Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prog Urol ; 19(3): 186-91, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19268256

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Graft thrombosis is a major complication of transplantation. However, there are no recommendation on immediate postoperative thromboprophylaxis after kidney transplantation. We recorded clinical practices in France. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 29 transplantation centres, four case studies were submitted to the medical kidney transplantation referent (compatible graft from cadaveric donor, without perioperative complication). N(o) 1: Man, 27-years-old, IgA glomerulonephritis, without history of hypercoagulability or cardiovascular risk factor. Hemodialysis since 12months. N(o) 2: Man, 53-years-old, with history of deep venous thrombosis after cholecystectomy 15years before. Membranous nephropathy. Hemodialysis since 10months. N(o) 3: Man, 58-years-old, with history of myocardial infarction. On aspirin therapy. Nephroangiosclerosis and diabetic nephropathy. Peritoneal dialysis since 6months. N(o) 4: Woman, 63-years-old. Atrial fibrillation on vitamin K antagonists therapy. Lupus nephritis without antiphospholipid syndrome. Hemodialysis since 12months. RESULTS: N(o) 1: No anticoagulation therapy (62%), calcium heparin at prophylactic doses (34.5%). N(o) 2: No anticoagulation therapy (38%), calcium heparin at prophylactic doses (44.8%). N(o) 3: 62% interrupted aspirin of whom 22% without any immediate anticoagulation and 55% replaced aspirin with calcium heparin at prophylactic doses. Thirty-eight percent carried on with aspirin of whom 63.6% without other prophylaxis and 27.3% in association with calcium heparin at prophylactic doses. N(o) 4: Unfractionned heparin at curative dose (62%), unfractionned heparin at prophylactic doses (17.2%), calcium heparin at prophylactic doses (13.8%). CONCLUSION: Postoperative anticoagulation after renal transplantation is established as a local dogma rather than evidence-based medicine. Guideline recommendations and standardized protocols for the use of anticoagulation after kidney transplantation should be developed.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Adulto , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Francia , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina
2.
Transplant Proc ; 41(10): 4193-6, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20005367

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft vascular thrombosis is a complication that often results in graft loss. Since there are no guidelines on immediate postoperative thromboprophylaxis, we performed a telephone survey of clinical practice in all renal transplantation centers in France. METHODS: Each center considered 4 cases relating to renal transplant candidates on dialysis with an increasing risk of thrombosis: Case 1: patient with no identified risk factors; Case 2: patient with an earlier incidence of deep vein thrombosis; Case 3: patient with ischemic heart disease on antiplatelet therapy; Case 4: patient with atrial fibrillation taking a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with lupus nephritis syndrome. RESULTS: The treatments proposed by the centers (%) were: Case 1: No anticoagulation therapy (57.1%), calcium heparin at prophylactic doses (P-dose) (40%), or unfractionated heparin (UFH); (P-dose; 2.9%). Case 2: No anticoagulation therapy (34.3%), calcium heparin (P-dose; 51.4%), or UFH (P-dose; 5.7%). Case 3: (A) Interruption of aspirin (65.7%), and either no anticoagulation therapy (21.7%) or substitution of aspirin by calcium heparin (P-dose; 56.6%) or by UFH (P-dose; 8.7%). (B) No interruption of aspirin (34.3%), and either no additional prophylaxis (58.3%) or calcium heparin (P-dose; 33.3%). Case 4: Interruption of VKA (100%), and UFH at a curative dose (68.6%), UFH (P-dose; 14.3%), or calcium heparin (P-dose; 11.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Practices varied widely in the absence of studies of sufficiently high power. There is a need for a preoperative classification of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk among renal transplant candidates and for consensus guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Francia , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Aparatos de Compresión Neumática Intermitente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos , Teléfono , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA