Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 68(8): 1826-32, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20493614

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of dentoalveolar trauma during a 9-year period in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Division at Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas in patients from the Piracicaba municipality and neighborhood regions in São Paulo, Brazil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective epidemiologic study from January 1999 to December 2007 evaluated all patients who presented at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Division at Piracicaba Dental School with sustained oral and maxillofacial traumatic injuries associated with dentoalveolar trauma. Information regarding age, gender, etiology, use of protective devices such seatbelts, crash helmets, and presence of facial fractures and general trauma, oral condition, stage of dentition, date of trauma, drug abuse, type, teeth affected, and classification of the trauma were gathered from the medical files. Descriptive analysis was conducted. RESULTS: In total, 2,785 patients were analyzed and 542 (19.46%) were included in this study. The male to female ratio was 2.81:1. Most patients presented with oral hygiene as regular (51.85%). Friday, Saturday, and Sunday were the most prevalent days. Smoking was the most common harmful habit analyzed (16.05%) followed by alcohol use (15.87%). Bicycle accidents (26.94%) were the most common cause, followed by falls (22.69%). With regard to protective devices, 31.51% of drivers were wearing seatbelts during the accidents and helmets were used by 84.38% of motorcycle drivers at the moment of injury. One hundred thirty-five facial fractures were associated with dental and dentoalveolar traumas, and the mandible was the facial bone most associated with dentoalveolar trauma. Upper and lower limbs were most frequently associated with general trauma, accounting for 140 (38.78%) and 111 (30.75%), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that dentoalveolar trauma rates and patterns in the Piracicaba municipality and neighborhood regions in São Paulo are similar to other populations. The weekend is the period with the major incidence of dentoalveolar trauma. Alcohol consumption was linked with this type of trauma. Dentoalveolar trauma is involved in and closely related to severe maxillofacial trauma. The use of a helmet is as important as that of a seatbelt. More studies are necessary for a better knowledge and understanding when considering protocols and organization charts in emergency rooms.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/epidemiología , Traumatismos de los Dientes/epidemiología , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Ciclismo/lesiones , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motocicletas/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Equipos de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Razón de Masculinidad , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
2.
Restor Dent Endod ; 42(2): 140-145, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28503480

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical study was to evaluate patients' intraoperative discomfort during root canal preparations in which either multi-file rotary (Mtwo) or single-file reciprocating (Reciproc) systems were used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five adult patients, aged between 25 and 69 years old, with irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis participated in this study. Either the mesiobuccal or the distobuccal canals for maxillary molars and either the mesiobuccal or the mesiolingual canals for mandibular molars were randomly chosen to be instrumented with Mtwo multi-file rotary or Reciproc single-file reciprocating systems. Immediately after each canal instrumentation under anesthesia, patient discomfort was assessed using a 1 - 10 visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 'least possible discomfort' (1) to 'greatest possible discomfort' (10). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine significant differences at p< 0.05. RESULTS: Little intraoperative discomfort was found in all cases. No statistically significant differences in intraoperative discomfort between the 2 systems were found (p = 0.660). CONCLUSIONS: Root canal preparation with multi-file rotary or single-file reciprocating systems had similar and minimal effects on patients' intraoperative discomfort.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA