Carotid Web and Ischemic Stroke: A Primer for Nursing.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Carotid artery web may cause ischemic stroke and affects a vulnerable population of mostly younger patients. Multiple treatment options and lack of diagnostic consensus can cause confusion and reduce the likelihood to follow the recommended follow-up care. METHODS: We reviewed relevant literature using the following keywords: carotid web, CW, risk factors, stroke, treatments, education, incidence, prevalence, diagnostics, and nursing care. RESULTS: CW is commonly missed or misdiagnosed, which has led to scarce prevalence data. It has been reported to potentially represent approximately 0.5% of all ischemic strokes; however, after appropriate workup of patients with no clear stroke etiology, as many as 9.4% to 37% were found to have CW. This fibrotic shelflike lesion in the internal carotid bifurcation leads to flow disruption and possible thrombus formation. Treatment options include dual antiplatelets and anticoagulation or more invasive options such as revascularization with surgical excision or stenting, but research remains limited on which could be most beneficial. CONCLUSION: With multiple options and the uncertainty of which are best, patients can be lost to follow-up because of confusion and stress. Involving neuroscience nurses in the education process of these patients may help facilitate understanding of this disease phenomenon and increase patient understanding and compliance.

Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: A Primer for Nursing.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Cryptogenic stroke has been used to identify ischemic strokes with no identified cause; however, this classification is limited by the lack of a standardized and thorough evaluation. Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source is used to define those strokes with no identified cause after a standardized diagnostic workup. METHODS: We conducted a literature review from January 1, 2014, to July 31, 2020 including the term "ESUS." RESULTS: Embolic stroke of undetermined source accounts for approximately 25% of ischemic strokes and is used to classify patients with no identified cause of stroke despite routine brain imaging, noninvasive vascular imaging of the head and neck, a minimum of 24 hours of cardiac monitoring, and echocardiography. Studies have shown that these strokes may be caused by occult atrial fibrillation, occult malignancy, and other hypercoagulable states but are often identified after hospital discharge. The risk of recurrent stroke in ESUS patients remains high at 4.5% per year on single antiplatelet therapy. Ongoing research aims to identify biomarkers that can identify ESUS subgroups who may benefit from alternative antithrombotic therapies. CONCLUSION: Because of the complexity of the evaluation and the uncertainty associated with an unknown cause of stroke, neuroscience nurses caring for these patients should be familiar with ESUS and educate the patient about the condition and the importance of complying with all prescribed treatments, tests, and subsequent follow-up appointments after discharge.

Legal authorized representative experience with smartphone-based electronic informed consent in an acute stroke trial.

BACKGROUND: The pilot use of a smartphone platform for electronic informed consent (e-Consent) in large vessel occlusion acute stroke (LVOS) trials has recently been reported. The degree of satisfaction from Legal Authorized Representatives (LARs) with regard to this process remains to be established. METHODS: A single-center study evaluating the experience of LARs with the use of e-Consent in a LVOS randomized trial of an investigational drug administered within 12 hours of last known normal was carried out. A structured survey was used to evaluate the experience of the LARs with the e-consenting process. RESULTS: From February to November 2018, 60 consecutive patients were e-Consented. Of these, 53 LARs completed the survey. The median (IQR) age of the patients was 63 (53-70) years, baseline/discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (12-20)/3(1-12), and 45% were independent at discharge. The survey was applied in person in 43% of cases and via telephone in 57%. Median LAR age was 48 (39-59) years, 64% were female, and a multi-ethnic composition was observed. Forty percent of LARs had less than tertiary level of education (high-school or less). Regarding the e-Consent, 98% of LARs reported to be 'clear' and 83% felt 'very comfortable' in signing. The overall experience was 'excellent/good' in 91%. Despite the positive general impression regarding the use of e-Consent, 12 LARs (22%) would have preferred paper consent. Multivariable regression indicated that lower educational status (tertiary education or less: OR 5.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 25.48; p=0.04) and lower baseline ASPECTS score (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.96; p=0.03) were independently associated with preference for paper consent. CONCLUSIONS: e-Consent was overall very well perceived by LARs in a randomized clinical trial of LVOS. A minority of proxies, who were more commonly less formally educated, would have preferred paper consenting.