A phase II evaluation of mifepristone in the treatment of recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of mifepristone in patients with ovarian, peritoneal and fallopian tube cancers. METHODS: Patients with confirmed epithelial ovarian, peritoneal and fallopian tube cancers which were persistent or recurred in less then 1 year after primary chemotherapy were entered into this study. Patients were given mifepristone 200 mg by mouth daily for a 28 day cycle. The medication was stopped for unacceptable toxicity or tumor progression. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were entered into the study. Twenty-two patients were evaluable for response. Only one patient had a partial response for a response rate of only 4.5% (90% confidence interval: 0.2%, 19.8%). CONCLUSION: Mifepristone has not proven to be an effective agent in the treatment of patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian, peritoneal and fallopian tube cancers.

Long-term trajectories of psychological adaptation among women diagnosed with gynecological cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Women diagnosed with gynecological cancers may cope with a difficult treatment regimen that includes multiple abdominal surgeries and courses of chemotherapy and/or radiation. Little attention has been paid to identifying what factors place women at risk for long-term problems with psychological adaptation. The goal of the present study was to identify a set of demographic, medical, and predisposing factors as well as cognitive and social processing strategies that predict the trajectory of psychological distress and well-being among women diagnosed with gynecological cancer. METHODS: One hundred thirteen women on active treatment for gynecological cancer completed measures at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months afterward. RESULTS: Women with poorer physician-rated performance status and self-reported functional impairment, women who were Caucasian, women who have received previous psychological treatments, women who were less expressive of positive emotions, women who had unsupportive friends and family, and women who were less able to find something positive in the cancer experience reported poorer adaptation. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a set of risk factors for poor long-term psychological adaptation among women diagnosed with gynecological cancers. Healthcare professionals working with these women can use these risk factors to screen for patients who may require additional psychological services.

A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus.

PURPOSE: After initial surgery, there has been no established consensus regarding adjunctive therapy for patients with uterine carcinosarcoma (CS). This study was designed to compare patient outcome following treatment with adjuvant whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) versus (vs.) chemotherapy for patients with this rare group of female pelvic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible, consenting women with stage I-IV uterine CS, no more than 1 cm postsurgical residuum and/or no extra-abdominal spread had their treatments randomly assigned as either WAI or three cycles of cisplatin (C), ifosfamide (I), and mesna (M). RESULTS: 232 patients were enrolled, of whom 206 (WAI=105; CIM=101) were deemed eligible. Patient demographics and characteristics were similar between arms. FIGO stage (both arms) was: I=64 (31%); II=26 (13%); III=92 (45%); IV=24 (12%). The estimated crude probability of recurring within 5 years was 58% (WAI) and 52% (CIM). Adjusting for stage and age, the recurrence rate was 21% lower for CIM patients than for WAI patients (relative hazard [RH]=0.789, 95% confidence interval [CI]: (0.530-1.176), p=0.245, 2-tail test). The estimated death rate was 29% lower among the CIM group (RH=0.712, 95% CI: 0.484-1.048, p=0.085, two-tail test). CONCLUSION: We did not find a statistically significant advantage in recurrence rate or survival for adjuvant CIM over WAI in patients with uterine CS. However, the observed differences favor the use of combination chemotherapy in future trials.

Coping and communication-enhancing intervention versus supportive counseling for women diagnosed with gynecological cancers.

This study compared the efficacy of 2 psychological interventions, a coping and communication-enhancing intervention (CCI) and supportive counseling (SC), in reducing depressive symptoms and cancer-specific distress of women diagnosed with gynecological cancer. Demographic, medical, and psychological moderators of intervention effects were evaluated. Three hundred fifty-three women with gynecological cancer were randomly assigned to 7 sessions of CCI, 7 sessions of SC, or usual care. Intent-to-treat growth curve analyses indicated that participants assigned to CCI and SC reported lower depressive symptoms than participants assigned to usual care at the 6- and 9-month follow-ups. Women with greater than average increases in physician-rated physical symptoms and/or women who were more expressive of positive emotions benefited more from SC than women with lower than average increases in symptom scores and/or women who were less expressive of positive emotions. These findings suggest that both interventions may be effective in treating depressive symptoms among patients with gynecological cancer. Future research should evaluate whether bolstering both psychological interventions with additional intervention sessions and topics in the disease trajectory will result in persistent long-term effects.

Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether cisplatin plus paclitaxel (C+P) improved response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), or survival compared with cisplatin alone in patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible: patients with measurable disease, performance status (PS) 0 to 2, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function received either cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or C+P (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Tumor measurements and quality-of-life (QOL) assessments were obtained before each treatment cycle. RESULTS: Of 280 patients entered, 6% were ineligible. Among 264 eligible patients, 134 received cisplatin and 130 received C+P. Groups were well matched with respect to age, ethnicity, PS, tumor grade, disease site, and number of cycles received. The majority of all patients had prior radiation therapy (cisplatin, 92%; C+P, 91%). Objective responses occurred in 19% (6% complete plus 13% partial) of patients receiving cisplatin versus 36% (15% complete plus 21% partial) receiving C+P (P = .002). The median PFS was 2.8 and 4.8 months, respectively, for cisplatin versus C+P (P < .001). There was no difference in median survival (8.8 months v 9.7 months). Grade 3 to 4 anemia and neutropenia were more common in the combination arm. There was no significant difference in QOL scores, although a disproportionate number of patients (cisplatin, n = 50; C+P, n = 33) dropped out of the QOL component, presumably because of increasing disease, deteriorating health status, or early death. CONCLUSION C+P is superior to cisplatin alone with respect to response rate and PFS with sustained QOL.

Goserelin acetate as treatment for recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

This Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study was designed to estimate the activity of goserelin acetate as treatment for advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Forty evaluable patients received monthly treatment with goserelin acetate at a dose of 3.6 mg, given subcutaneously. Standard GOG response and adverse effects criteria were used. The median age of patients was 71 years. Seventy-one percent of patients had received prior radiation therapy; 18% of patients were reported to have received prior progestational therapy for endometrial cancer. One patient had received prior chemotherapy. There were two complete responses (5%) and three partial responses (7%). One response occurred in a patient who previously did not respond to progestin therapy after having achieved a response. The overall response rate was 11% (95% CI: 4-27%). Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months and median overall survival was 7.3 months. No severe or life-threatening toxicities occurred because of goserelin. Deep venous thrombosis developed in two patients. This study confirmed the limited activity of goserelin acetate in endometrial carcinoma, with only one response in a patient previously treated with hormonal therapy. The activity is insufficient to warrant further study of the single agent at this time. Elucidation of the mechanism of action of this drug may allow more effective use in conjunction with other agents in the future.

Mediators of a coping and communication-enhancing intervention and a supportive counseling intervention among women diagnosed with gynecological cancers.

The authors evaluated mechanisms of change for a coping and communication-enhancing intervention (CCI) and supportive counseling (SC). They proposed that the effects of CCI on depressive symptoms would be mediated by psychological processes targeted by CCI, namely increases in the following: positive reappraisal, acceptance, planful problem solving, attempts to understand emotional reactions to cancer, emotional expression, seeking of emotional and instrumental support, and self-esteem. The authors hypothesized that the effects of SC on depressive symptoms would be mediated by the processes encouraged by SC, in this case increases in the following: expression of emotions, attempts to understand emotional reactions to cancer, and self-esteem. Three hundred fifty-three women were randomized to a CCI, SC, or usual care control group and completed measures at preintervention and 3, 6, and 9 months later. The effects of CCI were fully mediated by positive reappraisal, problem solving, and self-esteem and partially mediated by emotional expression. The effects of SC were partially mediated by positive reappraisal. These findings provide support for hypothesized mediators for CCI. The authors were less able to identify mediators for SC. Future research might benefit from identifying SC mediators.

Activity of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the antitumor activity of paclitaxel (Taxol) in patients with persistent or recurrent endometrial carcinoma who have failed prior chemotherapy. To determine the nature and degree of toxicity of paclitaxel in this group of patients. METHODS: Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-h infusion at an initial dose of 200 mg/m(2) every 21 days or 175 mg/m(2) for patients with prior pelvic radiation therapy. Dose modifications were based on nadir toxicity, both hematologic and nonhematologic, and were accomplished by dose level adjustments. The dose levels were 200, 175, 135, and 110 mg/m(2). Patients were evaluable for response after receiving one dose of paclitaxel and living 3 weeks. They were evaluable for toxicity after receiving any paclitaxel. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients evaluable for response, three patients (6.8%) achieved a complete response and nine patients (20.5%) had a partial response for an overall response rate of 27.3%. The 95% confidence interval for the true response rate was 15-42.8%. The median number of courses of paclitaxel to response was 2 (range: 1-4) and the median response duration was 4.2 months. The median overall survival was 10.3 months. Of 48 patients evaluable for toxicity, 28 experienced at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, with one treatment-related death. There were four patients who developed grade 3 neurotoxicity in this group of previously treated patients, most of whom had received cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. There was virtually no cardiac toxicity and only 3 of 48 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel is an active agent in the treatment of endometrial cancer in patients who have had prior chemotherapy.

Extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a phase II trial of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide with comparison to a cohort with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma-a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were first, to assess the clinical effectiveness of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide in a phase II study involving a well-defined group of women with extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (EPSPC); and second, to compare these results with those of a group of patients with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma (PSOC) who received identical therapy. METHODS: After primary surgery, patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) every 21 days for six cycles. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, clinical and surgical response to treatment, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. These patients were then compared with patients with PSOC who received identical treatment on a separate protocol. RESULTS: Women with a diagnosis of tended to be older that those with EPSPC PSOC (median age: 65.8 years vs 60.3 years, P = 0.04). The estimated probability of clinical response (complete and partial) to the treatment regimen for EPSPC was 65% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41-85%) compared with 59% (95% CI: 47-71%) for women with PSOC. Surgical complete responses were similar (20% vs 19%) in the two patient groups. Additionally, the death rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (hazard ratio: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.834-1.88). CONCLUSION: Women with EPSPC and PSOC exhibit a similar probability of response to cisplatin and cyclophosphamide and a similar overall survival. Based on these findings and the fact that results of ovarian cancer trials are frequently extrapolated to patients with EPSPC, it is reasonable to include EPSPC patients in future large-scale treatment trials involving patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Phase II evaluation of oxaliplatin in previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study.

OBJECTIVE: A phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy of oxaliplatin therapy in patients with previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. METHODS: Eligible patients were to have measurable disease and not more than one prior chemotherapy regimen that could include carboplatin or cisplatin but not oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously over 2 h. This treatment was repeated every 21 days until progression of disease or adverse effects prohibited further therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were entered onto this study, of whom 24 were evaluable for toxicity and 22 were evaluable for response; 23/24 evaluable patients had had prior platinum. There were two (8.3%) responses. One patient achieved a complete response which lasted 2.2 months, and a second patient attained a partial response which lasted 3.2 months. Nine (37.5%) patients had stable disease with a median duration of 7.6+ (3.1-21.2) months. The most frequently reported drug-related toxicities consisted of anemia, nausea and vomiting, and neurotoxicity. Three (12.5%) patients had a grade 3 allergic response that was infusion-related and was largely resolved by increasing infusion time. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin has limited activity in patients with persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix at the dose and schedule tested.

Phase I feasibility trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of administering a minimum of four cycles of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine (CPG) every 21 days without excessive dose modification or cycle delay in patients with previously untreated epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) was given over 3 h followed by carboplatin concentration time curve (AUC) 5 (day 1) and gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) (days 1 and 8) in the first cohort. A second cohort received paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) over 3 h followed by carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1) and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8). A maximum of eight cycles was administered. RESULTS: Fourteen patients received 89 cycles during the first cohort. Seven patients experienced 19 hematologic dose-limiting events (DLEs) within the first four cycles, including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 9), febrile neutropenia (n = 3), and omission of gemcitabine on day 8 (n = 7). This exceeded the threshold for nonfeasibility. In the second, less intense regimen, 36 patients were entered. Thirty-one evaluable patients received a total of 200 and median of 6 (range: 2-8) cycles. Thirteen of the thirty-one had 27 DLEs within the first four cycles including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 5), prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2), febrile neutropenia (n = 2), and omission of day 8 gemcitabine (n = 18). There was one patient death secondary to a wound abscess and febrile neutropenia. Myelosuppression as expected was the dose-limiting toxicity. CONCLUSION: The schedule of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) (day 1, 3 h), carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1), and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) is feasible, with an acceptable toxicity profile.