A biomechanical comparison of steel screws versus PLLA and magnesium screws for the Latarjet procedure.

INTRODUCTION: The fixation of the coracoid process onto the glenoid is an important step of the Latarjet procedure, and implant-associated complications are a relevant and severe problem. This study compares the fixation strength and failure mode of two biodegradable materials with stainless-steel screws. METHODS: 24 Fresh-frozen cadaveric scapulae were divided into three groups of equal size and received a coracoid transfer. Cadavers were matched according to their bone mineral density (BMD). In group 1, small-fragment screws made of stainless steel were used. In the second group, magnesium screws were used, and in the third group, screws consisted of polylactic acid (PLLA). A continuously increasing sinusoidal cyclic compression force was applied until failure occurred, which was defined as graft displacement relative to its initial position of more than 5 mm. RESULTS: At 5-mm displacement, the axial force values showed a mean of 374 ± 92 N (range 219-479 N) in group 1 (steel). The force values in group 2 (magnesium) had a mean of 299 ± 57 N (range 190-357 N). In group 3 (PLLA), failure occurred at 231 ± 83 N (range 109-355 N). The difference between group 1 (steel) and group 2 (magnesium) was not statistically significant (P = 0.212), while the difference between group 1 (steel) and group 3 (PLLA) was significant (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Stainless-Steel screws showed the highest stability. However, all three screw types showed axial force values of more than 200 N. Stainless steel screws and PLLA screws showed screw cut-out as the most common failure mode, while magnesium screws showed screw breakage in the majority of cases. EVIDENCE: Controlled laboratory study.

The three-way stopcock may be a weak component of total intravenous anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: An intravenous line is needed to administer anaesthesia, particularly when total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is performed. A disadvantage of TIVA is that the intravenous concentration of anaesthetics cannot be easily measured compared with volatile anaesthetics. If a three-way stopcock is accidentally unscrewed, TIVA drugs cannot reach the patient's veins, thus resulting in inadequate anaesthesia levels, possibly resulting in awareness. We therefore measured the required torque to open five different brands of three-way stopcocks in an attempt to make an intravenous-line including all elements safer. METHODS: The torque required to open one, two or three three-way stopcocks being connected in a perpendicular manner was measured with a biaxial servo hydraulic material testing machine. RESULTS: The force required to open three-way stopcocks connected with an intravenous catheter ranged in five different stopcock models from 5.03+/-0.75 to 2.21+/-0.51 N respectively; with two three-way stopcocks from 2.68+/-0.42 to 1.31+/-0.59 N, respectively, and with three three-way stopcocks from 1.29+/-0.27 to 0.82+/-0.05 N, respectively. CONCLUSION: Turning a three-way stopcock to become loose with possibly leaking drugs requires minimal amounts of force and decreases significantly if not connected in-line.

The effect of stem geometry on stresses within the distal cement mantle in total hip replacement.

Cement-stem debonding is one of the most common reasons for failure in Total Hip Replacement (THR). Four similar THR prostheses design configurations were investigated with reference to the influence of mechanical stress occurring in a cement mantle of differing thicknesses and potentially affecting clinical performance. Non-linear finite element analysis was performed on constant cement mantle thicknesses of 1, 2, and 4 millimetres. The results obtained indicate stress levels within the cement mantle decrease with increasing cement mantle thickness. The prosthesis distal tip is shown to have particular significance. Truncation of the distal tip hemisphere to a flat profile for the fixation of a centralizer increases the cement stresses.

[An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies]. / Ein verbessertes Wirbelkörperersatzimplantat für die thorakolumbale Wirbelsäule. Biomechanischer In-vitro-Test an humanen Lendenwirbelkörpern.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the use of expandable titanium cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine has been well established for the treatment of tumors, unstable traumatic lesions, or posttraumatic deformity. Collapse of the implant into the vertebral body remains a point of concern. A biomechanical compression test was designed to assess implant subsidence for a newly developed prototype for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine using human cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The objective of this study was to compare the compressive performance of a new expandable cage with modified end-plate design with three commonly available expandable cages for vertebral body replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The compressive strengths at the implant-vertebral body interface were measured via axial loading of the new prototype (Synex II) in comparison with three different expandable titanium cages: Synex I (Synthes), Obelisc (Ulrich Medical) and X-Tenz (DePuy Spine). Twenty-four intact, fresh frozen human lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) were distributed into four identical groups according to BMD (determined by quantitative computed tomography) and the vertebral level. Specimens were loaded in the craniocaudal direction with a material testing machine at a constant speed of 5 mm/min. Load displacement curves were continuously recorded for each specimen until failure (diminishment of compressive force (F)/obvious implant migration through the vertebral body endplate). One-way analysis of variance and post-hoc tests (Bonferroni) were applied to detect differences at 1, 2, 3, 4 mm displacement (F1-4 mm), and Fmax between implant groups. RESULTS: The four expandable cages did not show statistically significant biomechanical differences in terms of maximum compression force (Fmax) until failure: Synex II (1,782 N/4.7 mm); Synex I (1,645 N/4.7 mm); Obelisc (1,314 N/4.2 mm); X-Tenz (1,470 N/6.9 mm). However, the mean compression force until 4 mm displacement (F1-4 mm: 300-1,600 N) was highest for Synex II. The difference at 2 mm displacement was significant (p=0.028) between Synex II (F2 mm=879 N) and X-Tenz (F2 mm=339 N). CONCLUSION: The modified endplate design of the new prototype was found to improve its compressive performance under constrained uniaxial loading conditions at the implant-bone interface. The improved compressive behaviour of the new implant might help to reduce the risk of implant subsidence and collapse into the vertebral body in vivo.