Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Ultrasound Med ; 40(2): 269-277, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32681668

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic value of a Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) Doppler examination for distinguishing intraductal papilloma (IDP) from duct ectasia with secretion in lesions smaller than 1 cm compared to color Doppler imaging (CDI) and power Doppler imaging (PDI). METHODS: Fifty-nine lesions were evaluated by grayscale ultrasound, CDI, PDI, and SMI. Biopsied tissue samples were analyzed. Ultrasound evaluations and Doppler examinations were performed with a Toshiba Aplio 500 device. The lesions were divided into 2 groups, secretion and IDP, according to the pathologic results. Color Doppler imaging, PDI, and SMI data were compared statistically to investigate their diagnostic values. RESULTS: Of the 59 lesions, 22 were secretion, and 37 were IDP. The mean diameters ± SDs were 4.7 ± 0.6 mm in the secretion group and 4.9 ± 0.8 mm in the IDP group (P = .315). There was no significant difference in grayscale ultrasound features such as shape or margin between the groups (P > .05). No significant difference was found between the groups in CDI or PDI characteristics (P > .999; P = .702, respectively). The color SMI evaluation results showed no vascularity in 18 (81.8%) lesions in the secretion group. Vascularity was detected in 32 patients (86.5%) in the IDP group. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the areas under the curve were calculated as 0.842 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.728-0.925) for SMI, 0.522 (95% CI, 0.388-0.654) for PDI, and 0.518 (95% CI, 0.384-0.650) for CDI. CONCLUSIONS: Superb Microvascular Imaging is more accurate and has more diagnostic ability than CDI or PDI in distinguishing small IDPs from duct ectasia with secretion because of its ability to visualize slow flow speeds of vascular structures.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Papiloma Intraductal , Dilatación Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Japón , Microvasos/diagnóstico por imagen , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 70(4): 354-360, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31500858

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Lymphoid hyperplasia can be an important mimicker of acute appendicitis by creating a non-compressible appendix more than 6 mm in diameter. The aim of this study was to evaluate methods of distinguishing lymphoid hyperplasia and appendicitis on the basis of sonography, lamina propria thickness, and Alvarado scoring. METHODS: This retrospective study included 259 patients (142 appendicitis, 117 lymphoid hyperplasia). The US (ultrasound) reports of the patients were reviewed and the maximum diameter of the appendix, the presence or absence of increased echogenicity of the surrounding pericaecal fat, local fluid collection, the presence of reactive lymph nodes in the periappendiceal area, and mural hyperemia within the appendix were recorded. RESULTS: The use of additional sonographic criteria, lamina propria thickness (≤1 mm is indicative for appendicitis), or Alvarado scoring (>6 mm is indicative for appendicitis) provided a true-positive diagnosis for acute appendicitis. CONCLUSION: The presence of local fluid collection in the periappendiceal area and a lamina propria thickness ≤ 1 mm are the most successful parameters for distinguishing appendicitis from lymphoid hyperplasia.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Linfáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Apendicitis/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Enfermedades Linfáticas/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Ultrasound ; 26(4): 251-253, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30479640

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hydatid cystic disease is a parasitic infestation that is mostly caused by Echinococcus granulosus, which is common in sheep-rearing areas of the Mediterranean, Middle East, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and South America. Canines are the definitive hosts, and herbivores (e.g. sheep, horses, deer) or humans are intermediate hosts. Ingested eggs from animal feces hatch in the gut and release oncospheres (immature forms of the parasite enclosed in an embryonic envelope). CASE REPORT: A very rare case of isolated, thyroidal, hydatic cyst is presented. CONCLUSION: Non-vascular cysts may be seen on ultrasonographic examination that are not specific for hydatid disease. Clinical and laboratory findings are therefore important. Definitive diagnosis is based on histopathological findings. Treatment is surgical and antiparasitic drugs are required after surgery.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA