Diuretics for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Lung edema may complicate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to assess the risks and benefits of diuretic administration in preterm infants with RDS. SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search method of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) were searched using the following keywords: and . These searches were updated in April 2003 and March 2007. In addition, the abstract books of the American Thoracic Society and Society for Pediatric Research were searched. A MEDLINE and CENTRAL search was conducted in March 2007 using the keyword "Respiratory Distress Syndrome" alone, to make sure to find studies medications recently classified as diuretics, such as theophylline. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were included in which preterm infants with RDS and less than 5 days of age were randomly allocated to diuretic administration. Of those trials, studies were only included in which at least one of the following outcomes measures was evaluated: mortality, patent ductus arteriosus, hypovolemic shock, intraventricular hemorrhage, renal failure, duration of oxygen supplementation, duration of mechanical ventilation, need for oxygen supplementation at 28 days of life, oxygen supplementation at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (gestational age + postnatal age), length of stay, number of rehospitalizations during the first year of life, and neurodevelopmental outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The standard method for the Cochrane Collaboration, which is described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook, was used. Two investigators extracted, assessed and coded separately all data for each study. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion. MAIN RESULTS: Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Six studies using furosemide were done before the current era of prenatal steroids, surfactant and fluid restriction. Furosemide administration had no long-term benefits. Furosemide-induced transient improvement in pulmonary function did not outweigh an increased risk for patent ductus arteriosus and for hemodynamic instability. In one recent study, theophylline had no long-term benefits. Theophylline significantly decreased the risk of oligoanuria and transiently increased renal function, but did not significantly affect renal function at discharge or other outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are no data to support routine administration of furosemide in preterm infants with RDS. Elective administration of furosemide to any patient with RDS should be carefully weighed against the risk of precipitating hypovolemia or developing a symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus. There are not enough data to support routine administration of low-dose theophylline in preterm infants with RDS.

Heat loss prevention in neonates.

Maintaining a neutral thermal environment is one of the key physiologic challenges a newborn infant faces after delivery. Attention to detail regarding the management of an infant's neutral thermal environment may lead to improvement in clinical outcome, including improved survival. The details of this management cover a broad spectrum of interventions, from attention to the general environment (such as delivery room temperature) to specific individualized therapies, such as the use of polyethylene occlusive skin wrap. Although an integral part of the routine care of all newborns (whether term or preterm), these interventions have unfortunately received little attention and study. A commitment to greater understanding of these issues and their impact on newborns is essential if we hope to improve their outcome.

Protein containing synthetic surfactant versus animal derived surfactant extract for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. RDS is caused by a deficiency, dysfunction, or inactivation of pulmonary surfactant. Numerous surfactants of either animal extract or synthetic design have been shown to improve outcomes. New surfactant preparations that include peptides or whole proteins that mimic endogenous surfactant protein have recently been developed and tested. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of administration of synthetic surfactant containing surfactant protein mimics compared to animal derived surfactant extract on the risk of mortality, chronic lung disease, and other morbidities associated with prematurity in preterm infants at risk for or having RDS. SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard search methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used. The search included MEDLINE (1966 - May 2007) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) in all languages. In addition, published abstracts of the Society of Pediatric Research were searched electronically. For abstract books that did not include key words, the search was limited to the relevant sections on pulmonary and neonatology. The bibliography cited in each publication was obtained and searched in order to identify additional relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials were considered for this review. Studies that enrolled preterm infants or low birth weight infants at risk for or having RDS who were treated with either a synthetic surfactant containing surfactant protein mimics or an animal-derived surfactant preparation were included for this review. Studies that either attempted to treat or prevent respiratory distress syndrome were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Primary outcome measures, including mortality, chronic lung disease and multiple secondary outcome measures were abstracted by the reviewers. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager software. Categorical data was analyzed using relative risk, risk difference, and number needed to treat. 95% confidence intervals reported. A fixed effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared statistic. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies were identified that compared protein containing synthetic surfactants to animal derived surfactant preparations. In a meta-analysis of these two studies, infants who received protein containing synthetic surfactant compared to animal derived surfactant extract did not demonstrate significantly different risks of prespecified primary outcomes: mortality at 36 weeks [typical RR 0.81 (95% CI 0.64, 1.03)], chronic lung disease at 36 weeks [typical RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.84, 1.18)], or the combined outcome of mortality or chronic lung disease at 36 weeks [typical RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.82, 1.12)]. There were also no differences in any of the secondary outcomes regarding complications of prematurity between the two surfactant groups with the exception of necrotizing enterocolitis. A decrease in the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis was noted in infants who received protein containing synthetic surfactants compared to animal derived surfactant extract [typical RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.42, 0.86)]. However, this was a secondary outcome in both of the primary studies and there was moderate heterogeneity between the studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In two trials of protein containing synthetic surfactants compared to animal derived surfactant extract, no statistically different clinical differences in death and chronic lung disease were noted. Further well designed studies of adequate size and power will be needed to confirm and refine these findings.

Protein containing synthetic surfactant versus animal derived surfactant extract for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. RDS is caused by a deficiency, dysfunction, or inactivation of pulmonary surfactant. Numerous surfactants of either animal extract or synthetic design have been shown to improve outcomes. New surfactant preparations that include peptides or whole proteins that mimic endogenous surfactant protein have recently been developed and tested. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of administration of synthetic surfactant containing surfactant protein mimics compared to animal derived surfactant extract on the risk of mortality, chronic lung disease, and other morbidities associated with prematurity in preterm infants at risk for or having RDS. SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard search methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used. The search included MEDLINE (1966 - May 2007) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) in all languages. In addition, published abstracts of the Society of Pediatric Research were searched electronically. For abstract books that did not include key words, the search was limited to the relevant sections on pulmonary and neonatology. The bibliography cited in each publication was obtained and searched in order to identify additional relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials were considered for this review. Studies that enrolled preterm infants or low birth weight infants at risk for or having RDS who were treated with either a synthetic surfactant containing surfactant protein mimics or an animal-derived surfactant preparation were included for this review. Studies that either attempted to treat or prevent respiratory distress syndrome were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Primary outcome measures, including mortality, chronic lung disease and multiple secondary outcome measures were abstracted by the reviewers. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager software. Categorical data was analyzed using relative risk, risk difference, and number needed to treat. 95% confidence intervals reported. A fixed effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared statistic. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies were identified that compared protein containing synthetic surfactants to animal derived surfactant preparations. In a meta-analysis of these two studies, infants who received protein containing synthetic surfactant compared to animal derived surfactant extract did not demonstrate significantly different risks of prespecified primary outcomes: mortality at 36 weeks [typical RR 0.81 (95% CI 0.64, 1.03)], chronic lung disease at 36 weeks [typical RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.84, 1.18)], or the combined outcome of mortality or chronic lung disease at 36 weeks [typical RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.82, 1.12)]. There were also no differences in any of the secondary outcomes regarding complications of prematurity between the two surfactant groups with the exception of necrotizing enterocolitis. A decrease in the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis was noted in infants who received protein containing synthetic surfactants compared to animal derived surfactant extract [typical RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.42, 0.86)]. However, this was a secondary outcome in both of the primary studies and there was moderate heterogeneity between the studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In two trials of protein containing synthetic surfactants compared to animal derived surfactant extract, no statistically different clinical differences in death and chronic lung disease were noted. In general, clinical outcomes between the two groups were similar. Further well designed studies of adequate size and power will help confirm and refine these findings.

Surfactant for meconium aspiration syndrome in full term/near term infants.

BACKGROUND: Surfactant replacement therapy has been proven beneficial in the prevention and treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The deficiency of surfactant or surfactant dysfunction may contribute to respiratory failure in a broader group of disorders, including meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of surfactant administration in the treatment of term/near-term infants with MAS. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made using The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE and EMBASE (1985 to December 2006), previous reviews including cross-references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching. No language restrictions were applied. Authors were directly contacted to provide additional data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials which evaluated the effect of surfactant administration in term infants with meconium aspiration syndrome are included in the analyses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), pneumothorax, duration of assisted ventilation, duration of supplemental oxygen, intraventricular haemorrhage (any grade and severe IVH), and chronic lung disease, and were excerpted from the reports of the clinical trails by the review authors. Data analyses were done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: Four randomised controlled trials met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of 4 trials enrolling 326 infants showed no statistically significant effect on mortality (typical relative risk 0.98 (95% CI 0.41, 2.39), typical risk difference 0.00 (95% CI -0.05, 0.05). The risk of requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was significantly reduced in a meta-analysis of two trials (n = 208); (typical relative risk 0.64, 95% CI 0.46, 0.91; typical risk difference -0.17, 95% CI -0.30, -0.04); number needed to treat to benefit 6 (95% CI 3, 25). One trial (n = 40) reported a statistically significant reduction in the length of hospital stay [mean difference - 8 days (95% CI -14, -3 days)]. There were no statistically significant reductions in any other outcomes studied (duration of assisted ventilation, duration of supplemental oxygen, pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, air leaks, chronic lung disease, need for oxygen at discharge or intraventricular haemorrhage). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In infants with MAS, surfactant administration may reduce the severity of respiratory illness and decrease the number of infants with progressive respiratory failure requiring support with ECMO. The relative efficacy of surfactant therapy compared to, or in conjunction with, other approaches to treatment including inhaled nitric oxide, liquid ventilation, surfactant lavage and high frequency ventilation remains to be tested.

Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Both prophylactic and early surfactant replacement therapy reduce mortality and pulmonary complications in ventilated infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared with later selective surfactant administration. However, continued post-surfactant intubation and ventilation are risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). The purpose of this review was to compare outcomes between two strategies of surfactant administration in infants with RDS; prophylactic or early surfactant administration followed by prompt extubation, compared with later, selective use of surfactant followed by continued mechanical ventilation. OBJECTIVES: To compare two treatment strategies in preterm infants with or at risk for RDS: early surfactant administration with brief mechanical ventilation (less than one hour) followed by extubation vs. later selective surfactant administration, continued mechanical ventilation, and extubation from low respiratory support. Two populations of infants receiving early surfactant were considered: spontaneously breathing infants with signs of RDS (who receive surfactant administration during evolution of RDS prior to requiring intubation for respiratory failure) and infants at high risk for RDS (who receive prophylactic surfactant administration within 15 minutes after birth). SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE (1966 - December 2006), CINAHL (1982 to December Week 2, 2006), EMBASE (1980 - December 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006), Pediatric Research (1990 - 2006), abstracts, expert informants and hand searching. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials comparing early surfactant administration with planned brief mechanical ventilation (less than one hour) followed by extubation vs. selective surfactant administration continued mechanical ventilation, and extubation from low respiratory support. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were sought regarding effects on the incidence of mechanical ventilation (ventilation continued or initiated beyond one hour after surfactant administration), incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), chronic lung disease (CLD), mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of hospitalization, duration of oxygen therapy, duration of respiratory support (including CPAP and nasal cannula), number of patients receiving surfactant, number of surfactant doses administered per patient, incidence of air leak syndromes (pulmonary interstitial emphysema, pneumothorax), patent ductus arteriosus requiring treatment, pulmonary hemorrhage, and other complications of prematurity. Stratified analysis was performed according to inspired oxygen threshold for early intubation and surfactant administration in the treatment group: inspired oxygen within lower (FiO2< 0.45) or higher (FiO2 > 0.45) range at study entry. Treatment effect was expressed as relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) for categorical variables, and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables. MAIN RESULTS: Six randomized controlled clinical trials met selection criteria and were included in this review. In these studies of infants with signs and symptoms of RDS, intubation and early surfactant therapy followed by extubation to nasal CPAP (NCPAP) compared with later selective surfactant administration was associated with a lower incidence of mechanical ventilation [typical RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.57, 0.79], air leak syndromes [typical RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28, 0.96] and BPD [typical RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26, 0.99]. A larger proportion of infants in the early surfactant group received surfactant than in the selective surfactant group [typical RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.41, 1.86]. The number of surfactant doses per patient was significantly greater among patients randomized to the early surfactant group [WMD 0.57 doses per patient, 95% CI 0.44, 0.69]. In stratified analysis by FIO2 at study entry, a lower threshold for treatment (FIO2< 0.45) resulted in lower incidence of airleak [typical RR 0.46 and 95% CI 0.23, 0.93] and BPD [typical RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20, 0.92]. A higher treatment threshold (FIO2 > 0.45) at study entry was associated with a higher incidence of patent ductus arteriosus requiring treatment [typical RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.09, 4.13]. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Early surfactant replacement therapy with extubation to NCPAP compared with later selective surfactant replacement and continued mechanical ventilation with extubation from low ventilator support is associated with less need mechanical ventilation, lower incidence of BPD and fewer air leak syndromes. A lower treatment threshold (FIO2< 0.45) confers greater advantage in reducing the incidences of airleak syndromes and BPD; moreover a higher treatment threshold (FIO2 at study > 0.45) was associated with increased risk of PDA. These data suggest that treatment with surfactant by transient intubation using a low treatment threshold (FIO2< 0.45) is preferable to later, selective surfactant therapy by transient intubation using a higher threshold for study entry (FIO2 > 0.45) or at the time of respiratory failure and initiation of mechanical ventilation.

Alarm safety and oxygen saturation targets in the Vermont Oxford Network iNICQ 2015 collaborative.

OBJECTIVES: To assess progress of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) participating in the Vermont Oxford Network iNICQ 2015: Alarm Safety Collaborative in achieving Joint Commission 2014 alarm safety goals with respect to oximeters, and to compare patient-level oxygen saturation (SpO2) and oximeter alarm data to local policies. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter audits in February and August 2015 assessed implementation of policies addressing Joint Commission 2014 Alarm Safety goals, and ascertained SpO2 targets, oximeter alarm settings and compliance with policy-specified SpO2 targets and alarms. RESULTS: Eighty-six NICUs completed both audits. Of 13 policies addressing mandated goals, median (interquartile range) 8 (5, 9) policies were implemented at audit 1 and 9 (6, 11) at audit 2 (P=0.004). At audit 1, 28 NICUs had implemented ⩾9 policies versus 47 at audit 2. For 794 infants <31 weeks gestation, <36 weeks postmenstrual age, and on supplemental oxygen, median SpO2 target lower limit was 88% (interquartile range 87%, 90%; range 75% to 94%), upper limit 95% (interquartile range 94%, 96%; range 85% to 100%). High oximeter alarm was set according to local policy for 63% of infants, for whom SpO2 >97% was less frequent than when high alarm was not set to policy (10.1% vs 21.5%, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Participating NICUs showed significant progress between audits in their implementation of Joint Commission Alarm Safety goals for oximeter monitoring. Oximeter high alarm not set per local policy is associated with increased hyperoxemia in preterm infants. Recommendations to standardize oxygen saturation targets for infants at risk for oxygenation-related outcomes have not been widely adopted.

The clinical impact of high frequency ventilation: review of the Cochrane meta-analyses.

Experimental work in animal models suggests that ventilation strategies using high frequency oscillatory ventilation or high frequency jet ventilation hold great promise in the prevention of lung injury in preterm infants. However, clinical trials of either modality demonstrate little clinical benefit and there are possibilities of adverse effects, including increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage and poor neurological development.

Surfactant proteins and anti-surfactant antibodies in sera from infants with respiratory distress syndrome with and without surfactant treatment.

The presence of surfactant protein antigenemia and of surfactant protein antibodies was determined in serum from surfactant-treated and control infants with respiratory distress syndrome who were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial. The surfactant used for treatment (surfactant TA) contained surfactant proteins (SPs) B and C and no SP-A. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) that identify surfactant-associated proteins and ELISAs that identify IgG or IgM directed against surfactant proteins were used to investigate sera from these infants obtained prior to treatment, at 1 week of age, and at 2 months of age. There were no significant differences between average values in the surfactant-treated and control groups at each time period. However, in the control group, averaged results from ELISAs that identify SP-A and that identify IgM antibodies to SP-A or to SP-B, C showed significant differences between pretreatment sera and sera obtained at 1 week of age. No significant differences were noted in averaged results for IgG. Positive ELISA values were more frequently found in the control group than in the surfactant-treated group with regard to SP-A, and IgM against SP-A and SP-B, C in sera from neonates at 1 week of age. No positive ELISA values were found in sera from infants at 2 months of age. It is concluded that some patients with severe respiratory distress syndrome presumably leak surfactant proteins into the circulation and that this induces transient low titers of IgM antibody. This occurrence is decreased with surfactant treatment. Surfactant treatment may reduce leak of surfactant proteins into the vascular space by reducing lung damage.

Health and developmental outcomes of a surfactant controlled trial: follow-up at 2 years.

Several randomized clinical trials have shown that surfactant therapy improves the pulmonary status of infants with respiratory distress syndrome and has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality in these infants. Relatively little is known, however, about the long-term consequences of surfactant treatment. In this report, the results of health and developmental assessment are described at 1 and 2 years of age of 32 survivors of an initial group of 41 infants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of bovine surfactant therapy. The frequencies of abnormal findings were comparable in the two groups although there was a trend toward a greater frequency of allergic manifestations in the control group (6 of 16 (38%) vs 1 of 15 (7%), P = .08). Similarly, no differences were seen in the mental and motor scores of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at either 1 or 2 years of age. This study and other recently published reports of follow-up studies of infants treated with surfactant provide encouraging evidence that major long-term side effects do not result from surfactant therapy.

Randomized controlled trial of exogenous surfactant for the treatment of hyaline membrane disease.

We conducted a prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial of exogenous bovine surfactant (surfactant TA) in premature infants requiring ventilator support for the treatment of severe hyaline membrane disease. Forty-one low birth weight infants with severe hyaline membrane disease were randomly assigned to saline or surfactant therapy and treated within eight hours of birth. Significant improvements in oxygenation (increased arterial/alveolar PO2) and respiratory support (decreased mean airway pressure) were seen in the group receiving surfactant within four hours after treatment. These improvements were maintained in the surfactant-treated infants, who also had fewer pneumothoraces and fewer number of days in environments of fractional inspiratory oxygen greater than 0.4 mm Hg. No problems were associated with administration of surfactant, and no acute side effects were detected. We conclude that exogenous surfactant, administered early in the course of severe hyaline membrane disease, is an effective therapy that can diminish the amount of respiratory support required during the first 48 hours of life.

Multicenter trial of single-dose modified bovine surfactant extract (Survanta) for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome. Ross Collaborative Surfactant Prevention Study Group.

A multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial was performed comparing the efficacy of a single intratracheal dose of modified bovine surfactant extract (Survanta, 100 mg/kg, Abbott Laboratory, North Chicago, IL) with air placebo in preventing respiratory distress syndrome. Infants were enrolled if they were estimated to be between 24 and 30 weeks' gestation, weighed between 750 and 1250 g, and were intubated and stabilized within 15 minutes after birth. A total of 160 infants were treated (79 with surfactant, 81 with air placebo) between 4 and 37 minutes after birth (median time 12 minutes). Of these, 5 infants were excluded from the final analysis. The 72-hour average values for the arterial-alveolar oxygen ratio, fraction of inspired oxygen, and mean airway pressure were calculated from the area under the curve of scheduled values measured throughout 72 hours. Clinical status was classified using five ordered categories (no supplemental oxygen or assisted ventilation, supplemental oxygen only, continuous positive airway pressure or assisted ventilation with intermittent mandatory ventilation less than or equal to 6 breaths/min, assisted ventilation with intermittent mandatory ventilation greater than 6 breaths/min, death). Chest radiographs at 24 hours were graded for severity of respiratory distress syndrome. Infants receiving Survanta had less severe radiographic changes at 24 hours of age and decreased average fraction of inspired oxygen (31% vs 42%, P = .002) compared with control infants. No differences were noted in the average arterial-alveolar oxygen ratio, mean airway pressure, or clinical status on days 7 and 28. A beneficial effect was noted in the incidence of pneumothorax (P = .057) and an increase was noted in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (P = .052). No differences in incidence of patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia were seen. According to results of a secondary analysis, there was improvement in the fraction of inspired oxygen and a greater number of survivors without bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the subgroup of infants weighing less than 1000 g who were treated with surfactant. It was concluded that a single dose of Survanta given shortly after birth resulted in decreased severity of chest radiographic findings 24 hours after treatment and improved oxygenation during 72 hours after treatment, but did not improve other acute measures of disease severity or clinical status later in the neonatal period. The group at highest risk for respiratory distress syndrome (infants with birth weights between 750 and 999 g) may benefit the most from preventive therapy.

The pharmacokinetics and lipoprotein fraction distribution of intramuscular vs. oral vitamin K1 supplementation in women of childbearing age: effects on hemostasis.

Prenatal maternal vitamin K1 supplementation to improve the hemostatic status of the fetus may depend upon the route of administration and subsequent presentation at the placental barrier. We investigated intramuscular (IM) vs oral (PO) vitamin K1 supplementation in eight healthy, nonpregnant women of childbearing age. Pharmacokinetics were studied in each subject after a 5 mg IM dose and after a 5 mg oral dose of vitamin K1 approximately one month later. Plasma collected at the peak vitamin K level for each treatment was separated into very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL) and lipoprotein-free fractions by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Vitamin K1 was measured in the plasma and lipoprotein fractions using HPLC. The concentration of vitamin K1 in plasma reached a peak 2 h after an IM dose and remained high throughout the 30 h course of the study. In contrast, the oral dose of vitamin K1 peaked at 4 h and rapidly decreased to near baseline by 18 to 30 h. The distribution of vitamin K1 in the lipid fractions was different for IM compared to PO. The percentage of vitamin K1 in the VLDL fraction at the peak for an oral dose was significantly higher than for an IM dose (80.8% +/- 3.5 vs 10.8% +/- 6.5, p < 0.0001). After the oral absorption stage, the subjects took 5 mg of vitamin K1 orally, once a day, for 12 days. No significant differences were observed for the following coagulation proteins and hemostatic markers measured immediately before and after long-term oral vitamin K supplementation: factor II, factor VII, protein C, and thrombin-antithrombin III complex. In conclusion, physiological processing of supplemented vitamin K1 differs in the IM vs PO routes of administration and 12 days of oral vitamin K1 does not alter the concentration of selected vitamin K-dependent coagulation proteins or thrombin-antithrombin complex generation.

Cost effectiveness of beractant in the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome.

Beractant, a modified natural bovine surfactant extract, has been used successfully in the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in premature neonates. This analysis investigates the cost effectiveness of prophylactic surfactant therapy. Resource utilisation data were analysed retrospectively from 210 patients who had participated previously in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. No baseline differences were apparent between the beractant and sham-air control groups. There was a significant difference in survival favouring the beractant-treated neonates. When the acquisition cost of the study drug was excluded, there was an incremental, daily cost-savings benefit for the beractant-treated group compared with the sham-air treated group. Costs per case per day were significantly lower for neonates treated with beractant ($US1442 beractant vs $US1544 sham-air; 1991 dollars p = 0.01). Costs for radiological and diagnostic procedures, respiratory care and drugs (excluding beractant) were all significantly lower. When the acquisition cost of beractant was included, the cost to produce a 28-day survivor was $US3319 less with beractant ($US41 020) than with sham-air ($US44 339). Thus, when viewed in terms of costs per year of life saved, beractant compares very favourably with other recently evaluated health technologies.

Digoxin for preventing or treating neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of digoxin on clinical outcome in infants at risk of, or with, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH terms: digoxin; limits: age groups, newborn infants; publication type, clinical trial), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal handsearching in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of digoxin in either the prevention or treatment of respiratory distress syndrome are included in this overview. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes were excerpted from the trial reports by the reviewer. Data were analyzed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials have studied the effects of digoxin in the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. No improvement in respiratory status or mortality was noted. Meta-analysis of the effect of digoxin given to infants at risk of or with RDS on mortality does not suggest any benefit of digoxin treatment (typical relative risk 1.27 95% CI 0.78, 2.07; typical risk difference 0.06, 95% CI -0.06, 0.17). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Although hemodynamic disturbances play a role in the overall pathogenesis of respiratory distress syndrome, the specific contribution of early congestive heart failure (unrelated to hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus) does not appear to be a significant factor in RDS. Treatment with digoxin has no proven value in infants solely affected with respiratory distress syndrome.

Multiple versus single dose natural surfactant extract for severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of multiple doses of natural surfactant extract to single doses of natural surfactant extract in premature infants with established respiratory distress syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH terms: pulmonary surfactant; limits: age groups, newborn infant; publication type, clinical trials), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing a policy of multiple doses of natural surfactant extract to a policy of single doses of natural surfactant extract in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome were considered for this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on clinical outcomes including pneumothorax, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage (all intraventricular hemorrhage and severe intraventricular hemorrhage), chronic lung disease, retinopathy of prematurity, and mortality were excerpted by the primary reviewer (R. Soll). Data were analyzed according to the standards of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials of multiple vs. single dose natural surfactant extract in infants with established respiratory distress syndrome were identified. Meta-analysis of these trials suggests a reduction in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.51, 95% CI 0.30, 0.88; typical risk difference-0.09, 95% CI -0.15, -0. 02) and a trend towards a reduction in mortality (typical relative risk 0.63, 95% CI 0.39, 1.02; typical risk difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.14, 00.00). No complications associated with multiple dose treatment are reported in the identified trials. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In infants with established respiratory distress, a policy of multiple doses of natural surfactant extract results in greater improvements regarding oxygenation and ventilatory requirements, a decreased risk of pneumothorax and a trend toward improved survival. The ability to give multiple doses of surfactant to infants with ongoing respiratory insufficiency leads to improved clinical outcome and appears to be the most effective treatment policy.

Natural surfactant extract versus synthetic surfactant for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of synthetic surfactant to natural surfactant in premature infants with established respiratory distress syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH terms: pulmonary surfactant; limits: age groups, newborn infant; publication type, clinical trial), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing administration of synthetic surfactants to administration of natural surfactant extracts in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome were considered for this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including pneumothorax, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage (all intraventricular hemorrhage and severe intraventricular hemorrhage), chronic lung disease, retinopathy of prematurity, and mortality were excerpted by the primary reviewer (R. Soll). Data analysis was conducted according to the standards of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: The meta-analysis supports a significant reduction in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.68, 95% CI 0.56, 0.83; typical risk difference -0.04 95% CI -0.06, -0.02). No disadvantages to natural surfactant extract treatment are noted regarding other outcomes. A trend towards reduced mortality is noted in association with natural surfactant extract treatment. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Both natural surfactant extracts and synthetic surfactant extracts are effective in the treatment of established respiratory distress syndrome. Comparative trials demonstrate greater early improvement in the requirement for ventilatory support and fewer pneumothoraces associated with natural surfactant extract treatment. On clinical grounds, natural surfactant extracts would seem to be the more desirable choice.

Prophylactic natural surfactant extract for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of prophylactic intratracheal administration of natural surfactant extract in preterm newborns at risk for developing respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH terms: pulmonary surfactant; limits: age groups; newborn infants), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants and journal hand searching in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials which compared the effect of prophylactic natural surfactant administration (surfactant obtained from human or bovine sources, either modified with additional phospholipids or not) administered to high risk preterm newborns at or shortly after birth in order to prevent respiratory distress syndrome, other complications of prematurity, and mortality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including incidence of pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage (any grade and severe intraventricular hemorrhage), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death, and retinopathy of prematurity were excerpted from the reports of the clinical trials by the reviewer. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: All of the included studies note an initial improvement in respiratory status and a decrease in the risk of respiratory distress syndrome in infants who receive prophylactic natural surfactant extract. The meta-analysis supports a decrease in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.35, 95% CI 0.26, 0.49; typical risk difference -0.15, 95% CI -0.20, -0.11), a decrease in the risk pulmonary interstitial emphysema (typical relative risk 0.46, 95% CI 0.35, 0.60; typical risk difference -0.19, 95% CI -0.25, -0.13), a decrease in the risk of neonatal mortality (typical relative risk 0. 60, 95% CI 0.44, 0.83; typical risk difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.12, -0.03), and a decrease in the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death (typical relative risk 0.84, 95% CI 0.75, 0.93; typical risk difference -0.10, 95% CI -0.16, -0.04. No differences are reported in the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis or retinopathy of prematurity. Few data are available on long-term followup of treated infants. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic intratracheal administration of natural surfactant extract to infants judged to be at risk of developing respiratory distress syndrome (intubated infants <30 weeks gestation) has been demonstrated to improve clinical outcome. Infants who receive prophylactic natural surfactant extract have a decreased risk of pneumothorax, a decreased risk of pulmonary interstitial emphysema, a decreased risk of mortality, and a decreased risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death.

Prophylactic synthetic surfactant for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of prophylactic administration of synthetic surfactant in preterm newborns at risk for developing respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH terms: pulmonary surfactant; limits: age groups, newborn infants; publication type, clinical trial), previous reviews including cross-references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, controlled trials which compared the effect of prophylactic synthetic surfactant administered to high risk preterm newborns at or shortly after birth in order to prevent respiratory distress syndrome and other complications of prematurity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including the incidence of pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage (any grade and severe intraventricular hemorrhage), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death, retinopathy of prematurity (any retinopathy, and retinopathy stages 3-4) mortality to one year of age, and cerebral palsy was excerpted from the report of the clinical trials by the reviewer. Data were analyzed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: Studies of prophylactic administration of synthetic surfactant note a variable improvement in the respiratory status and a decrease in respiratory distress syndrome in infants who receive prophylactic synthetic surfactant. The meta-analysis supports a decrease in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.67, 95% CI 0.50, 0.90; typical risk difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.09, -0. 02), a decrease in the risk of pulmonary interstitial emphysema (typical relative risk 0.68, 95% CI 0.50, 0.93; typical risk difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.11, -0.01), and a decrease in risk of neonatal mortality (typical relative risk 0.70, 95% CI 0.58, 0.85; typical risk difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.11, -0.03). No differences were seen in the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity and cerebral palsy. The meta-analysis supports an increase in the risk of patent ductus arteriosus associated with prophylactic synthetic surfactant administration (typical relative risk 1.11, 95% CI 1.00, 1.22; typical risk difference 0.05, 95% CI 0. 00,0.10), and an increase in the risk of pulmonary hemorrhage (typical relative risk 3.28, 95% CI 1.50, 7.16; typical risk difference 0.03, 95% CI 0.01, 0.05). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic intratracheal administration of synthetic surfactant to infants judged to be at risk of developing respiratory distress syndrome has been demonstrated to improve clinical outcome. Infants who receive prophylactic synthetic surfactant have a decreased risk of pneumothorax, a decreased risk of pulmonary interstitial emphysema, and a decreased risk of neonatal mortality. Infants who receive prophylactic synthetic surfactant have an increased risk of developing patent ductus arteriosus and pulmonary hemorrhage.

Synthetic surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of intratracheal administration of synthetic surfactant in premature newborns with established respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH terms: pulmonary surfactants; limits: age groups, newborn infant; publication types, clinical trial), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal handsearching in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials which compared the effect of synthetic surfactant treatment to routine management in the treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcome including the incidence of pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, pulmonary hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, apnea of prematurity, intraventricular hemorrhage (any grade, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death, retinopathy of prematurity (any retinopathy, and retinopathy greater than Stage 3), mortality at hospital discharge, mortality to one year of age, and cerebral palsy (any, and moderate/severe cerebral palsy) was excerpted from the report of the clinical trials by the reviewer. Data were analyzed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials of synthetic surfactant treatment of established respiratory distress syndrome were identified. Five of the studies used Exosurf Neonatal (a synthetic surfactant composed of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, hexadecanol and tyloxapol); one small study utilized a mixture of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG). Treatment with intratracheal Exosurf Neonatal in premature infants with established respiratory distress syndrome improves pulmonary gas exchange and decreases the requirement for ventilatory support. In individual trials, the use of Exosurf Neonatal resulted in a statistically significant reduction in pneumothorax, patent ductus arteriosus, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), BPD or death at 28 days, and mortality. Similar results are seen when these large trials of Exosurf Neonatal are analyzed in conjunction with the smaller trial of dry powdered DPPC and phosphatidylglycerol (PG). The meta-analysis supports a decrease in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.64, 95% CI 0.55, 0.76, typical risk difference -0.09, 95% CI -0.12,-0.06), a decrease in the risk of pulmonary interstitial emphysema (typical relative risk 0.62, 95% CI 0.54, 0.71, typical risk difference -0.12, 95% CI -0.16, -0.09), a decrease in the risk of patent ductus arteriosus (typical relative risk 0.90, 95% CI 0.84, 0.97; typical risk difference -0.06 95% CI -0.10, -0.02), a decrease in the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (typical relative risk 0.88, 95% CI 0.77, 0.99; typical risk difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.08, -0.00), a decrease in the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (typical relative risk 0.75, 95% CI 0.61, 0.92; typical risk difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.06, -0.01), a decrease in the risk of neonatal mortality (typical relative risk 0. 73, 95% CI 0.61, 0.88; typical risk difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.07, -0.02), a decrease in the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death at 28 days (typical relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.65, 0.83; typical risk difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.11, -0.05), a decrease in the risk of mortality prior to hospital discharge (typical relative risk 0.79, 95% CI 0.68, 0.92; typical risk difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.07, -0.02) and a decrease in the risk of mortality during the first year of life (typical relative risk 0.80, 95% CI 0.69, 0.94; typical risk difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.07, -0.01). (ABS