The surface electronic structure of silicon terminated (100) diamond.

A combination of synchrotron-based x-ray spectroscopy and contact potential difference measurements have been used to examine the electronic structure of the (3 × 1) silicon terminated (100) diamond surface under ultra high vacuum conditions. An occupied surface state which sits 1.75 eV below the valence band maximum has been identified, and indications of mid-gap unoccupied surface states have been found. Additionally, the pristine silicon terminated surface is shown to possess a negative electron affinity of -0.86 ± 0.1 eV.

Oxidation of the silicon terminated (1 0 0) diamond surface.

The oxidation of the silicon terminated (1 0 0) diamond surface is investigated with a combination of high resolution photoelectron spectroscopy, low energy electron diffraction and near edge x-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy. The effects of molecular [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] dosing under UHV conditions, as well as exposure to ambient conditions, have been explored. Our findings indicate that the choice of oxidant has little influence over the resulting surface chemistry, and we attribute approximately 85% of the surface oxygen to a peroxide-bridging arrangement. Additionally, oxidation does not alter the silicon-carbon bonding at the surface and therefore the [Formula: see text] reconstruction is still present.

Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynametric muscle testing.

Physical therapists require an accurate, reliable method for measuring muscle strength. They often use manual muscle testing or hand-held dynametric muscle testing (DMT), but few studies document the reliability of MMT or compare the reliability of the two types of testing. We designed this study to determine the intrarater reliability of MMT and DMT. A physical therapist performed manual and dynametric strength tests of the same five muscle groups on 11 patients and then repeated the tests two days later. The correlation coefficients were high and significantly different from zero for four muscle groups tested dynametrically and for two muscle groups tested manually. The test-retest reliability coefficients for two muscle groups tested manually could not be calculated because the values between subjects were identical. We concluded that both MMT and DMT are reliable testing methods, given the conditions described in this study. Both testing methods have specific applications and limitations, which we discuss.