Incidence of High Risk and Malignant Pathological Findings in Transgender and Gender Diverse Individuals Undergoing Gender-Affirming Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Concrete, data-driven guidelines for breast cancer screening among the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) population is lacking. The present study evaluates possible associations of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) on incidental breast pathology findings in trans-masculine patients to inform decision making about breast cancer screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who had gender-affirming mastectomy or breast reduction at a single center from July 2019 to February 2024. A total of 865 patients met the inclusion criteria. Gender-affirming testosterone therapy and length of exposure were evaluated to seek differences in post-operative pathology findings. RESULTS: The median age at the time of surgery was 27 years [interquartile range (IQR) 21-30]. Most participants identified as female to male (658, 75.6%). A significant portion of the participants (688, 79.2%) were undergoing testosterone therapy at the time of surgery, with the median duration of testosterone use prior to surgery being 14 months (IQR 4-29). High risk or malignant findings were noted in pathology results for 12 of 1730 breasts (0.7%). Ordered logistic regression found that duration of testosterone therapy was not associated with increasing severity of incidental breast pathology. Additionally, patients under 25 years of age were 70% less likely to have any incidental finding on pathological evaluation than older patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.3, p < 0.01, confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.50]. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found that patients undergoing GAHT should not be screened for breast cancer with increased frequency compared with cis-gender women. Additionally, it may be appropriate for trans women under the age of 25 with normal breast cancer risk to forego pathological breast tissue examination.

Increasing rates of general anesthesia use in lumpectomy procedures: A 15-year trends analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia methods in oncologic breast surgery have evolved with less invasive practices. The aims of this study were primarily to examine trends in anesthesia type used during lumpectomy. METHODS: We analyzed lumpectomy procedures from 2005 to 2019 using the NSQIP database. Upon defining the nadir in general anesthesia (GA) and peak in monitored anesthesia care (MAC) use as 2007, we compared patient characteristics and complications in the 2007 versus 2019 GA and MAC cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations with receipt of GA. RESULTS: Of 253 545 lumpectomy patients, 191 773 (75.6%) received GA and 61 772 (24.4%) received MAC. From 2005 to 2019, GA rates increased from 66.7% to 82.5%, while MAC rates decreased from 33.3% to 17.5%. More GA patients were obese and American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3. Over time, age and body mass index (BMI) increased in both GA and MAC cohorts. Odds of receiving GA increased over time, and predictors included concurrent axillary lymph node dissection (p < 0.0001) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate increasing use of GA over time for lumpectomy, which may be related to aging lumpectomy patient population with higher BMIs. We also find a strong association between use of GA and concurrent lymph node procedures.

Volume-based Feeds: A Quality Improvement Project for Better Nutrition.

This quality improvement (QI) project at a single institution aimed to increase the proportion of prescribed tube feeds delivered to adult patients in the burn population with greater than 20% affected total body surface area (TBSA). A retrospective chart review was performed on all adult burn patients from January 2018 to July 2022 with greater than 20% TBSA burns to compare quantitative measures such as length of stay, change in weight, and mean tube feeds delivered over hospitalization. Prospective data collection began in August 2022, when the first intervention was implemented, and continued until July 2023 in the same patient population to serve as a post-intervention cohort. Using a multidisciplinary approach, the team implemented eight interventions which increased the mean proportion of tube feeds delivered to patients from 43% to 78%, marking a significant increase in nutrition delivered to patients, which is critical for wound healing following burn injuries.

Margin-Negative en Bloc Resection of a Large Retroperitoneal Melanoma Including Reconstruction of the Infra-renal Inferior Vena Cava.

The management and outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma have been revolutionized by immunotherapy. This case report highlights the role of surgery as an adjuvant to systemic therapies when there is oligoprogressive disease. We describe a 74-year-old man with metastatic melanoma who initially had a complete radiographic response after dual agent immunotherapy but subsequently developed a large metastasis in the retroperitoneum. After multidisciplinary discussion, he underwent margin negative resection that required en bloc segmental resection of the infra-renal inferior vena cava. To our knowledge, this is the first reported resection of a melanoma metastasis in this location.

A Case of Anastomosing Hemangioma of the Breast During Pregnancy.

Anastomosing hemangiomas (AH) are rare benign masses. We report an occurrence of AH in the breast during pregnancy, its pathological analysis, and clinical management. Key in the evaluation of these rare vascular lesions is differentiating AH from angiosarcoma. A low proliferative Ki-67 index and small size on imaging and final pathology will confirm AH from angiosarcoma. Clinical management of AH requires surgical resection and standard interval mammography and clinical breast examination.

Free Nipple Graft Breast Reduction without a Vertical Incision.

Background: A technique of a free nipple graft with an inframammary incision and no vertical incision offers promising postoperative results as a safe and aesthetic alternative. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who presented to a single surgeon for breast reduction surgery using a free nipple graft with an inframammary incision from June 1999 to March 2021. Baseline patient demographics and clinical information along with postoperative complications were recorded and compared between patients who presented for concomitant reconstruction or just reduction. A narrative literature review on surgical techniques and outcomes was also conducted. Results: From the literature search, there have been minimal prior mentions of breast reductions using a free nipple graft with an inframammary incision and no vertical incision. Fifty-five cases were identified for breast reduction surgery in the author's 22-year study period, of which 46 had adequate clinical documentation and follow-up. An estimated 22 patients had either both or one breast reconstructed with opposite side breast reduction, and 24 patients underwent breast reduction alone with free nipple grafting. No implants were used in any of the patients. Conclusions: The free nipple graft technique with an inframammary incision can be performed on patients with excessively large or ptotic breasts. It is possible to reduce the volume of the breast and obtain good projection with this method. Furthermore, avoidance of the vertical incision reduces breakdown at the T-junction and is aesthetically beneficial.

Propensity Scoring in Plastic Surgery Research: An Analysis and Best Practice Guide.

Randomized controlled trials, though considered the gold standard in clinical research, are often not feasible in plastic surgery research. Instead, researchers rely heavily on observational studies, leading to potential issues with confounding and selection bias. Propensity scoring-a statistical technique that estimates a patient's likelihood of having received the exposure of interest-can improve the comparability of study groups by either guiding the selection of study participants or generating a covariate that can be adjusted for in multivariate analyses. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive review of research articles published in three major plastic surgery journals (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive, & Aesthetic Surgery, and Annals of Plastic Surgery) to determine the utilization of propensity scoring methods in plastic surgery research from August 2018 to August 2020. We found that propensity scoring was used in only eight (0.8%) of 971 research articles, none of which fully reported all components of their propensity scoring methodology. We provide a brief overview of propensity score techniques and recommend guidelines for accurate reporting of propensity scoring methods for plastic surgery research. Improved understanding of propensity scoring may encourage plastic surgery researchers to incorporate the method in their own work and improve plastic surgeons' ability to understand and analyze future research studies that utilize propensity score methods.

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Satisfaction and Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: Although it is intuitive that nipple-sparing mastectomy in selected patients would result in excellent cosmetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction, studies of clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life are limited and show mixed results. This study aimed to use a propensity score-matching analysis to compare satisfaction and health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction following bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy. METHODS: A propensity score-matching analysis (1:1 matching, no replacement) was performed comparing patients undergoing nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. Patients with a history of any radiation therapy were excluded. Matched covariates included age, body mass index, race, smoking history, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bra size, and history of psychiatric diagnosis. Outcomes of interest included BREAST-Q scores and complications. RESULTS: The authors examined 1371 patients for matching and included 460 patients (nipple-sparing mastectomy, n = 230; skin-sparing mastectomy, n = 230) in the final analyses. The authors found no significant differences in baseline, cancer, and surgical characteristics between matched nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy patients, who also had similar profiles for surgical complications. Interestingly, the authors found that postoperative Satisfaction with Breasts scores and all other health-related quality-of-life domains were stable over a 3-year period and did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with skin-sparing mastectomy, bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy did not improve patient-reported or clinical outcomes when combined with immediate implant-based reconstruction. The impact that nipple-sparing mastectomy may have on breast aesthetics and the ability of the BREAST-Q to gauge an aesthetic result following nipple-sparing mastectomy warrant further investigation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Method for Flushing Surgical Drains Using a Butterfly Needle.

Surgical drains placed during breast surgery can become blocked by clots or other debris, which may lead to infection of the prosthetic and seroma or hematoma formation from improper drainage. Current methods involve stripping the drain, which does not clear the pores inside the cavity, or flushing the drain at the opposite end using a syringe with the debris going into the cavity being drained. The authors propose an easily available flushing option using a butterfly needle inserted at an angle that provides a sterile and efficient method for flushing the drain near the body cavity and clearing blockages. This creates a self-sealing valve that can be reinforced with Tegaderm and allows for the use of antibiotics or hemostatic agents through it. The primary author has performed this technique in-office in multiple patients undergoing breast augmentation, mastopexy/mammaplasty, breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and breast revision surgeries requiring implants or expanders with satisfactory results and no complications. This method is limited in that it must be performed by a health care professional, but it is easy to perform.