently encountered challenge (77.1%). On multivariable analysis adjusting for career stage and percentage of foreign-born patients, female gender of a surgeon was associated with more frequent perception of barriers related to language (OR 4.91, [95% CI 1.43, 16.82; p = 0.0114]), the patient's desired role in decision-making (OR 3.000 [95% CI 1.116-8.059; p = 0.0294]), and poor access to interpreters (OR 3.63 [95% CI 1.24, 10.64; p = 0.0189]). Furthermore, on multivariable analysis adjusting for gender and career stage, surgeons identified as having < 25% foreign-born patients in their practice were less likely to identify communication barriers due to the patients' perception and understanding of their healthcare (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.11, 0.95; p = 0.041]). Cultural sensitivity training did not appear to be an influential factor though this may be due to the low number of surgeons who received training (5.7%). There are multiple cross-cultural communication challenges. Gender, years in practice, and the cultural diversity of a practice might play significant roles in the identification and perception of these barriers.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Cancer Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Surgeons' Perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: While studies have documented delays in breast cancer (BC) care during the COVID-19 pandemic due to healthcare restrictions, there have been no studies on the experiences, and, particularly, the challenges with providing care faced by breast surgeons during this unprecedented time. This paper aims to understand the perspectives of breast surgeons regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on BC care. METHODS: We used purposeful and snowball sampling to identify breast surgeons in Ontario, Canada. One-on-one qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted exploring the impact of the pandemic on BC treatment, psychosocial well-being of patients and providers, and the future state of BC care. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: A total of 10 breast surgeons (5 community and 5 academic) were interviewed. Breast surgeons reported that the pandemic led to increased multidisciplinary collaboration and innovations in delivery of BC surgery (e.g., increased use of regional anesthesia). Multiple surgeons identified that the pandemic created disparities in BC care based geographic location and that existing disparities in care based on ethnicity or marginalization were exacerbated. Last, surgeons identified that virtual care improved, but also created some challenges to how BC care was delivered, with many hoping for this to be continued after the pandemic was over. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, breast surgeons identified unique challenges and solutions to BC care delivery during the pandemic. Concerns regarding disparities in care based on geographic location and marginalized patients require further study to improve future BC care.

#COVID19 and #Breastcancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Tweets.

Rapid and efficient communication regarding quickly evolving medical information was paramount for healthcare providers and patients throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Over the last several years, social media platforms such as Twitter have emerged as important tools for health promotion, virtual learning among healthcare providers, and patient support. We conducted a qualitative thematic content analysis on tweets using the hashtags #BreastSurgery, #BreastCancer, #BreastOncology, #Pandemic, and #COVID19. Advocacy organizations were the most frequent authors of tweets captured in this dataset, and most tweets came from the United States of America (64%). Seventy-three codes were generated from the data, and, through iterative, inductive analysis, three major themes were developed: patient hesitancy and vulnerability, increased efforts in knowledge sharing, and evolving best practices. We found that Twitter was an effective way to share evolving best practices, education, and collective experiences among key stakeholders. As Twitter is increasingly used as a tool for health promotion and knowledge translation, a better understanding of how key stakeholders engage with healthcare-related topics on the platform can help optimize the use of this powerful tool.

High Risk Breast Cancer Screening is a Double Edged Sword: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on the Ontario High Risk Breast Cancer Screening Program.

BACKGROUND: MRI-based breast cancer screening for high-risk women has been associated with false positives. This study explored the benefits and drawbacks of MRI-based screening using in-depth patient interviews. METHODS: This was a qualitative study of interviews with women participating in the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program. Women enrolled at two centers who had completed at least one round of screening were invited to participate. Recruitment was suspended when thematic saturation was reached. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Emergent themes were identified and a coding framework established. RESULTS: 21 women (median age 41 years) participated in telephone interviews. Women had been in the program a median of 4 years (IQR 1-5), and 71% had experienced at least one abnormal screen. Eight participants (38%) had undergone biopsies. Six women (29%) were BRCA mutation carriers. MRIs were described as intimidating, uncomfortable, and claustrophobic. Participants were concerned about long-term exposure to gadolinium contrast. Compared to MRI, mammography alone was viewed as painful, less sensitive, and a "useless…waste of time." MRI provided a "psychological safety net" that outweighed the distress associated with abnormal screens. Many women accepted this trade-off as a "two-edged sword" that was "worth it" and provided a sense of control. Suggestions for improvement included more information regarding the risks of MRI, and access to counselling. CONCLUSIONS: Women participating in MRI-based screening strongly value reassurance from a highly sensitive screening test. This outweighed the distress of abnormal screens. There are areas for improvement around patient communication and psychosocial support.