Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Interv Cardiol ; 29(5): 454-460, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27578540

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCB) have been used to treat de novo small vessel coronary disease (SVD), with promising results and shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration compared to drug-eluting stents (DES). We compared safety and effectiveness of the two treatments at 1 year. METHODS: We reviewed 3,613 angioplasty cases retrospectively from 2011 to 2013 and identified 335 patients with SVD treated with device diameter of ≤2.5 mm. DCB-only angioplasty was performed in 172 patients, whereas 163 patients were treated with second-generation DES. RESULTS: DCB patients had smaller reference vessel diameter (2.22 ± 0.30 vs. 2.44 ± 0.19 mm, P < 0.001) and received smaller devices (median diameter 2.25 vs. 2.50 mm, P < 0.001) compared to the DES group. DES-treated vessels had larger acute lumen gain (1.71 ± 0.48 mm) than DCB (1.00 ± 0.53 mm, P < 0.001). Half the patients had diabetes mellitus. While there were more patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the DCB group (77.9% vs. 62.2%, P = 0.013), they received shorter DAPT (7.4 ± 4.7 vs. 11.8 ± 1.4 months, P < 0.001) than the DES group. The 1-year composite major adverse cardiac event rate was 11.6% in the DCB arm and 11.7% in the DES arm (P = 1.000), with target lesion revascularization rate of 5.2% and 3.7%, respectively, (P = 0.601). CONCLUSIONS: In this high-risk cohort of patients, DCB-only angioplasty delivered good clinical outcome at 1 year. The results were comparable with DES-treated patients, but had the added benefit of a shorter DAPT regime.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Reestenosis Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Reestenosis Coronaria/prevención & control , Reestenosis Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Singapur/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 26: 100469, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32021903

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Amphilimus-eluting stent (AES) is a novel polymer-free drug eluting stent that combines sirolimus with fatty acid as antiproliferative drug and has shown promising results in percutaneous coronary intervention.We evaluated the clinical safety and efficacy of AES in an all-comers South-East Asian registry. METHODS: Between May 2014 to April 2017, 268 patients (88% male, mean age 60.1 ±â€¯10.8 years) with 291 coronary lesions were treated with AES. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) ie a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: The majority of patients presented with acute coronary syndrome (75%) and 75% had multi-vessel disease on angiography. Diabetes mellitus was present in 123 patients (46%). The most common target vessel for PCI was left anterior descending artery (43%) followed by right coronary artery (36%), left circumflex (10%) and left main (6%).The majority of lesions were type B-C (85%) by ACC/AHA lesion classification. An average of 1.25 ±â€¯0.5 AES were used per patient, with mean AES diameter of 3.1 ±â€¯0.4 mm and average total length of 34.8 ±â€¯19.4 mm.At 12-month follow-up, 4% of patients developed MACE. MACE was mainly driven by cardiovascular mortality (1.5%), MI (2%) and TLR (1.5%). The rate of stent thrombosis was 1.5%. CONCLUSION: In a contemporary all-comers South-East Asian registry with high rate of diabetes mellitus, AES was found to be efficacious with a low incidence of MACE observed at 12-month follow-up.

3.
World J Cardiol ; 7(6): 311-4, 2015 Jun 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26131335

RESUMEN

We evaluated the clinical feasibility of using drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Between January 2010 to September 2014, 89 ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients (83% male, mean age 59 ± 14 years) with a total of 89 coronary lesions were treated with DCB during PPCI. Clinical outcomes are reported at 30 d follow-up. Left anterior descending artery was the most common target vessel for PCI (37%). Twenty-eight percent of the patients had underlying diabetes mellitus. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 44% ± 11%. DCB-only PCI was the predominant approach (96%) with the remaining 4% of patients receiving bail-out stenting. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow was successfully restored in 98% of patients. An average of 1.2 ± 0.5 DCB were used per patient, with mean DCB diameter of 2.6 ± 0.5 mm and average length of 23.2 ± 10.2 mm. At 30-d follow-up, there were 4 deaths (4.5%). No patients experienced abrupt closure of the infarct-related artery and there was no reported target-lesion failure. Our preliminary experience showed that DCB angioplasty in PPCI was feasible and associated with a high rate of TIMI 3 flow and low 30-d ischaemic event.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA