Extended-Duration Work Shifts in Surgical Specialties: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: There has been widespread international implementation of duration-hour restrictions to prevent surgical resident burnout and promote patient safety and wellbeing of doctors. A variety of Extended-Duration Work Shifts (EDWS) have been implemented, with a variety of studies examining the effect of shift systems on both surgical performance and the stress response unestablished in the literature. METHODS: This was a systematic review evaluating the impact of extended working hours on surgical performance, cognitive impairment, and physiological stress responses. The review used PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar search engines between September and October 2021 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Filters including studies carried out after 2002 and published in the English language were applied. RESULTS: In total, 30 studies were included for analysis. General surgery was the most commonly studied rotation, with Neurosurgical, Orthopedic, and ear, nose and throat specialties also included. The majority of studies found no difference or a significant improvement in post-EDWS on simulated performance. EDWS appeared to have the greatest impact on physiological stress markers in junior surgical trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Experience appears to confer a protective element in the postcall period, with preservation of skill demonstrated. More experienced clinicians yielded lower levels of physiological markers of stress, although variability in hierarchical workload should be considered. Heterogeneity of findings across physiological, cognitive, and psychomotor assessments highlights the need for robust research on the optimum shift pattern prevents worker burnout and promotes patient safety. Future research to evaluate correlation between stress, on-call workload, and performance in the postcall period is warranted.

Acquisition of Surgical Skills in Medical Students via Telementoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pandemic related changes have radically altered the delivery of medical teaching. The practical skills of medicine which students should be proficient in at time of graduation have tended to require in-person tutelage, with reduced access resulting in the risk of skill deficits in newly qualified doctors. Small group teaching sessions are amenable to a virtual mode of delivery, with the ability of the virtual platform to confer practical skills unproven. The objective of the study was to evaluate the use of teleproctoring in acquisition of suturing skills in medical students. METHODS: This was a single blinded two- armed randomized control trial. Medical students undergoing clinical rotations in their penultimate and final years who were able to complete the suturing tutorial were invited to participate in this study. Control groups underwent conventional suturing training under direct supervision, with the interventional group undergoing the tutorial in a remote learning setting via live streaming. Pre- and post-test assessment was carried out using validated suturing Global Rating Scale tool. RESULTS: A total of 24 participants were recruited, with 23 participants completing the task. Adequacy of sampling was demonstrated in both groups using Box's M test (P = 0.9). Participants' individual and composite scores were comparable at baseline (P = 0.28) and following the tutorial (P = 0.52). Participants improved to a statistically significant degree regardless of method of teaching delivery, in all skill parameters (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Teleproctoring is an effective tool in the provision of teaching basic suturing skills in medical students. Research on its use in more complex practical skills is warranted.

Hand dominance and experience improve bimanual performance on arthroscopic simulator task.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify if experience in arthroscopy confers ambidexterity to the operator and the role of baseline characteristics in arthroscopic simulator performance. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was carried out across four regional Orthopaedic training centres. Participants were divided into novice, intermediate or experienced groups based on arthroscopic experience. Baseline demographics including age, sex, handedness, and gaming history were also collected. Following familiarisation with the procedure, participants were asked to complete a simulated task requiring bimanual control consisting of visualisation with camera control and manipulation of highlighted objects using a grasping instrument. One attempt using camera control and grasping accuracy per hand was performed by each participant, with scores for each hand collected for analysis. Performance scores for camera alignment, camera path length, grasper path length and grasping efficiency were collected. Time taken to completion was also noted for each attempt. RESULTS: Fifty-six participants were recruited to the study. A significant difference in grasping efficiency between groups in the dominant hand was demonstrated (p = 0.013). Novices demonstrated laterality with superior performance in grasping efficiency in the dominant hand (p = 0.001). No significant difference was noted between dominant and non-dominant hand performance in the experienced group. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic simulation-based training is a valuable learning tool for orthopaedic training. This study demonstrated that experienced orthopaedic surgeons have a greater degree of ambidexterity than intermediate or novice groups, hypothesised by authors to be conferred through conventional orthopaedic training. Dedicated bimanual control tasks to reduce laterality in trainees should be incorporated in simulated surgical curricula. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The specialty mentor effect in enhancing surgical experience of medical students: A randomised control trial.

INTRODUCTION: The positive learning experiences of students on surgical rotations which subsequently influence career choice may be delineated into practical and interpersonal themed factors. It remains unclear the relative impact each component has on the student experience and subsequent specialisation. AIMS: We evaluate the influence of having senior resident mentor during practical simulation in orthopaedic surgery has on medical student interest in surgery; their comfort in theatre; and its role in enhancing knowledge acquisition within the rotation. METHODS: Medical students undergoing clinical rotations in a Regional University Hospital were randomised to undertaking a virtual reality simulated operation independently or performing under the guidance of an experienced resident. Baseline levels of interest in surgery, comfort in theatre, perceived barriers to surgical learning and entry to surgery were established and compared to answers following completion of the tutorial. Qualitative feedback was collected regarding the benefits and limitations to the experience. Presented according to CONSORT guidelines. RESULTS: Participants in the trainee guided group achieved significantly higher simulated performance scores compared to the control (p < 0001), with an increase in interest in orthopaedic surgery from baseline expressed to a statistically significant degree (p = 0.01). Participants in the unsupervised group demonstrated no significant increase in interest in Orthopaedic surgery (p = 0.3). 100% participants strongly agreed it was a beneficial learning experience which would be useful in surgical curricula. CONCLUSION: Surgical trainee guided simulation led to improved performance and interest in orthopaedic surgery, while virtual practical experience was felt to be a useful learning tool independent of supervision. Further research is needed to establish the role of interpersonal interactions in student surgical experience.

Trends in Irish hip fracture surgery over a 7-year period and international registry comparison.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. Timely surgical fixation and early mobilisation are the cornerstone to successful outcomes. The Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) was established in 2012 and publishes annual reports on hip fracture care. This paper describes the trends in surgical fixation in Ireland during a 7-year period (2013-2019), assesses for compliance with guidelines and compares the most recent published reports from ten international hip fracture registries. METHODS: All published IHFD reports were systematically reviewed and tabulated. Data corresponding to demographics, fracture type, surgical fixation and post-operative management was plotted and analysed. Ten international hip fracture registries were identified and reviewed. Data was extracted corresponding to the IHFD dataset. RESULTS: A total of 21,684 hip fractures were recorded during this period. The majority of patients were female (70.16%), >80 years old (58.26%), admitted from their own home (82.13%) and ASA grade 3 (53%). The majority of undisplaced and displaced intracapsular fractures were treated with hemiarthroplasty, 62% and 88% respectively. There has been a decline in the use of dynamic hip screw (DHS) for intertrochanteric fractures with intramedullary nails being favoured. CONCLUSION: Despite greater awareness of hip fracture care through the IHFD and the introduction of Best Practice Tariffs (BPT), further improvements are needed. Ireland compares well to international standards but has low rates of compliance to NICE guidelines for surgical fixation.

Under viral attack: An orthopaedic response to challenges faced by regional referral centres during a national cyber-attack.

BACKGROUND: A national ransomware attack on the Irish Health Service Executive left the Healthcare system bereft of access to IT systems, electronic patient records, and the national imaging system. Widespread disruption to internal and external referral pathways, and both trauma and elective Orthopaedic services occurred as a result. The purpose of this paper to discuss the challenges faced by Regional trauma units and adjustments made to overcome these. METHODS: Issues occurring as a result of the IT cybersecurity attack were discussed at regional level. Local and specialist centre adaptations were collated to identify effective modifications to established practice in the wake of the IT attack. RESULTS: The main areas affecting Orthopaedic regional practice were identified, including internal referrals, interhospital referrals to both regional and specialist centres, outpatient clinics, and elective practice. Strategies to overcome these were collated and shared between regional centres, including the use of secure messaging systems to safely transmit relevant clinical information between services, use of radiological hard copies, and integration of imaging resources to the outpatient department to expedite clinical review. CONCLUSION: The national cyberattack necessitated rapid adaptations to overcome the challenges faced as a result of reduced clinical and radiological access. While the recent cyberattack highlights the vulnerability of electronic systems, and the need for vigilance including staff training on cybersecurity; Changes implemented by regional centres also illustrate the potential for further development and expansion of current clinical practices.

The addition of oral Tranexamic acid to knee arthroplasty patients does not further improve blood loss: a double blinded randomized control trial.

Perioperative intravenous (IV) TA has become routine in knee and hip arthroplasty. Less evidence exists on the administration of oral TA in the post- operative period. Our study aims to identify the efficacy and safety of combined perioperative IV and post-operative oral TA on blood loss and Hemoglobin (Hb) drop compared to perioperative IV TA alone. Patients undergoing primary elective knee arthro- plasty at our institution were invited to participate in the study (n=50). A computer-generated randomisation sequence was created online (www.randomization. org), with an allocation ratio of 1:1 and a block size of 50. Group A received perioperative IV TA alone and post-operative oral TA (n= 26) and Group B received perioperative IV TA plus 48 hours additional oral placebo (n= 24). Day 3 total blood loss and Hb drop was calculated. Continuous, normally distributed data (total blood loss) was compared utilising using one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test. Continuous skewed data (Hb drop) was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Group A demonstrated a trend in decreased total blood loss that was close to statistical significance ( p = 0.072). No difference in Hb drop was identified between the 2 groups. Increased nausea was also observed in Group A. The administration of oral TA to post-operative knee arthroplasty patients does not improve further blood loss compared to patients receiving perioperative IV TA pre-operatively and at wound closure.

Challenges faced by orthopaedic trainees during the Covid-19 pandemic - An Irish perspective.

BACKGROUND: The recent SARS-CoV2/COVID-19 pandemic has caused a change in most aspects of our daily lives. Our health systems have had to adjust at an unprecedented rate to accommodate care for patients affected by the virus. As a result there has been widespread disruption to trauma and elective services throughout the Orthopaedic community Worldwide. We discuss the changes facing orthopaedic residents in training and the adaptations that have been made. METHODS: We discuss the challenges posed from a reduction in caseload to surgeons in training, teaching activities, patient interaction, workforce reinforcement and support networks in Ireland. RESULTS: A structured deployment of residents has taken place ensuring maximum exposure to operative cases to maintain competency. Teaching activities have been virtualised into a new curriculum that provides trainees with convenient access to a wide range of specialists at defined time periods during the week. Strategies have been employed to reinforce the workforce in anticipation of an acute reduction in staff due to the Covid-19 virus. CONCLUSIONS: The changes have been rapid and despite many of these adjustments being borne out of necessity, the innovation displayed will almost certainly alter how training is ultimately delivered long after the crisis has ceased.

Postoperative Infection Risk in Total Joint Arthroplasty After Perioperative IV Corticosteroid Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative corticosteroid administration is associated with reduced postoperative nausea, pain, and enhanced recovery after surgery. However, potential complications including wound and periprosthetic joint infections remain a concern for surgeons after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: A systematic review of the search databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE was made in January 2021 to identify comparative studies evaluating infection risk after perioperative corticosteroid administration in TJA. PRISMA guidelines were used for this review. Meta-analysis was used to assess infection risk in accordance with joint and corticosteroid dosing regimen used. RESULTS: 201 studies were returned after initial search strategy, with 29 included for review after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were categorized as using low- or high-dose corticosteroid with single or repeat dosing regimens. Single low-dose corticosteroid administration was not associated with an increased risk of infection (P = .4; CI = 0.00-0.00). Single high-dose corticosteroid was not associated with an increased infection risk (P = .3; CI = 0.00-0.01) nor did repeat low-dose regimens result in increased risk of infection (P = .8; CI = -0.02-0.02). Studies assessing repeat high-dosing regimens reported no increased infection, with small numbers of participants included. No significant risk difference in infection risk was noted in hip (P = .59; CI = -0.03-0.02) or knee (P = .2; CI = 0.00-0.01) arthroplasty. Heterogeneity in patient profiles included in studies to date was noted. CONCLUSION: Use of perioperative corticosteroid in TJA does not appear to be associated with increased risk of postoperative infection in patients with limited comorbidities. Further research is warranted to evaluate postoperative complications after TJA in these at-risk patient populations.

Are Virtual Fracture Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic a Potential Alternative for Delivering Fracture Care? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Virtual fracture clinics are an alternative to the traditional model of fracture care. Since their introduction in 2011, they have become increasingly used in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) health crisis has driven institutions to examine such innovative solutions to manage patient care. The current controversies include quantifying safety outcomes, such as potential delayed or missed injuries, inadequate treatment, and medicolegal claims. Questions also exist regarding the potential for cost reductions and efficiencies that may be achieved. Physical distancing has limited the number of face-to-face consultations, so this review was conducted to determine if virtual fracture clinics can provide an acceptable alternative in these challenging times. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) adverse outcomes, (2) cost reductions, and (3) efficiencies associated with the virtual fracture clinic model. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted from database inception to March 2020. The keywords "virtual" or "telemedicine" or "telehealth" or "remote" or "electronic" AND "fracture" or "trauma" or "triage" AND "clinic" or "consultation" were entered, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Inclusion criteria included adults and children treated for injuries by a virtual clinic model at the initial review. Eligible injuries included injuries deemed to not need surgical intervention, and those able to be treated remotely using defined protocols. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients reviewed by telemedicine using video links or in person at the initial review. Initially, 1065 articles were identified, with 665 excluded as they did not relate to virtual fracture clinics. In all, 400 articles were screened for eligibility, and 27 full-text reviews were conducted on 18 studies (30,512 virtual fracture clinic encounters). Three subdomains focusing on adverse outcomes, cost reductions, and efficiencies were recorded. The term adverse outcomes was used to describe any complications, further surgeries, re-referrals back to the clinic, or deviations from the protocols. Efficiency described the number of patients reviewed and discharged using the model, savings in clinic slots, reduced waiting times, or a reduction in consumption of resources such as radiographs. All studies were observational and the quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa tool, which demonstrated a median score of 6 ± 1.8, indicating moderate quality. RESULTS: Six studies reported adverse outcomes in detail, with events ranging from inappropriate splinting, deviations from protocols, and one patient underwent an osteotomy for a malunion. Efficiency varied from direct discharge proportions of 18% in early studies to 100% once the virtual fracture clinic model was more established. Cost reductions compared with estimates derived from conventional fracture clinics varied from USD 53 to USD 297 and USD 39,125 to USD 305876 compared with traditional fracture clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual fracture clinics may provide a means to treat patients remotely, using agreed-upon protocols. They have an important role in the current COVID-19 pandemic, due to the possibility to provide ongoing care in an otherwise challenging setting. More robust studies looking at this model of care will be needed to assess its long-term effects on patients, institutions, and health care systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Educational impact of joint replacement school for patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery programmes for hip and knee arthroplasty surgery have been shown to decrease length of stay and improve patient outcomes in the elective setting. There are limited studies looking at pre-operative patient education alone and its role, however, more recent studies have demonstrated that it can help reduce length of stay and health care costs. The elective orthopaedic unit at Tullamore Hospital was the first unit in the Irish public health system to have a joint school, pre-operative, educational session, and the aim of this study was to assess our patient understanding of this session to ensure a sustained, high level of patient care, quality assurance and educational standards. METHODS: A sample size of n = 51 was calculated to adequately power the study. Final sample size was 57. Data was collected across four joint school sessions. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire before and after the session. RESULTS: Twenty-seven male (47.3%) and 30 female (52.7%) patients completed the surveys. Mean age overall was 64.5 years. All survey questions except those related to anaesthesia and physiotherapy showed a statistically significant improvement after the joint school session. A total knowledge score was calculated and revealed a statistically significant difference between pre- and post-joint school survey answering (P value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our joint school, pre-operative educational session remains a very effective way of delivering content to patients regarding their surgery. Continuous auditing is paramount to its success and there is potential scope for web-based learning as an adjunct to this validated session.

Impact of Mentoring for Underrepresented Groups in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Despite efforts to mitigate challenges to advance underrepresented groups (URG) groups' representation in medical education, diversity remains underwhelming. In response to this several mentoring programs to increase diversification within medical education have been implemented. However, the impact of these programs on URG representation across disciplines is unknown. The aim of this review is to evaluate the impact of structured mentoring programs on URGs in undergraduate medical education. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was performed of electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid Medline, and EMBASE between January and September 2022 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Both qualitative and quantitative outcomes including characteristics of the mentoring structure explored within each study were collected, and differences in study outcomes analyzed. RESULTS: In total 17 studies were included for analysis. Mentoring within URGs resulted in an increase in research opportunities, exam performance, medical specialty applications, and residency matching. Structured feedback yielded positive experiences by both mentors and mentees participating in programs, with both emotional and cultural competence issues explored across studies included for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Mentoring for medical students underrepresented in medicine across mentoring relationships including peer, senior, formal, and informal structures yield positive outcomes within research, academic modules, and career pathways. Future applications of mentoring programs should consider the use of tandem mentoring from both senior and peer mentors to optimize benefits URG students derive from each mentoring relationship.

Frequency of complications in intramedullary nailing of open tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review.

Background: Open tibial shaft fractures comprise almost 45% of all open fractures and are frequently the result of high-energy trauma. Due to contamination, limited soft tissue coverage of the tibial shaft and poor tibial blood supply, open tibial shaft fractures are associated with high rates of complication including malunion, non-union and infection. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is a mainstay of treatment. This study aims to determine the frequency of the various complications in this cohort. Methods: A systematic review of papers published on Embase, PubMed and Cochrane databases pertaining to the use of IMN to fix open tibial shaft fractures were included. The available evidence was collated in regard to the incidence of union, malunion, non-union and infection seen in this cohort. Results: A total of 2767 citations were reviewed, and 17 studies comprising 1850 patients were included in the analysis. There was a delayed union rate of 22.4%, malunion rate of 8.3%, non-union rate of 9.7% and infection rate of 8.1% (95% CI: 5.7%-10.8%) in this patient cohort. Subgroup analysis showed a 3-fold increase in non-union and a 2-fold increase in deep infection among Gustilo III injuries compared to Gustilo I and II. Conclusions: IMN for open tibial shaft fractures results in high rates of union and low rates of infection, comparable to figures seen in closed injuries and superior to those seen with alternative methods of fixation. There is a substantially increased risk of complication associated with Gustilo III injuries, reinforcing the significance of the soft tissue injury in these patients.

'Out of hours' orthopaedics in an Irish regional trauma unit and the impact of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: MRHT is the regional trauma service for the Midlands, providing 24/7 orthopaedic cover. 'Out of hours' surgery is reserved for those occasions where waiting for the next operating list during normal working hours would result in an unacceptable outcome for the patient. AIMS: To identify how many 'out-of-hours' surgeries were performed and what proportion of the total workload was made up by these cases. Secondly, to identify the impact of COVID-19 on our workload as an acute trauma service. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all operations performed in the emergency orthopaedic theatre between January 2017 and October 2020. Included were all emergency orthopaedic procedures performed after 6 p.m. and before 8 a.m. We compared this to the total number of trauma surgeries performed in the same time period to calculate the percentage of our total operations. RESULTS: There were a total of 7615 orthopaedic trauma operations performed in the 193 weeks. 164 of these were 'out-of-hours'. This represents 2.2% of the total operations performed and is equal to 0.84 cases per week. 55 of the 164 (33.5%) were performed in children under the age of 18. 62 were performed between 6 and 8 p.m., 61 between 8 and 10 p. m., 31 between 10 p.m. and midnight, and the remaining 10 were performed between midnight and 3 a.m. CONCLUSION: Surgery out of hours has been associated with increased complications, and so decisions to perform emergency surgery should not be made lightly. However, sometimes they are unfortunately necessary and are some of the most important operations we can perform as orthopaedic surgeons.

Surgical Priming Improves Operative Performance in Surgical Trainees: A Crossover Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a surgical warm-up using a virtual reality simulator on operative performance. DESIGN: This was a single-blinded cross-over randomized control trial in a single tertiary Orthopedic training center. PARTICIPANTS: Orthopedic trainees were recruited, and each morning participants rostered to theatre were randomized to either undergo a simulated surgical procedure on a virtual reality simulation system prior to their first case as primary operator (priming arm), or to perform their usual preparatory routine for surgery (control arm). Consultant orthopedic trainers were recruited within the orthopedic unit to carry out subjective surgical performance assessments using a validated global rating scale tool on the first case the participant performed on the list as primary operator. RESULTS: Over 3 study periods a total of 151 data points were collected, with 49 matched data points across priming status and procedural level of difficulty. Subjective assessment tools consistently demonstrated improved operative performance by participants following surgical priming (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study highlights that introduction of preoperative priming to improve operative preparation, and optimizes operative performance. This has not only implications for improved resident training, but also signals towards beneficial downstream effects on patient outcomes, and theatre list planning.

Use of procedure specific preoperative warm-up during surgical priming improves operative outcomes: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative warm-up in preparation for surgery is a technique used in recognition of similarities between surgeons and performance based professionals. The aim of this review was to evaluate the use of simulation-based preoperative warm-up on surgical performance in the operating room and its impact on both clinical and patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines between August-September 2021. In total 15 studies were retrieved. RESULTS: Seven studies across general surgery, urology, and vascular surgery used a procedure specific warm-up, with significant improvement in operative performance, rate of errors, radiological and patient-based outcomes. Variables including level of experience and specialty appeared to have no impact on the merits of preoperative warm-up demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: While heterogeneity in the benefit of generic warm-up procedures was noted, procedure specific warm-up methods consistently resulted in significantly better operative outcomes.

Trauma Assessment Clinic: A virtual fracture clinic model that delivers on its PROMise!

BACKGROUND: The use of virtual fracture clinics across the United Kingdom and Ireland is growing and have been shown in an increasing number of studies to be safe, cost-effective and associated with good functional outcomes and patient satisfaction rates for certain fracture types. Initially pioneered at Glasgow Royal Infirmary, many centres have adopted similar templates, or variations of, and the overall aim of this study was to assess functional outcomes and injury recovery satisfaction rates of patients discharged directly following review in a specific virtual fracture clinic model known as the Trauma Assessment Clinic (TAC). METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out of paediatric (aged <17 years) and adult (aged >17 years) patients, with the five most commonly observed fracture types, who were discharged directly following review at the TAC in a single hospital centre over a 12 month period from January to December 2018. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed via telephone administered questionnaires and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were included in the study (n = 98 paediatric and n = 100 adult). Overall, 192 (97%) patients or parents/guardians of patients stated that they either strongly agreed (n = 148, 74.9%) or agreed (n = 44, 22.1%) that they were satisfied with their own or their child's recovery from their injury at a median follow-up of 9 months post direct discharge from the TAC. Adult patients had an EQ-5D-5L index median value of 1 (range 0-1), an EQ-VAS median of 87 (range 0-100), a QuickDASH median score of 0 (range 0-100) and a median LEFS of 80 (range 0-80). CONCLUSION: The virtual management of trauma patients via the TAC model is a safe and patient-centred approach to treating certain injuries and fracture patterns. This study reports excellent patient reported outcome measures and patient injury recovery satisfaction rates. The use of current available technology in tandem with up-to-date best clinical practice and guidelines play a central role in this novel care pathway.