Comparison of conventional cytomorphology, flow cytometry immunophenotyping, and automated cell counting of CSF for detection of CNS involvement in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cytospin conventional cytomorphology (CCC) is the standard method for detecting lymphoblasts in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and for guiding treatment decisions. We evaluated flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCI) performance for improving detection of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in ALL. METHODS: This prospective study included analysis of consecutive CSF samples of patients of all ages with ALL at 3 clinical stages: new diagnosis, relapse suspicion, and after relapse treatment. Manual, cytospin, automated, and FCI methods were compared and their performance statistically assessed. Using FCI as the reference method, optimal CSF cutoff cell count that better correlated with presence of lymphoblasts was established by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-seven CSF samples were investigated, 35 (45.4%) from newly diagnosed cases, 30 (39%) suspicion of relapse, and 12 (15.6%) after treatment for relapse. Median manual WBC count in patients with CNS involvement detected by FCI was 3.75 cells/µL (0.0-1280), and this was also the count that best correlated with CNS infiltration (sensitivity, 50.0%; specificity, 82.2%). Compared with FCI, CCC sensitivity and specificity were 28.6% and 100%. Automated CSF WBC count in patients with CNS involvement detected by FCI was 5 (0.0-1578). For automated count, optimal WBC cutoff was 4.5 cells/µL (sensitivity, 62.5%; specificity, 70.5%). CONCLUSION: Flow cytometry immunophenotyping complements conventional cytospin analysis for detection of lymphoblasts in the CSF of ALL patients at any clinical stage.

[Bone marrow involvement in lepromatous leprosy]. / Afección de la médula ósea en lepra lepromatosa.

A case of lepromatous leprosy with bone marrow involvement in a 37 year old man is presented. Bone marrow aspiration was performed for evaluation of anemia and leukopenia. Ziehl-Neelsen stain demonstrated numerous bacilli lying free in the interstitium and in the cytoplasm of foamy macrophages. The patients was treated with dapsone, rifampicin and thalidomide, and obtained a good response. Bone marrow evaluation is useful in the initial study and surveillance of selected patients with lepromatous leprosy and hematological abnormalities.

Non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is of limited value in advanced or refractory acute myeloblastic leukemia. The Mexican experience.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective strategy for preventing relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). We analyzed the outcome of 31 primary AML patients who received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for allogeneic HSCT in first or second remission. Thirty-one AML patients, 20 in first complete remission (FCR), 8 in second complete remission (SCR) and 3 in a partial remission (SPR) were included. All received busulfan 4 mg/kg/d/2 days, fludarabine 30 mg/m(2)/d/3 days and cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m(2)/d/3 days as conditioning regimen. The median number of CD34+ cells infused was 5.6 x 10(6)/kg and 5.2 x 10(6) in FCR and SCR group, respectively. All patients received cyclosporine-A (CsA) and methotrexate as graft vs. host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. All patients showed myeloid engraftment (neutrophils >0.5 x 10(9)/l) after a median of 13 days in FCR group and 15 days in SCR group. Platelet recovery >20 x 10(9)/l was achieved after a median of 13 days in both groups. Relapse for 20 patients in FCR was 35% compared to 91% for 11 in SCR/SPR (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Reduced-intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic HSCT can induce stable remission in primary AML patients transplanted in FCR. A high relapse rate was documented in patients with refractory or relapsed AML.