Evaluation of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Shows Different Results Based on Bioelectric Impedance Analysis and Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the difference between computed tomography (CT)-based and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-based assessment of sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). METHODS: We enrolled a total of 257 patients who were evaluated with or without sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was defined as a low skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) with low muscular strength by the Japan Society of Hepatology. To evaluate whether or not the different methods influence the diagnosis of sarcopenia for patients with CLD, we assessed the number and characteristics of mismatches between the low SMI using BIA and CT. We also compared the overall survival (OS) in patients with and without sarcopenia based on CT and BIA to evaluate the appropriate methods. RESULTS: The numbers of patients with low SMI using BIA or CT were 53 (20.6%) and 114 (44.3%) patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that hepatic ascites and body weight were independent factors of mismatch between SMI using BIA versus CT (hazard ratio [HR] 3.232, p < 0.001; HR 2.347, p = 0.005, respectively). The median OS in patients with sarcopenia based on CT was significantly lower than that in patients without sarcopenia (p = 0.006). In contrast, there was no difference between patients with sarcopenia based on BIA (p = 0.217). CONCLUSION: Muscle mass in patients with CLD may be overestimated by the BIA method compared to CT when assessing sarcopenia, especially in cases of fluid retention.

Prospective study for an independent predictor of prognosis in liver cirrhosis based on the new sarcopenia criteria produced by the Japan Society of Hepatology.

AIM: There are limited data from prospective studies showing the clinical usefulness of the new criteria for sarcopenia in liver disease produced by the Japan Society of Hepatology. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of this new criteria for prognosis in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: This prospective study was performed at six centers. The 300 enrolled patients, aged more than 20 years with liver cirrhosis, were evaluated over a 3-year period for skeletal muscle mass index and grip strength. Sarcopenia was defined according to the Japan Society of Hepatology criteria by grip strength and computed tomography-based skeletal muscle mass index values. We investigated the correlation between sarcopenia and the survival rate of cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: Among the 300 assessed patients there were 99 (33%) patients with sarcopenia. The number of deaths in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups was 34 (34.3%) and 38 (18.9%), respectively (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis confirmed that sarcopenia, decompensated phase, albumin-bilirubin grade, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stage 3/4 were independent factors correlated with death in patients with liver cirrhosis during the observation period. The interaction between sarcopenia and the presence of HCC was statistically significant (p < 0.001), and the presence of HCC had the highest hazard ratio of 6.665 for deaths in cirrhotic patients when non-sarcopenia and the absence of HCC were used as references. CONCLUSIONS: The new Japan Society of Hepatology criteria for sarcopenia are accurate predictors of poor prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Randomized study of prevention of gastrointestinal toxicities by nutritional support using an amino acid-rich elemental diet during chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer (KDOG 1101).

BACKGROUND: This randomized study was designed to evaluate the clinical effect of an elemental diet during chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, (2) stage IB-IV, (3) schedule to receive docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF chemotherapy), (4) 20-80 years old, (5) performance status of 0-2, (6) oral intake ability, and (7) written informed consent. Patients were divided into two groups: the elemental supplementary group and the non-supplementary group. Patients received ELENTAL® (160 g/day) orally 9 weeks after the start of chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of all adverse events and the evaluation of nutritional status. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients in the elemental supplementary group and 35 patients in the non-supplementary group were included in the analysis. The incidence of grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity and all grade 3 or 4 adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. In the elemental supplementary group, the body weight (p = 0.057), muscle mass (p = 0.056), and blood levels of transferrin (p = 0.009), total amino acids (p = 0.019), and essential amino acids (p = 0.006) tended to be maintained after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Nutritional support provided by an amino acid-rich elemental diet was ineffective for reducing the incidence of adverse events caused by DCF chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.