Prospective screening for subtelomeric rearrangements in children with mental retardation of unknown aetiology: the Amsterdam experience.

OBJECTIVE: The frequency of subtelomeric rearrangements in patients with unexplained mental retardation (MR) is uncertain, as most studies have been retrospective and case retrieval may have been biased towards cases more likely to have a chromosome anomaly. To ascertain the frequency of cytogenetic anomalies, including subtelomeric rearrangements, we prospectively screened a consecutive cohort of cases with unexplained MR in an academic tertiary centre. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: age <18 years at referral, IQ<85, no aetiological diagnosis after complete examination, which included karyotyping with high resolution banding (HRB). RESULTS: In 266 karyotyped children, anomalies were detected in 20 (7.5%, seven numerical, 13 structural); 39 cases were analysed by FISH for specific interstitial microdeletions, and anomalies were found in nine (23%). FISH analyses for subtelomeric microdeletions were performed in 184 children (44% moderate-profound MR, 51% familial MR), and one rearrangement (0.5%) was identified in a non-familial MR female with mild MR (de novo deletion 12q24.33-qter). The number of probable polymorphisms was considerable: 2qter (n=7), Xpter (n=3), and Ypter (n=1). A significantly higher total number of malformations and minor anomalies was present in the cytogenetic anomaly group compared to the group without cytogenetic anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: The total frequency of cytogenetic anomalies in this prospective study was high (1:10), but the frequency of subtelomeric rearrangements was low. The most likely explanations are the high quality of HRB cytogenetic studies and the lack of clinical selection bias. Conventional cytogenetic analyses, combined with targeted microdeletion testing, remain the single most effective way of additional investigation in mentally retarded children, also in a tertiary centre.

Tandem duplication of 11p12-p13 in a child with borderline development delay and eye abnormalities: dose effect of the PAX6 gene product?

We report on a girl with a duplication of chromosome band 11p12-->13, which includes the Wilms tumor gene (WT1) and the aniridia gene (PAX6). The girl had borderline developmental delay, mild facial anomalies, and eye abnormalities. Eye findings were also present in most of the 11 other published cases with partial trisomy 11p, including 11p12-->13. Recently, it was shown that introduction of additional copies of the PAX6 gene into mice caused very variable eye abnormalities. Therefore, a PAX6 gene dosage effect is likely to be present in mice and humans. The central nervous system may be less sensitive to an altered PAX6 gene dosage, which is consistent with the borderline developmental delay in the present patient. Urogenital abnormalities were absent in this patient and in most of the other patients with partial trisomy of 11p. Therefore, the effect of a WT1 gene duplication on the embryological development of the urogenital tract remains uncertain.

A patient with a de novo t (6;9) and an interstitial duplication of (9)(q21.2q22.1).

We report on a 4-year-old child with psychomotor retardation, general hypotonia and only mild dysmorphic features. Her chromosome constitution was 46,XX, t (6;9) (q27;q22.1), dup (9) (q21.2q22.1). This de novo interstitial duplication was confirmed using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with band-specific probes. This is the second report of a patient with an interstitial duplication of this region of the long arm of chromosome 9. It is concluded that in a child with an abnormal phenotype and a de novo (apparently) balanced translocation, the possibility of a small duplication or deletion should be considered.