Trends in guideline-adherent chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer before and after the affordable care act.

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in guideline-adherent chemoradiation therapy (GA-CRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer relative to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation. METHODS: National Cancer Database patients treated with chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 Stage IB3-IVA) from 2004 to 2016 were included. GA-CRT was defined according to NCCN guidelines and included: 1) delivery of external beam radiation, 2) brachytherapy, and 3) chemotherapy, 4) no radical hysterectomy. Logistic regression was used to determine trends in GA-CRT relative to the ACA. Survival was also estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: 37,772 patients met inclusion criteria (Pre-ACA:16,169; Post-ACA:21,673). A total of 33,116 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 4626 patients had other histologies. Forty-five percent of patients had lymph node-positive disease. A total of 14.6% of patients had Stage I disease, 41.8% had Stage II disease, 36.4% had Stage III disease, and 7.9% had Stage IVA disease. On multivariable analysis, medicare insurance (OR 0.91; 95%CI: 0.84-0.99 compared to commercial insurance), non-squamous histology (OR 0.83; 95%CI: 0.77-0.89 for adenocarcinoma) and increasing Charlson-Deyo score were associated with decreased odds of receiving GA care. Increasing T-stage was associated with greater receipt of GA-CRT. The percentage of the population that received guideline adherent care increased post-ACA (Pre-ACA 28%; Post-ACA 34%; p < 0.001). Adherence to treatment guidelines increased 2-year survival by 15% (GA 76%; Not GA 61%; p < 0.001). Increased 2-year survival was seen in the post-ACA cohort (Pre-ACA 62%; Post-ACA 69%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ACA was associated with improved GA-CRT and survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Racial disparities in breast cancer hereditary risk assessment referrals.

For poorly understood reasons, Black non-Hispanic (BNH) women meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing for breast cancer risk are less likely than White non-Hispanic (WNH) women to undergo testing (Armstrong, Micco, Carney, Stopfer, & Putt, JAMA, 293, 1729 and 2005). We compared physician referral rates and uptake for genetic testing of BNH and WNH women meeting select NCCN criteria (breast cancer under age 50, two primary breast cancers, triple-negative disease under age 60) in the Cancer Center at George Washington University (GWCC) between 2015 and 2018. Of the 723 BNH and WNH patients treated for breast cancer at GWCC, 28% met study criteria for genetic counseling referral (n = 252; BNH n = 115, WNH n = 137). Physician referral rates to genetic counseling differed significantly by race (BNH 75.7%, n = 87 and WNH 92.7%; n = 127; χ2  = 14.19, p-value < .01). Once referred, though, there was no significant difference in uptake of genetic counseling by race (BNH 95.4%, n = 83; WNH 97.6%, n = 124, χ2  = 1.33, p-value = .25) for patients appropriately referred.

Comparing Ultra-hypofractionated Proton versus Photon Therapy in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Purpose: Recent single institution, phase II evidence has demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of ultra-hypofractionated, preoperative photon therapy in 5 fractions for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Our purpose was to evaluate the dosimetric benefits of modern scanning beam proton therapy compared with conventional photon radiation therapy (RT) for the neoadjuvant treatment of adult extremity STS. Materials and Methods: Existing proton and photon plans for 11 adult patients with STS of the lower extremities previously treated preoperatively with neoadjuvant RT at our center were used to create proton therapy plans using Raystation Treatment Planning System v10.A. Volumes were delineated, and doses reported consistent with International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements reports 50, 62, and 78. Target volumes were optimized such that 100% clinical target volume (CTV) was covered by 99% of the prescription dose. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy for PT and RT delivered in 5 fractions. For proton therapy, doses are reported in GyRBE = 1.1 Gy. The constraints for adjacent organs at risk (OARs) within 1 cm of the CTV were the following: femur V30Gy ≤ 50%, joint V30Gy < 50%, femoral head V30Gy ≤ 5 cm3, strip V12 ≤ 10%, and skin V12 < 50%. Target coverage goals, OAR constraints, and integral dose were compared by Student t test with P < .05 significance. Results: A minimum 99% CTV coverage was achieved for all plans. OAR dose constraints were achieved for all proton and photon plans; however, mean doses to the femur (10.7 ± 8.5 vs 16.1 ± 7.7 GyRBE), femoral head (2.0 ± 4.4 vs 3.6 ± 6.4 GyRBE), and proximal joint (1.8 ± 2.4 vs 3.5 ± 4.4 GyRBE) were all significantly lower with PT vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (all P < .05). Integral dose was significantly reduced for proton vs photon plans. Conformity and heterogeneity indices were significantly better for proton therapy. Conclusion: Proton therapy maintained target coverage while significantly reducing integral and mean doses to the proximal organs at risk compared with RT. Further prospective investigation is warranted to validate these findings and potential benefit in the management of adult STS.