Sociodemographic Comparison of Children With High-risk Medical Conditions Referred vs Identified Through Screening Plus Outreach for COVID-19 Therapeutics.

Importance: Minoritized groups are less likely to receive COVID-19 therapeutics, but few studies have identified potential methods to reduce disparities. Objective: To determine whether screening plus outreach, when compared with referral alone, increases identification of vulnerable pediatric patients at high risk for severe disease eligible for COVID-19 therapeutics from low-resourced communities. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 medication allocation between January 1, 2022, and February 15, 2022, at Lurie Children's Hospital, a quaternary care children's hospital, in Chicago, Illinois. The cohorts were pediatric patients referred for COVID-19 therapeutics or with a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction within the hospital system followed by outreach. Screening involved daily review of positive cases of SARS-CoV-2, followed by medical record review for high-risk conditions, and communication with clinicians and/or patients and families to offer therapy. Exposures: Diagnosis of COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary measure was difference in child opportunity index (COI) scores between the 2 cohorts. Secondary measures included presence and duration of symptoms at diagnosis, medication uptake, race and ethnicity, insurance type, qualifying medical condition, sex, primary language, and age. Results: Of 145 total patients, the median (IQR) age was 15 (13-17) years, and most were male (87 participants [60.0%]), enrolled in public insurance (83 participants [57.2%]), and members of minoritized racial and ethnic groups (103 participants [71.0%]). The most common qualifying conditions were asthma and/or obesity (71 participants [49.0%]). From 9869 SARS-CoV-2 tests performed, 94 eligible patients were identified via screening for COVID-19 therapeutics. Fifty-one patients were identified via referral. Thirty-two patients received medication, of whom 8 (25%) were identified by screening plus outreach alone. Compared with referred patients, patients in the screening plus outreach group were more likely to have moderate, low, or very low COI composite scores (70 patients [74.5%] vs 27 patients [52.9%]); public insurance (65 patients [69.1%] vs 18 patients [35.3%]); and asthma or obesity (60 patients [63.8%] vs 11 patients [21.6%]). Patients in the referral group were more likely to be non-Hispanic White (23 patients [45.1%] vs 19 patients [20.2%]) and receive medication (24 patients [47.1%] vs 8 patients [8.5%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with referral patients, screening plus outreach patients for COVID-19 medications were more socially vulnerable, with lower COI scores, and more likely to have asthma or obesity. Future studies should investigate communication strategies to improve uptake of these medications after outreach.

Short-Duration Electronic Health Record Option Buttons to Reduce Prolonged Length of Antibiotic Therapy in Outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged antibiotic therapy may be associated with increased adverse events and antibiotic resistance. We deployed an intervention in the electronic health record (EHR) to reduce antibiotic duration for pediatric outpatients. METHODS: A preintervention and postintervention interrupted time series analysis of antibiotic duration for 7 antibiotics was performed for patients discharged from the ED and clinics of a children's hospital network from 2012 to 2018. In February 2015, clickable 5- and 7-day duration option buttons were deployed in the EHR for clindamycin, cephalexin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, amoxicillin, and cefdinir, with an additional 10-day option for the latter 2. Prescribers were able to enter a free-text duration. The option buttons were not announced, and were not linked to a specific diagnosis or quality improvement initiative. The primary outcome was proportion of prescriptions per month with duration of 10 days. Balancing secondary outcomes were reorders of the same agent, return to clinic, and inpatient admissions within 30 days. RESULTS: There were 54 315 prescriptions for the 7 antibiotics associated with 39 894 patients, 18 683 clinic visits, and 35 632 ED visits. Overall, a -5.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], -8.3% to -2.0%) change in the proportion of prescriptions with a 10-day duration was attributable to the intervention, with larger effects noted for clindamycin (-20.8% [95% CI, -26.9% to -14.7%]) and cephalexin (-9.9% [95% CI, -14.3% to -5.4%]). There was no increase in the reorders of the same agent, return clinical encounters, or inpatient admissions within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: A simple intervention in the EHR can safely reduce duration of antibiotic therapy.

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the impact of hematologic malignancies and/or conditioning regimens on the risk of developing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Secondary objectives were to determine if traditional CDI risk factors applied to patients undergoing HSCT and to determine the presence of CDI markers of severity of illness among this patient population. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Quaternary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 105 patients who underwent HSCT between December 2009 and December 2014; of these patients, 35 developed an initial episode of CDI (HSCT/CDI group [cases]), and 70 did not (controls). Controls were matched in a 2:1 ratio to cases based on age (± 10 yrs) and date of HSCT (± 6 mo). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced regarding age, sex, race, ethnicity, and type of HSCT. No significant differences in conditioning regimen, hematologic malignancy, total body irradiation received for HSCT, use of antibiotics within 60 days of HSCT, or use of prophylactic antibiotics after HSCT were noted between the two groups. Patients in the control group were 10.57 (95% confidence interval 1.24-492.75) more likely to have received corticosteroids prior to HSCT than patients in the HSCT/CDI group (p=0.01). Use of proton pump inhibitors at the time of HSCT was greater among the control group than among patients in the HSCT/CDI group (97% vs 86%, p=0.048). No significant difference in mortality was noted between the groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after HSCT. Metronidazole was frequently prescribed for patients in the HSCT/CDI group (34 patients [97%]). Severe CDI was not common among patients within the HSCT/CDI group (13 patients [37%]); vancomycin was infrequently prescribed for these patients ([31%] 4/13 patients). CONCLUSION: Hematologic malignancies and a conditioning regimen administered for HSCT were not significant risk factors for the development of CDI after HSCT. Use of corticosteroids prior to HSCT and use of proton pump inhibitors at the time of HSCT were associated with a significantly decreased risk of CDI.