Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 16 [upd(16)mat]: clinical features are rather caused by (hidden) trisomy 16 mosaicism than by upd(16)mat itself.

Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 16 [upd(16)mat] as the result of trisomy 16 is one of the most frequently reported uniparental disomies in humans, but a consistent phenotype is not obvious. Particularly, it is difficult to discriminate between features resulting from upd(16)mat and mosaic trisomy 16. By evaluating literature data (n = 74) and three own cases we aimed to determine whether the clinical features are due to upd(16)mat or to trisomy 16 mosaicism. While in single cases the clinical symptoms were caused by homozygosity of autosomal recessive mutations on chromosome 16, it turned out that clinical features in upd(16)mat are caused by (hidden) trisomy 16 mosaicism and a specific chromosome 16-associated imprinting disorder does not exist. In trisomy 16/upd(16)mat pregnancies, the management should be based on the ultrasound results and on the clinical course of the pregnancy. In fact, mosaic trisomy 16 pregnancies require a close monitoring because of the higher risk for hypertensive disorders. Postnatal testing for upd(16)mat should be considered in case of homozygosity for an autosomal-recessive mutation, in individuals carrying chromosome 16 aberrations and in phenotypes comprising features of the trisomy 16/upd(16)mat spectrum. Finally, upd(16)mat probably represents a bioindicator for a hidden trisomy 16 mosaicism.

Recent Advances in Imprinting Disorders.

Imprinting disorders (ImpDis) are a group of currently 12 congenital diseases with common underlying (epi)genetic etiologies and overlapping clinical features affecting growth, development and metabolism. In the last years it has emerged that ImpDis are characterized by the same types of mutations and epimutations, i.e. uniparental disomies, copy number variations, epimutations, and point mutations. Each ImpDis is associated with a specific imprinted locus, but the same imprinted region can be involved in different ImpDis. Additionally, even the same aberrant methylation patterns are observed in different phenotypes. As some ImpDis share clinical features, clinical diagnosis is difficult in some cases. The advances in molecular and clinical diagnosis of ImpDis help to circumvent these issues, and they are accompanied by an increasing understanding of the pathomechanism behind them. As these mechanisms have important roles for the etiology of other common conditions, the results in ImpDis research have a wider effect beyond the borders of ImpDis. For patients and their families, the growing knowledge contributes to a more directed genetic counseling of the families and personalized therapeutic approaches.